Congressional Scorecard. 111th Congress First Session How to Judge a Member s Voting Record

Similar documents
Congressional Scorecard. 112th Congress First Session How to Judge a Member s Voting Record

Congressional Scorecard

Washington, DC Washington, DC 20510

Senators of the 111th Congress

October 3, United States Senate Washington, DC Dear Senator:

Sort by: Name State Party. What is a class?

NRCAT Action Fund Senate Scorecard

2016 Club for Growth Senate Rating

FIRST SESSION, January to December 2013

Senators of the 110th Congress

FAIR s Congressional Voting Report is designed to help you understand a U.S. senator s support for. immigration control during the second session of

Senators of the 109th Congress

TITLE VII PROTECTING TENANTS AT FORECLOSURE ACT

Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research

PERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES. Member Electronic Vote/ . Alabama No No Yes No. Alaska No No No No

2008 U.S. SENATE CANDIDATE SCORECARD

Midterm Elections 2018 Results

2016 Voter Registration Deadlines by State

Text as Data. Justin Grimmer. Associate Professor Department of Political Science Stanford University. November 20th, 2014

Campaign Finance E-Filing Systems by State WHAT IS REQUIRED? WHO MUST E-FILE? Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily).

ACCESS TO STATE GOVERNMENT 1. Web Pages for State Laws, State Rules and State Departments of Health

Working Paper Number 149 July 2008

State Trial Courts with Incidental Appellate Jurisdiction, 2010

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5

National State Law Survey: Statute of Limitations 1

Voice of America s Private Schools.

Notice N HCFB-1. March 25, Subject: FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY PROGRAM OBLIGATION AUTHORITY FISCAL YEAR (FY) Classification Code

2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview

IAALS

The remaining legislative bodies have guides that help determine bill assignments. Table shows the criteria used to refer bills.

Rhoads Online State Appointment Rules Handy Guide

MEMORANDUM JUDGES SERVING AS ARBITRATORS AND MEDIATORS

THE PROCESS TO RENEW A JUDGMENT SHOULD BEGIN 6-8 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE

NRCAT Action Fund Senate Scorecard

Affordable Care Act: A strategy for effective implementation

The Victim Rights Law Center thanks Catherine Cambridge for her research assistance.

MOC First State or District Party. Full Committee/FSGG/ Leadership Position. Rep/Sen MOC Last Name

State Complaint Information

STATE LAWS SUMMARY: CHILD LABOR CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS BY STATE

Limitations on Contributions to Political Committees

Democratic Convention *Saturday 1 March 2008 *Monday 25 August - Thursday 28 August District of Columbia Non-binding Primary

Red, white, and blue. One for each state. Question 1 What are the colors of our flag? Question 2 What do the stars on the flag mean?

NOTICE TO MEMBERS No January 2, 2018

Federal Rate of Return. FY 2019 Update Texas Department of Transportation - Federal Affairs

Registered Agents. Question by: Kristyne Tanaka. Date: 27 October 2010

12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office

Delegates: Understanding the numbers and the rules

Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund

Election 2014: Its Impact on Federal Policy-Making in 2015

INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY

Bylaws of the. Student Membership

If you have questions, please or call

2008 Changes to the Constitution of International Union UNITED STEELWORKERS

S IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

Case 1:16-cv Document 3 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 66 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

National Latino Peace Officers Association

Background Information on Redistricting

The 2016 Election and U.S. Foreign Policy


THE STATE OF PLAY IN THE BELTWAY 2017 COLLEEN LENERS DNP APRN FAANP DIRECTOR OF POLICY

American Government. Workbook

ADVANCEMENT, JURISDICTION-BY-JURISDICTION

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION [NOTICE ] Price Index Adjustments for Contribution and Expenditure Limitations and

December 30, 2008 Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote

The Electoral College And

ACTION: Notice announcing addresses for summons and complaints. SUMMARY: Our Office of the General Counsel (OGC) is responsible for processing

Women in Federal and State-level Judgeships

State-by-State Chart of HIV-Specific Laws and Prosecutorial Tools

7-45. Electronic Access to Legislative Documents. Legislative Documents

Class Actions and the Refund of Unconstitutional Taxes. Revenue Laws Study Committee Trina Griffin, Research Division April 2, 2008

TELEPHONE; STATISTICAL INFORMATION; PRISONS AND PRISONERS; LITIGATION; CORRECTIONS; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ISSUES

Committee Consideration of Bills

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2010 Session

For jurisdictions that reject for punctuation errors, is the rejection based on a policy decision or due to statutory provisions?

28 USC 152. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

We re Paying Dearly for Bush s Tax Cuts Study Shows Burdens by State from Bush s $87-Billion-Every-51-Days Borrowing Binge

ASSOCIATES OF VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA, INC. BYLAWS (A Nonprofit Corporation)

WYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY

Complying with Electric Cooperative State Statutes

Soybean Promotion and Research: Amend the Order to Adjust Representation on the United Soybean Board

POLITICAL LAW AND GOVERNMENT ETHICS NEWS

Judicial Selection in the States

Parties and Elections. Selections from Chapters 11 & 12

Case 1:14-cv Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/14 Page 1 of 61 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

New Census Estimates Show Slight Changes For Congressional Apportionment Now, But Point to Larger Changes by 2020

More State s Apportionment Allocations Impacted by New Census Estimates; New Twist in Supreme Court Case

STATUS OF 2002 REED ACT DISTRIBUTION BY STATE

Race to the White House Drive to the 2016 Republican Nomination. Ron Nehring California Chairman, Ted Cruz for President

Chapter 12: The Math of Democracy 12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment - SOLUTIONS

Apportionment. Seven Roads to Fairness. NCTM Regional Conference. November 13, 2014 Richmond, VA. William L. Bowdish

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. State Voter Registration and Election Day Laws

Components of Population Change by State

Official Voter Information for General Election Statute Titles

Table A1. Medicare Advantage Enrollment by State and Plan Type, 2014

Revised December 10, 2007

Polarization: Implications for Policymaking & Accountability

ARTICLE I ESTABLISHMENT NAME

Expiring Unemployment Insurance Provisions

#WeChooseWelcome for refugees of all faiths and nations

Transcription:

111th Congress First 2009 How to Judge a Member s Record selects a few roll-call votes from the hundreds cast by members of Congress every session. In choosing these votes, attempts to fairly represent a lawmaker s position on issues determined to be important to members first and foremost as workers, but also as citizens and union brothers and sisters. Congressional Scorecard This voting scorecard is one of the key factors used in making judgments on campaign support, endorsements or contributions from PEOPLE s Political Action Committee, or PAC. Other important factors often include the member s official leadership position, chairmanship or seniority on important committees, leadership in a state s congressional delegation, and accessibility and responsiveness to s lobbying efforts. Visit s website at www.afscme.org to obtain e-news, weekly reports, letters to congressional members and votes. Questions concerning the selection of the votes or other aspects of a member s record are welcome. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO Write to Department of Legislation, 1625 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036-5687, or call (800) 732-8120. 1

2009 Senate Descriptions 1. The Senate approved the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 (S. 181), which restores long-standing pay discrimination protection the Supreme Court eliminated in its 2007 Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. decision. Senate Number 14 supported the bill, which the Senate approved by a vote of 61 to 36 on January 22, 2009. 2. The Senate approved the Children s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (H.R. 2), which expands coverage for low-income children who lack health insurance. Senate Number 31 supported the bill, which the Senate passed by a vote of 66 to 32 on January 29, 2009. 3. Providing State and Local Government Aid The Senate approved the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (H.R. 1), which provided vital state and local fiscal relief, unemployment assistance and key funding for job preservation and creation. Senate Number 61 supported the bill, which the Senate passed by a vote of 61 to 37 on February 10, 2009. 4. The Senate approved the nomination of Hilda Solis to be Secretary of Labor. During her tenure in the U.S. House of Representatives, Solis maintained a 100 percent voting record. Senate Number 66 supported the nomination, which the Senate approved by a vote of 80 to 17 on February 24, 2009. 5. Position: No During debate on the Omnibus Appropriations Act, Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) offered an amendment to deny funding for implementation of an executive order Pres. Barack Obama issued on January 30, 2009, entitled Notification of Employee Rights Under Federal Labor Laws. The order reversed a Bush-era anti-worker executive order that made it harder to form unions and organize. Senate Number 91 supported the executive order and opposed the amendment, which the Senate rejected by a vote of 38 to 59 on March 10, 2009. 6. Restoring Funding for Labor and Education Programs The Senate approved the Omnibus Appropriations Act of 2009 (H.R. 1105), which combined funding for several agencies, including the Department of Labor and Department of Education. It provided a 5 7 percent increase in critical funding for labor, health 2

and safety net programs when compared with the Bush administration s spending request. Senate Number 96 supported the bill, which the Senate approved by a vote of 62 to 35 on March 10, 2009. 7. During debate on the Helping Families Save Their Homes Act (S. 896), Sen. Richard Durbin (D-IL) offered an amendment to allow bankruptcy judges to modify home mortgages and allow thousands facing foreclosure to keep their homes. Despite predatory lending, many mortgage lenders have been slow or failed to modify loans based on false or misleading information. Senate Number 174 supported the amendment, which the Senate rejected by a vote of 45 to 51 on April 30, 2009. 8. The Senate approved the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. Sotomayor has served with distinction as a litigator, prosecutor, trial court attorney and U.S. appellate judge and demonstrated a commitment to civil liberties and equal justice under the law. Senate Number 262 supported the nomination, which the Senate approved by a vote of 68 to 31 on August 6, 2009. 9. Moving Health Care Reform Forward To proceed with consideration of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (H.R. 3590), the Senate approved a motion to invoke cloture. A cloture motion allows the Senate to cut off debate if a 3/5 majority is achieved. Senate Number 353 supported the motion, which the Senate approved by a vote of 60 to 39 on November 21, 2009. 10. Position: No During debate on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (H.R. 3590), a number of Republican senators used motions to recommit to stall debate and kill the health care bill. A motion to recommit, if passed, removes the bill from the floor and sends it back to committee. Senate Number 364 opposed the motion offered by Sen. Mike Johanns (R-NE), which the Senate rejected by a vote of 41 to 53 on December 5, 2009. 11. The Senate approved the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (H.R. 3590) comprehensive health care reform legislation. The bill required most large employers to provide or help fund health care for workers, included measures to help reduce cost pressures on our coverage, improved Medicare and created subsidies for families who do not get coverage through their job. The bill also addressed abuses by insurance companies such as denying coverage to those with pre-existing conditions. However, the bill included a tax on high-cost plans. Senate Number 396 supported moving the debate forward and passing a Senate health care bill. The Senate passed the bill by a vote of 60 to 39 on December 24, 2009. 3

Alabama s, J. (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8? 8 8 8 8 0% 4 105 4% Shelby (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 9% 49 156 24% Alaska Begich (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 11 0 100% Murkowski (R) 4 4 8 4 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 36% 13 46 22% Arizona Kyl (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 119 0% McCain (R) 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9% 30 164 15% Arkansas Lincoln (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 8 4 82% 75 17 82% Pryor (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 91% 54 5 92% California Boxer (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 141 2 99% Feinstein (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 131 18 88% Colorado Bennet, M. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 91% 10 1 91% Udall, M. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 86 4 96% Connecticut Dodd (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 238 26 90% Lieberman (I) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 171 30 85% Delaware Carper (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 91% 70 8 90% Kaufman (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 11 0 100% 4 Key: 4 voted with s position; 8 voted against s position;? did not vote.

Florida LeMieux (R)???????? 8 8 8 0% 0 3 0% Martinez (R) resigned 8 4 8 4 8 8 8 4??? 38% 4 36 10% Nelson, Bill (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 72 7 91% Georgia Chambliss (R) 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9% 3 56 5% Isakson (R) 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9% 1 42 2% Hawaii Akaka (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 172 4 98% Inouye (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 281 20 93% Idaho Crapo (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 89 1% Risch (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 11 0% Illinois Burris (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 11 0 100% Durbin (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 108 2 98% Indiana Bayh (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 8 4 82% 83 9 90% Lugar (R) 8 4 8 4 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 27% 36 261 12% Iowa Grassley (R) 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9% 29 241 11% Harkin (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 211 14 94% Kansas Brownback (R) 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9% 2 106 2% Roberts (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 4 106 4% Key: 4 voted with s position; 8 voted against s position;? did not vote. 5

Kentucky Bunning (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 4 88 4% McConnell (R) 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9% 19 220 8% Louisiana Landrieu (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 91% 92 17 84% Vitter (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 43 0% Maine Collins (R) 4 4 4 4 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 45% 38 72 35% Snowe (R) 4 4 4 4 8 4 8 4 8 8 8 55% 50 78 39% Maryland Cardin (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 27 0 100% Mikulski (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 209 7 97% Massachusetts Kennedy, E. (D) deceased?? 4???????? 100% 288 12 96% Kerry (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 217 13 94% Kirk (D)???????? 4 4 4 100% 3 0 100% Michigan Levin, C. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 267 16 94% Stabenow (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 78 1 99% Minnesota Franken, A. (D)??????? 4 4 4 4 100% 4 0 100% Klobuchar (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 27 0 100% Mississippi Cochran (R) 8 8 8 4 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 18% 33 247 12% Wicker (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 9% 1 19 5% 6 Key: 4 voted with s position; 8 voted against s position;? did not vote.

Missouri Bond (R) 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 4 8 8 8 18% 31 187 14% McCaskill (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 4 91% 25 1 96% Montana Baucus (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 91% 223 55 80% Tester (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 91% 25 2 93% Nebraska Johanns (R) 8 8 8 4?? 8 8 8 8 8 11% 1 8 1 1% Nelson, Ben (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 8 4 82% 54 25 68% Nevada Ensign (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 73 3% Reid, H. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 201 18 92% New Hampshire Gregg (R) 8 8? 4 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 20% 8 139 5% Shaheen (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 11 0 100% New Jersey Lautenberg (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 59 0 100% Menendez (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 35 0 100% New Mexico Bingaman (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 230 18 93% Udall, T. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 92 0 100% New York Gillibrand (D)? 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 28 0 100% Schumer (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 88 3 97% Key: 4 voted with s position; 8 voted against s position;? did not vote. 7

North Carolina Burr (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 42 2% Hagan (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 11 0 100% North Dakota Conrad (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 192 28 87% Dorgan (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 91% 135 10 93% Ohio Brown, Sherrod (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 27 0 100% Voinovich (R) 8 8 8 4 4 8 8 4? 8 8 30% 18 72 20% Oklahoma Coburn (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 42 0% Inhofe (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8? 8 0% 2 124 2% Oregon Merkley (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 11 0 100% Wyden (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 107 10 91% Pennsylvania Casey (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 27 0 100% Specter (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 91% 141 111 56% Rhode Island Reed, J. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 108 1 99% Whitehouse (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 27 0 100% South Carolina DeMint (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 0 43 0% Graham (R) 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 4 8? 8 20% 3 55 5% 8 Key: 4 voted with s position; 8 voted against s position;? did not vote.

South Dakota Johnson, Tim (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 91% 94 7 93% Thune (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 2 41 5% Tennessee Alexander, L. (R) 8 4 8 4 8 4 8 4 8 8 8 36% 7 52 12% Corker (R) 8 4 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 18% 3 24 11% Texas Cornyn (R) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0% 1 58 2% Hutchison (R) 4 4 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 27% 13 131 9% Utah Bennett, R. (R) 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9% 9 140 6% Hatch (R) 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9% 33 263 11% Vermont Leahy (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4? 4 100% 287 25 92% Sanders (I) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4? 4 100% 26 0 100% Virginia Warner (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 11 0 100% Webb (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 91% 26 1 96% Washington Cantwell (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 75 4 95% Murray (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 138 8 95% West Virginia Byrd (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4? 4 90% 279 46 86% Rockefeller (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4? 4 4 4 4 100% 215 15 93% Key: 4 voted with s position; 8 voted against s position;? did not vote. 9

Wisconsin Feingold (D) 4 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 4 91% 139 10 93% Kohl, H. (D) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 100% 178 26 87% Wyoming Barrasso (R) 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9% 1 22 4% Enzi (R) 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9% 3 105 3% 10 Key: 4 voted with s position; 8 voted against s position;? did not vote.