Choose or Chosen? An Interactive Exploration of Congressional District Boundaries

Similar documents
TX RACIAL GERRYMANDERING

Reading Between the Lines Congressional and State Legislative Redistricting

Objectives. 1. Warm-Up. 2. National/State Legislatures Worksheet. 3. Congressional Membership Notes. 4. Video Clip US Congress. 5.

The Next Swing Region: Reapportionment and Redistricting in the Intermountain West

WHERE WE STAND.. ON REDISTRICTING REFORM

CITIZEN ADVOCACY CENTER

Organization of Congress

2. Identify the factors of political socialization. Rank them from #1 (most important) to #5 (least important). Then, explain your ranking.

Assessing California s Redistricting Commission

Gerrymandering: t he serpentine art VCW State & Local

Redistricting Matters

activists handbook to

ORGANIZING TOPIC: NATIONAL GOVERNMENT: SHAPING PUBLIC POLICY STANDARD(S) OF LEARNING

Elections by Trustee Area Informational Session on Transition to Trustee Areas. June 25-26, 2018

16 Ohio U.S. Congressional Districts: What s wrong with this picture?

Redrawing the Map: Redistricting Issues in Michigan. Jordon Newton Research Associate Citizens Research Council of Michigan

Local Opportunities for Redistricting Reform

Overview. League of Women Voters: The Ins and Outs of Redistricting 4/21/2015

CITIZEN ADVOCACY CENTER. Congressional Redistricting What is redistricting and why does it matter? A Moderated Discussion

New York Redistricting Memo Analysis

Module 7 - Congressional Representation

The 2020 Census, Gerrymandering, and Voter Suppression

Redistricting 101 Why Redistrict?

IUSD ELECTORAL PROCESS UNDER CONSIDERATION. March 27, 2018

Mid Term Elections 2018

activist handbook to

Purpose of Congress. Make laws governing the nation

Illinois Redistricting Collaborative Talking Points Feb. Update

Map Manipulations: A Brief Perspective on Gerrymandering

The Legislative Branch Chapter 10, 11, 12

AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF PHILIP P. KALODNER IN SUPPORT OF NEITHER PARTY

CITIZENS REDISTRICTING COMMISSION PROPOSAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Redistricting & the Quantitative Anatomy of a Section 2 Voting Rights Case

Partisan Gerrymandering in 2016: More Extreme Than Ever Before

RACIAL GERRYMANDERING

Summary of the Fair Congressional Districts for Ohio Initiative Proposal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

GIS in Redistricting Jack Dohrman, GIS Analyst Nebraska Legislature Legislative Research Office

IUSD ELECTORAL PROCESS UNDER CONSIDERATION. May 8, 2018

What to Do about Turnout Bias in American Elections? A Response to Wink and Weber

Capstone Prospectus Julia Jackson, PUAD 5361 September 2, 2015

The Very Picture of What s Wrong in D.C. : Daniel Webster and the American Community Survey

Illinois Redistricting Collaborative 2018 Gubernatorial Gerrymandering Survey

CALIFORNIA INITIATIVE REVIEW

Redistricting in Louisiana Past & Present. Regional Educational Presentation Baton Rouge December 15, 2009

Can Mathematics Help End the Scourge of Political Gerrymandering?

Fair Maps=Fair Elections

Board on Mathematical Sciences & Analytics. View webinar videos and learn more about BMSA at

By social science convention, negative numbers indicate Republican advantage and positive numbers indicate Democratic advantage.

REDISTRICTING commissions

Mathematics of Voting Systems. Tanya Leise Mathematics & Statistics Amherst College

ILLINOIS (status quo)

CSE 308, Section 2. Semester Project Discussion. Session Objectives

Redistricting Reform in Virginia: Why It's Needed, Why We Should Care 1

Claremont McKenna College April 21, 2010 Douglas Johnson Ian Johnson David Meyer

NEW PERSPECTIVES ON THE LAW & ECONOMICS OF ELECTIONS

ILLINOIS (status quo)

Michigan Redistricting Ballot Proposal (VNP)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. v. Civil Case No. 1:17-CV TCB

Examples that illustrate how compactness and respect for political boundaries can lead to partisan bias when redistricting. John F.

2010 CENSUS POPULATION REAPPORTIONMENT DATA

Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund

NEW YORK STATE SENATE PUBLIC MEETING ON REDISTRICTING DECEMBER 14, 2010

Florida's Future State and County Policies: 2010 Elections Will Be Significant in Future Policy Choices 1

APPORTIONMENT Statement of Position As announced by the State Board, 1966

William & Mary Law School 2011 Virginia Redistricting Competition

Partisan Gerrymandering

The Journey From Census To The United States Supreme Court Linda J. Shorey

Case 3:15-cv WHA Document 35 Filed 04/22/16 Page 1 of 7

Partisan Gerrymandering

Topic 4: Congress Section 1

All People are Equal, but Some People are More Equal Than Others

COMPACTNESS IN THE REDISTRICTING PROCESS

Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Electoral Districts

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

A STATISTICAL EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS OF LEGISLATIVE AND CONGRESSIONAL REDISTRICTING IN CALIFORNIA:

VNP Policy Overview. Davia Downey, Ph.D Grand Valley State University

MN LET THE PEOPLE VOTE COALITION INFORMATION SHEETS ON SOME PROPOSED CAUCUS RESOLUTIONS FOR FEBRUARY 6, 2018 CAUCUSES JANUARY 22, 2018

Apportionment and Redistricting: Asking geographic questions to address political issues

Putting an end to Gerrymandering in Ohio: A new citizens initiative

Testimony of FairVote The Center for Voting and Democracy Jack Santucci, Program for Representative Government. October 16, 2006

The Congress 113th Congress (ISTOCKPHOTO)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

GUIDE TO DISTRICTING LAW PREPARED FOR THE CHULA VISTA DISTRICTING COMMISSION

American Government Unit 3 Rules were made to be broken or at least interpreted

Redistricting in Louisiana Past & Present. Regional Educational Presentation Monroe February 2, 2010

Geometry of Gerrymandering. Introduction. black representation in the U.S. House through drawing districts in such a way that diluted the

Case 2:03-cv TJW Document 323 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LEGAL ISSUES FOR REDISTRICTING IN INDIANA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

A Fair Division Solution to the Problem of Redistricting

3 2fl17 (0:9901. Colorado Secretary of State Be it Enacted by the People ofthe State ofcolorado:

REDISTRICTING REDISTRICTING 50 STATE GUIDE TO 50 STATE GUIDE TO HOUSE SEATS SEATS SENATE SEATS SEATS WHO DRAWS THE DISTRICTS?

The National Legislature Chapter 10 Section 1

DESIGNING INDEPENDENT REDISTRICTING COMMISSIONS

Redistricting in Michigan

Texas Redistricting: Rules of Engagement in a Nutshell

Open Source, Public Redistricting Software

[J ] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Article I: Legislative Branch

Transcription:

Yale University EliScholar A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale Library Map Prize Library Prizes May 2017 Choose or Chosen? An Interactive Exploration of Congressional District Boundaries Steven M. Roets Yale University Follow this and additional works at: http://elischolar.library.yale.edu/library_map_prize Recommended Citation Roets, Steven M., "Choose or Chosen? An Interactive Exploration of Congressional District Boundaries" (2017). Library Map Prize. 1. http://elischolar.library.yale.edu/library_map_prize/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Library Prizes at EliScholar A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale. It has been accepted for inclusion in Library Map Prize by an authorized administrator of EliScholar A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale. For more information, please contact elischolar@yale.edu.

Choose or Chosen? An Interactive Exploration of Congressional District Boundaries Senior Project in Art: Painting and Printmaking Steven Matthew Roets Advisor: Molly Zuckerman-Hartung

There are many boundaries that are obvious marked by rivers, walls, or signs. But there are others that are hidden in plain sight and are slyly changed every decade. These boundaries determine our decision-makers, influencing the political process in every imaginable way. Every ten years, congressional districts are redrawn to reflect changes in population a process known as redistricting. Redistricting is a political process, which in most states is controlled by the majority party in the legislature. The resulting districts determine the citizens that will together elect a Member of Congress for five elections. A series of Supreme Court cases in the early 1960s, including Baker v. Carr (1962) and Wesberry v. Sanders (1964), solidified the principle of one person, one vote. Before this time, congressional districts had often remained unchanged for decades, creating massively unequal representation, typically under-representing urban areas. In the decades since, congressional districts have been redrawn after every census to ensure approximately equal population. While a step in the right direction, this does not mean that representation has been fair. Because redistricting is a political process, legislators can choose who is in what district, solidifying their own party s hold on power. Instead of voters choosing politicians, politicians choose voters. This is known as Gerrymandering. Hanging from the hooks on the wall are a series of congressional district maps. The maps on black fabric are the decennial congressional districts for the Upper Midwest from 1963 to the present day. The maps on white fabric represent hypothetical congressional districts using various methods of redistricting. On the floor is a map showing the current partisan political representation in Congress. Color Years (Black) Methods (White) Orange 1963-1972 Compactness Yellow 1973-1982 Dilution Green 1983-1992 Political Boundaries Blue 1993-2002 Preserve Communities Purple 2003-2012 Cracking Red 2013-present Tacking Grab the maps. Layer them on top of each other. See how they have changed over time and how they compare. The previous text was my gallery statement for the art installation which served as my Art Senior Project. I made a series of geographically accurate maps of congressional districts since the 1960s for Wisconsin and adjacent states in the Upper Midwest. Through layering these maps, viewers could compare how district boundaries changed over time and see the direct

impact of gerrymandering. In addition, I made a second map for each year which exaggerated the redistricting or gerrymandering tactic that seemed to be most obviously employed in that decade s redistricting. My installation was designed to engage the viewer in a conversation about redistricting and gerrymandering. Through layering and manipulating the maps I made, the viewer could actually see how redistricting really does impact the political system. Through the use of materials, I also explored my relationship to gender roles and the distinction between gallery art and family crafts (sewing, embroidery, quilting, etc.). I have included images of the installation below. If interested, I also have a video of myself discussing the work. Questions can be directed to either steven.roets@yale.edu or steven.m.roets@gmail.com.