Remittances reached US$24.77 billion in 2015, 4.8% up on the previous year

Similar documents
Impact of the crisis on remittances

2. Situation: Mexican migrants in the US and

8 PRIORITY CRIMES. CIDAC 2012 CRIMINAL INDEX. Facebook: /cidac.org YouTube: /CIDAC1

Forum on Global Violence Prevention May 12, 2016 Keck Center Arturo Cervantes, MD

WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THE JULY 2018 ELECTIONS IN MEXICO.

DISCUSIÓN Inequality and minimum wage policy in Mexico: A comment

Migrants Remittances and Related Economic Flows

BINATIONAL EXCHANGE - STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL AND PROSECUTORS

Regional Economic Report

Return migra,on to Mexico: Policy response, measurement challenges and data needs Claudia Masferrer

Public policy as a determinant for attracting foreign direct investment in Mexico since

It s the best way to send money home.

Localization of manufacturing industries and specialization in Mexican states:

Drug trafficking, violence, corruption and democracy in Mexico.

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND MEXICAN OUT-MIGRATION. Kurt Unger. Working Paper

Migrants Remittances and Home Country Elections: Cross-National and Subnational Evidence

Effects on the distribution of population and economic activities of Mexico, derived from the globalization of trade

The right to life is usually used to refer to that primary and essential right

Message From the New Executive Director

Reflections on social cohesion

MEXICO CANADA SEASONAL AGRICULTURAL WORKERS PROGRAM AND ACTIONS TAKEN BY MEXICAN CONSULATES TO ASSIST MEXICAN WORKERS ABROAD

Exploring the Causes of the Slowdown in Remittances to Mexico

Trade liberalization and the relative importance of domestic and foreign demand

Mexico City s experience: The Sanctuary Clinic Program

MOBILITY INFORMAL TO FORMAL SECTOR IN MEXICO : THE EFFECT OF REMITTANCES

DECLARATION NEZAHUALCOYOTL FOR FOOD SOVEREIGNTY Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo, Chapingo México November 27th, 2016

Findings from the National Agricultural Workers Survey (NAWS) : A Demographic and Employment Profile of United States Farmworkers

GENERAL ACT OF TRANSPARENCY AND ACCESS TO PUBLIC INFORMATION. General Act of Transparency and Access to Public Information

CHALLENGES FACING MAQUILADORA INDUSTRY GROWTH. Enrique CASTRO SEPTIEN September 29 th, 2006

Online Appendix 1 Comparing migration rates: EMIF and ENOE

WORLD ECONOMIC OUTLOOK CONFERENCE

TERMS OF REFERENCE NATIONAL CONSULTANT ILO/UNHCR JOINT PROJECT

TERMS OF REFERENCE NATIONAL CONSULTANT ILO/UNHCR JOINT PROJECT

Climate Change, Crop Yields and Mexico-U.S. Cross-border Migration. [Supporting Information] Shuaizhang Feng, Alan B. Krueger, Michael Oppenheimer

EFFECTS OF BORDER PRICE CHANGES ON AGRICULTURAL WAGES AND EMPLOYMENT IN MEXICO

Mexico Kidnap and Ransom Summary. November 2017

BUILDING BRIDGES 2015 CONFERENCE OF THE CANADIAN WORKER CO-OP FEDERATION & CO-OP ZONE

Effect of NAFTA on Mexico s Income Distribution in the presence of Migration

LATINO NATIONAL SURVEY TOPLINES. English Spanish

Revista de Administración Pública

Conference Paper Institutional Factors in the Economic growth of Mexico

Interest Organizations and Distributive Politics: Small-Business Subsidies in Mexico

Female Migration and Urban Informal Sector in Monterrey Metropolitan Region

24 Negocios infographics oldemar. Mexico Means

Is Mexico a Lumpy Country?

ESSAYS ON MEXICAN MIGRATION. by Heriberto Gonzalez Lozano B.A., Universidad Autonóma de Nuevo León, 2005 M.A., University of Pittsburgh, 2011

United Mexican States Country Profile

Gubernaturas Cortas: Will Concurrence Change Mexican State Elections? Raymond Humbert

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women

The violation of human rights in the struggle against drug cartels in Mexico during the presidency of Felipe Calderón

Regional Economic Analysis of Internal Migration in Mexico

Female Migration and Urban Informal Sector in Monterrey Metropolitan Region of Mexico

David Griffith East Carolina University UCDC Center May 28, 2010

MIGRATION STRATEGIES IN URBAN CONTEXTS: LABOR MIGRATION FROM MEXICO CITY TO THE UNITED STATES

Public Service and Good Governance vs. Corruption and Self-Promotion: MPA Programs in Mexico

judges, lawyers, and other legal professionals in the region. LALIC has produced materials

(WEAK) INSTITUTIONS FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF WOMEN: THE CASE OF WOMEN S POLICY AGENCIES IN MEXICAN STATES * 1

Measuring income poverty at the state level using Stata. Carlos Guerrero de Lizardi Manuel Lara Caballero

Envía CentroAmérica at gives you free information on how much it costs you to send money.

Maria del Carmen Serrato Gutierrez Chapter II: Internal Migration and population flows

Minimum wages and wage structure in Mexico

THE EVOLUTION OF WORKER S REMITTANCES IN MEXICO IN RECENT YEARS

Who Crossed the Border? Self-Selection of Mexican Migrants in the Early 20 th Century

Drug Violence in Mexico

(Revised August 2017, Approved by CAPPA Membership September 21, 2017)

Center for lnter-a~nerican

Migration, Trade and FDI in Mexico. Patricio Aroca Universidad Catolica del Norte, Antofagasta, Chile

Shadow Report on employment discrimination against women in Mexico

Long-Run Human Development in Mexico:

ProMéxico: your strategic partner. Mexico: a leading economy. Mexico s competitive sectors

Youth Mexican labor market, ethnicity and education 2010

Sneak Preview. Evaluating Accountability and Transparency in Mexico. National, Local, and Comparative Perspectives

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY JORNALEROS SAFE REPORT

Defining Economic Opportunities, Potential, and Challenges Confronting the US Mexico Border Region and Strategies for Enhanced Prosperity

Remittances To Latin America and The Caribbean in 2010 STABILIZATION. after the crisis. Multilateral Investment Fund Member of the IDB Group

The economic recession of 2008 marked the end of an era of Mexican migration. Equitable teaching for returnee children in Mexico

Working Group on Development and Environment in the Americas

2,600 currently remain in the Mexican asylum process

Mexican politicians continuously demand more visas for their citizens, an expanded guest-worker

The North Wind Doth Blow: U.S. Recession Brings Turbulence to the Mexican Economy Presented to: Maquiladora Industry Outlook Conference May 16, 2008

Social segregation of indigenous migrants in Mexico: An overview from Monterrey

Working Paper Series

Migration Strategies in Urban Contexts: Labor Migration from Mexico City to the United States

Chapter 3. Reversal of Democracy or Decline in Quality? A Preliminary Analysis of Mexico s Democracy at the National and Subnational Levels 1

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. Special thanks for advisory contributions on this issue from

Globalization and Inequality: Subnational Differentials within Nation States

Mexican elections in 2018:

Joint submission to the Universal Periodic Review of Mexico by ARTICLE 19, Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) and PEN International

Conducting Business in the Current Security Environment of Cd Juarez. Updated August 10, 2010

Criminal Violence and Forced Internal Displacement in Mexico: Evidence, Perception and Challenges. Sebastián Albuja Steve Hege Laura Rubio Díaz Leal

Appendix 1-Sources of Data for the Indigenous Farmworker Study (IFS) project

CEP Discussion Paper No 804 June 2007

Public Policies Benefiting Migrants

Additional Designations, Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act

Regional Economic analysis of Internal Migration in Mexico

The Abortion Debate in Latin America

Social Networks and Their Impact on the Employment and Earnings of Mexican Immigrants. September 23, 2004

Why do political actors undertake reforms that constrain their own discretion? We argue that

Abortion in Mexico Year 2000 Myriam Brito Domínguez*

Who Crossed the Border? The Selection of Mexican Migrants in the Early 20 th Century

Transcription:

Migration Remittances reached US$24.77 billion in 2015, 4.8% up on the previous year Juan José Li Ng / Alfredo Salgado The total inflow of remittances to Mexico grew by 4.8% in 2015 to US$24.77 billion In December 2015 remittances fell by 2.1% compared with the same month of 2014, with a inflow of US$2.19 billion, bringing an end to a period of ten consecutive months of growth The states with the biggest increases in remittances in 2015 were Chiapas (18.1%), Chihuahua (16.1%) and Querétaro (15.5%), while Michoacán, Guanajuato and Jalisco were the leading recipients at state level Tijuana, Puebla and Guadalajara were the leading recipients of remittances at a municipal level, with US$387.4, US$340.7 and US$325.1 million respectively in 2015 Banco de México figures show that 95.6% of all remittances received by Mexico in 2015 came from the United States, that nearly all this worldwide inflow to Mexico were send by electronic transfers (97.5%), and that 36.3% of remittances were paid through a bank. In 2015, family remittances to Mexico reached a total of US$24.77 billion, a 4.8% increase on the previous year. There were a total of 7.55 million transactions in December 2015, 2.15% more than in December 2014. This increase in the frequency of remittances largely offset the decline seen in their average amount, which at US$290 was down by 4% on the previous year. Figure 1 Remittances to Mexico, 2015 (US$ millions and % of total) by country of origin by transmission channel by receiving institution Others* 832.70 (3.4%) Canada 254.4 (1.0%) United States 23,683.8 (95.6%) Money Orders 832.70 (3.4%) Cash and payment in kind 463.2 (1.9%) Electronic transfers 24,145.5 (97.5%) Non-bank institution 15,788.3 (63.7%) Banks 8,982.6 (36.3%) Note.* Others and unspecified Page 1 / 7

Figure 2 Family remittances to Mexico (% change in year in dollars) 20 % 10 0-10 -20 10 months in a row with growth -2.1 Nov-13 Feb-14 May-14 Aug-14 Nov-14 Feb-15 May-15 Aug-15 Nov-15 The remittances figure for December 2015 showed a slight fall of 2.1% compared with the same month of 2014, with a monthly flow of US$2.19 billion. Remittances thus brought an end to the period of growth that had lasted for ten consecutive months from February to November. However, the December figure should not be interpreted negatively, despite representing a slight fall, since the monthly flow performed above market expectations at more than two billion dollars for the second year in succession to become the second highest figure ever posted for December. The growth in remittances over the course of 2015 is largely explained by three main factors. Firstly, the performance of the U.S. economy, which according to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis' advance estimate showed GDP growth at an annual rate of 2.0% in the fourth quarter of 2015; secondly, the low U.S. unemployment rate, which is at its lowest point since the crisis of 2007; and thirdly, the strong appreciation of the dollar seen throughout the past year, which boosts the purchasing power of the households receiving remittances from the U.S. During December these households saw an increase of 13.0% in real terms in their remittance income compared with the same month the previous year. Figure 3 Cumulative flows of remittances to Mexico over 12 months (US$ millions) Figure 4 U.S.: National unemployment rate (%) 30,000 25,000 26,058.8 Dec 07 21,306.3 Dec 09 24,770.9 Dec 15 12 10 9.8 20,000 15,000 8 6 Dec15 5.0 10,000 4 5,000 2 0 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11 Dec-12 Dec-13 Dec-14 0 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11 Dec-12 Dec-13 Dec-14 Dec-15 Source: BBVA Research with US Bureau of Labor Statistics data. Note: Seasonally adjusted. Page 2 / 7

Remittances by federal state Figure 5 Family remittances by federal state, 2015 (% share of national total) As regards the distribution of remittances by federal state, we see that in 2015 the states with the biggest shares of remittances nationwide were: Michoacán (10.2%), Guanajuato (9.1%), Jalisco (9.0%), México (6.3%) and Puebla (5.6%), while Quintana Roo (0.5%), Campeche (0.2%) and Baja California Sur (0.2%) were the states with the smallest shares in the national total. Michoacán Guanajuato Jalisco México Puebla Oaxaca Guerrero Distrito Federal 6.3% 5.5% 5.2% 5.2% 4.4% 10.2% 9.1% 9.0% Veracruz 4.4% San Luis Potosí 3.4% Zacatecas 3.1% Hidalgo 2.9% Baja California 2.7% Tamaulipas 2.7% Nuevo León 2.6% Chihuahua 2.6% Chiapas 2.4% Morelos 2.2% Durango 2.2% Sinaloa 2.2% Querétaro 1.9% Nayarit 1.6% Coahuila 1.6% Sonora 1.5% Aguascalientes 1.4% Tlaxcala 0.9% Colima 0.9% Yucatán 0.5% Tabasco 0.5% Quintana Roo 0.5% Campeche 0.2% Baja California Sur 0.2% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% Page 3 / 7

We can also see that the states with the most growth in remittances in 2015 relative to 2014 were Chiapas (18.1%), Chihuahua (16.1%) and Querétaro (15.5%); while only four federal states posted falls: Distrito Federal (-28.0%), Tamaulipas (-20.2%), Coahuila (-1.4%) and Tabasco (-0.7%). Table 1 Remittances to Mexico by federal state, 2014-2015 (US$ millions) State 2014 2015 Inc. % Aguascalientes 323.9 349.7 8.0% Baja California 619.9 680.9 9.8% Baja California Sur 46.6 51.2 9.9% Campeche 55.8 56.4 1.2% Coahuila 392.3 386.9-1.4% Colima 216.8 219.1 1.1% Chiapas 502.1 593.2 18.1% Chihuahua 554.2 643.2 16.1% Distrito Federal 1,513.9 1,089.6-28.0% Durango 491.0 533.3 8.6% México 1,462.1 1,560.3 6.7% Guanajuato 2,096.5 2,262.2 7.9% Guerrero 1,203.5 1,277.0 6.1% Hidalgo 720.5 725.2 0.6% Jalisco 1,959.9 2,217.3 13.1% Michoacán 2,244.0 2,530.5 12.8% Morelos 527.7 550.8 4.4% Nayarit 361.8 399.5 10.4% Nuevo León 614.5 644.1 4.8% Oaxaca 1,214.8 1,288.7 6.1% Puebla 1,338.6 1,370.5 2.4% Querétaro 398.2 459.9 15.5% Quintana Roo 105.0 117.4 11.7% San Luis Potosí 769.9 849.0 10.3% Sinaloa 517.0 533.0 3.1% Sonora 337.1 375.6 11.4% Tabasco 131.0 130.1-0.7% Tamaulipas 833.2 664.6-20.2% Tlaxcala 218.9 224.8 2.7% Veracruz 1,047.4 1,085.6 3.6% Yucatán 129.3 134.6 4.1% Zacatecas 700.2 766.8 9.5% Total national 23,647.3 24,770.9 4.8% Page 4 / 7

Remittances at municipal level Table 2 shows a list of the top 20 recipients of remittances at municipal level in 2015. We should highlight the fact that these 20 municipalities together received an amount of US$4.39 billion by way of remittances, equivalent to 17.7% of the national total. In 2015 the municipality of Tijuana, in the state of Baja California, was the leading recipient of remittances, with US$387 million, overtaking the Mexico City borough of Miguel Hidalgo, which had been the leading recipient of remittances in 2014. The municipalities of Puebla (US$340.7 million), Guadalajara (US$325.1 million), Morelia (US$295.1 million) and Oaxaca de Juárez (US$275.5 million) complete the list of the five main recipients of remittances at a municipal level in 2015. Table 2 The 20 leading municipalities by receipt of remittances, 2015 (US$ millions and % increase) State Municipality 2014 2015 % change Baja California Tijuana 366.2 387.4 5.8% Puebla Puebla 324.4 340.7 5.0% Jalisco Guadalajara 295.8 325.1 9.9% Michoacán Morelia 264.8 295.1 11.4% Oaxaca Oaxaca de Juárez 263.7 275.5 4.5% Nuevo León Monterrey 185.7 222.5 19.8% Distrito Federal Miguel Hidalgo 444.6 222.3-50.0% Guanajuato León 199.2 219.4 10.1% San Luis Potosí San Luis Potosí 211.5 203.5-3.8% Sinaloa Culiacán 191.3 201.8 5.5% Aguascalientes Aguascalientes 184.1 197.9 7.5% Guerrero Acapulco de Juárez 169.9 188.9 11.2% Chihuahua Juárez 152.4 181.9 19.3% Durango Durango 161.4 173.8 7.7% Michoacán Uruapan 142.3 166.4 17.0% Jalisco Zapopan 151.9 162.0 6.7% México Ecatepec de Morelos 157.1 161.0 2.5% Guanajuato Irapuato 137.7 157.7 14.5% Chihuahua Chihuahua 132.0 156.4 18.4% Querétaro Querétaro 136.2 154.1 13.1% Total 20 leading municipalities 4,272.3 4,393.2 2.8% Total National 23,647.3 24,770.9 4.8% Share of total national 18.1% 17.7% Page 5 / 7

Outward remittances from Mexico In 2015 outward remittances from Mexico to other countries totalled US$810.6 million, representing a reduction of 19.1% relative to 2014. This reduction was due mainly to the appreciation of the dollar against the peso seen over the course of the year, given that nearly half the remittances sent from Mexico are to the United States. The average amount of outward remittances from Mexico in 2015 was US$526.5 and the total number of transactions was 1.5 million. The five main destinations of Mexican remittances were: United States (US$402.9 million), Colombia (US$85.8 million), China (US$74.5 million), Guatemala (US$34.7 million) and Peru (US$31.4 million). Table 3 Outward remittances from Mexico, 2014-2015 Outward remittances Year (US$ millions) Number of transactions Average amount of remittance 2014 1,001.8 1,489.7 676.8 2015 810.6 1,546.3 526.5 % change -19.1% 3.8% -22.2% Map 1 Outward remittances from Mexico, 2015 (US$ millions and % of total) United States of America 402.9 (49.7%) Guatemala 34.7 (4.3%) Canada 9.6 (1.2%) Dominican Republic 8.5 (1.0%) Honduras 24.1 (3.0%) Spain 10.5 (1.3%) China 74.5 (9.2%) Panama 8.0 (1.0%) Colombia 85.8 (10.6%) Peru 31.4 (3.9%) Page 6 / 7

Disclaimer This publication is a joint initiative between the BBVA Bancomer Foundation and BBVA Research's Economic Research Department, Mexico. It aims to make new contributions in the field of Migration studies that add to knowledge of this important social movement. It has been prepared on their own behalf and is for information purposes only. The opinions, estimates, forecasts and recommendations contained in this document refer to the date appearing in the document, and, therefore, they may undergo changes due to market fluctuations. The opinions, estimates, forecasts and recommendations contained in this document are based on information obtained from sources deemed to be reliable, but BBVA does not provide any guarantee, either explicit or implicit, of its exactitude, integrity or correctness. This document does not constitute an offer, invitation or incitement to subscribe to or purchase securities Page 7 / 7