PARKER, et al., THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF PURSUANT TO RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.

Similar documents
STIPULATION FOR JOINT APPENDIX. KAMALA D. HARRIs Attorney General of California. DOUGLAS J. WOODS Senior Assistant Attorney General

Fresno County Superior Court, Case No. 1OCECGO2 116 The Honorable Jeffrey Y. Hamilton, Judge

TO THE HONORABLE TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, CHIEF JUSTICE, AND TO THE HONORABLE ASSOCIATE JUSTICES OF THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT:

DAVID GENTRY, JAMES PARKER, MARK MID LAM, JAMES BASS, and CALGUNS SHOOTING SPORTS ASSOCIATION,

2 STEPAN A. HAYTAYAN. 1 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

1 The parties to this action, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to. 2 the following:

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff{s),

COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION 2. CALGUNS FOUNDATION INC., et al v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. SECOND APPELLATE DISTRlCT, DIVISION TWO. Petitioners and Appellants, Respondent and Appellee,

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiffs and Appellants, Defendants and Res ondents.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO 21 TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

E-FILED 12/26/2017 4:20 PM FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT By: C. Cogburn, Deputy

SAMPLE FORM F NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL

MOTION TO STRIKE OPENING BRIEF; PROPOSED ORDER

DEC 1 i1z ) FOR DEFENDANTS DEMURRER TO ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ) ) Time: 439-pm.3) C.D. Michel -

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

copy 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VTJLCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FAX. IN TUE SUPERIOR COURT OF TUE STATE OF caiafornia INANDFORTHLCQLNTYOELOSANELES. EAST l)i$trict

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION } } } } } } } } } } } } } } /

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiffs - Appellants, Defendants - Appellees.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

1 Justice, on January 9, A copy of the Proof of Service of Summons is attached hereto. 4 Dated: January 27, 2015 MICHEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER ANSWERING A BREACH OF CONTRACT COMPLAINT

REQUEST FOR PUBLICATION OF OPINION. Andre Torigian v. WT Capital Lender Services Case No. F (Fresno County Superior Court No.

Case3:09-cv RS Document78 Filed05/03/11 Page1 of 7

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)

TO BE FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Case 2:18-cv R-AGR Document 7 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:26

Case 2:00-cv GAF-RC Document 435 Filed 05/14/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:1893

Case 2:09-cv DOC-RZ Document 72 Filed 08/31/10 Page 1 of 37 Page ID #:992

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT APPELLANT S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OPENING BRIEF

Case 5:08-cv RMW Document 7 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 1 of 7

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER

AS MODIFIED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, STERLING SAVINGS BANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv WBS-EFB Document 14 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 5

CON. KEhrlichjmbm.com. ECulleyjmbm.com. 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7

vs. ) NOTICE OF RULING 14 )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

In the Supreme Court of the State of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 3:09-cv IEG -BGS Document 55 Filed 11/08/10 Page 1 of 5

CLASS ACTION. Attorneys for Defendant CHARLES W. MCCALL IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Part Description 1 5 pages 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Motion for Summary Judgment

in furtherance of and in response to its Tentative Decision dated 1/4/2010 addressing various matters

)

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Real Parties in Interest.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Request for Publication

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

This matter came on regularly before this Court for hearings on October 7,2004 and on April

IIAR CONN )14)R1) toliv

JOINT RULE 16(b)/26(f) REPORT

Case 3:13-cv EMC Document 736 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CACJ CALIFORNIA ATTORNEYS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Case 3:08-cv VRW Document 9 Filed 07/23/2008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENT

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. DIVISION [Number]

a. Name of person served:

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:07-cv TJH-CT Document 56 Filed 11/29/2007 Page 1 of 6

Benjamin v. Google Inc. Doc. 45

Case 3:08-cv BEN-BLM Document 3 Filed 06/17/2008 Page 1 of 2

Case 3:15-cv WHA Document 35 Filed 04/22/16 Page 1 of 7

ooa Efiiing Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

December 10, Cohen v. DIRECTV, No. S177734

555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1200 Sacramento, California tel fax

By S. Lee, Deputy Clerk

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY ROCKARD J. DELGADILLO CITY ATTORNEY REPORT RE: COURT RULING

Case 2:15-cr SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 61 Page ID #:2023

DISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT GRANTING PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE

Jonathan Arvizu v. City of Pasadena Request for Publication Second District Case No.: B Superior Court Case No.: BC550929

B CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE. LINDA DE ROGATIS, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

the unverified First Amended Complaint (the Complaint ) of plaintiffs MIKE SPITZER and

CACJ CALIFORNIA ATTORNEYS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Petitioner. Respondent. Real Party in Interest.

18 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case3:11-cv WHA Document33 Filed01/06/12 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Plaintiffs,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CHURCHILL

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5

Federal Pro Se Clinic CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FILED SAN MATEO COUNTY

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

Exempt from filing fee Gov't Code Secs. 6100, 6103 NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY OF COUNSEL

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/28/17 Page 1 of 7 SAN FRANCISCO

Transcription:

- J IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PARKER, et al., v Plaintiffs and Respondents, Case No. F06249Q HFTH/AL ST0Cr THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants and Appellants. ty Fresno County Superior Court, Case No. 1OCECGO2 116 The Honorable Jeff Hamilton, Judge STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF PURSUANT TO RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.212(B) KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California DOUGLAS J. WOODS Senior Assistant Attorney General PETER A. KRAUSE Supervising Deputy Attorney General Ross C. MOODY Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 142541 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94 102-7004 Telephone: (415) 703-1376 Fax: (415) 703-1234 E-mail: Ross.Moodydoj.ca.gov Attorneys for Appellants State of California, Kamala Harris, and the California Department ofjustice

Defendants and Appellants the State of California, Kamala Harris in her official capacity as Attorney General of California, and the California Department of Justice ( the State Defendants ), through their attorney of record, and Plaintiffs and Respondents Sheriff Clay Parker, Tehama County Sheriff, Herb Bauer Sporting Goods, California Rifle And Pistol Association, Able s Sporting, Inc., RTG Sporting Collectibles, LLC., And Steven Stonecipher, through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate for an extension of time for the State Defendants to file Appellants Opening Brief and Appendix pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 8.212(b)(l) which provides in relevant part: The parties may extend each period under (a) by up to 60 days by filing one or more stipulations in the reviewing court before the brief is due. Stipulations must be signed by and served on all parties. The original signature of at least one party must appear on the stipulation filed in the reviewing court; the signatures of the other parties may be in the form of facsimile copies of the signed signature page of the stipulation. A stipulation is effective on filing. The reviewing court may not shorten a stipulated extension. The State Defendants Appellants Opening Brief and Appendix is scheduled to be filed on or before September 12, 2011 following one stipulated extension. No Rule 8.220 Notice has been sent by the court. Appellants and Respondents stipulate that the State Defendants shall have an additional 45 days to file Appellants Opening Brief and Appendix. The Opening Brief and Appendix shall be filed by the State Defendants on or before October 27, 2011. The Opening Brief in the companion appeal in F062490 is currently also due on September 12, 2011, and will be extended by stipulation to October 27 as well. This additional extension is needed due to the trial court s continuance of the hearing on the pending attorneys fee motion below, as well as due to Appellants counsel s involvement as lead counsel for the state defendants in California Redevelopment 1

Association v. Matosantos (S194861), a case being briefed on an expedited basis in the California Supreme Court. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: September, 2011 KAMALA D. HARRIs Attorney General of California By: Ross C. MOODY Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Appellants State of California, Kamala Harris, and the California Department ofjustice Dated: September 2011 MIcHEL AND AssocIATEs, P.C. By: C.D. ict Attorney At Law Attorneys for Respondents Sherff Clay Parker, Tehama County Sheriff Herb Bauer Sporting Goods, California Rfle And Pistol Association, Able s Sporting, Inc., RTG Sporting Collectibles, LLC., and Steven Stoneczpher fl IS SO ORDER1D 2

I, Ross C. Moody, Deputy Attorney General, certify that I have caused a copy of this Stipulation to be served upon my clients the State of California, Kamala Harris in her official capacity as Attorney General of California, and the California Department of Justice. Dated: September 2011 By: / Ross C. MOODY I, C. D. Michel, attorney at law, certify that I have caused a copy of this Stipulation to be served upon my clients Sheriff Clay Parker, Tehama County Sheriff, Herb Bauer Sporting Goods, California Rifle And Pistol Association, Able s Sporting, Inc., RTG Sporting Collectibles, LLC., and Steven Stonecipher. Dated: September, 2011 By C. D. MICHEL SA2011101434 3

DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY U.S. MAIL Case Name: Sheriff Clay Parker, et al. v. The State of California, et al. No.: F062490 I declare: I am employed in the Office of the Attorney General, which is the office of a member of the California State Bar, at which member s direction this service is made. I am 18 years of age or older and not a party to this matter. I am familiar with the business practice at the Office of the Attorney General for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. In accordance with that practice, correspondence placed in the internal mail collection system at the Office of the Attorney General is deposited with the United States Postal Service that same day in the ordinary course of business. On September 9, 2011, I served the attached STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF PURSUANT TO RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.212(B) by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the internal mail collection system at the Office of the Attorney General at 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000, San Francisco, CA 94 102-7004, addressed as follows: Carl Dawson Michel Attorney at Law Trutanich & Michel LLP 180 East Ocean Blvd., Ste. 200 Long Beach, CA 90802 (Attorney for Respondents) County of Fresno Civil Division - B.F. Sisk Courthouse Superior Court of California B.F. Sisk Courthouse 11300 Street Fresno, CA 93721-2220 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on September 9, 2011, at San Francisco, California. J. Wong Declarant Signature SA2OI 1101434 20520741.doc

Tpy IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PARKER, et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, Case No. F062709 V. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants and Appellants. Fresno County Superior Court, Case No. 1 OCECGO2 116 The Honorable Jeff Hamilton, Judge STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF PURSUANT TO RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.212(B) KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California DOUGLAS J. WOODS Acting Senior Assistant Attorney General PETER A. KRAUSE Supervising Deputy Attorney General ROSS C. MOODY Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 142541 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94 102-7004 Telephone: (415) 703-1376 Fax: (415)703-1234 E-mail: Ross.Moodydoj.ca.gov Attorneys for Appellants State of Calfornia, Kamala Harris, and the California Department ofjustice

Defendants and Appellants the State of California, Kamala Harris in her official capacity as Attorney General of California, and the California Department of Justice ( the State Defendants ), through their attorney of record, and Plaintiffs and Respondents Sheriff Clay Parker, Tehama County Sheriff, Herb Bauer Sporting Goods, California Rifle And Pistol Association, Able s Sporting, Inc., RTG Sporting Collectibles, LLC., And Steven Stonecipher, through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate for an extension of time for the State Defendants to file Appellants Opening Brief and Appendix pursuan to California Rules of Court, Rule 8.212(b)(1) which provides in relevant part: The parties may extend each period under (a) by up to 60 days by filing one or more stipulations in the reviewing court before the brief is due. Stipulations must be signed by and served on all parties. The original signature of at least one party must appear on the stipulation filed in the reviewing court; the signatures of the other parties may be in the form of facsimile copies of the signed signature page of the stipulation. A stipulation is effective on filing. The reviewing court may not shorten a stipulated extension. The State Defendants Appellants Opening Brief and Appendix is scheduled to be filed on or before September 12, 2011 following one stipulated extension. No Rule 8.220 Notice has been sent by the court. Appellants and Respondents stipulate that the State Defendants shall have an additional 45 days to file Appellants Opening Brief and Appendix. The Opening Brief and Appendix shall be filed by the State Defendants on or before October 27, 2011. The Opening Brief in the companion appeal in F062490 is currently also due on September 12, 2011, and will be extended by stipulation to October 27 as well. This additional extension is needed due to the trial court s continuance of the hearing on the pending attorneys fee motion below, as well as due to Appellants counsel s involvement as lead counsel for the state defendants in California Redevelopment

Association v. Matosantos (S 194861), a case being briefed on an expedited basis in the California Supreme Court. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: September b, 2011 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California By: /2. ROSS C.MOODY Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Appellants State of Cal fornia, Kamala Harris, and the Caljfornia Department ofjustice Dated: September j, 2011 MIci-EL AND ASSOCIATES, P.C. By:_ C.D. cj Attorney At Law Attorneys for Respondents SherT Clay Parker, Tehama County Sher[f Herb Bauer Sporting Goods, California Rfle And Pistol Association, Able s Sporting, Inc., RTG Sporting Collectibles, LLC., and Steven Stonecipher

I, Ross C. Moody, Deputy Attorney General, certify that I have caused a copy of this Stipulation to be served upon my clients the State of California, Kamala Harris in her official capacity as Attorney General of California, and the California Department of Justice. Dated: September 2011 By (2 Ross C.MOODY I, C. D. Michel, attorney at law, certify that I have caused a copy of this Stipulation to be served upon my clients Sheriff Clay Parker, Tehama County Sheriff, Herb Bauer Sporting Goods, California Rifle And Pistol Association, Able s Sporting, Inc., RTG Sporting Collectibles, LLC., and Steven Stonecipher. Dated: September 2011 By 4JTEL SA2O1 1101434 3

DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY U.S. MAIL Case Name: Sheriff Clay Parker, et al. v. The State of California, et a!. No.: F062709 I declare: I am employed in the Office of the Attorney General, which is the office of a member of the California State Bar, at which member s direction this service is made. I am 18 years of age or older and not a party to this matter. I am familiar with the business practice at the Office of the Attorney General for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. In accordance with that practice, correspondence placed in the internal mail collection system at the Office of the Attorney General is deposited with the United States Postal Service that same day in the ordinary course of business. On September 9, 2011, I served the attached STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF PURSUANT TO RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.2 12(B) by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the internal mail collection system at the Office of the Attorney General at 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000, San Francisco, CA 94102-7004, addressed as follows: Carl Dawson Michel Attorney at Law Trutanich & Michel LLP 180 East Ocean Blvd., Ste. 200 Long Beach, CA 90802 (Attorney for Respondents) County of Fresno Civil Division - B.F. Sisk Courthouse Superior Court of California B.F. Sisk Courthouse 1130 0 Street Fresno, CA 93721-2220 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on September 9, 2011, at San Francisco, California. J._Wong Declarant ignature SA2OI] 01434 20520723.doc