UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DEFENDANTS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION IN LIMINE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc Doc. 332 Att. 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Western Division - Los Angeles) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:08-cv VBF-PLA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv TSC-DAR Document 104 Filed 06/24/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: Civ-Martinez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,

AS MODIFIED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, STERLING SAVINGS BANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CERTIFICATE OF NO RESPONSE

INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. Plaintiff, Case No. 2:09-CV Hon. Marianne O.

Case dml11 Doc 6977 Filed 03/13/12 Entered 03/13/12 15:13:05 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:16-cv PK Document 486 Filed 07/24/17 Page 1 of 6

Case Doc 225 Filed 10/05/18 Entered 10/05/18 14:02:08 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 9

Case 2:13-cv JAK-AGR Document 457 Filed 12/07/15 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:13889

Case GMB Doc 207 Filed 12/21/13 Entered 12/21/13 14:45:36 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 2

CASE NUMBER: DIV 71. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

CASE NO. 16-CV RS

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION : : : Chapter 9

2:12-cv DPH-MJH Doc # 63 Filed 05/30/13 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 1692 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv RS Document 380 Filed 04/19/18 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:12-cv JD Document 48 Filed 10/31/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,_. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:10-cv LTS

Case3:15-cv VC Document25 Filed06/19/15 Page1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * *

Case 2:16-cv RAJ Document 8 Filed 03/30/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Jose) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:06-cv JF

Case: 3:18-cv TMR Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/16/18 Page: 1 of 4 PAGEID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

mg Doc 5847 Filed 11/18/13 Entered 11/18/13 19:33:43 Main Document Pg 1 of 10

The parties to this case, through their respective counsel, have conferred by regarding

scc Doc 74 Filed 10/13/17 Entered 10/13/17 14:26:37 Main Document Pg 1 of 7

NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/11/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 58 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/11/2016 EXHIBIT 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION. THOMAS C. and PAMELA McINTOSH

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

1900 M Street, NW, Ste. 250, Washington, D.C

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. District of Oregon. Plaintiff(s), vs. Case No: 6:07-CV-6149-HO. Defendant(s). Civil Case Assignment Order

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Case 2:08-cv GLF-NMK Document 62 Filed 12/09/09 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Funambol, Inc. Doc. 52

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

being preempted by the court's criminal calendar.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

U.S. District Court Eastern District of Michigan (Flint) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:98-cv PVG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:10-cv RMU Document 19 Filed 01/13/11 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. Chapter 11

Case 2:16-cv JAK-AS Document 29 Filed 10/15/16 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:190

Third-Party Plaintiff, Third-Party Defendant x YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED, to answer the Complaint of the

2 BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRE-TRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

PlainSite. Legal Document

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

Case3:12-cv MEJ Document5 Filed01/18/12 Page1 of 5

THERE ARE NO SUBMITTED MOTIONS IN THIS PART AND ALL MOTIONS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, MUST BE ORALLY ARGUED.

Case 1:18-cv JFK Document 62 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 8:14-cv DOC-AN Document 85 Filed 09/11/14 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:2663

Case 1:15-cv LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-1274-LCB-JLW

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:15-cv WHA Document 150 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 7

mg Doc 5954 Filed 11/26/13 Entered 11/26/13 14:41:13 Main Document Pg 1 of 7 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Debtors.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendant.

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2011 Page 1 of 8

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO.3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. ELAINE SCOTT, Plaintiff, Case No. 4:09-cv-3039-MH v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/31/ :44 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2015

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 3:08-cv CRB Document 1 Filed 09/02/2008 Page 1 of 1

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:14-cv JGK

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS SIXTH DIVISION

LEWIS A. KAPLAN United States District Judge United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Transcription:

Eight Mile Style, LLC et al v. Apple Computer, Incorporated Doc. 123 EIGHT MILE STYLE, LLC and MARTIN AFFILIATED, LLC, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION vs. Plaintiffs Case No. 2:07-CV-13164 Honorable Anna Diggs Taylor Magistrate Judge Donald A. Scheer APPLE COMPUTER, INC. and AFTERMATH RECORDS d/b/a AFTERMATH ENTERTAINMENT, Defendants. / STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING TRIAL SCHEDULE, EXPERT DISCOVERY ON DAMAGES, AND RESOLUTION OF PLAINTIFFS EMERGENCY DISCOVERY MOTION (DKT #120) At a session of said Court, held in the Federal Courthouse in the City of Detroit, County of Wayne, State of Michigan, on this June 22, 2009 Present: Honorable Anna Diggs Taylor United States District Judge Upon noting the stipulation of the parties below, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) The Bench Trial in this matter shall commence on September 22, 2009, at 9:00 A.M. before United States District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor. The Final Pretrial Conference and Settlement Conference shall take place on August 6, 2009, at 9:30 A.M. (2) The date for Plaintiffs to serve their disclosure pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) on the issue of alleged damages shall be July 3, 2009. The date for Dockets.Justia.com

Defendants to serve their rebuttal disclosure on the issue of alleged damages shall be August 3, 2009. The last date for depositions of damages experts shall be August 14, 2009. (3) The date for completing all depositions noticed as of May 28, 2009 (including depositions noticed as of that date and thereafter re-noticed) shall be July 31, 2009, in accordance with the parties stipulation set forth herein; (4) Plaintiffs Emergency Motion to Resolve Discovery Issues (Docket No. 120), which this Court referred to Magistrate Judge Scheer (Docket No. 121), is withdrawn. The hearing set for June 16, 2009 before Magistrate Judge Scheer is taken off calendar (Docket No. 122). Dated: June 22, 2009 S/ ANNA DIGGS TAYLOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES WHEREAS, by Order entered June 8, 2009, the Court set a Bench Trial in this matter for September 1, 2009, at 9:00 A.M. before United States District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor, and set the Final Pretrial Conference and Settlement Conference for August 6, 2009, at 9:30 A.M.; and WHEREAS, Defendants have advised Plaintiffs that the September 1, 2009 presents a hardship for Defendants because Defendant Aftermath Records client representative and at least one of Defendants trial witnesses would be unavailable for the trial. Specifically, Aftermath s client representative, Scott Bauman, Vice President and Litigation Counsel (Universal Music Group), has a pre-paid, pre-planned (since December 2008) vacation out of the country with his family scheduled for the period August 18 - September 3, 2009. Mr. Bauman has been Aftermath s client representative responsible for this litigation. He has attended numerous depositions, has been involved in client-to-client discussions with Plaintiffs representatives, and will be Aftermath s client representative in attendance at the trial. In addition, one of 2

Aftermath s trial witnesses, Rand Hoffman, Head of Business and Legal Affairs (Interscope- Geffen-A&M Records), will be on a pre-planned vacation from September 4 through September 11, 2009. Defendants have inquired of Plaintiffs of their willingness to continue the trial from the September 1, 2009 date to accommodate these conflicts; and WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have advised Defendants that Plaintiffs counsel is unavailable for trial starting on either September 8 or September 15, 2009, because of pre-existing commitments. Plaintiffs have further advised that they would be available for and agree to a trial commencement of September 22, 2009. Plaintiffs have further advised that they would not agree to commence the trial at a later date, because Defendants counsel has a trial commitment in early October, Plaintiffs counsel is unavailable the second half of October, and Plaintiffs do not want the trial to be continued to November; and WHEREAS, counsel for the parties have inquired of the Court s availability for trial commencing on September 22, 2009, and have been informed by the Court s staff that the parties should submit a stipulation explaining the reasons for their request; and WHEREAS, the parties would not request a modification to the date and time for the Final Pretrial Conference and Settlement Conference; and WHEREAS, the parties have discussed and agreed on a schedule for the exchange of expert disclosures and expert depositions on the issue of alleged damages, as set forth herein; and WHEREAS, by Stipulation and Order entered April 21, 2009, the Court set a cut-off date of June 10, 2009 for remaining discovery (Docket No. 119); and WHEREAS, a dispute arose between the parties regarding Plaintiffs service on May 28, 2009 of deposition subpoenas on third parties EMI Music Publishing ( EMI ), Harry Fox Agency ( Harry Fox ), Rondor Music International/Almo Music Publishing ( Rondor ), Universal Music Corp. ( Universal ) and WB Music Corp. ( Warner ) (each, hereafter, a Third 3

Party, and the subpoenas to these Third Parties referred to collectively as the May 28, 2009 Third-Party Subpoenas ); and WHEREAS, on June 2, 2009, Plaintiffs filed an Emergency Motion to Resolve Discovery Issues Concerning the May 28, 2009 Third-Party Subpoenas (Docket No. 120); and WHEREAS, by Order entered June 3, 2009, the Court referred Plaintiffs Emergency Motion to Magistrate Judge Donald A. Scheer (Docket No. 121); and WHEREAS, the parties, having met and conferred regarding the Emergency Motion, have agreed to a resolution of issues related to the May 28, 2009 Third-Party Subpoenas, as set forth below; NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND AMONG THE PARTIES HERETO AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD THAT (1) Subject to the Court s approval, the parties agree to the commencement of the Bench Trial in this matter on September 22, 2009, at 9:00 A.M. The parties are available for the Final Pretrial Conference and Settlement Conference on August 6, 2009, at 9:30 A.M., and do not ask the Court to change the date and time for the Final Pretrial Conference and Settlement Conference. In the event the Court is unavailable to commence the trial starting on September 22, 2009, Defendants respectfully request that the Court convene a scheduling conference with counsel to discuss the trial date. (2) The date for Plaintiffs to serve their disclosure pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) on the issue of alleged damages shall be July 3, 2009. The date for Defendants to serve their rebuttal disclosure on the issue of alleged damages shall be August 3, 2009. The last date for depositions of damages experts shall be August 14, 2009. (3) The parties have agreed to the following procedure regarding the conduct of remaining fact depositions, including those depositions noticed in the May 28, 2009 Third-Party Subpoenas: 4

(a) As of the date of this stipulation, Plaintiffs have received documents in response to the May 28, 2009 Third-Party Subpoenas from EMI and Warner, and Plaintiffs have not received documents from Harry Fox, Rondor or Universal. In addition, Defendants are producing additional documents to Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs would like the opportunity to review these documents to determine if Plaintiffs want to go forward with one or more of the depositions noticed pursuant to the May 28, 2009 Third-Party Subpoenas; (b) Upon receiving and reviewing documents, if any, produced in response to the May 28, 2009 Third-Party Subpoenas, as well as any additional documents produced by Defendants, Plaintiffs will make a good-faith determination whether the need for one or more depositions pursuant to the May 28, 2009 Third-Party Subpoenas can be obviated by means of a foundational affidavit or declaration from one or more Third Parties. Defendants reserve the right to seek a foundational affidavit or declaration from one or more of the Third Parties (or from any other non-party subpoenaed in connection with this matter). (c) If Plaintiffs elect to proceed with the deposition of any Third Party, then Plaintiffs shall follow the following procedures for each such deposition: (i) Plaintiffs deposition of each such Third Party shall be no more than two hours in duration, unless otherwise agreed to by Defendants or permitted by Order of the Court (or the Magistrate Judge) based upon a showing of good cause based on documents produced to Plaintiffs following the date of this stipulation; (ii) Any deposition of Rondor or Universal shall be treated together as a single deposition for purposes of the two-hour limitation set forth in Paragraph 3(c)(i) above; (iii) If Plaintiffs elect to take a deposition of EMI and/or Harry Fox, Plaintiffs agree to (A) conduct those depositions on the same day in New York, (B) work cooperatively with Defendants counsel to schedule such New York deposition(s) in conjunction with Defendants counsel s availability in New York during the month of July 2009, and 5

(C) make Plaintiffs witness on pending 30(b)(6) topics, Joel Martin, available for deposition in New York in conjunction with the depositions of EMI and/or Harry Fox; and (iv) Any deposition that Plaintiffs elect to take of Rondor/Universal and/or Warner shall take place in Los Angeles at the offices of Defendants counsel, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP. (4) The date for completing all depositions noticed as of May 28, 2009 (including any depositions noticed as of that date and thereafter re-noticed) shall be extended to and including July 31, 2009. (5) Plaintiffs and Defendants each represent that, as of the date of this stipulation, neither has any plans or intentions to notice the depositions of any additional fact witnesses (whether an entity or individual). (6) Plaintiffs Emergency Motion to Resolve Discovery Issues (Docket No. 120), which this Court referred to Magistrate Judge Scheer (Docket No. 121), is withdrawn as moot. /s/ Daniel D. Quick P48109 Daniel D. Quick (P48109) Dickinson Wright PLLC 38525 Woodward Avenue Suite 2000 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304 (248) 433-7200 dquick@dickinsonwright.com /s/ Kelly M. Klaus Kelly M. Klaus Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP 355 South Grand Avenue Suite 3500 Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560 (213) 683-9238 kelly.klaus@mto.com Attorneys for Defendants 6

/s/ Howard Hertz Howard Hertz (BAR) Hertz Schram PC 1760 South Telegraph Road, Suite 300 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302-0183 (248)335-5000 hhertz@hertzschram.com /s/ Richard S. Busch Richard S. Busch King & Ballow 1100 Union Street Plaza 315 Union Street Nashville, TN 37201 (615) 726-5422 rbusch@kingballow.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Order was served upon counsel of record via the Court's ECF System to their respective email addresses or First Class U.S. mail disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on June 22, 2009. s/johnetta M. Curry-Williams Case Manager 7