Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Airlines, Inc., and Transport Workers Union Local 501

Similar documents
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rochdale Village, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Japanese Food Solutions Inc., d/b/a Minado Restaurant

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al., v. White House Home for Adults

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Revolution Studios and Smile Productions, LLC

EEOC and David Marcotte and Robert Kerouac v. Federal Express Corp.

EEOC & Suzanne Whitty v. Mount Carmel, LLC, and Benedictine Health System, et al.

EEOC. v. Fox News. Cornell University ILR School. Judge William H. Pauly

EEOC v. Family Dollar Stores of Arkansas

EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC

EEOC & Wolansky v. United Healthcare of Florida, Inc.

EEOC v. River View Coal, LLC

EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Foodscience Corporation

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Peter Servidio, Plaintiffs, v. Labranche & Co., Inc., Defendant.

EEOC v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Defendant.

EEOC v. Altec Industries

EEOC v. Moka Shoe Corporation

EEOC v. Dillard's, Inc

EEOC and Maria Torres v. The Restaurant Company dba Perkins

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

EEOC v. Oglethorpe University

EEOC v. Bice of Chicago, et al.

EEOC v. John Wieland Homes and Neighborhoods, Inc.

EEOC v. Consolidated Stores, Inc. d/b/a Big Lots

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bob Watson Chevrolet

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels

EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC

EEOC v. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. and Mike Patel

EEOC & Aimee Boss and Morgan Hagedon v. Bodega Bars USA, LLC d/b/a Mosaic Restaurant

EEOC, et al v Lafayette College, et al.,

EEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC

EEOC v. Fleming, Inc., d/b/a J. Edward's

U.S. EEOC v Promens USA, Inc. and Bonar Plastics, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Studley Products, Inc. and Wildwood Industries, Inc., Defendants.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Associated Home Health Care of Palm Beach.

EEOC v. Northwest Savings Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E CONSENT DECREE

EEOC v. Pass and Seymour, Inc. and Kennmark Group, Ltd. (Consent Decree as to Pass and Seymour)

EEOC v. Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center

EEOC v. Mcdonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff and Jane Doe, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Brookshire Grocery Company, Defendant.

EEOC v. Tropiano Transportation Services, Inc.

EEOC & Mitchel, et al., v. Allied Aviation Services, Inc., Allied Aviation Fueling of Dallas, LP, Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Texas, Inc.

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

EEOC v. Grimmway Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Grimmway Farms; Esparza Enterprises, Inc.

United States of America v. City of Alma, Georgia and Bacon County, Georgia

EEOC and Quianna M. Knowles v. Remedy Intelligent Staffing, Inc.

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

EEOC & Rodriguez, et al. v. Dynamic Medical Services, Inc.

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Jetson Midwest Mailers, Inc., Defendant.

EEOC v. Original Hot Dog Shops, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop, Food Gallery Original, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop

EEOC v. Supervalu Holdings, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

EEOC v. Supreme Corporation and Supreme Northwest LLC

EEOC and Darmo et al. v. Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. et al.

EEOC v. Cleveland Construction, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Majesty Maintenance, Inc.

EEOC v. CMC Service of Chicago, LLC d/b/a Great Clips for Hair

EEOC, Christopher, Bhend, and Chamara v. National Education Association, National Education Association - Alaska

EEOC v. Michoacan Seafood Group. LLC

Cornell University ILR School. Judge Karen E. Schreier

EEOC v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Sherree Salter, et al., v. The Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc., Andre Jones

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. d/b/a Betsy Ross Flag Girl and Barjac Company

EEOC v. Baldwin Supply Co.

EEOC v. Ealge Wings Industries, Inc.

Case 2:99-cv JPM Document 14 Filed 11/24/1999 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

EEOC v. Hannon's Food Services of Jackson Inc (d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken)

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores d/b/a Sam s Club

EEOC v. Sunrise Hospitality BC II, LLC d/b/a Microtel Inns & Suites

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Convergys Corporation

Case 6:06-cv CJS Document 2 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 1 of 8

EEOC v. Eastern Engineered Wood Products, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc., Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Houston Area Sheet Metal Joint Apprenticeship Committee, Defendant.

EEOC v. Preferred Labor LLC, d/b/a Preferred People Staffing

United States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. United Airlines, Inc., Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. lj'lhed States FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS E,.'/';~rn DiStrict. HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

Case 2:01-cv DLG Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2002 Page 1 of 10

EEOC v. Brink's Incorporated

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, and The Heil Company, Defendant.

Anita Robinson, et al., v. Boeing Company, d/b/a Boeing Defense & Space Group

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, CV-W-2-ECF

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Gehl Corporation d/b/a The Gehl Group

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dutch Farms, Inc.

EEOC v. Stephens Institute d/b/a The Academy of Art College

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc.

~ Civil Action No. A-04-C~-o03370lI

EEOC v. Lawry's Retaurants, Inc,, d/b/a Lawry's The Prime Rib, Five Crowns, and Tam O'Shanter Inn

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Monk's Inc., d/b/a International House of Pancakes, Defendant.

Case 1:11-cv NLH -AMD Document 61 Filed 01/24/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 211 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv CCB Document 98 Filed 06/28/16 06/23/16 Page 1 of 14 11

EEOC v. JEC Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a McDonalds

EEOC v. KCD Construction, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Seafoods Company

Transcription:

Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 3-17-2004 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Airlines, Inc., and Transport Workers Union Local 501 Judge Nina Gershon Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec Thank you for downloading this resource, provided by the ILR School's Labor and Employment Law Program. Please help support our student research fellowship program with a gift to the Legal Repositories! This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Labor and Employment Law Program at DigitalCommons@ILR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Consent Decrees by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@ILR. For more information, please contact hlmdigital@cornell.edu.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Airlines, Inc., and Transport Workers Union Local 501 Keywords EEOC, American Airlines Inc., Transport Workers Union Local 501, CV-01-5171 (NG)(MDG), Consent Decree, Transportation, Title VII, Employment Law This article is available at DigitalCommons@ILR: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec/505

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------x EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. CV-01-5171 (NG) (MDG) " w. p > vj 44/ ' < ' / * * * ' v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., and TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION LOCAL 501, Defendants. --------------------------x CONSENT DECREE This cause of action was initiated on August 3, 2001 by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (hereinafter Commission or E.E.O.C. ), an agency of the United States Government. The Complaint alleged that in 1998, American Airlines Inc. ( American ) and Transport Workers Union Local 501 ( Local 501 ) violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended 42 U.S.C. 2000(e), et. seq. (hereinafter Title VII ). The Defendants deny that they engaged in the unlawful conduct alleged in the Complaint. Further, it is understood that this Agreement does not constitute an admission by American or Local 501 of any violation of Title VII. Nevertheless, the E.E.O.C. and Defendants desire to amicably resolve and settle all disputes and matters now in controversy between them. Therefore, the parties do hereby stipulate and consent to the entry of this Decree to avoid the time and expense of further litigation. In consideration of the mutual promises of each party to this Decree, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is agreed and IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The Court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action. The parties agree that venue is proper and that all administrative prerequisites have been met. 2. This Consent Decree is final and binding between the parties signatory hereto and resolves all pending issues and claims relating to race and/or color and/or national origin discrimination which were alleged in the Complaint in this action or in E.E.O.C. Charge Nos. 160-99-2542, 160-99 2544, 160-99-2546, 160-99-2548, 160-99-2550, 160-99-2552, 160-99-2554, and 160-99-2556 including claims asserted on behalf of similarly situated individuals. The terms of this Agreement represent the full and complete agreement of the parties. This Decree in no way affects the E.E.O.C. s right to process any pending or future charges that may be filed against Defendants in accordance with standard E.E.O.C. procedures, and to commence civil actions on any such charges. 3. No party shall contest the validity of this Decree nor the jurisdiction of the federal district court to enforce this Decree and its terms or the right of any party to bring an enforcement suit upon breach of any of the terms of this Decree by the other party. Breach of any term of this Decree should be deemed to be a substantive breach of this Decree. All parties are authorized to seek compliance with the Decree in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. 4. The term American shall include American, its officers, owners, managers, successors, and agents. 5. The term Local 501 shall include its officers, successors, and agents. 6. American is hereby enjoined from discriminating against any individual because of the individual s race or national origin. In furtherance of this commitment, American shall conspicuously post and maintain, at its JFK facility, the Notice on E.E.O.C. letterhead, appended hereto as Exhibit A, in a prominent place where employee notices are posted. This Notice shall remain posted for one year after the date of entry of this Consent Decree. 7. Local 501 is hereby enjoined from discriminating against any individual because of the individual s race or national origin. In furtherance of this commitment, Local 501 shall conspicuously

post and maintain in the union hall the Notice on E.E.O.C. letterhead, appended hereto as Exhibit A, in a prominent place where union notices are posted. This Notice shall remain posted for one year after the date of entry of this Consent Decree. 8. American is further enjoined from retaliating against Dave Browne, Abraham Emmanuel, Barbara Gonzalez, Gladys Machuca, Michael Nurse, Jimmy Perez, Errol Rambaran, and Rafael Vargas (jointly, Claimants ) for asserting his or her rights under Title VII. American further agrees not to retaliate against any individual who has filed a charge in this matter, or given testimony or given assistance in connection with the investigation of these charges at issue or this action, or asserted his or her rights under Title VII in this matter. 9. Local 501 is also enjoined from retaliating against Dave Browne, Abraham Emmanuel, Barbara Gonzalez, Gladys Machuca, Michael Nurse, Jimmy Perez, Errol Rambaran, and Rafael Vargas for asserting his or her rights under Title VII. Local 501 further agrees not to retaliate against any individual who has filed a charge in this matter, or given testimony or given assistance in connection with the investigation of these charges or these actions, or asserted his or her rights under Title VII. 10. In settlement of this dispute, and in accordance with the terms of Paragraph 12, Defendant American shall pay a total of $ 27,500 (Twenty seven thousand five hundred dollars) to Claimants Browne, Emmanuel, Machuca, Vargas and Nurse less applicable deductions and withholdings. The money shall be distributed to these Claimants in the gross amounts set forth in Exhibit B, annexed. Money paid to existing employees shall be subject to those deductions and withholdings required by law, and those deductions and withholdings authorized by the employee. Money paid to former employees shall be subject to deductions and withholdings required by law. All payments will be reported to the IRS via a form W2.

11. In settlement of this dispute, and in accordance with the terms of Paragraph 12, Defendant Local 501 shall pay a total of $ 10,000 (Ten thousand dollars) to Claimants Gonzalez, Perez, and Rambaran. The money shall be distributed to these Claimants in the gross amounts set forth in Exhibit B, annexed. All payments will be reported to the IRS via a form 1099. 12. Within twenty business days of the later of: a) the execution of this Decree or b) the return of a full and final Release of Claims against American Airlines and Local 501 described in paragraph 2 herein, executed by the individual Claimants, Defendants shall issue checks directly to the Claimants. The appropriate checks shall be sent certified mail, return receipt requested to the claimants at the following addresses:

A copy of each check shall be forwarded to Nora E. Curtin, Senior Trial Attorney, of the E.E.O.C., upon issuance of the check. 13. American will answer any and all inquiries by prospective employers regarding the claimants in this lawsuit by providing only neutral reference information consistent with its policy regarding such inquiries, which currently states that only former employees dates of employment, and position(s) held, will be provided. 14. Each party shall bear its own attorney fees and costs incurred in this action. 15. This Decree will remain in effect for one (1) year from the date of entry.

Dated: March *s_, 2004 Dated: March 2>, 2004 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY C0TV,1N/irCQTrVNJ AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. By: Katherine E. Bissell Regional Attorney New York District Office 33 Whitehall Street, 5th Floor New York, New York 10004 (212) 336-3721 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 101 Park Avenue New York, New York 10178 (212) 309-6000 Dated: March 4 ^ 2004 TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION LOCAL 501 Bv: David M. Glanstein, Esq. O DONNELL, SCHWARTZ, GLANSTEIN & LILLY LLP 60 East 42nd Street New York, New York 10165 (212)370-5100 SO ORDERED. Date:» a /UU/JL 17,780 f

EXHIBIT A U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION New York District Office 33 Whitehall Street, 5,h Floor New York, NY 10004-2112 Phone: (212) 336-3620 General Fax: (212) 336-3625 TTY: (212) 336-3622 NOTICE TO ALL EMPLOYEES This notice is being posted pursuant to an agreement between the EEOC, the Transport Workers Union Local 501 and American Airlines, Inc. concerning matters that were alleged to have occurred in 1998. Federal law prohibits discrimination with respect to hiring, discharge, compensation, promotion, or other terms, conditions, and privileges of employment because of an individual s race or national origin. Federal law also prohibits retaliation against any employee by an employer because the individual complains about discrimination, cooperates in an internal or governmental investigation of a charge of discrimination, participates as a witness or potential witness in litigation, or otherwise exercises his or her rights under the law. Should you have any complaints of discrimination, you may contact any of the following individuals: your manager, or anyone to whom he or she reports; Employee Services at (800) 447-2000 (press option #4); The Network Hotline at (800) 241-5689 or the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 33 Whitehall Street, 5th Floor, New York, New York 10004, (212) 336-3620. American Airlines policies and procedures regarding equal employment opportunity can be viewed atjetnet.aa.com This notice must remain posted for one (1) year from the date of posting and may not be altered, defaced, or covered by any other material. Date:

EXHIBIT B As set forth in Paragraph 12, in settlement of this dispute and in exchange for the Release of Claims executed by the individual Claimants, American shall pay to the following individuals the amount indicated, below: Dave Browne $6500 Abraham Emmanuel $6500 Gladys Machuca $4000 Michael Nurse $6500 Rafael Vargas $4000 As set forth in Paragraph 12, in settlement of this dispute and in exchange for the Release of Claims executed by the individual Claimants, Local 501 shall pay to the following individuals the amount indicated, below: Barbara Gonzalez $3,500

Jimmy Perez Errol Rambaran $2,500 $4,000