Early Resolution Mechanism for Patent Disputes Regarding Approved Drug Products - Canada

Similar documents
The Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations: What patents are eligible to be listed on the register?

Are the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations Working?

PURDUE PHARMA AND EURO-CELTIQUE S.A. and PURDUE PHARMA. and COLLEGIUM PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. MAPI LIFE SCIENCES CANADA INC. AND THE MINISTER OF HEALTH

Canada Intellectual property enforcement

T H E W O R L D J O U R N A L O N J U R I S T I C P O L I T Y. BOLAR EXEMPTION VS. DATA EXCLUSIVITY: RIGHT TO HEALTH vs RIGHT OF PATENT HOLDER

Notwithstanding Article 29, any invention that is liable to injure public order, morality or public health shall not be patented (Article 32).

Answer of the Canadian National Group

Litigation Webinar Series. Hatch-Waxman 101. Chad Shear Principal, San Diego

PATENT, TRADEMARK & COPYRIGHT!

Ordinary or Extraordinary: The NOC Regulations

TRIPS Article 28 Rights Conferred. 1. A patent shall confer on its owner the following exclusive rights:

Global Access to Medicines Program Compiled by Stephanie Rosenberg. December 2, This chart compares provisions from the following texts:

Norway. Norway. By Rune Nordengen, Bull & Co Advokatfirma AS

Remedies: Injunction and Damages. 1. General

TEVA CANADA LIMITED. and PFIZER CANADA INC., PFIZER INC. AND PFIZER IRELAND PHARMACEUTICALS REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

Second medical use or indication claims

The Korean Drug Approval-Patent Linkage System: A Comparison with the US Hatch-Waxman Act

BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-sixth Year of the Republic of India as follows:-

The Patents (Amendment) Act,

PATENTED MEDICINE PRICES REVIEW BOARD. IN THE MATTER OF the Patent Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. P-4, as amended

ETHIOPIA A PROCLAMATION CONCERNING INVENTIONS, MINOR INVENTIONS AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS PROCLAMATION NO. 123/1995 ENTRY INTO FORCE: May 10, 1995

Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web

CANADA: INTERNATIONAL TREATIES AND THE PROMISE OF THE PATENT

Frequently Asked Questions. Trade/service marks: What is a trade/service mark?

Comparative Analysis of the U.S. Intellectual Property Proposal and Peruvian Law

People s Republic of China State Intellectual Property Office of China

Case 1:12-cv SLR Document 18 Filed 08/27/12 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

REPUBLIC OF VANUATU BILL FOR THE PATENTS ACT NO. OF 1999

Patent Enforcement in India

AUSTRALIA Patents Act 1990 Compilation date: 24 February 2017 Includes amendments up to: Act No. 61, 2016 Registered: 27 February 2017

Patent Enforcement UK perspectives

From Law of Patents, Layout Designs of Integrated Circuits, Plant Varieties, and Industrial Designs, Chapter Two:

PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES FOR HEARINGS BEFORE THE MINING AND LANDS COMMISSIONER

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 01/19/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Caraco V. Novo Nordisk: Antitrust Implications

Validity in the US and Canada: The Challenges of Patent Enforcement. Lawrence T. Welch Assistant General Patent Counsel

DHS Patentanwaltsgesellschaft mbh Munich. RECENT RULINGS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE ON SPCs

Note: When any ambiguity of interpretation is found in this provisional translation, the Japanese text shall prevail.

FDA, PATENT TERM EXTENSIONS AND THE HATCH WAXMAN ACT. Dr.Sumesh Reddy- Dr. Reddys Lab Hyderabad-

IP Litigation in Life Sciences Germany 2016

Pharmaceutical Patent Settlement Cases: Mixed Signals for Settling Patent Litigation

The use of prosecution history in post-grant patent proceedings. The Groups are invited to answer the following questions under their national laws.

Patent Act, B.E (1979) As Amended until Patent Act (No.3), B.E (1999) Translation

2012 Winston & Strawn LLP

Recent developments in US law: Remedies and damages for improper patent listings in the FDA s Orange Book

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/13/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Second medical use or indication claims

Patents in Europe 2016/2017. Helping business compete in the global economy

Understanding the Unified Patent Court: The Next Rocket-Docket for Patent Owners?

POST LICENSING GUIDANCE DOCUMENT NATURAL HEALTH PRODUCTS DIRECTORATE

Second medical use or indication claims. Mr. Antonio Ray ORTIGUERA Angara Abello Concepcion Regala & Cruz Law Offices Philippines

Intellectual Property Department Hong Kong, China. Contents

Second medical use or indication claims. [Please insert name last name in CAPITAL letters please]

Notice. Re: Draft Guidance Document: Cancellation of a Drug Identification Number (DIN) and Notification of the Discontinuation of Sales

Patent Litigation. Block 2; Module Plaintiff /Claimant. Essentials. The patent proprietor as plaintiff/claimant in infringement proceedings

ONTARIO SECURITIES COMMISSION PRACTICE GUIDELINE

CHAPTER 2 AUTHORS AND PATENT OWNERS Article 5. Author of the Invention, Utility Model, and Industrial Design Article 6.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO TRANSFER OR STAY

MATERIAL TRANSFER AGREEMENT

The Unitary Patent Plan Beta Update on National Case Law in Europe

Uniform Class Proceedings Act

Injunctions for patent infringement after the ebay decision Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto

JOINT DOH-DTI-IPO-BFAD ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO

PHARMACEUTICAL LAW GROUP PC

The ITC's Potential Role In Hatch-Waxman Litigation

Case 1:10-cv JCJ Document 20 Filed 04/14/10 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Sughrue Mion, PLLC Washington, Tokyo, San Diego, Silicon Valley 7/2/2012

US-China Business Council Comments on the Draft Measures for the Compulsory Licensing of Patents

EUROPEAN GENERIC MEDICINES ASSOCIATION

Taiwan International Patent & Law Office

Compilation date: 24 February Includes amendments up to: Act No. 61, Registered: 27 February 2017

Post-Grant Proceedings at the Patent Office After Passage of the America Invents Act

Attorneys for Defendants Watson Laboratories, Inc. and Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

SUCCESSFULLY LITIGATING METHOD OF USE PATENTS IN THE U.S.

RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE OF THE ONTARIO COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORKERS AND SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS INDEX

M/s. BDR Pharmaceuticals International Pvt. Ltd Applicant VERSUS

SFIR / AIPPI 31 August Amendment of patent claims in France. Partial revocation of a claim by Court (only possibility until January 1, 2009)

REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE GOVERNMENT GAZETTE ACTS SUPPLEMENT. Published by Authority NO. 28] FRIDAY, DECEMBER 21 [2012 REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE

[English translation by WIPO] Questionnaire on Exceptions and Limitations to Patent Rights

Pregabalin: Where stand plausibility, Swiss-form claims, late amendment and more?

FINAL PROPOSAL OF THE ACT ON AMENDMENTS TO THE PATENT ACT

Patent Term Extensions in Taiwan

Article 2: A patent of invention shall not be granted in respect of the following:

4. COMPARISON OF THE INDIAN PATENT LAW WITH THE PATENT LAWS IN U.S., EUROPE AND CHINA

SWITZERLAND: Patent Litigation CHAMBERS 2017 DOING BUSINESS IN BRAZIL: Global Practice Guides. Switzerland LAW & PRACTICE: p.<?> p.3. p.<?> p.

IBC s 20 th Conference on. Paediatric Extensions Issues and Challenges. Christopher Stothers 22 February 2012

Guidance Document for the Precursor Control Regulations APPLICATION FOR CLASS B PRECURSOR REGISTRATION

EXTENDING THE LIFE OF A PATENT IN THE UNITED STATES

Case 1:10-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/05/10 Page 1 of 20

For a patent to be valid, it needs to be useful, novel, nonobvious, and adequately

We have carefully considered the Petition.! For the reasons described below, the Petition is granted.

Client Privilege in Intellectual Property Advice

The Hatch-Waxman Act and Market Exclusivity for Generic Manufacturers: An Entitlement or an Incentive

America Invents Act H.R (Became Law: September 16, 2011) Michael K. Mutter Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch October 11-12, 2011

CZECH REPUBLIC Utility Model Act

Questionnaire on Exceptions and Limitations to Patent Rights. The answers to this questionnaire have been provided on behalf of:

Young EPLAW Congress. Bolar provision: a European tour. Brussels, 27 April 2015 Guillaume Bensussan Kathy Osgerby Agathe Michel de Cazotte

The National Center of Intellectual Property Belarus. Contents

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants.

WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS OF THE RESPONDENT (Alexion's Motion to Strike Evidence as Inadmissible) PART 1 - OVERVIEW

Transcription:

Early Resolution Mechanism for Patent Disputes Regarding Approved Drug Products - Canada Pharma Workshop 4 AIPPI Toronto September 16, 2014 Warren Sprigings Direct Dial: +1-416-777-2273 warren@sprigings.com Sun Life Financial Centre, East Tower 3250 Bloor Street West, Suite 715 Toronto, Ontario, M8X 2X9 Tel: +1-416-777-0888 Fax: +1-416-777-0881 www.sprigings.com

Presentation Overview The Pharmaceutical Regulatory Regime in Canada The Drug Approval Process in Canada The Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations The Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) 2

The Pharmaceutical Regulatory Regime in Canada 1. The Food and Drugs Act and Regulations Governs the approval and sale of drugs Governs the evaluation of drug effectiveness and safety 2. The Patent Act Provides a period of market exclusivity for an invention in exchange for the disclosure of the invention to the public 3. The Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) ( PM(NOC) ) Regulations Provides a linkage mechanism between the drug approval system and the patent system Attempts to strike a balance between effective patent enforcement for new and innovative drugs and the timely entry of their lower priced generic competitors Replaced compulsory licencing system 3

The Drug Approval Process in Canada All drugs must be approved for sale and marketing by Health Canada. Any manufacturer seeking approval of a "new drug must submit a New Drug Submission ( NDS ) to Health Canada which sets out evidence of efficacy and safety. Once approved, Health Canada issues a Notice of Compliance ( NOC ), which allows the drug to be marketed and sold in Canada. 4

The Drug Approval Process in Canada A manufacturer seeking approval of a generic drug can submit an Abbreviated New Drug Submission ( ANDS ) to Health Canada which demonstrates that the generic formulation is bioequivalent to the brand formulation. Once approved, Health Canada issues an NOC, which allows the drug to be marketed and sold in Canada. 5

PM(NOC) Regulations enacted in 1993 Summary proceedings not a trial and no right to oral or documentary discovery An application based on affidavit evidence and crossexamination (outside of court no live testimony) Patentee retains the right to commence infringement action if unsuccessful in a PM(NOC) proceeding Generic manufacturer retains the right to commence impeachment action/declaration of non-infringement if unsuccessful in a PM(NOC) proceeding 6

ss. 3 and 4 - Patent List and Register Establishes the linkage between drug patents and the NOC system s. 5 Notice of Allegation ( NOA ) Provides the procedure for the generic drug manufacturer to address the listed patents of the brand-name drug ss. 6 and 7 Proceedings Under the Regulations Describes the procedure for PM(NOC) proceedings s. 8 Damages Establishes a generic manufacturer s right to damages from PM(NOC) proceedings 7

The Patent List and Register (ss. 3 and 4) The Minister of Health is required to maintain a public register of patents that pertain to drugs for which NOCs have been issued. These patents are submitted by the patentee (or party having consent of patentee) when an NDS is filed or within 30 days of the grant of the patent. Patents which are listed on the register are entitled to protection under the PM(NOC) Regulations. 8

The Patent List and Register (ss. 3 and 4) In order to be listed on the patent register the patent must contain: (a) a claim for the medicinal ingredient; (b) a claim for the formulation; (c) a claim for the dosage form; or (d) a claim for the use of the medicinal ingredient, and the medicinal ingredient, formulation, dosage form or use has been approved through the issuance of a notice of compliance in respect of the submission. 9

Notice of Allegation Procedure (s. 5) When a generic manufacturer files a drug submissoin that references a drug which has patents listed on the register, the PM(NOC) Regulations are activated. Before a generic manufacturer may obtain an NOC for their drug, they must make an allegation of invalidity or non-infringement against each patent on the register in a Notice of Allegation ( NOA ). Otherwise, the generic manufacturer needs to wait until all patents on the register that relate to the reference brand-name drug have expired. 10

Notice of Allegation Procedure (s. 5) The NOA is a letter from the generic manufacturer served on the patent holder (or the person who files the patent list) and filed with Health Canada. The NOA sets out the allegations of noninfringement and/or invalidity relied on by the generic manufacturer. The NOA cannot be amended 11

Proceedings Under the Regulations (ss. 6 and 7) Within 45 days of receiving an NOA, the patentee may commence an application in the Federal Court for an order prohibiting the Minister of Health from issuing an NOC to the generic manufacturer. The patentee must argue that the generic manufacturer s allegations of invalidity and/or non-infringement as set out in its NOA are not justified. 12

Proceedings Under the Regulations (ss. 6 and 7) After a proceeding has been initiated under the PM(NOC) Regulations, the Minister may not issue an NOC for the generic drug until the expiry of 24 months unless: 1. The patent(s) listed on the register have expired; or 2. The court has found the allegations of noninfringement and/or invalidity in the NOA to have been justified. This mechanism effectively provides for an automatic injunction preventing the generic manufacturer from marketing or selling the drug in Canada. 13

Proceedings Under the Regulations (ss. 6 and 7) The proceedings under the PM(NOC) Regulations are intended to be summary in nature and must be completed within the 24 month period. These proceedings do not allow for oral or documentary discovery or live testimony. Evidence is tendered in the form of affidavits and crossexamination transcripts. 14

Proceedings Under the Regulations (ss. 6 and 7) At the conclusion of the PM(NOC) proceeding, the court will either: 1. grant a prohibition order preventing the issuance of an NOC for the generic drug until the expiry of the patent(s); or 2. dismiss the application for the prohibition order, allowing for the issuance of an NOC for the generic drug. 15

After the PM(NOC) Proceeding If unsuccessful in the PM(NOC) proceeding, the patentee: - can appeal the decision to the Court of Appeal prior to the issuance of an NOC to the generic manufacturer (once the NOC issues the appeal is considered moot); - can commence an infringement action once the generic manufacturer obtains its NOC and makes, uses or sells the infringing product. 16

After the PM(NOC) Proceeding If unsuccessful under the PM(NOC) Regulations, the generic manufacturer: - has a right to appeal to the Court of Appeal; and - has the right to commence an impeachment action/or an action for a declaration for noninfringement. 17

After the PM(NOC) Proceeding As stated by the Court of Appeal: The basic principle is that the extraordinary procedures provided by the Regulations are for the public law purpose of enabling the Trial Division to prevent a public officer from issuing a Notice of Compliance, designed for the protection of the public's health, if the patentee can show that the patents, as referred to by a generic company in its notice of allegation seeking a Notice of Compliance, are not invalid and would be infringed. This is a finding of the Court for the limited purpose of deciding whether or not the Minister can issue a Notice of Compliance: no one could suppose that this is a scheme designed for res judicata determinations of the scope or validity of patents. 18

Damages (s. 8) If the patentee (applicant) is unsuccessful in the PM(NOC) proceeding, it will be liable to the generic manufacturer for damages. These damages compensate a generic manufacturer for lost profits on sales it would have made during the period it was prohibited from selling its product due to the PM(NOC) proceedings. 19

The Patented Medicines (Notice of Damages (s. 8) Compliance) Regulations the patentee is liable to the generic for any loss suffered from (1) the date it received Health Canada s approval to sell its product (subject to PM(NOC) Regulations) to (2) the date the proceeding instituted under s. 6 is dismissed by the court, reversed on appeal, or otherwise discontinued or withdrawn. 20

The Patented Medicines (Notice of Damages (s. 8) Compliance) Regulations The generic manufacturer must commence an action to recover damages from the patentee. The generic manufacturer must establish sales it would have made and its profits during the period it was excluded from the market. 21

The Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations Damages (s. 8) In the past few years there have been damages awarded to generic companies in the 100s of million dollars. Even so, not a significant deterrent to patent holders in commencing PMNOC proceedings Patentee Profits >> Generic Profits (generic product 25% of selling price of patentee) 22

The Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) A comprehensive free trade agreement between Canada and the European Union that has been the subject of ongoing negotiation for many years. It was announced that the agreement had been agreed to in principle in October 2013, and last month it was officially confirmed that the text of CETA had been finalized. The final text of CETA has not been released. 23

The Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) CETA will require Canada to make two significant changes to its patent law: 1. providing an effective right of appeal from PM(NOC) decisions for patentees; and 2.an extension of patent term for basic patents to compensate for delay in obtaining market authorization (maximum of 2 years) 24

The Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) Canada will likely implement changes under CETA late in 2015. In order to provide patent holders with an effective right of appeal, Canada may provide for an action (similar to US model) or if a PM(NOC) decision is appealed the right to commence a subsequent action is forfeited. 25

Thank you Warren Sprigings Direct Dial: +1-416-777-2273 warren@sprigings.com Sun Life Financial Centre, East Tower 3250 Bloor Street West, Suite 715 Toronto, Ontario, M8X 2X9 Tel: +1-416-777-0888 Fax: +1-416-777-0881 www.sprigings.com