CERTIFIED SPECIALIST PROGRAM STANDARDS FOR CERTIFICATION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW (PATENT/TRADEMARK/COPYRIGHT)

Similar documents
RULE 408 CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION AND SPECIALIZATION PREAMBLE

Supreme Court of Florida

How patents work An introduction for law students

Canada Intellectual property enforcement

Section 2 Competition and supervision cases (1) The Market Court considers as competition and supervision cases those assigned

COLLEGE OF NATUROPATHIC PHYSICIANS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

NACC Standards for Child Welfare Law Attorney Specialty Certification California Specific

CIVIL TRIAL LAW CERTIFICATION STANDING COMMITTEE POLICIES 100 ADMINISTRATION

IP MANAGEMENT IN NIGERIA: TRADEMARKS & DESIGNS

Guide to WIPO Services

... Revision,

LATVIA Patent Law adopted on 15 February 2007, with the changes of December 15, 2011

CHINA S SUPREME PEOPLE S COURT HAS CLARIFIED FOUR TYPES OF IP RELATED ADMINISTRATIVE CASES TO BE HEARD BY SPECIAL IP TRIBUNALS

CORNELL STANDARD PROJECT AGREEMENT FOR STUDENT COLLABORATIONS (CSP-SC)

Collaborative Research Agreement. (Draft)

Contributing firm Granrut Avocats

Intellectual Property Reform In Australia

Architects Regulation 2012

Material Transfer Agreement

c t PSYCHOLOGISTS ACT

ST CHRISTOPHER AND NEVIS CHAPTER PROTECTION OF LAYOUT-DESIGNS (TOPOGRAPHIES) OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITS ACT

Intellectual Property Issue-Spotting for the General Practitioner

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM ON THE DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR RULES ON THE EUROPEAN PATENT LITIGATION CERTIFICATE AND OTHER APPROPRIATE QUALIFICATIONS

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRISTS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA. Bylaws

POLICY. Number: Subject: Inventions and Works

Table of Contents. 9 Intellectual Property Policy

Social Workers Act CHAPTER 12 OF THE ACTS OF as amended by. 2001, c. 19; 2005, c. 60; 2012, c. 48, s. 40; 2015, c. 52

Supported by. A global guide for practitioners

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE TRADEMARK MANUAL OF EXAMINING PROCEDURE (TMEP) Chapter 600 Attorney, Representative, and Signature

Mediation/Arbitration of

France Baker & McKenzie SCP

BYLAWS CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF ALBERTA. (effective September 20, 2016)

Approval of CLE Seminars can be made by NFPA s CLE Coordinator(s) and NFPA s

Patents in Europe 2011/2012. Greece Lappa

Patent Law in Cambodia

ANNEX VI REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 24 PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Basic Patent Information from the USPTO (Redacted) November 15, 2007

AUSTRALIA Patents Act 1990 Compilation date: 24 February 2017 Includes amendments up to: Act No. 61, 2016 Registered: 27 February 2017

1) Relating to Article 2(1)(m) of the November 2017 Draft Convention:

ANNEX VII REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 25 PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Düsseldorf. KRIEGER GENTZ MES & GRAF v. der GROEBEN March 19, 2004 AIPPI

Using the ITC as a Trademark Enforcement Tool

April 30, Dear Acting Under Secretary Rea:

Republika e Kosovës Republika Kosovo-Republic of Kosovo Kuvendi - Skupština - Assembly

THE PATENTS ACT, 1978 PATENT EXAMINATION REGULATIONS

A Patents, Copyrights, Intellectual Property Policy

BELIZE PATENTS ACT CHAPTER 253 REVISED EDITION 2003 SHOWING THE SUBSIDIARY LAWS AS AT 31ST MAY, 2003

INTERNSHIP TERMS. For Graduate Student Educational Projects. Undertaken Through the UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA

Survey on Trends for Commercializing IP. Australia

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 19 March /08 PI 14

Patent Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Chapter 1. General provisions. Article 1. Basic notions and definitions used in the present Law

BASIC FACTS ABOUT REGISTERING A TRADEMARK

EMC Proven Professional Program

THE PATENTS EXAMINATION REGULATIONS, as published in GenN 25 in GG of 17 January 2003

Israel Israël Israel. Report Q191. in the name of the Israeli Group by Tal BAND. Relationship between trademarks and geographical indications

DOMESTIC OPTIONS FOR PROTECTING YOUR TRADEMARKS IN A GLOBAL ECONOMY

Compilation date: 24 February Includes amendments up to: Act No. 61, Registered: 27 February 2017

NORTH CAROLINA PARALEGAL RESOURCE BINDER CHAPTER I EFFECTIVE UTILIZATION AND SUPERVISION OF PARALEGALS

BY-LAW 14. Made: May 1, 2007 Amended: June 28, 2007 April 30, 2009 May 21, 2009 (editorial changes) September 29, 2010 October 28, 2010

WIPO International Symposium on IP and Sustainable Development Documentation and Registration of TK and TCEs

OBJECTS AND REASONS

106TH CONGRESS Report HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMMUNICATIONS OMNIBUS REFORM ACT OF 1999

United Kingdom. By Penny Gilbert, Kit Carter and Stuart Knight, Powell Gilbert LLP

Intellectual Property High Court

DOCUMENT RETENTION AND ARCHIVAL POLICY

CHAPTER 72. PATENT LAW

SEC. 6. AIA: POST-GRANT REVIEW PROCEEDINGS

THE LAW ON TRADEMARKS 1. Article 1

The Consolidate Patents Act

Chief Judge of the IP High Court Makiko Takabe

Immigration and Asylum Law Advanced Accreditation Scheme

PATENTS ACT NO. 57 OF 1978 [ASSENTED TO 26 APRIL, 1978] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 1 JANUARY, 1979]

Direct Phone Number: Last Name: Title: Alliance Primary Contact (if different than authorized signatory contact): First Name:

UNFAIR COMPETITION PREVENTION AND TRADE SECRET PROTECTION ACT

Pakistan. Contributing firm Khursheed Khan & Associates. Author Zulfiqar Khan. World Trade Organisation Agreement and the Paris Convention.

THE CONTRACT FORMATION PROCESS THE PRESENTER INTRODUCTION TOPICS CONTRACT LAW: ESSENTIAL SKILLS FOR NON-LAWYERS HYATT HOTEL CANBERRA 18 JUNE 2014

THE ATTORNEYS' ADMISSION EXAMINATION (2017 Issue)

PROFESSIONAL PROGRAMME UPDATES FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS: LAWS AND PRACTICES MODULE 3- ELECTIVE PAPER 9.4

Queensland Law Society Administration Rule 2005

POST-GRANT REVIEW UNDER THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT GERARD F. DIEBNER TANNENBAUM, HELPERN, SYRACUSE & HIRSCHTRITT LLP

Planning and Organizing Public Hearings

GOVERNMENT GAZETTE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA

Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005

Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005

ANNEX XV REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 7 PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Bylaws American Academy of Water Resources Engineers of Civil Engineering Certification, Inc.

The Optometry Act, 1985

World Intellectual Property Organization

Expression of Interest. for

Work-Made-for-Hire-Agreement

Patents in Europe 2016/2017. Helping business compete in the global economy

WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER

Recent Developments in IP Enforcement in Korea

The Medical Profession Act, 1981

UNFAIR COMPETITION PREVENTION AND TRADE SECRET PROTECTION ACT

TEACHERS ACT [SBC 2011] Chapter 19. Contents PART 1 - DEFINITIONS

2018 Special Effects Video Contest ("Contest") Official Rules NO PURCHASE IS NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN.

Patent Attorney and Trade Mark Attorney Qualification and Registration Regulations 2009

In the Arbitration under Chapter 11 of the North American Free Trade Agreement and the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. Eli Lilly and Company.

Transcription:

CERTIFIED SPECIALIST PROGRAM STANDARDS FOR CERTIFICATION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW (PATENT/TRADEMARK/COPYRIGHT) Definition of Intellectual Property Law Specialty 1. The practice of Intellectual Property Law is the practice of law including Patent Law, Trademark Law, Copyright Law, Industrial Design, Integrated Circuit Typography, Trade Secrets and Plant Breeders Rights. 2. The practice of Patent Law is the practice of law relating to all aspects of the Patent Act and regulations, including the acquisition, protection, maintenance and enforcement of patent rights in the Patent Office and in the courts, and the licensing and sale of such rights. 3. The practice of Trademark Law is the practice of law relating to trademark, trade dress and related rights under the Trademarks Act and regulations and at common law. The practice of Trademark Law includes the acquisition, protection, maintenance and enforcement of trademark rights in the Trademarks Office and the courts, and the licensing and sale of such rights. 4. The practice of Copyright Law is the practice of law relating to rights under the Copyright Act and regulations. The practice of Copyright Law includes the acquisition, protection and enforcement of copyrights in the Copyright Office and before the Courts and Copyright Board, and the licensing and sale of such rights. Designation 5. An applicant who is certified as a specialist in patent law may be identified as a Certified Specialist (Intellectual Property Law: Patent). 6. An applicant who is certified as a specialist in patent and trademark law may be identified as a Certified Specialist (Intellectual Property Law: Patent/Trademark). 7. An applicant who is certified as a patent and copyright law specialist may be identified as a Certified Specialist (Intellectual Property Law: Patent/Copyright). 8. An applicant who is certified as a specialist in trademark law may be identified as a Certified Specialist (Intellectual Property Law: Trademark). 9. An applicant who is certified as a specialist in trademark and copyright may be identified as a Certified Specialist (Intellectual Property Law: Trademark/Copyright).

10. An applicant who is certified as a specialist in copyright law may be identified as a Certified Specialist (Intellectual Property Law: Copyright). 11. An applicant who is certified as a specialist in intellectual property law may be identified as a Certified Specialist (Intellectual Property Law: Patent/Trademark/Copyright). Achieving Specialist Certification in Intellectual Property Law 12. Applicants must comply with the requirements for certification set out in Policies Governing the Law Society s Certified Specialist Program ( Policies ), particularly those relating to: Minimum Years of Practice and Recent Experience; Substantial Involvement in the Specialty Area; Professional Development; References; Professional Standards; and Application Fee 13. Applicants must satisfy the following requirements in order to demonstrate their substantial involvement in the area(s) for which application is made. (a) practice concentration requirements: applicants seeking certification in one area of Intellectual Property Law will have devoted at least 30% of their practice concentration to such area or to Intellectual Property Law averaged over the 5 years of their recent experience; applicants seeking certification in 2 areas of Intellectual Property Law will have devoted at last 60% of their practice concentration to such areas or to Intellectual Property Law; averaged over the 5 years of their recent experience; and applicants seeking certification in all three areas of Intellectual Property Law will have devoted at least 90% of their practice concentration to Intellectual Property Law, averaged over the 5 years of their recent experience. (b) during the 5 years of their recent experience applicants will have attained broad and varied experience and a mastery of substantive law and procedures in the applicable area(s), and comply with the experience requirements for the applicable area(s) set out below. 11. In the event that applicants do not entirely meet the experience requirements, they may apply to the Society for consideration of their individual circumstances or their related (nonpractice) skills. Consideration will be given in circumstances where applicants have: (a) limited their practice in recent years to a particular area of intellectual property law or have been involved in matters of extraordinary length and complexity; or 2

(b) engaged in advanced course work or performed related activities such as teaching, authoring books or articles for publication, completing post-graduate or other studies, participating in the development and/or presentation of professional development programs, research, participating in the policy development process, drafting legislation and/or instruments, participating as active members on boards or tribunals, or on the executive of any organization related to intellectual property law or any other experience that applicants consider relevant to their application. Applicants applying for consideration under this paragraph must, in addition to the brief description of their practice required pursuant to paragraph 12, include with their application (c) a detailed description of their individual circumstances or related (non practice) skills; and (d) references from the institutions or organizations from which their experience is drawn, references from peers, samples of writing and/or research, and a complete list of publications. 12. All applicants must include a brief description (no more than 100 words) of the nature of their practice in relation to the specialty area(s) for which application is made. Intellectual Property Law Experience 13. During the 5 years of their recent experience, applicants must have complied with the experience requirements for the applicable specialty area(s) 14. Applicants are asked to place a check mark () next to the tasks they are selecting from the categories below to demonstrate their patent law and/or trademark law and/or copyright law experience and submit the completed Standards with the application package, along with any supplementary information required in the Standards. (a) Patent Law Experience 15. Applicants have 3 routes to meeting the experience requirements: Route 1: Applicants must have performed all the tasks in Category 1 Route 2: Applicants must have performed all the tasks in any 2 of Categories 2, 3 or 4. Route 3: Applicants who do not meet the Requirements in routes 1 and 2 may be considered for certification on a case-by-case basis. Applicants applying under this route must indicate which of the task requirements in any or all of the categories they have completed and provide a brief description of the tasks so as to demonstrate expertise in the field of Patent Law and related rights including Industrial Design, Integrated Circuit Typography, Trade Secrets and Plant Breeders Rights. 3

Category 1: Patent Prosecution (a) Registration as a Patent Agent: Has successfully written and passed the Canadian Patent Agents Examination and is currently and has been continuously, for the previous 5 years, a registered Canadian Patent Agent in good standing with the Canadian Commissioner of Patents. (b) Direct Prosecution Drafted or supervised the drafting and filing of 5 originating applications Prepared or supervised the preparation and filing of at least 5 responses to formalities request Prepared or supervised the preparation and filing of at least 5 substantive office action responses (c) Prosecution of Foreign Patent Applications Corresponding to a Canadian Patent Application Supervised the filing of at least 5 applications Supervised the reporting and recommendations for action on at least 5 substantive office action responses Category 2: Patent Licensing Prepared or supervised the preparation of at least 5 licenses involving either pending patents, issued patents, know how, or improvements Prepared or supervised the preparation of at least 1 license involving foreign patent rights Acted as patent counsel in at least two commercial transactions Category 3: Patent Opinions Prepared or supervised the preparation of at least 2 substantial infringement opinions Prepared or supervised the preparation of at least 2 substantial validity opinions Prepared or supervised the preparation of at least 1 substantial right to use opinion Category 4: Patent Litigation Drafted or supervised the drafting of pleadings in 2 legal proceedings Acted as lead counsel on at least 2 procedural motions Acted as lead counsel or junior counsel in at least 1 trial or appeal, or 2 substantive motions such as motions for injunctive relief or summary judgment 4

Prepared or supervised the preparation of at least 2 affidavits of documents Conducted at least 2 examinations for discovery (b) Trademark Law Experience 16. Applicants have 2 routes to meeting the experience requirement: Route 1: Applicants must have performed all the tasks in any 3 of the 4 Categories. Route 2: Applicants who do not meet the experience requirements in Route 1 may be considered for certification on a case-by-case basis. Applicants applying under this Route must indicate which of the task requirements in any or all of the categories they have completed and provide a brief description of the tasks so as to demonstrate expertise in the field of Trademark Law and related rights including domain names. Category 1: Trademark Prosecution (a) Registration as a Trademark Agent Has been continuously for the previous 5 years a registered Canadian trademark agent in good standing with the Canadian Registrar of Trademarks or is a member of a firm that is registered as a Canadian trademark agent and in good standing with the Canadian Registrar of Trademarks. (b) Direct Prosecution Drafted or supervised the drafting and filing of 10 trademark applications; Prepared or supervised the preparation and filing of at least 5 substantive office action responses; Prepared or supervised the preparation and filing of at least 5 statements of opposition; Prepared or supervised the preparation and filing of evidence in at least 5 opposition proceedings or section 45 proceedings; Prepared or supervised the preparation of at least 5 written arguments in either opposition proceedings or section 45 proceedings. Conducted at least 2 oral hearings in opposition proceedings or section 45 proceedings. Category 2: Trademark Licensing Prepared or supervised the preparation of at least 5 licenses involving trademarks, trade dress or related rights; 5

Prepared or supervised the preparation of at least 1 license involving foreign trademark, trade dress or related rights; Acted as trademark counsel in at least 2 commercial transactions; Category 3: Trademark Opinions Prepared or supervised the preparation of at least 2 substantial infringement opinions involving trademark, trade dress or related rights under the Trademarks Act or at common law; Prepared or supervised the preparation of at least 2 substantial validity opinions involving trademark, trade dress or related rights under the Trademarks Act or at common law; Prepared or supervised the preparation of at least 10 registrability opinions; Category 4: Trademark Litigation Drafted or supervised the drafting of pleadings in 2 legal proceedings; Acted as lead counsel on at least 2 procedural motions; Acted as lead counsel or junior counsel in at least 1 trial or appeal, or 2 substantive motions such as motions for injunctive relief or summary judgment; Prepared or supervised the preparation of at least 2 affidavits of documents; Conducted at least 2 examinations for discovery or 2 substantive cross examinations; (c) Copyright Law Experience 17. Applicants have 2 routes to meeting the experience requirement: Route 1: Applicants must have performed all the tasks in any 2 of the 3 Categories. Route 2: Applicants who do not meet the experience requirements may be considered for certification on a case-by-case basis. Applicants applying under this Route must indicate which of the tasks requirements in any or all of the categories they have completed and provide a brief description of the task so as do demonstrate expertise in the field of Copyright Law and related rights including Industrial Design and Integrated Circuits Typography. Category 1: Copyright Licensing Drafted or supervised the drafting and filing of 5 applications for registration of copyright 6

Prepared or supervised the preparation of at least 5 copyright; Prepared or supervised the preparation of at least 1 license involving foreign copyright rights Acted as copyright counsel in at least 2 commercial transactions involving copyrights; Category 2: Copyright Opinions Prepared or supervised the preparation of at least 2 substantial infringement opinions involving rights under the Copyright Act; Prepared or supervised the preparation of at least 2 substantial opinions regarding the ownership, authorship and or validity of copyrights; Category 3: Copyright Litigation Drafted or supervised the drafting of pleadings in 2 legal proceedings or drafted or supervised the drafting of equivalent documents in proceedings before the Copyright Board; Acted as lead counsel on at least 2 procedural motions before the Courts or the Copyright Board; Acted as lead counsel or junior counsel in at least 1 trial, hearing or appeal before the courts or Copyright Board, or 2 substantive motions such as motions for injunctive relief or summary judgment before the courts; Prepared or supervised the preparation of at least 2 affidavits of documents or equivalent productions before the Copyright Board; Conducted at least 2 examinations for discovery or corresponding discovery process (interrogatory or otherwise) before the Copyright Board. Professional Development 18. Applicants must attest to the completion of the professional development requirements. The requirements are: (a) not less than 50 hours of self-study; and (b) not less than 12 hours of relevant professional development, in the two years immediately preceding the date of application date and any other year within the five years of recent experience. The 12 hour professional development requirement may be met through participation at CLE programs or through alternative methods such as, but not limited to: (c) teaching or being guest lecturer on a course in the specialty area; (d) writing and editing of published books or articles relating to the specialty area; (e) graduate or post-graduate studies in the specialty area; 7

References (f) involvement in the development and/or presentation of professional development programs related to the specialty area; (g) involvement in the development of policy related to the specialty area. 19. Applicants must submit 4 references from legal practitioners eligible to practise law in Ontario who have direct knowledge of the applicant s work in the specialty area in the 5 years of the applicant s recent experience and can attest to the applicant s competent performance of the tasks outlined under Patent Law Experience and/or Trademark Law Experience and/or Copyright Law Experience. Applicants must provide to the referees a copy of the completed Standards to let them know which categories they have selected to demonstrate their experience. 20. Applicants should not include as reference: judges, partners, associates, co-workers, employers, employees, relatives, 3 rd party neutrals, members of the Certified Specialist Board, benchers or employees of the Law Society. 21. The Statements of Reference must be submitted with the application to the Law Society in confidential envelopes which have been sealed, signed and dated by the referees. Envelopes which have been opened or appear to have been tampered with will not be accepted. Application Assessment 22. The Society will consider the totality of an applicant s practice in the relevant specialty area(s), the applicant s Professional Development Report and references. 23. Applicants should not assume that completion of all of the enumerated practice concentration and experience requirements will automatically entitle them to certification as a specialist. 24. Applicants may be required to provide additional information to the Society facilitate the assessment process. 25. The Society may make discreet inquiries, as it deems appropriate, to determine the applicant s eligibility and suitability for certification as a specialist. Last Revised: November 27, 2007 8