Meeting: 1150 DH meeting (24-26 September 2012)

Similar documents
1288 th meeting (June 2017) (DH) Communication from the applicant (09/05/2017) in the case of CAKA v. Albania (Application No.

1265 meeting (20-22 September 2016) (DH)

1294 th meeting (September 2017) (DH)

1310 th meeting (March 2018) (DH) Communication from Turkey (07/03/2018) concerning the case of CYPRUS v. Turkey (Application No /94).

1310 th meeting (March 2018) (DH) Communication from Cyprus (07/03/2018) concerning the case of CYPRUS v. Turkey (Application No /94).

1208 meeting (23-25 September 2014) (DH)

Human rights impact of the external dimension of European Union asylum and migration policy: out of sight, out of rights?

1208 meeting (23-25 September 2014) (DH)

Meeting: 1150 DH meeting (24-26 September 2012)

1302 nd meeting (December 2017) (DH)

1318 th meeting (June 2018) (DH) Communication from Turkey concerning the case of SINAN ISIK v. Turkey (Application No /05)

Communication from Hungary concerning the case of Tímár v. Hungary (Application No /97) * * * * * * * * * * *

1331 st meeting (December 2018) (DH) Communication from Slovenia concerning the case of Mirovni Institut v. Slovenia (Application No /13).

EN 1 EN ACTION FICHE. 1. IDENTIFICATION Title/Number. Support to the Libyan authorities to enhance the management of borders and migration flows

1288 th meeting (June 2017) (DH)

States Obligations to Protect Refugees Fleeing Libya: Backgrounder

Submission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. For the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Compilation Report

LIBYA. Overview. Operational highlights. People of concern

INTERCEPTION AT SEA AND PUSH-BACK OF REFUGEES

Amnesty International Statement on the occasion of the EUROMED Ministerial Conference on Migration Algarve November 2007

The Dynamics of Migrant Smuggling in North Africa: Focus on the Central Mediterranean Route

Joint Statement Paris, August 28, Addressing the Challenge of Migration and Asylum

Communication d'une ONG (Pat Finucane Centre(PFC))

COMMONWEALTH OF THE BAHAMAS

European Union. Third informal thematic session on. International co-operation and governance of migration in all its dimensions,

WORKING PAPER. Brussels, 17 September 2018 WK 10084/2018 REV 1 LIMITE ASIM JAI RELEX

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL AND THE COUNCIL

COMMONWEALTH OF THE BAHAMAS

Delegations will find in the Annex the Council conclusions on Libya, adopted by the Council at its 3516 th meeting held on 6 February 2017.

I. THE UNITED KINGDOM AND THE EUROPEAN UNION

II. Smuggling of migrants and trafficking in persons in the Mediterranean Sea off the coast of Libya

INTERCEPTION OF ASYLUM-SEEKERS AND REFUGEES THE INTERNATIONAL FRAMEWORK AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH

EUROPEAN COUNCIL ON REFUGEES AND EXILES CONSEIL EUROPEEN SUR LES REFUGIES ET LES EXILES AD2/10/2005/EXT/RW

Secretariat. Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Committee Rue Wiertz B-1047 BRUSSELS

1324 th meeting (September 2018) (DH) Communication from Slovenia concerning the case of FLISAR v. Slovenia (Application No.

1318 th meeting (June 2018) (DH) Communication from Latvia concerning the case of Dzirnis v. Latvia (Application No /05) * * * * * * * * * * *

EMHRN Position on Refugees from Syria June 2014

Sahrawi mechanics participate in self-reliance activities in Rabouni, Algeria.

PUBLIC COUNCILOF THEEUROPEANUNION. Brusels,22July /03 LIMITE ASIM 48 RELEX 304 LIBYE 2

Managing Migration in a Mediterranean context. Presentation by Laurence Hart Chief of Mission IOM Tripoli, Libya

Council of the European Union Brussels, 9 October 2017 (OR. en)

WE ARE FOREIGNERS, WE HAVE NO RIGHTS THE PLIGHT OF REFUGEES, ASYLUM-SEEKERS AND MIGRANTS IN LIBYA

International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. IFRC Policy Brief: Global Compact on Migration

NIGER ISSUES RELATED TO IMMIGRATION DETENTION

1273 meeting (6-8 December 2016) (DH) Communication from Armenia concerning the Virabyan group of cases against Armenia (Application No.

COUNTRY FACTSHEET: MALTA 2012

IOM NIGER OVERVIEW NOVEMBER 2017 MIGRANT RESOURCE AND RESPONSE MECHANISM (MRRM)

Amnesty International statement to the 86 th Session of the Council of the International Organization for Migration (IOM)

EN 4 EN ACTION FICHE FOR MIGRATION AND ASYLUM SPECIAL MEASURES 2008 ANNEX. 1. IDENTIFICATION Title/Number

L 348/98 Official Journal of the European Union

Delegations will find attached the conclusions adopted by the European Council at the above meeting.

Ambassador Peter SØRENSEN Permanent Delegation of the European Union to the United Nations Office and other international organisations in Geneva

Malta Declaration by the Members of the European Council. on the external aspects of migration: addressing the Central Mediterranean route

MSS v. Belgium & Greece (application No /09)

HAUT-COMMISSARIAT AUX DROITS DE L HOMME OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS PALAIS DES NATIONS 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND

Managing migrations: the cooperation strategy begins to bear fruit

***I POSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular point (d) of Article 77(2) thereof,

THE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA

European Council Conclusions on Migration, Digital Europe, Security and Defence (19 October 2017)

Are migrants paying price as EU targets smugglers in the Med?

Submission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. For the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Compilation Report

Greece Amnesty International submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review 11 th session of the UPR Working Group, May 2011

ACP-EU JOINT PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

JOINT STATEMENT Thailand: Implement Commitments to Protect Refugee Rights End detention, forcible returns of refugees

GLOBAL INITIATIVE ON PROTECTION AT SEA. UNHCR / A. D Amato

8147/18 1 GIP LIMITE EN

Western Europe. Working environment

Draft Council Conclusions on initiating dialogue and cooperation with Libya on migration issues

Content: Arrivals to Europe Overview, Relocations, Migrants Presence, Transit Countries, Overview Maps, Fatalities in the Mediterranean and Aegean

Purposive Interpretation

THE EU S GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT TO COUNTER SMUGGLING AND TRAFFICKING NETWORKS

ALGERIA. I. Background and current conditions

20. ASYLUM SEEKERS AND REFUGEES A RIGHTS BASED APPROACH

Angola Immigration Detention Profile. Last Updated: June 2016

Delegations will find attached the conclusions adopted by the European Council at the above meeting.

Eritrea Researched and compiled by the Refugee Documentation Centre of Ireland on 8 February 2013

SUPPLEMENTARY APPEAL 2015

VISION IAS

Ten years of EUROMED: Time to end the human rights deficit

Concluding observations on the combined twentieth to twenty second periodic reports of Bulgaria*

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 11 October 2013 (OR. en) 2011/0427 (COD) PE-CONS 56/13 FRONT 86 COMIX 390 CODEC 1550

Concluding observations on the fifth and sixth combined periodic reports of Italy*

José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero Prime Minister of Spain Presidency of the European Union Brussels, 25 February 2010 Our Ref: B942

11836/17 PC-JNG/es 1 DGD 1B LIMITE EN

COUNTRY OPERATIONS PLAN OVERVIEW

1310 th meeting (March 2018) (DH) Communication from Ireland concerning the case of O'KEEFFE v. Ireland (Application No /09)

Controlling Borders while Ensuring Protection

IN THE COURT OF SESSION WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS FOR THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES IN THE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL BY I.A.

SELECTED BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS CARIBBEAN REGIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE PROTECTION OF VULNERABLE PERSONS IN MIXED MIGRATION FLOWS

MIGRANTS IN CRISIS IN TRANSIT: 2015 NGO PRACTITIONER SURVEY RESULTS NGO Committee on Migration. I. Introduction

Revision to the UNHCR Supplementary Budget: The Libya Situation 2011

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL AND THE COUNCIL. Fifteenth report on relocation and resettlement

Kingdom of Thailand Universal Periodic Review 2 nd Cycle Submitted 21 September 2015

LIMITE EN COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 23 October /12 LIMITE ASIM 131 COMIX 595

BRIEF POLICY. Drowned Europe Authors: Philippe Fargues and Anna Di Bartolomeo, Migration Policy Centre, EUI. April /05

Ad-Hoc Query on Return Policy to Eritrea. Requested by BE EMN NCP on 24 th June Compilation produced on 16 th August 2010

GA CCME Work Programme

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL SHARPSTON delivered on 20 June 2017(1) Case C 670/16. Tsegezab Mengesteab v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Transcription:

SECRETARIAT GENERAL SECRETARIAT OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS SECRETARIAT DU COMITE DES MINISTRES Contact: Mireille Paulus Tel: 03 88 41 22 55 DH-DD(2012)744 Date: 24 August/août 2012 Documents distributed at the request of a Representative shall be under the sole responsibility of the said Representative, without prejudice to the legal or political position of the Committee of Ministers. Meeting: 1150 DH meeting (24-26 September 2012) Item reference: Communication from a NGO (Amnesty International) in the case of Hirsi Jamaa against Italy (Application No. 27765/09) and reply of the government (original text in Italian available at the Secretariat). Information made available under Rules 9.2 of the Rules of the Committee of Ministers for the supervision of the execution of judgments and of the terms of friendly settlements. * * * * * * * * * * * Les documents distribués à la demande d un/e Représentant/e le sont sous la seule responsabilité dudit/de ladite Représentant/e, sans préjuger de la position juridique ou politique du Comité des Ministres. Réunion : 1150 réunion DH (24-26 septembre 2012) Référence du point : Communication d'une ONG (Amnesty International) dans l'affaire Hirsi Jamaa contre Italie (requête n 27765/09) et réponse du gouvernement (texte original en italien disponible auprès du Secrétariat). Informations mises à disposition en vertu des Règles 9.2 et 9.3 des Règles du Comité des Ministres pour la surveillance de l exécution des arrêts et des termes des règlements amiables.

Ms Geneviève Mayer Head of the Department for the Execution of Judgments Directorate of Monitoring Council of Europe Avenue de l Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex France Genevieve.Mayer@coe.int European Institutions Office Brussels, 14 August 2012 Our Ref : B1241 TIGO IOR 61/2012.003 AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL S SUBMISSION TO THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS: HIRSI JAMAA AND OTHERS V ITALY, APPLICATION NO 27765/09 Dear Ms Mayer, Please find enclosed a briefing submitted in accordance to Rule 9 (2) of the Rules of the Committee of Ministers for the supervision of the execution of judgments and of the terms of friendly settlements with a view to assisting the Committee of Ministers in its evaluation of the general measures taken to date by the Italian government to fulfil its obligations to implement the Grand Chamber s judgment in the case of Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy. Annexed to the briefing are the following documents: - Migration control agreement between Italy and Libya, 3 April 2012 - Unofficial English translation of the Migration control agreement between Italy and Libya - Libya: Rule of Law or Rule of Militias?, Amnesty International, Index: MDE 19/012/2012, July 2012 Yours sincerely, Dr Nicolas J Beger Director rue de Trèves 35, B-1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel. +32-2-502.14.99 - Fax +32-2-502.56.86 E-mail : AmnestyIntl@amnesty.eu - Web site : www.amnesty.eu

DH-DD(2012)744: distributed at the request of Italy / distribué à la demande de l'italie. Documents distributed at the request of a Representative shall be under the sole responsibility of the said Representative, without prejudice to the legal or political position of the Committee of Ministers. / Les documents distribués à la demande d un/e Représentant/e le sont sous la seule responsabilité dudit/de ladite Représentant/e, sans préjuger de la position juridique ou politique du Comité des Ministres. Amnesty International European Institutions Office AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL S SUBMISSION TO THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS: HIRSI JAMAA AND OTHERS V ITALY, APPLICATION NO 27765/09 This briefing is submitted in accordance with Rule 9(2) of the Rules of the Committee of Ministers for the supervision of the execution of judgments and of the terms of friendly settlements adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 10 May 2006. In the light of Italy s obligations under international human rights and refugee law, Amnesty International seeks to assist the Committee of Ministers in its evaluation of the general measures that the Italian Government states that it has taken to date to comply with the judgment of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy. The Grand Chamber s indication in its Hirsi Jamaa judgment of individual measures necessary for its execution was without prejudice to the general measures required to prevent other similar violations in the future.1 Regarding the general measures, the following information focuses on: the risk to foreign nationals in an irregular situation in Libya, particularly those from SubSaharan Africa, whether refugees, asylum-seekers or migrants, of being subjected to illtreatment in the country; and, the additional risk people in an irregular situation face, including those entitled to international protection, of being arbitrarily repatriated from Libya to third countries, as the Grand Chamber found in Hirsi Jamaa. Amnesty International considers that the said risks are partly the result of the continuing cooperation measures between Italy and Libya in the context of preventing irregular migration. 1. Continuing cooperation between Italy and Libya on migration control Despite substantial public evidence that migrants, refugees and asylum-seekers still face serious abuse in Libya, on 3 April 2012 Italy signed a new agreement with Libya on migration control. Amnesty International repeatedly asked the Italian authorities to make the content of the agreement public but the requests went unheeded. The text of the agreement was leaked to the Italian press on 18 June. A copy of the text is attached, together with an unofficial English translation. 2 The veracity of the leaked document was not questioned by Italian authorities.3 Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy, [GC] no. 27765/09, 23 February 2012, 210. A copy of the agreement can be found annexed to this submission and in the following link: http://www.lastampa.it/_web/tmplframe/default.asp?indirizzo=http://www.lastampa.it/_web/download/pdf/ruotolo.pd f. An unofficial English translation of the agreement, by the Jesuit Refugee Service, is attached. 3 On 20 June 2012, the Italian Minister of Interior, Annamaria Cancellieri, released an interview on this matter, also reported on the website of the Ministry of Interior. In it, among other things, Minister Cancellieri confirmed that she did not intend to revise agreements already established between Italy and Libya, although the Italian government would not implement further pushbacks, even because we are working to create conditions where Libya has the instruments and means to avoid departures from its coasts. 1 2 2

Amnesty International European Institutions Office The provisions in the agreement confirm Amnesty International s concerns: the Italian authorities seek support from Libya in stemming migration flows, while turning a blind eye to the fact that migrants, refugees and asylum-seekers are at real risk of serious human rights abuses there. Through the agreement, Libya commits itself to strengthening control over its borders to prevent unauthorized departures from its territory, and Italy commits itself to providing training and equipment to enhance border surveillance. However, apart from a tokenistic mention of human rights, there is no indication of any concrete measures to prevent human rights abuses from occurring in the context of this cooperation. In relation to foreign nationals held in detention centres, commitment to respect human rights is not accompanied by any implementation mechanism, such as giving access to UNHCR and other independent organizations to detention places to monitor conditions of detention, ensuring access to legal counsel and interpretation services and the courts. There is no commitment to provide for the specific protection needs of asylum-seekers, such as signing a Memorandum of Understanding with the UNHCR, ratifying the UN Refugee Convention and adopting asylum legislation and practices consistent with international law and standards. The right to asylum is not even mentioned, despite the fact that among the many Sub-Saharan African nationals living in Libya or transiting the country who are the target of Italian-Libyan cooperation, there will inevitably be many who need international protection. Moreover, the agreement euphemistically refers to reception, rather than detention centres, and to the construction of new reception centres and European support to re-establish existing ones. This is despite the fact that Italy knows or ought to know that Libya s holding centres for irregular migrants are detention centres, and currently, largely outside government control. Within a framework of bilateral cooperation, the agreement includes a commitment to re-start the activities already agreed on for the construction of the health centre in Kufra. This is intended to provide medical services for first aid to illegal immigrants who come from Kufra and surrounding areas. As Amnesty International has documented, the situation in Kufra is extremely dangerous and volatile and the city serves as a hub for unscrupulous human smugglers. Migrants, refugees and asylum-seekers who are apprehended crossing into Libya are subjected to harsh detention in inhumane conditions. The agreement signed on 3 April refers to planning sea operations in the respective areas of jurisdiction, in accordance with bilateral agreements. As emerged from the Hirsi judgment, the operation to intercept vessels on the high seas and to push the occupants back to Libya followed the entry into force of bilateral agreements between Italy and Libya. According to the Committee of Ministers Decision on Hirsi Jamaa and others v. Italy, 4 the Italian authorities have provided the Committee of Ministers with information about renegotiation of these agreements with a view to adapting them to the Convention s requirements. However Amnesty International cannot see how, under the terms of the 3 April agreement, previous bilateral agreements have been made consistent with the Convention s requirements, as they have been left untouched. The Committee of Ministers may wish to establish, in particular: http://www.interno.gov.it/mininterno/export/sites/default/it/sezioni/sala_stampa/interview/interviste/2099_500_mini stro/0979_2012_6_20_intervista_la_stampa.html 4 Adopted at the Committee of Ministers 1144th (DH) meeting, 4-6 June 2012, paragraph 4. 3

DH-DD(2012)744: distributed at the request of Italy / distribué à la demande de l'italie. Documents distributed at the request of a Representative shall be under the sole responsibility of the said Representative, without prejudice to the legal or political position of the Committee of Ministers. / Les documents distribués à la demande d un/e Représentant/e le sont sous la seule responsabilité dudit/de ladite Représentant/e, sans préjuger de la position juridique ou politique du Comité des Ministres. Amnesty International European Institutions Office what steps the Italian Government has taken since 3 April to ensure the new agreement and former bilateral agreements are implemented in a way that is consistent with Italy s international human rights and refugee law obligations; and what steps the Italian Government has taken to ensure that the Libyan Government is not violating the human rights of refugees, asylum-seekers and other foreign nationals as part of the implementation of these agreements. The 3 April agreement envisages that Italy supplies technical means and equipment to Libya to strengthen border surveillance and prevent departures of migrants from its territory. Amnesty International has collected testimonies from people who described embarking from the Libyan coast, being intercepted by a Libyan coastguard and taken into detention. The conditions prevailing in detention centres in Libya, where foreign nationals in an irregular situation are held, are described below. Any supplies provided by the Italian Government are likely to cause or contribute to human rights violations. A state cannot deploy its official resources, agents or equipment for actions that would constitute or lead to human rights violations, including within the territorial jurisdiction of another state. The Court s case-law holds contracting parties responsible for violations of their obligations under the Convention which are neither negotiable, nor avoidable through extra-territorialisation.5 2. Overview of the current human rights situation, with particular respect to refugees, asylumseekers and migrants in Libya Research by Amnesty International and other human rights groups has exposed widespread human rights abuses against foreign nationals in an irregular situation, particularly refugees, asylum-seekers and migrants from Sub-Saharan Africa, in Libya during Colonel al-gaddafi s rule, as well as during and following the conflict that deposed him.6 In a report published on 5 July 2012, Libya: Rule of Law or Rule of Militias? (see attachment), Amnesty International documents the prevailing lawlessness in Libya, where transitional authorities have been unable or unwilling to rein in the hundreds of militias formed during and after the 2011 conflict that ended the rule of Colonel al-gaddafi.7 The militias now threaten the very future of Libya. They are killing people, making arbitrary arrests, torturing detainees and forcibly displacing and terrorising entire communities. They act above the law, committing crimes without fear of punishment. Since March 2011, Amnesty International has visited over 30 places of detention in Libya, including official, semi-official and unrecognised ones. Follow-up visits in 2012 to several facilities confirmed that while treatment generally improves for longer-term detainees, new arrivals continue to suffer abuse. In May and June this year, Amnesty International found evidence of recent abuses, including torture, in 12 of 15 detention facilities where it was allowed to interview detainees in private. 5 See, inter alia: M.S.S. v Belgium and Greece [GC], application no. 30696/09, 21 January 2011, 342; T.I. v United Kingdom (decision, 2000); Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083/94, 67, ECHR 1999 I. 6 See for example Amnesty International reports: Libya of Tomorrow: What hope for human rights? (Index: MDE 19/007/2010); Libya: Militias threaten hopes for new Libya (Index: MDE 19/002/2012). 7 Libya: Rule of Law or Rule of Militias?, Amnesty International, Index: MDE 19/012/2012, July 2012, available at http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/mde19/012/2012/en/f2d36090-5716-4ef1-81a7f4b1ebd082fc/mde190122012en.pdf See particularly Chapter 3, entitled Foreign Nationals at Risk, pp. 34-45. 4

Amnesty International European Institutions Office Amnesty International s above-mentioned report also shows that the situation of foreign nationals in an irregular situation is more precarious now than during the al-gaddafi era. Undocumented foreign nationals, especially those from Sub-Saharan Africa, remain at risk of arbitrary arrest, indefinite detention in harsh conditions, and beating or other ill-treatment, which in some cases amounts to torture. They are frequently taken by armed militias at check-points or from the streets, rounded up from their homes, intercepted in the desert or at sea, or caught while trying to board boats. Their crime is to have entered or remained in the country illegally. Detention centres for irregular migrants are under the control of armed militias, and are not overseen by the Ministry of Justice or any other central authority. Individuals who need international protection are vulnerable to the same kind of abuses faced by other foreign nationals in an irregular situation, but their plight is compounded by the fact that there is no possibility of their seeking asylum. Libya has no functioning asylum system; the UNHCR operates there without an official memorandum of understanding, and is not in a position to exercise its protection mandate over people of concern. What is more, UNHCR has not been in a position to register any new asylum-seeker or carry out any refugee status determinations since June 2010. In May and June this year, Amnesty International visited various detention facilities known as holding centres for irregular migrants, including the Kufra detention centre. They were directly controlled by armed militias. Kufra is at the crossroads for people who need international protection and migrants coming from the Horn of Africa. Since the end of the conflict, fighting has erupted several times and tension in the area remains extremely high. While at the time of Amnesty International s most recent visits to the country in May and June this year, a tacit policy of refraining from deporting Somali and Eritrean nationals appeared to remain in place, the situation remains extremely precarious for Somalis and Eritreans who need international protection. Their release from detention was at times conditional on the authorities of their own country confirming nationalities and signing documents to that effect. Amnesty International is deeply concerned that Somali and Eritrean officials are being granted access to asylum-seekers and refugees from those countries as this can put the individuals concerned and their families at real risk. Under its non-refoulement obligations, Libya is required to ensure the safety of individuals seeking protection. This must include ensuring confidentiality for those seeking asylum and not exposing asylum-seekers or their families to direct or indirect risk. Nationals from other countries who have no valid documents are subject to deportation. The absence of a functioning asylum system and the failure to assess cases individually means safeguards against refoulement are non-existent or ineffective. 5

Amnesty International European Institutions Office CONCLUSIONS As detailed above and in the above-mentioned report on Libya, Amnesty International s recent research has established continuing and widespread serious human rights abuses against migrants, refugees and asylum-seekers in Libya with no opportunity for any effective redress. The organization considers that there is ample, credible information publicly available which indicates that foreign nationals in an irregular situation, and particularly Sub-Saharan African refugees and asylum-seekers, face a real risk of human rights abuses in Libya. Amnesty International therefore considers that the Italian authorities, and the authorities of any other state, know or ought to know that such a situation currently endures in Libya. The organization therefore considers that the Italian authorities are not in a position to assert that their Libyan counterparts are able and willing to comply with fundamental human rights in the context of the implementation of any Italian-Libyan cooperation agreements on the prevention of illegal immigration. Indeed, Amnesty International considers that such cooperation will continue to result in grave human rights violations for which, in the circumstances, Italy bears joint responsibility. RECOMMENDATIONS Amnesty International calls on the Committee of Ministers to consider recommending that the Italian Government adopts the following measures: Set aside its existing migration control agreements with Libya Not enter into any further agreements with Libya until the latter demonstrates that it respects and protects the human rights of refugees, asylum-seekers and migrants, and has in place a satisfactory system for assessing and recognising claims for international protection Ensure all migration control agreements negotiated with Libya or any other countries are made public Ensure that any new migration control agreements include adequate safeguards to protect human rights with appropriate implementation mechanisms Ensure that interception operations look to the safety of people in distress and include measures that provide access to individualised assessment procedures, including the opportunity to claim asylum Disclose details of cooperation projects with Libya, including those funded by the EU, as well as information on provision of official resources, personnel and equipment Disclose details of current interception at sea practices vis-à-vis migrants departing from Libya. 6

Courtesy Translation Observations on the Communication of Amnesty International on the Hirsi case. With reference to the document drafted by Amnesty International, we deem it necessary, first of all, to point out that the Italian-Libyan agreement referred to therein (http://www.asgi.it/public/parser_download/save/1_2012_accordo.libia.pdf) does not contain any provision to the contrary of international conventions on human rights signed by our Country, as it was also mentioned by the Minister of Internal Affairs in a meeting with representatives of the organization prior to the signature of the act. Far from being merely formal, the reference to human rights contained in the agreement holds a particular relevance, with contents that improve Libyan capacity of reception of migrants and persons in need of international protection. We do not therefore understand references contained in point 1. of the aforesaid document. Italy is aware of the importance of the migration issue and of the fact that the migration problem in Libya is a problem to be met with determination and urgency, with the help and support of the international community, in order to ensure the stability and security of the Mediterranean, especially in light of the growing instability in the Sahel region and of the need for a rapid re-establishment of an effective and autonomous Libyan capacity of control and management of its borders. The Italian action in support of Libya takes place in this context, on the basis of specific agreements signed - within the framework of the Tripoli Declaration - by the Ministries of Internal Affairs (April 3 rd ) and Defense (May 28 th ) with their Libyan counterparts; these agreements allowed to give real impetus to a substantial package of technical assistance, education, training, institution building and supply of materials in favor of re-established Libyan armed and security forces. Many measures are already in place or have been planned. The Italian Government, in order to ensure a coherent approach to the migration issue one that provides for activities in the field of the rights of migrants and refugees to take place alongside with activities aimed at combating illegal immigration - began in early May a project of assistance and capacity building in the field of reception and management of migrants and refugees, realized by the Italian NGO "Italian Council for Refugees" (CIR). This project carried out in collaboration with the Libyan Ministry of Justice together with the International Organization for Cooperation and Emergency Aid (IOCEA), Caritas Tripoli and the IOM, and in conjunction with UNHCR, the Italian Embassy and the EU Delegation - foresees to put forward an action on the ground, aimed at the creation of a new model for the reception of migrants and refugees in Libya, a model allowing to overcome the difficulties constituted by the presence of numerous victims of trafficking (especially women), by the lack of a mapping and of a proper management of Libyan "detention centers" that will be transformed into "reception centers" and by the lack of a regulatory framework based on international and European standards. In the first phase of the project, CIR has carried out visits and interventions in the centers of Sabratha and Garyan, where a draft project of health care for migrants is being prepared. An initial mapping of 36 centers has been realized in co-operation with UNHCR and the main organizations active in the country. 1

In agreement with the Libyan authorities - who have shown their readiness to cooperate in the improvement of the conditions of migrants and in collaboration with IOM, a program of assisted voluntary return is also being developed. Furthermore, on September 17 th in Tripoli, a first workshop will be held one addressed to Libyan authorities on capacity building in the fight against illegal immigration. Such action will be accompanied by an intervention aimed at facilitating Libya's accession to the Geneva Convention on Refugees of 1951 or, alternatively, the conclusion of a Headquarters Agreement between Tripoli and UNHCR in order to enable the High Commissioner to regularly work in the country. One should also keep in mind the co-operation activities initiated by Italy with Tripoli as part of a training for the control and management of Libyan land, air and maritime areas - activities which include, among other things, the development of technological infrastructure, training of employees in different areas of operation and capacity and institution building activities in favor of the relevant Libyan authorities. Equally effective is the Italian action within the EU, where it is worth mentioning the recent joint letter of the Italian Foreign Affairs and Internal Affairs Ministers to Commissioner Malmstroem and to the High Representative in order to encourage a stronger commitment in North Africa, with particular reference to the issue of migration. As a result of the constant and continuous Italian awareness raising initiative for an effective and rapid support to Libya in the field of security and border control, the Union - recognizing the seriousness of the situation in the country in terms of security - confirmed its commitment to provide further assistance in the areas of border management and security. In this way, among other things, the European project "Sah-Med" - created for the prevention of illegal immigration and trafficking from the Sahara to the Mediterranean and co-financed by the EU and Italy after a suspension due to the war, has been re-started. Of particular importance is the agreement - reached also with Italian support - to start preparing a "Crisis Management Concept" (CMC), in view of the possible deployment of an ESDP civilian mission in the field of border security in Libya. 2