Law s Borders: Yale Global Constitutionalism Law s Borders. Judith Resnik, Editor. Table of Contents

Similar documents
Law s Borders: Yale Global Constitutionalism 2012 OPINIONS EXCERPTED

PERMISSIONS TO REPUBLISH MATERIALS

LAW S FUTURE(S): THE SUSTAINABILITY OF TRANSNATIONAL, NATIONAL, AND INTERNATIONAL COURTS

CONSTITUTIONAL PLURALISM AND CONSTITUTIONAL CONFLICTS

VI. READING ASSIGNMENTS International Law (Laws ) Fall 2008

Fundamental Rights in the European Union

Building a Future on Peace and Justice Nuremberg 24/25 June Address by Mr Luis Moreno Ocampo, Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court

UNITED NATIONS OFFICE OF LEGAL AFFAIRS

The Relationship Between Constitutionalism and Pluralism

UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW JURISDICTION AND IMMUNITIES: (2) IMMUNITIES

Bridging Between Law, Life and Assassinations

Prerequisites. Methodology

WAR ON TERROR. Shristhi Debuka 1

The Harmonization Project: Improving Compliance with the Law of War in Non- International Armed Conflicts

Re: Shared Concerns Regarding U.S. Drone Strikes and Targeted Killings

Preface to the Seventh Edition

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2 ISSN

THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL AND NON-INTERNATIONAL ARMED CONFLICTS: CHALLENGES FOR IHL?

B. The transfer of personal information to states with equivalent protection of fundamental rights

COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Background Paper on Geneva Conventions and Persons Held by U.S. Forces

Exam Questions By Year IR 214. How important was soft power in ending the Cold War?

Contemporary Issues in Law: Law and Human Rights in Central Europe Syllabus Spring 2011

International Law and the Use of Armed Force by States

Contemporary Issues in International Law. Syllabus Golden Gate University School of Law Spring

TERROR COUNTER-TERROR AND HUMAN RIGHTS

Statewatch briefing on the European Evidence Warrant to the European Parliament

2. So to start I turn to increasing judicialisation. Increasing judicialisation

Consequences under International Humanitarian Law for Civilians Who Take a Direct Part in Hostilities

OI Policy Compendium Note on the International Criminal Court. Overview: Oxfam International s position on the International Criminal Court

Practicing What We Preach: Humane Treatment for Detainees in the War on Terror

Launch of EU Military operation in Bosnia-Herzegovina (Operation ALTHEA -EUFOR)

***...

Modified Objectives. Flight path preview. Conflict Classification (plus a little extra) Know the three categories of armed conflict

The International Criminal Court: Trigger Mechanisms for ICC Jurisdiction

1. On or about December 17, 2002, in Kabul, Afghanistan, the Accused. allegedly threw a hand grenade into a vehicle in which two American service

The DISAM Journal, Winter

The US must protect Habeas Corpus

2014 Projects Conference. Jasna Omejec*

Wayne Sandholtz, Prohibiting Plunder: How Norms Change. Oxford : Oxford University Press, Pp. xi, 338. $ ISBN:

CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS

No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ) ) ) ) ) Proceedings below: In re OMAR KHADR, ) ) United States of America v. Omar Khadr Applicant ) )

THE LAW IN THESE PARTS. Occupation is a legal concept.

The Concept of Normative Power in World Politics

CALL FOR PAPERS THE ROLE OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS: JURISPRUDENTIAL ADVANCES AND NEW RESPONSES. Workshop - Oslo, Norway.

The Syrian Conflict and International Humanitarian Law

Identifying the Enemy: Civilian Participation in Armed Conflict

Index of the session

TOWARDS CONVERGENCE. IHL, IHRL and the Convergence of Norms in Armed Conflict

UNITED NATIONS OFFICE OF LEGAL AFFAIRS

Office and Office Hours: Areeda 130, Friday 12:30-2 p.m. or by appointment

The first affirmation of the Center s Guideline ( on

1. 4. Legal Framework for United Nations Peacekeeping. L e s s o n

International Law and Contemporary Challenges (1st Module)

Fiji Comments on the Discussion Paper on implementation of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

INTERNATIONAL LAW AND INSTITUTIONS International Law Regarding the Conduct of War - Mark A. Drumbl INTERNATIONAL LAW REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF WAR

HUMAN INTERNATIONAL LAW

Book Review: War Law Understanding International Law and Armed Conflict, by Michael Byers

Course Description Course Goals and Objectives Required Texts and Readings

Speech by Michel Barnier at the 28th Congress of the International Federation for European Law (FIDE)

Lesson 8 Legal Frameworks for Civil-Military-Police Relations

Regional Roundtable Discussion on Implementation of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings

OSO Political Science 2014.xlsx

INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COURSE/SEMINAR. Chicago-Kent College of Law

Due Process in American Military Tribunals After September 11, 2001

AP Gov Chapter 15 Outline

On the Constitutionalisation of the Convention: The European Court of Human Rights as a Constitutional Court

INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LouvainX online course [Louv2x] - prof. Olivier De Schutter

Speeches by the Legal Counsel

EU GUIDELINES on INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW

Counterterrorism strategies from an international law. and policy perspective

Setting a time limit: The case for a protocol on prolonged occupation

International justice and diplomacy: partnering for peace and international security

FOSTERING AN EU APPROACH TO SERIOUS INTERNATIONAL CRIMES BACKGROUND PAPER

Eritrea Researched and compiled by the Refugee Documentation Centre of Ireland on 8 February 2013

Preventive Detention in the Law of Armed Conflict: Throwing Away the Key?

Political Science 79 Seminar on War and Peace Amherst College Spring 2011 Ronald Tiersky

1.2 Distinguish between common law and equity. 1.3 Distinguish between civil law and criminal law

Common law reasoning and institutions

Judicial Review, Competence and the Rational Basis Theory

Treatise on International Criminal Law

Statement of the Prosecutor Luis Moreno Ocampo to Diplomatic Corps The Hague, Netherlands 12 February 2004

The Hegemonic Arbitrator Replaces Foreign Sovereignty: A Comment on Chevron v. Republic of Ecuador

POWERS, DISTINCTIONS, AND THE STATE IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY: THE NEW PARADIGM OF FORCE IN DUE PROCESS

Bosnia and Herzegovina's Constitution of 1995 with Amendments through 2009

1 Ratified by the UK on 9 February Ratified by the UK on 7 April Ratified by the UK on 16 December 1991.

MAIN COMMUNICATION LETTER REFERENCE

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JURISDICTION

The Emergence of European Constitutional Law * Rainer Arnold

Ingrid B. Wuerth. Vanderbilt University Law School st Ave. South Nashville, TN

Solemn hearing for the opening of the Judicial Year. 27 january 2017

ANNEX I: APPLICABLE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK

Panel Presentation by Alex Conte, * Director of the International Law and Protection Programmes, International Commission of Jurists

War and Geography 4/13/2011. U.S. Navy Aircraft Carrier

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 4 December /03 COHOM 47 PESC 762 CIVCOM 201 COSDP 731. NOTE From : To :

IMMIGRATION & ASYLUM ACCREDITATION SCHEME

Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice

REJOINDER THE WAR ON TERRORISM: INTERNATIONAL LAW, CLEAR STATEMENT REQUIREMENTS, AND CONSTITUTIONAL DESIGN. and Jack L. GoldsmithT

Strasbourg, 21/02/11 CAHDI (2011) Inf 2 (CAHDI)

Transcription:

Law s Borders Judith Resnik, Editor Table of Contents Preface... i I. TARGETING, DETENTION, AND PUNISHMENT: PROBLEMS IN THE RELATIONSHIP OF WAR AND CRIME DISCUSSION LEADERS: JOHN FABIAN WITT AND AHARON BARAK What Counts as Armed Conflict and Who Is In it? The Meaning of Armed Conflict Prosecutor v. Tadić (International Criminal Court for the Former Yugoslavia) (1995)... I-7 International Law Association, Final Report on the Meaning of Armed Conflict in International Law (2010)... I-8 Who Is a Combatant? Carl Schmitt, Theory of the Partisan (1963)... I-9 International Committee of the Red Cross, Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law (2008)... I-11 Public Committee Against Torture v. Government (Israel Supreme Court) (2006)... I-13 Targeted Killings The Legal Culture of Targeting Aharon Barak, Human Rights in Times of Terror A Judicial Point of View (2008)... I-14 Jack Goldsmith, Power and Constraint: The Accountable Presidency After 9/11 (2012)... I-16 Amichai Cohen, Legal Operational Advice in the Israeli Defense Forces (2011)... I-18

Table of Contents Extra-Legal Killing or Armed Conflict? Philip Alston, Study on Targeted Killings (United Nations Human Rights Council) (2010)... I-20 Eric Holder, Speech at Northwestern University Law School (2012)... I-22 The Power to Detain Is There a Duty to Capture If You Can? International Committee of the Red Cross, Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities Under International Humanitarian Law (2008)... I-23 The Vast Powers of Detention Karl S. Chang, Enemy Status and Military Detention in the War against al-qaeda (2012)... I-25 Al-Bihani v. Obama (United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit) (2010)... I-26 Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians in Time of War (Fourth Geneva Convention) (1949)... I-30 New Legal Limits? A and Others v. U.K. (European Court of Human Rights) (2009)... I-31 Al-Jedda v. United Kingdom (European Court of Human Rights) (2011)... I-36 Ryan Goodman, The Detention of Civilians in Armed Conflict (2009)... I-39 Is There a Detention/Targeting Tradeoff? Punishing Benjamin Wittes, Detention and Trial: The Case for Candor After Guantánamo (2011)... I-40 The Enlightenment Immunity from Criminal Laws John Fabian Witt, The Enlightenment Separation of War from Crime (2012)... I-42 Johann Caspar Bluntschli, Amnesties (1868)... I-44 Lassa Oppenheim, Conceptualizing the War Crime (1912)... I-45 ii

The Return of Criminalization Prosecutor v. Erdemovic (International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia) (1997)... I-46 Prosecutor v. Kallon (Special Court for Sierra Leone) (2004)... I-51 The Critique of Criminalization Michael Ignatieff, We re So Exceptional (2012)... I-56 Abigail H. Moy, International Criminal Court s Arrest Warrants and Uganda s Lord's Resistance Army: Renewing the Debate over Amnesty and Complementarity (2006)... I-57 Ian Paisley, Peace and the Price of Justice (2012)... I-58 W. Michael Reisman, Institutions and Practices for Restoring and Maintaining Public Order (1995)... I-60 Proportionality Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 Aug. 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I) (1977)... I-63 Francis Lieber, Instructions for the Government of Armies of the United States in the Field (1863)... I-65 Correspondence Between Mayor and Councilmen of Atlanta Georgia, and U.S. General William Tecumseh Sherman (1864)... I-66 Public Committee Against Torture v. Government, (Israel Supreme Court) (2006)... I-67 Coda: The Role of the Judge in Terrible Decisions? Michael Walzer, The Dishonoring of Arthur Harris (1977)... I-71 II. DIALOGUES ON THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, 2012 High Level Conference on the Future of the European Court of Human Rights, Brighton Declaration (2012)... II-2 Nicolas Bratza, Speech at High Level Conference on the Future of the European Court of Human Rights (2012)... II-7

Table of Contents III. (DIS)UNIFORMITY OF RIGHTS IN FEDERATIONS AND UNIONS DISCUSSION LEADERS: JUDITH RESNIK AND REVA SIEGEL Uniformity, Disuniformity, Sovereignty, and the Import of Rights Andreas Auer, The Constitutional Scheme of Federalism (2005)... III-5 Robert Cover, The Uses of Jurisdictional Redundancy: Interest, Ideology, and Innovation (1981)... III-7 Unreasonably Wrong? Codifying Doctrines of Deference... III-10 Democratic Sovereignty and Individual Rights: The Examples of Enfranchisement and Reproduction Disenfranchisement Hirst v. United Kingdom (European Court of Human Rights) (2005)... III-13 Joint Committee on Human Rights, Enhancing Parliament s Role in Relation to Human Rights Judgments (2009)... III-24 Lord Irvine of Lairg, A British Interpretation of Convention Rights (2011)... III-27 Sejdić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (European Court of Human Rights) (2009)... III-32 Counting, Consensus, and Categorizing Roderick M. Hills, Jr., Counting States (2009)... III-35 John L. Murray, Consensus: Concordance, or Hegemony of the Majority? (2008)... III-38 Judith Resnik, Categorical Federalism: Jurisdiction, Gender, and the Globe (2001)... III-40 Health and Life A, B and C v. Ireland (European Court of Human Rights) (2010) III-43 Reva B. Siegel, The Constitutionalization of Abortion (2012)... III-54 Siobhán Mullally, Debating Reproduction Rights in Ireland (2005)... III-56 iv

IV. CONSTITUTIONAL PLURALISM AND CONSTITUTIONAL CONFLICTS DISCUSSION LEADERS: ALEC STONE SWEET AND MIGUEL POIARES MADURO Dialogues and Distinctions Miguel Poiares Maduro, Three Claims of Constitutional Pluralism (2012)... IV-5 Wojciech Sadurski, Solange Chapter 3 : Constitutional Courts in Central Europe Democracy European Union (2008)... IV-8 Jan Komarek, Playing with Matches: The Czech Constitutional Court s Ultra Vires Revolution (2012)... IV-11 Lisbon Treaty Case (German Constitutional Court) (2009)... IV-16 Lisbon Treaty II (Czech Constitutional Court) (2009)... IV-19 M v. Germany (European Court of Human Rights) (2010)... IV-21 Mork v. Germany (European Court of Human Rights) (2011)... IV-28 No. 348-2007 (Italian Constitutional Court) (2007)... IV-33 Conceptualizing the Exchanges Ricardo Lorenzetti, Global Governance: Dialogue Between Courts (2010)... IV-35 Víctor Abramovich, From Massive Violations to Structural Patterns: New Approaches and Classic Tensions in the Inter- American Human Rights System (2009)... IV-38 Alec Stone Sweet, Trustee Courts and the Evolution of International Regimes: The Politics of Majoritarian Activism in the ECHR, the EU, and the WTO (2012)... IV-41 Alec Stone Sweet, A Cosmopolitan Legal Order: Constitutional Pluralism and Rights Adjudication in Europe (2012)... IV-44 V. INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW AND ARBITRATION AMIDST GLOBAL CHANGE DISCUSSION LEADER: W. MICHAEL REISMAN CHAIR: DANIEL MARKOVITS W. Michael Reisman, International Investment Law and Arbitration Amidst Global Change (2012)... V-2

Table of Contents VI. LAW S FUTURE(S): THE SUSTAINABILITY OF TRANSATIONAL, NATIONAL, AND INTERNATIONAL COURTS DISCUSSANTS: ROBERT BADINTER, STEPHEN BREYER, SABINO CASSESE, RONALD DWORKIN, DIETER GRIMM, BRENDA HALE The Nation State and Supra-National Adjudication CO-CHAIRS: SAM MULLER AND JUDITH RESNIK Dieter Grimm, Defending Sovereign Statehood against Transforming the European Union into a State (2009)... VI-4 Ambrose v. Harris (United Kingdom Supreme Court) (2011)... VI-14 Brenda Hale, Argentoratum Locutum: Is Strasbourg or the Supreme Court Supreme? (2012)... VI-23 Jonathan Sumption, Judicial and Political Decisionmaking: The Uncertain Boundary (2011)... VI-32 Luzius Wildhaber, A Constitutional Future for the European Court of Human Rights? (2002)... VI-34 Medellín v. Texas (United States Supreme Court) (2008)... VI-35 Armin von Bogdandy & Ingo Venzke, In Whose Name? An Investigation of International Courts Public Authority and its Democratic Justification (2012)... VI-55 The Growth, Legitimacy, and Relevance of Transnational Institutions Sabino Cassese, The Global Polity (2012)... VI-60 Sam Muller, Why Law Scenarios to 2030? (2012)... VI-66 Jan Klabbers, The Idea(s) of International Law (2011)... VI-71 Jean L. Cohen, Whose Sovereignty? Empire Versus International Law (2004)... VI-75 Mark Osiel, After International Law: Non-Juridical Responses to Mass Atrocity (2011)... VI-82 vi

Opinions Excerpted... A-1 Commentary and Additional Materials Excerpted... A-2 Permissions to Republish Materials... A-7