Plum Books hide SES employees in a blizzard of bad math and contradictory, nonsensical categories

Similar documents
Don t Let the Door Hit You on the Way Out : A Primer on Revolving Door Restrictions

No Sn t~e ~uprem~ (~ourt of the i~tnit~l~

2017 NALEO PRESIDENTIAL APPOINTMENTS PRIMER

CRS Report for Congress

section:2409 edition:prelim) OR (granul...

Treasury Personnel Policy Manual Chapter

Lobbying Do s and Don t s for Government Contractors: Our Unique Regulatory Environment

Attest Engagements 1389

Page 2 of 5 Forensic investigation of building failures and damages due to materials, design, construction defects, contract issues, maintenance and w

5 Book Lot!! (Hardcover) ~ "The Summons", "The Last Juror", The Testament", "The King of Torts", "The Street Lawyer"!! (By: John Grisham)

Vocabulary Activity 7

EXAMINATION OF GOVERNANCE FOR COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES

The Federal Advisory Committee Act: Analysis of Operations and Costs

To all parties and to the Honorable, Judge: Insert Name of the Hearing/Trial Judge Assigned

Focus Words amnesty undocumented orient exclude compound Weekly Passage

BEST PRACTICES IN REGULATION OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES

COMMON GROUND BETWEEN COMPANY AND CIVIL SOCIETY SURVEILLANCE REFORM PRINCIPLES

Case 1:10-cr LMB Document 257 Filed 10/11/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 2040 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Political Environment and Congressional Breakdown Charts. November 7, 2017

Changes to the OMB Regulatory Review Process by Executive Order 13422

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

ENFORCING A CUSTODY ORDER (CONTEMPT)

The Natural Resources Act of Ohio

COMMENTS OF THE ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. [Docket No. DHS ]

Another Dirty Judge Cleaning Up Clinton Crimes

Suite RE: Investigating Improper White House Influence on Specific Investigations

Protection of Classified Information by Congress: Practices and Proposals

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Privacy Commissioner's submission to the Law and Order Committee on the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Amendment Bill

Political Environment and Congressional Breakdown Charts. December 12, 2017

Perfecting Civil Appeals in the New York State Appellate Division: Which of the Three Available Methods is Perfect for Your Case?

RULE 3.8(g) AND (h):

Already Buried and Sinking Fast: Presidential Nominees and Inquiry

42 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Last month, the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), reporting on national

Reducing Questions. Three strategies for reform would ameliorate nominees burdens without changing the nature of information required of them.

JUDICIARY OF GUAM ELECTRONIC FILING RULES 1

United States Merit Systems Protection Board

Recommended citation: 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. SC *********************************************************************

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : :

Report for Congress. Border Security: Immigration Issues in the 108 th Congress. February 4, 2003

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. U.S. Customs and Border Protection [ ] NAFTA Regulations and Certificate of Origin

APPENDIX A. I-9 Requirements Document List

Discussion. Discussion

PETITION FOR SPECIAL RELIEF CUSTODY

TIM HORTONS INC. DISCLOSURE COMMITTEE CHARTER. Adopted October 27, 2009 (Most Recently Revised: November 2013)

Issue Area Current Law S as reported by Senate Judiciary Comm. H.R as reported by House Judiciary Comm.

Permanent Editorial Board for the Uniform Commercial Code PEB COMMENTARY NO. Draft for Public Comment. February 1, 2012

Staying Compliant in 2018 and Beyond

House Standing Committee on Social Policy and Legal Affairs

When the cartel investigators come calling: Top ten do s, top ten don ts

NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2017 RULES

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. U.S. Customs and Border Protection [ ] Agency Information Collection Activities:

Case 1:12-cv JMF Document 6 Filed 06/06/12 Page 1 of 10. : : Plaintiff, : : Defendants.

Dates Week COS# Standards / Objectives References

Safe Harbor Procedures for Employers Who Receive a No-Match Letter: Clarification; Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Basics of Internet Defamation. Defamation in the News

Lesson Objectives: The student will be able to... Step by Step

AP United States Government and Politics Summer Assignment

TAX-INSURANCE PROCEDURE CODE

The Bureaucracy. Chapter Eight

Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protections: In Brief

Earmark Disclosure Rules in the Senate: Member and Committee Requirements

COMPARATIVE STUDY REPORT INVENTIVE STEP (JPO - KIPO - SIPO)

CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY AND GUIDELINES

2014 CO 53. No. 14SA135, In re Matter of the Title, Ballot Title and Submission Clause for #129 Single Subject Clear Title.

Review of The Policing of Terrorism: Organizational and Global Perspectives by Mathieu Deflem

CRS Report for Congress

Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights

No More Border Walls! Critical Analysis of the Costs and Impacts of U.S. Immigration Enforcement Policy Since IRCA

MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE ACCESS REVIEW COMMITTEE

Federal Workforce Statistics Sources: OPM and OMB

Case 8:12-cv JDW-EAJ Document 112 Filed 10/25/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID 2875 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

How To Read And Brief A Case. William S. Richardson School of Law Orientation 2014 Richardson Lawyering 2.0

BEFORE THE EUROPEAN COMMITTEE ON LEGAL COOPERATION OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE PLENARY MEETING OCTOBER 11-14, 2010

The Undefined Branch. Chapter 13 The Federal Bureaucracy. The Federal Bureaucracy has only one task to faithfully execute all the laws

CRS Report for Congress

18 USC 3006A. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

CRS Report for Congress

Federal Workforce Statistics Sources: OPM and OMB

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Whistleblower Protection Act 10 of 2017 (GG 6450) ACT

Ethics Policy. Administrative Code under Part 3, Chapter 9, Article 1, Section 1.4

March 26, 2012 As attachment to: By fax to: * Subject: OMB and OIRA: Noncompliance with Executive Order

U.S. Congressional Documents AALL 2018 Baltimore, Maryland GREATEST OF ALL

Visa Bulletin For April 2011

Protection of Official Data: Information for Consultees

ALLIANT ENERGY CORPORATION. Corporate Governance Principles

New 2016 Campaign Finance Law

New Form I-9 & Update on Government Enforcement of Employment Eligibility Verification Requirements

INVISIBLE ENEMY: THE AFRICAN AMERICAN FREEDOM STRUGGLE AFTER 1965 BY GRETA DE JONG

DELAWARE STATE BAR ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS OPINION

Filling Advice and Consent Positions at the Outset of Recent Administrations,

Amendments to the Commission s Freedom of Information Act Regulations

CRS Report for Congress

Form F4 Director s or Officer s Circular

Ethical Culture. Speaking up: Information for CII members about whistleblowing. CII guidance series

FBI Director: Appointment and Tenure

On Dec 20, 2017, at 3:17 PM, Lee S Gliddon Jr wrote: POSTED

Transcription:

Plum Books hide SES employees in a blizzard of bad math and contradictory, nonsensical categories Then, besides hiding their identities from We The People, they say their SES benefits and privileges are not accountable to the President of the United States. 1 See footnote below on independent regulatory commission. 2 By Anonymous Patriots Apr. 04, 2018 Kudos to the American Intelligence Media reader who noticed that the tables in the Plum Books use a confusing array of notations for Type of Appointment. 1 S. Prt. 114-26. (Dec. 01, 2016). Plum Book, Policy and Supporting Positions. Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. U.S. Senate, 114th Congress, 2d Session, PDF p. 228. GPO. 2 Shockingly, the phrase independent regulatory commission is undefined in the Plum Books. Generally, when lawyers loosely define a term, it is intentional so that in the future it can mean whatever their buddies want it to mean. This phrase is only used here in their claim that these positions are not accountable to the President. Independent is undefined. The related concept of impartiality is used in this same section to imply that SES positions ensure impartiality. Therefore, this could apply to all SES positions, if they want it to mean that (which they obviously do it appears that they punish SES alums that become whistleblowers, like Dinesh D Souza, SES 1988). See H. Prt. 100-NN. (Nov. 09, 1988). Dinesh D Souza, Plum Book, Policy and Supporting Positions. Committee on Post Office and Civil Service House of Representatives, 100th Congress, 2d Session. Y 4.G 74/7 :P 75/6/988. GPO. Regulatory can mean anything since government agencies are all regulatory in function. Commission is not defined either, and if broadly defined, encompasses the activities of all agencies in their overall missions. -1-

This person noticed that in the 1984 Plum Book J.B. Sessions III (Jefferson Jeff Beauregard Sessions III, PDF p. 134) had a PAS designation, while others in the chart, their superiors, had SES designations. On the surface, it would appear that the PAS Type of Appointment is different than SES. In fact, just above Sessions name is the following list of DOJ directors who ran the U.S. Attorneys office all designated SES. To make the disclosure even more convoluted, the summary in Appendix No. 2 about SES positions states: 3 However, investigators actually counted the records in the 1984 Plum Book (see Table below). It discloses approximately 9,872 positions in its 137 pages. If we use that number instead of the 8,000 number, that would mean that only 1,872 of those positions are not SES positions. Still more discombobulated is the fact that there are, in fact, approximately 1,264 PAS positions and 3,728 SES positions in the 1984 Plum Book. So which is it? 8,000 SES positions or 3,728 SES? The Book says both! 3 S. Prt. 98-286. (Nov. 22, 1984). Plum Book, Policy and Supporting Positions. Committee on Governmental Affairs. U.S. Senate, 98th Congress, 2d Session. Y 4.G 74/7:P 75/6/984, PDF p. 84. GPO. -2-

A reader can only conclude that most of the other designations, like PAS, PA, PL, NEA, A, B, C, GS, GG, GM, NE, p.d., p.h., W.c.,(I) and WG are surreptitiously SES. This conclusion is reinforced by looking at what changes were made in the Types of Appointments between the 1988 and 1992 Plum Books. In 1992, the SES Type of Appointment was removed completely. SES became a Pay Plan accompanied by a hopelessly vague explanation: Original Text: "Note that several categories of positions can be filled by more than one type of appointment e.g., SES positions listed in this publication may be filled by using career, noncareer, limited emergency or limited term appointment authorities." Commentary with Text: "Note that several [open-ended] categories of positions can be filled by more than one type of appointment [open-ended], e.g., SES positions listed in this publication may be filled [open-ended] by using career, noncareer, limited emergency or limited term appointment authorities." This one paragraph permits the SES positions to be hidden. Following this change, only some of the names were designated as an SES (or ES) pay grade, while the total number of disclosures, in aggregate, matched the total number of SES positions disclosed. The entire disclosure is nonsensical bureaucratic jibberish. See Table below. In other words, any type of Plum Book appointment can be SES, the SES pay plan can be added to any type of appointment, the totals disclosed roughly match the total number of SES appointments summarized in Appendix No. 2 in the back of each Plum Book. -3-

Plum Book Analysis: Year Pages total Pages with position tables SES positions allocated Positions per page Positions disclosed Non-SES reported 1980 178 137 8,590 39.33 5,388 (3,202) 1984 280 251 8,000 39.33 9,872 1,872 1988 248 218 8,000 39.33 8,574 574 1992 216 205 8,800 39.33 8,063 (737) 1996 495 450 7,876 24 10,800 2,924 2000 349 330 7,815 28.5 9,405 1,590 2004 234 212 7,815 39.33 8,338 523 2008 217 195 8,328 39.33 7,669 (659) 2012 220 194 8,328 39.33 7,630 (698) 2016 236 211 9,936 39.33 8,299 (1,637) Conclusion: Cumulative Total: 83,488 84,038 550 This analysis shows that the positions disclosed in the 10 Plum Books from 1980-2016 are essentially all SES. If this is not the correct interpretation, then it is the government s responsibility to explain the SES in clear terms, rather than forcing citizens to consume almost 100 hours of creative time just to try and figure out what the government SES reports are saying, and not saying. -4-

Appendix: Summary of the Legends from the Plum Books 1980-5-

1984-6-

1988-7-

1992-8-

1996-9-

2000-10-

2004-11-

2008-12-

2012-13-

2016-14-

Download Plum Books (1980-2016) and Related Research https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2018/03/obama-hired-them-trump-cannot-fire-them.html#sesplum-books-1996-2016 Notices: This document may contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties. All documents from the Federal Register and Government Printing Office designated as Authenticated U.S. Government Information. GPO are presumed to be judicially-recognizable public records. -15-