Putting an end to Gerrymandering in Ohio: A new citizens initiative

Similar documents
16 Ohio U.S. Congressional Districts: What s wrong with this picture?

Summary of the Fair Congressional Districts for Ohio Initiative Proposal

Local Opportunities for Redistricting Reform

Citizens Union and the League of Women Voters of New York State

Citizens Union and the League of Women Voters of New York State

Reading Between the Lines Congressional and State Legislative Redistricting

WHERE WE STAND.. ON REDISTRICTING REFORM

ILLINOIS (status quo)

As Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session S. J. R. No A J O I N T R E S O L U T I O N

REDISTRICTING REDISTRICTING 50 STATE GUIDE TO 50 STATE GUIDE TO HOUSE SEATS SEATS SENATE SEATS SEATS WHO DRAWS THE DISTRICTS?

The Very Picture of What s Wrong in D.C. : Daniel Webster and the American Community Survey

State redistricting, representation,

The Center for Voting and Democracy

Partisan Gerrymandering

Assessing California s Redistricting Commission

Partisan Gerrymandering

Redrawing the Map: Redistricting Issues in Michigan. Jordon Newton Research Associate Citizens Research Council of Michigan

ILLINOIS (status quo)

Testimony of FairVote The Center for Voting and Democracy Jack Santucci, Program for Representative Government. October 16, 2006

Redistricting Matters

TX RACIAL GERRYMANDERING

CITIZEN ADVOCACY CENTER

Partisan Advantage and Competitiveness in Illinois Redistricting

H 7749 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

9 Advantages of conflictual redistricting

Purpose of Congress. Make laws governing the nation

Oregon Progressive Party Position on Bill at 2017 Session of Oregon Legislature:

New York Redistricting Memo Analysis

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 S 1 SENATE BILL 702. Short Title: Independent Redistricting Commission. (Public)

Overview. League of Women Voters: The Ins and Outs of Redistricting 4/21/2015

Chapter 5 - The Organization of Congress

Michigan Redistricting Ballot Proposal (VNP)

Gerrymandering: t he serpentine art VCW State & Local

What is fairness? - Justice Anthony Kennedy, Vieth v Jubelirer (2004)

Illinois Redistricting Collaborative Talking Points Feb. Update

REDISTRICTING commissions

A Fair Division Solution to the Problem of Redistricting

PARTISAN GERRYMANDERING

(132nd General Assembly) (Substitute Senate Joint Resolution Number 5) A JOINT RESOLUTION

APPORTIONMENT Statement of Position As announced by the State Board, 1966

Objectives. 1. Warm-Up. 2. National/State Legislatures Worksheet. 3. Congressional Membership Notes. 4. Video Clip US Congress. 5.

AP UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS 2008 SCORING GUIDELINES

Apportionment and Redistricting: Asking geographic questions to address political issues

Case 2:17-cv MMB Document 148 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Ivy Global. Reading Passage 3: History with Graph Practice for the New SAT (2016)

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2005 H 1 HOUSE BILL 1448

The 2020 Census, Gerrymandering, and Voter Suppression

Background Information on Redistricting

IUSD ELECTORAL PROCESS UNDER CONSIDERATION. March 27, 2018

Redistricting in Michigan

Testimony of Natasha M. Korgaonkar Assistant Counsel, Political Participation Group NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

The California Primary and Redistricting

2014 Ohio Election: Labor Day Akron Buckeye Poll

The University of Akron Bliss Institute Poll: Baseline for the 2018 Election. Ray C. Bliss Institute of Applied Politics University of Akron

Mathematics of Voting Systems. Tanya Leise Mathematics & Statistics Amherst College

CITIZEN ADVOCACY CENTER. Congressional Redistricting What is redistricting and why does it matter? A Moderated Discussion

Cooper v. Harris, 581 U.S. (2017).

SECTION 1 The President s Job Description. SECTION 2 Presidential Succession and the Vice Presidency

The League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania et al v. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al. Nolan McCarty

Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund

The Journey From Census To The United States Supreme Court Linda J. Shorey

What to Do about Turnout Bias in American Elections? A Response to Wink and Weber

Paul Smith, Attorney at Law Jenner and Block Washington, DC. Gerry Hebert, Attorney at Law Washington, DC

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 95 Filed 08/01/11 Page 1 of 11

9. Some industries like oil and gas companies largely support candidates. A) Democrats B) Republicans C) Libertarians D) Independent candidates

Congress has three major functions: lawmaking, representation, and oversight.

activists handbook to

LEGAL ISSUES FOR REDISTRICTING IN INDIANA

Congressional Elections, 2018 and Beyond

CITIZENS REDISTRICTING COMMISSION PROPOSAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Redistricting in Louisiana Past & Present. Regional Educational Presentation Baton Rouge December 15, 2009

INITIATIVE PETITION AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION

1. States must meet certain requirements in drawing district boundaries. Identify one of these requirements.

The Next Swing Region: Reapportionment and Redistricting in the Intermountain West

Redistricting Reform in Virginia: Why It's Needed, Why We Should Care 1

Congressional Elections

Chapter 32. Bipartisan Gerrymandering: Miller v. Ohio. To the conventional wisdom the term Bipartisan Gerrymandering is an oxymoron.

Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Electoral Districts

VNP Policy Overview. Davia Downey, Ph.D Grand Valley State University

AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF PHILIP P. KALODNER IN SUPPORT OF NEITHER PARTY

In The Supreme Court of the United States

ELECTING CANDIDATES WITH FAIR REPRESENTATION VOTING: RANKED CHOICE VOTING AND OTHER METHODS

NEW PERSPECTIVES ON THE LAW & ECONOMICS OF ELECTIONS

Magruder s American Government

activist handbook to

Primary Election Systems. An LWVO Study

Name: Class: Date: 5., a self-governing possession of the United States, is represented by a nonvoting resident commissioner.

Political Report: September 2010

AN AMENDMENT TO ESTABLISH THE ARKANSAS CITIZENS' REDISTRICTING COMMISSION

REPUBLICAN PARTY OF MINNESOTA CONSTITUTION

- 1 - Second Exam American Government PSCI Fall, 2001

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Utah Citizens Initiative Petition

A STATISTICAL EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS OF LEGISLATIVE AND CONGRESSIONAL REDISTRICTING IN CALIFORNIA:

Gerrymandering and Local Democracy

Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Electoral Districts

Redistricting: Nuts & Bolts. By Kimball Brace Election Data Services, Inc.

TOP TWO PRIMARY By Harry Kresky, openprimaries.org INTRODUCTION

NEW YORK STATE SENATE PUBLIC MEETING ON REDISTRICTING DECEMBER 14, 2010

Transcription:

Putting an end to Gerrymandering in Ohio: A new citizens initiative

Gerrymandering is the practice of stacking the deck in favor of the candidates of one party and underrepresenting its opponents by drawing district lines in a manner that effectively determines which candidate will win

Gerrymandering

This is done by packing supermajorities of the opponent s voters into a few districts, thereby wasting many of the votes in support of the opposition party, and/or cracking their core areas of support by splitting communities and scattering their votes into several districts with overall majorities supporting the other party. In contrast, the gerrymandering party s supporters are efficiently distributed into districts with safe but not excessive majorities.

This has consequences that are highly detrimental to the quality of democracy In 2012, Democratic candidates for the Ohio House of Representatives received 55,000 votes more than their Republican rivals, and yet the Republicans increased their share of seats to a supermajority of 60 out of 99 seats. First, the distribution of seats does not fairly reflect the preferences of the voters. In 2012, Republican candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives received 1.4 million fewer votes than Democrats, but retained control of the House with a 16-seat majority; and in Ohio, Republican Congressional candidates received 52% of the vote but won 75% of the seats (12 out of 16).

Second, incumbents are ensconced in safe seats, supported by majorities that are so large that they cannot realistically be removed from office. In the 2016 election for the Ohio House of Representatives only 4 of 99 seats were decided by 10% or less; 44 of 99 seats were won by margins of victory greater than 40%; and 25 districts were so lopsided in favor of one party that the opposition did not even field a candidate. And none of our 16 congressional districts is competitive. This lack of competitiveness greatly undermines the accountability of elected officials, who cannot really be removed from office by the voters no matter how poorly they perform in office.

The lack of competitiveness also means that the real election is the primary, not the general election, whose outcome is a foregone conclusion. And since those voters who participate in primaries tend to be more ideologically extreme than the general electorate, this has contributed to a serious polarization of American politics. Finally, the representation of communities is undermined by splintering them into several districts, or by diluting their voting strength by outnumbering them with voters from distant regions with very different views and preferences

Ohio s Congressional Districts: 20012-2020 7 of Ohio s counties are split up among 3 or more districts, with Cuyahoga and Summit counties fragmented into 4 districts. And what community is represented by districts 4, 6 or 15?

The root of the problem: The party that controlled the Apportionment Board by a simple majority was largely free to draw state legislative district boundaries as it sees fit, subject only to population size requirements and the VRA. And there are no constraints on the ability of the majority party in the legislature to gerrymander Congressional district boundaries. The Ohio Supreme Court ruled in 2012 that the Ohio Constitution does not require political neutrality or, for that matter, politically competitive districts or representational fairness in the apportionment board s creation of state legislative districts. We therefore changed the Constitution regarding legislative districts.

Issue 1 will put an end to the gerrymandering of state legislative districts in time for the 2022 elections. Issue 1 will replace the 5-member Apportionment Board with a 7-member Redistricting Commission, composed of the Governor, the Auditor, the Secretary of State and two representatives of the legislature appointed by the leaders of the party caucuses in each house Unlike the current process (in which the party holding a simple majority on the Apportionment Board is free to enact whatever gerrymandered map it wants), the new Redistricting Commission can only adopt a 10-year plan if it receives support from at least two members of the minority party

New and clearly stated criteria must be followed in drawing district lines requiring that communities be kept together by regulating and limiting the number of splits of counties, municipalities and contiguous townships; that No General Assembly district plan shall be drawn primarily to favor or disfavor a party; that the overall allocation of seats correspond closely to the statewide political preferences of the voters of Ohio ; and that districts should be geographically compact. For the first time, representational fairness is an aspirational goal in the Ohio Constitution.

Issue 1 had broad bipartisan support. It (as HJR 12) was approved in the Ohio Senate by a vote of 28-1, and in the Ohio House by a vote of 81-7. It was ratified by the voters on Nov. 3, 2015, by a margin of 71.5% to 28.5%. But what about Congressional redistricting reform? All of Ohio s major newspapers have endorsed Congressional redistricting reform; so, too, have all of Ohio s governors or recent former governors (Kasich, Strickland, Taft, Voinovich and Celeste), as have most of the Republican statewide office holders (Kasich, Husted, Yost, Mandel and DeWine)

So if there is broad, bipartisan agreement in support of reform of redistricting for state legislative districts, why not move immediately to apply these reforms to Congressional redistricting as well? Ohio House Speaker Rosenberger and Senate President Obhof have both said we must wait Issue 1 goes into effect so that we see how this works that would delay Congressional redistricting reform until 2032 a stand described by the Akron Beacon Journal as Speaker Rosenberger s 17-year Plan We should not have to wait nearly two decades before we get rid of gerrymandering!

Therefore, we are preparing to launch a citizen initiative which would place a proposed constitutional amendment before the voters in 2017. Our plan is quite simple: It begins by transferring responsibility for drawing Congressional district lines from the legislature (where Republicans have supermajorities in both houses) to the 7-member Ohio Redistricting Commission created by Issue 1, and requiring the supportive vote of at least two members of the minority party in order to adopt a Congressional map

It allows any citizen of Ohio to submit a plan The criteria used by the Redistricting Commission to rank plans are as follows: Compliance with the constitutions and laws of Ohio and the US, including those dealing specifically with protection of minority voting rights No congressional district plan shall be drawn to favor or disfavor a political party or candidates Splits of counties, cities and townships shall be minimized, and no county shall be split more than once

Representational fairness will be maximized by adopting a plan whose statewide proportion of districts most closely corresponds to the partisan preferences of the voters in state and federal partisan statewide general election results over the previous ten years Congressional districts shall be compact Nearly all of the language of our initiative is taken verbatim from Issue 1, but it is much shorter

Simulations using our initiative language show that it is most likely to result in no more than 9 districts favoring one party and no less than 6 districts favoring the other, with an 8 and 7 district compromise most likely It would also create 6 competitive districts in the 50-55% range, and a few more between 55 and 60% In the 2014 election, there was only one race that was as close as 58% It would also create a minority opportunity district in the Cuyahoga/Summit county area and another favorable to African-American representation Franklin County Moreover, the creation of the maps described above required just 9 splits (including just 5 county splits)

Unless redistricting procedures and criteria can changed, unfair, single-party domination of Ohio s Congressional delegation will continue until at least 2032!

Here s how you can help to correct this serious flaw in American democracy: (1) Donate to support Fair Congressional Districts for Ohio: [Until our official campaign account is set up] Go to www.lwvohio.org. Click donate, noting that your contribution is for Fair Districts [Until our official campaign account is set up, your contribution is tax-deductible]

[After our official campaign account is set up ] (2) Help us with crowdsourcing our fundraising efforts Share our e-mail requests with your friends and family throughout the United States We will probably need $10 million to win, and we hope that most of this funding will be from small donations (3) Please help us collect signatures to place our initiative on the ballot

(4) Write letters to the editor in support of our redistricting reform campaign (5) Talk to your friends, neighbors, family and co-workers Remember, Fair Districts = Fair Elections