European Union. EU key messages. BTWC Meeting of Experts on Strengthening National Implementation. Geneva, 13 August 2018

Similar documents
COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP)

AS DELIVERED. EU Statement by

Preparatory Committee for the 2020 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) - EU Statement

European Union. Statement on the occasion of the 62 nd General Conference of the IAEA

FSC CHAIRPERSON'S PROGRESS REPORT TO THE EIGHTEENTH MEETING OF THE MINISTERIAL COUNCIL

Contributions of the United Nations in Implementing Resolution 1540

876th PLENARY MEETING OF THE FORUM

770th PLENARY MEETING OF THE FORUM

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540 and the CBRN Security Culture

Introduction to The Biological Weapons Convention and the 2017 Meeting of States Parties

========== On behalf of the European Union. 96th session of the IOM Council

Prohlášení Statement Déclaration

NEWSLETTER. No. 49 / August 2013 IN FOCUS

MALTA. I have the honour to speak on behalf of the European Union.

798th PLENARY MEETING OF THE FORUM

786th PLENARY MEETING OF THE FORUM

I. Biological arms control

When the EU met the western Balkans: Ready for the wedding?

CEFTA Trade Facilitation Agenda

The Stability Instrument: The Longer-Term Component. November 2009 Louis-Victor Bril, DG External Relations

United Nations General Assembly 60 th Session First Committee. New York, 3 October 3 November 2005

604th PLENARY MEETING OF THE FORUM

UNIDEM CAMPUS FOR THE SOUTHERN MEDITERRANEAN COUNTRIES

NEWSLETTER. Accession of Croatia to the. No. 50 / September & October 2013 IN FOCUS

Draft Report of the 2018 Meeting of Experts on review of developments in the field of science and technology related to the Convention

European Food Safety Authority s cooperation with the Western Balkan IPA countries now and in the future

854th PLENARY MEETING OF THE FORUM

National Action Plan for the Implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540 (2004) MEXICO

Briefing of the Security Council by Ambassador Román Oyarzun Marchesi Chair, 1540 Committee 22 December 2015

BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION: MEETINGS IN 2013

OSCE Permanent Council No Vienna, 30 August 2018

EUP2P. The Dual use Regulation: general frame, control regimes and weaknesses

NEWSLETTER 59 EU-OUTREACH THE EU ATT OUTREACH PROJECT REGIONAL SEMINAR TO SUPPORT THE IMPLEMEN- TATION OF THE ATT FOR LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN

A Call to Action to End Forced Labour, Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking

The Biological Weapons Convention

Contracting Parties to the Ramsar Convention

TOWARDS MORE DISASTER RESILIENT SOCIETIES The EUR-OPA contribution

ALBANIAN STATE EXPORT CONTROL AUTHORITY

United action towards the total elimination of nuclear weapons

Outreach to Third Countries Methods, Risks and Challenges

759th PLENARY MEETING OF THE FORUM

Human Rights Council adopts New Important resolution on NHRIs

Fragile situations, conflict and victim assistance

The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 429 persons in January 2018, and 137 of these were convicted offenders.

2nd Ministerial Conference of the Prague Process Action Plan

BWC/MSP/2018/MX.1/3. I. Introduction. 2 November Original: English Meeting Geneva, 4-7 December 2018

Accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the EU- a debate in the Bundestag

NEWSLETTER 66 EU-OUTREACH EU-OUTREACH IN EXPORT CONTROL OF DUAL-USE ITEMS (LTP)

814th PLENARY MEETING OF THE FORUM

THE REVIEW CONFERENCE PROCESS

The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 375 persons in March 2018, and 136 of these were convicted offenders.

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 14 June /06 PESC 595 CODUN 21 COARM 28

Biological Risk Management and United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540

Mapping: International activity by states and the UN on armed drones

IOM International Organization for Migration OIM Organisation Internationale pour les Migrations IOM Internationale Organisatie voor Migratie REAB

Embassies and Travel Documents Overview

Evaluation of the Good Governance for Medicines programme ( ) Brief summary of findings

Translation from Norwegian

REGIONAL WORKSHOP. ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF UNSC RESOLUTION 1540 (2004) May 9 and I O, 2013, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia

Country pairings for the second cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

Country pairings for the first cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

The Biological Weapons Convention Meeting of Experts August 2010

The Role of RCC to strengthen Regional Cooperation in South East Europe. Economic and Social Development

CUSTOMS AND EXCISE ACT, AMENDMENT OF SCHEDULE NO. 2 (NO. 2/3/5)

Budapest Process 14 th Meeting of the Budapest Process Working Group on the South East European Region. Budapest, 3-4 June Summary/Conclusions

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540 (2004) and the Biological Weapons Convention: Synergy and Complementarity

Draft Beirut Progress Report Monitoring progress in implementing the Vientiane Action Plan from the First up to the Second Meeting of States Parties

Czech Republic Development Cooperation in 2014

51. Items relating to the rule of law

COUNCIL NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES. C 228/4 Official Journal of the European Union

8193/11 GL/mkl 1 DG C I

The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) returned 444 persons in August 2018, and 154 of these were convicted offenders.

29. Strasbourg / Kehl Summit Declaration

Country pairings for the first review cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

The NPIS is responsible for forcibly returning those who are not entitled to stay in Norway.

The Global State of Corruption Control. Who Succeeds, Who Fails and What Can Be Done About It

Activities undertaken by the EC to alleviate the economic situation in the Western Balkans

The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 412 persons in December 2017, and 166 of these were convicted offenders.

2017 BWC Implementation Support Unit staff costs

Return of convicted offenders

Information note by the Secretariat [V O T E D] Additional co-sponsors of draft resolutions/decisions

Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption: country pairings for the second review cycle

Asylum Levels and Trends in Industrialized Countries. First Quarter, 2005

LIST OF CONTRACTING STATES AND OTHER SIGNATORIES OF THE CONVENTION (as of January 11, 2018)

EU-Western Balkans Ministerial Forum on Justice and Home Affairs. 6-7 November, Zagreb. Presidency Statement

General Assembly. United Nations A/66/442. Globalization and interdependence. I. Introduction. Report of the Second Committee* * *

Delays in the registration process may mean that the real figure is higher.

Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption: country pairings for the second review cycle

A) List of third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders. 1. States

Country pairings for the first review cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

Country pairings for the second review cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

AUSTRALIA S REFUGEE RESPONSE NOT THE MOST GENEROUS BUT IN TOP 25

Asylum Trends. Monthly Report on Asylum Applications in The Netherlands. February 2018

Economic and Social Council

Global Harmonisation of Automotive Lighting Regulations

European Union GLOBAL COMPACT ON REFUGEES. Second Formal consultations on the Global Compact on Refugees: Geneva, March 2018.

Report of the 2018 Meeting of States Parties 1 *

CCW/P.V/CONF/2018/5. Draft final document. I. Introduction. 29 November Original: English

NOTE BY THE TECHNICAL SECRETARIAT INVITATION

The Multidimensional Financial Inclusion MIFI 1

Transcription:

European Union EU key messages BTWC Meeting of Experts on Strengthening National Implementation Geneva, 13 August 2018 Mr Chair, I have the honour to speak on behalf of the European Union. The Candidate Countries the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia *, Montenegro *, Serbia * and Albania *, the country of the Stabilisation and Association Process and potential candidate Bosnia and Herzegovina, as well as Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova and Georgia align themselves with this statement. We are pleased to see you chairing this important Meeting of Experts on Strengthening National Implementation and would like to assure you of the EU s and its Member States' full support in your endeavours. The Meeting of Experts provides an excellent opportunity to discuss ways to strengthen and support national implementation of the BTWC. The EU would like to encourage all States Parties to adopt and sustain robust national implementation measures, including administrative, judicial and criminal legislation; to exercise effective export controls in a manner consistent with national law and practices; as well as ensure control over pathogenic microorganisms and toxins in the framework of the BTWC. We continue to pay attention to compliance with obligations under UN Security Council Resolution 1540 (2004) and subsequent resolutions, where relevant to the reduction and * The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia and Albania continue to be part of the Stabilisation and Association Process. 1

elimination of the risk of biological or toxin weapons being acquired or used for terrorist purposes, including the risk of non-state actor access to materials, equipment, and knowledge that could be used in the development and production of biological and toxin weapons. In this context, the EU Member States have upheld their longstanding commitment to UNSCR 1540 not only through national implementation, but through providing assistance to third countries. In 2017, a fourth consecutive EU assistance programme was adopted, amounting to over 2.6 million Euros (EU Council Decision 2017/809/CFSP). Its implementation has been entrusted to the UN Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA) in New York, in close cooperation with relevant regional organisations, in particular the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). The EU continues to provide support to BTWC States Parties at their request, in particular by funding national implementation activities carried out by the BTWC Implementation Support Unit (ISU), worth of more than 2.3 million Euros (EU Council Decision 2016/51/CFSP). Extended assistance programmes were launched in 2017 in ten selected States Parties: Colombia, Cameroon, Côte d'ivoire, Iraq, Lebanon, Malawi, Malaysia, Nepal, Sierra Leone and Yemen. Structured Action Plans have been developed, tailored for each beneficiary country on the basis of their needs and priorities, to facilitate capacity building assistance, notably drafting of legislation, biosafety/biosecurity training, dual use export control, preparation and submission of Confidence Building Measures, awareness-raising for scientists, and emergency response planning. The main challenges faced in the preparation, implementation and follow-up of in-country assistance relate to the need to have a proper BTWC architecture at the national level and effective coordination among national stakeholders. A workshop organised for international assistance providers in 2017 in Geneva resulted in a number of good practices and lessons learned, which are available on the BTWC ISU website. These include: Good practices for successful assistance Ensuring ownership and long-term commitment of the State Party to the assistance programme. Identifying a national focal point will contribute to the effective implementation of assistance activities and building institutional memory; 2

Establishing a solid legal and regulatory framework to sustain the implementation of BTWC related obligations at the national level. In this context, responsibilities between the competent national entities need to be clearly defined to avoid unnecessary tensions and delays; Adopting a methodological approach to assistance provision, including by identifying the best way to provide assistance to a country in the most efficient, sustainable and cost-effective manner; Following up on the assistance delivered. National Action Plans, such as those developed by Cameroon, Côte d Ivoire, Malawi and Sierra Leone are key to ensuring sustainability and impact of the results achieved; Identifying priorities and narrowing down topics when designing assistance programmes, as it is not possible to provide in-depth assistance in all areas; Approaches such as the Results Based Management framework, particularly its evaluation tools, can provide an effective basis for developing, monitoring and evaluating the progress of an assistance programme. Coordination and cooperation in providing assistance Coordination and cooperation are crucial, both within the beneficiary State Party and among the assistance providers; Pre-existing tools should be fully utilised and taken advantage of; identifying stakeholders and mapping the existing frameworks and mechanisms is a prerequisite for successful coordination and for creating synergies during the implementation of the programme; Exploring a cooperative approach with each beneficiary State Party rather than imposing external coordination models. The EU continues to support the effective implementation of the BTWC also through other assistance programmes such as the Centres of Excellence on the mitigation of chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) risks. We invite interested Delegations to attend 3

the EU side event on Legislative Assistance in BTWC Implementation today (Monday, 13 August 2018) at 13:15. Transparency and confidence-building measures We invite all States Parties to support the ongoing efforts to enhancing transparency and building confidence in compliance, including through necessary revisions to the current Confidence-Building Measures. States Parties should be able to demonstrate compliance, inter alia, by means of interactive information exchanges, such as mandatory or voluntary declarations, as well as enhanced transparency about their capabilities, activities and actions, including voluntary and other on-site measures. Voluntary initiatives and exercises The EU and its Member States continue to promote voluntary peer review and transparency exercises involving States Parties in the context of the BTWC. The objective of these initiatives is to enhance transparency, to improve exchanges of information and good practices on national implementation regarding, for instance, capabilities, activities and actions for implementation, and to provide reassurance on compliance. We would like to congratulate Morocco for successfully conducting a peer review exercise that was organised with EU support in Rabat and in Casablanca in May 2017. Sixteen international experts from ten States Parties participated in this exercise which contributed to strengthening national implementation, improving confidence in compliance by increased transparency, and deepening international cooperation. We also welcome the upcoming peer review exercise in Tbilisi, Georgia in November 2018, supported by Germany. Such initiatives build upon earlier exercises carried out by EU Member States, notably by France in 2013, BENELUX countries in 2015, Germany in 2016 and Spain in 2015 and 2017. The EU and its Member States remain ready to continue cooperation with States Parties in this regard. CBM declarations We believe there are several ways to increase the relevance and comprehensiveness of CBMforms: 4

Examining annual CBM-forms as the regular national declaration tool on implementation and compliance and developing them further with this objective in mind; Reducing to the largest extent possible remaining complexities of CBM-forms and removing potential ambiguities; Ensuring a role for the ISU to support States Parties national points of contact in compiling their CBMs, inter alia, through organising regional seminars and providing training for electronic submission of CBM-forms; Working to increase the participation in, and the quality and comprehensiveness of CBMs returns, by expanding the functionality of the electronic CBM facility and making it, as well as the CBM guide, available in all UN official languages on the BTWC website. We call on all States Parties to increase their participation in, and the quality and comprehensiveness of annual CBMs and make use of the CBM guide and the upcoming electronic CBM facility, which have received EU funding. Thank you, Mr Chair 5