TOUHY REQUESTS Responding to Subpoenas and Requests for Information and Witnesses U.S. Army Litigation Division

Similar documents
FRAUD STATISTICS - OVERVIEW

FRAUD STATISTICS - OVERVIEW October 1, September 30, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Discovery Requests in Trademark Cases Under U.S. Law

New Article 32, Preliminary Hearing Procedures for Commanders. (On or After 26 December 2014)

FRAUD STATISTICS - OVERVIEW

TABLE OF CONTENTS. PREFACE...i

Obtaining Information From Financial Institutions

CONGRESSIONAL REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION

UNCLASSIFIED INSTRUCTION

Obtaining Information From Financial Institutions

Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. No. 164 August 24, Part V

Subj: USE OF BINDING ARBITRATION FOR CONTRACT CONTROVERSIES

Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures

R in a Nutshell by Mark Meltzer and John W. Rogers

Presentation to the. Mexico City. Phillip Herr. April 18, 2012

District of Columbia False Claims Act

SECURING ATTENDANCE OF WITNESSES

Responding to Government Investigations of Fraud and Abuse: Legal and Practical Issues

April 30, Dear Acting Under Secretary Rea:

View from a Federal Prosecutor: Legal Pitfalls to Avoid. Medtrade Spring March 28, 2018 Mark Rush Josh Skora

"Body" means a governmental, international or non-profit organisation. ***

POSITION DESCRIPTION TRIAL ATTORNEY, GS

Army Regulation Legal Services. Litigation. Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 19 September 1994.

USE OF DoD INSPECTOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE SUBPOENAS IN SUPPORT OF AUDITS, EVALUATIONS, AND INVESTIGATIONS FOREWORD

TEXAS DISCOVERY. Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

California Bar Examination

Handling Criminal Healthcare Fraud Cases Healthcare Enforcement Compliance Institute October 25, :30 to 3:00 P.M. Washington, D.C.

STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES

Attorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters

Privacy, personal information, law enforcement and lawful access

FRAUD STATISTICS - OVERVIEW October 1, September 30, 2010 Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice

Protect Our Defenders Comment on Victims Access to Information and the Privacy Act

INTERPLAY Patent-Related Issues in the Government Contracts Universe

John Fargo, Director Intellectual Property Staff, Civil Division Department of Justice.

Overview. n Discovery-Related Considerations n Scope of Discovery n Typical Types of Fact Discovery n Expert Discovery

PlainSite. Legal Document. District Of Columbia District Court Case No. 1:07-mc RJL TROLLINGER et al v. TYSON FOODS, INC.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION. THOMAS C. and PAMELA McINTOSH

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Guidance on Obtaining Information from Financial Institutions

The Arbitration Act, 1992

Illinois Freedom of Information Act

A Basic Overview of The Privacy Act of 1974

SOLUTIONS. An Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedure. Version

Damages and Remedies in Civil IP Cases An U.S. Perspective

Patient Any person who consults or is seen by a physician to receive medical care

Uniform Arbitration Act; Mediation or Arbitration of Trust Instruments; HB 2571

Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California. Law & Order Code INTER-TRIBAL COURT OF APPEALS RULES

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

REVISED AS OF MARCH 2014

Citizen Advocacy Center Guide to Illinois Freedom of Information Act

Policy on Minimum Substantive and Procedural Standards for Student Disciplinary Proceedings

Chicago False Claims Act

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Record Retention Program Overview

Standing Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals

Understanding and Applying the CREATE Act in Collaborations

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Investigations and Enforcement

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

PART III Discovery CHAPTER 8. Overview of the Discovery Process KEY POINTS THE NATURE OF DISCOVERY THE EXTENT OF ALLOWABLE DISCOVERY

Case 1:07-mc GBL-BRP Document 21 Filed 04/18/2008 Page 1 of 17

Secured Services Web Site Administrator Agreement

A.A.C. T. 6, Ch. 5, Art. 75, Refs & Annos A.A.C. R R Definitions

NOTICE OF FINAL RULEMAKING TITLE 16. TAX APPEALS CHAPTER 4. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION PREAMBLE

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW COURT

APPEALS, LITIGATION and WORKING WITH THE GENERAL COUNSEL

Ch. 41 MEDICAL ASSISTANCE APPEAL PROCEDURES 55 CHAPTER 41. MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROVIDER APPEAL PROCEDURES GENERAL PROVISIONS

NC General Statutes - Chapter 50 Article 2 1

Organizational Conflicts of Interest and Post Government Employment Restrictions

MISCONDUCT BY ATTORNEYS OR PARTY REPRESENTATIVES BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD (NLRB)

TECHNOLOGY & BUSINESS LAW ADVISORS, LLC

Responding to Government Investigations: What to do when the Government Knocks. Gabriel Colwell Partner Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP

Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (Federal Acquisition Regulation - Subpart 33.2)

U.S. Army Garrison Fort A.P. Hill Instructions for Request for Unescorted Installation Access

ADOPTED JUNE 19, 2013 MODEL POLICY DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL IMPEACHMENT EVIDENCE FOR RECURRING INVESTIGATIVE OR PROFESSIONAL WITNESSES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

NC General Statutes - Chapter 150B Article 3A 1

Whistleblowers: Brief Overview of Bio-Rad and Its Implications for. Corporate Counsel and Their Employers

ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE

CHAPTER 1. DISCLOSING EXPERT WITNESSES UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES: AN OVERVIEW

DATA COLLECTION AGREEMENT MASTER TERMS RECITALS

You means the associate signing this document and any other person who asserts that associate s rights.

ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 H 1 HOUSE BILL 380. Short Title: Amend RCP/Electronically Stored Information.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office Brady Committee Protocol

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

10 THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT PATENT REFORM. W. Edward Ramage Chair, IP Group Baker Donelson

FRESNO COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION (FCERA) ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS AND APPEALS TO THE BOARD POLICY

Issue Original UFADAA PEAC Act Revised UFADAA Permitted unless the decedent opted out while alive.

ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS

T he landscape for patent disputes is changing rapidly.

CHAPTER 121 STORED WIRE AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AND TRANSACTIONAL RECORDS ACCESS

The Army Privacy Program

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

I. THE COMMITTEE S INVESTIGATION

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. Association of Chief Police Officers England & Wales

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 45C 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER ADOPTING PROTECTIVE ORDER. (Issued January 23, 2012)

Transcription:

TOUHY REQUESTS Responding to Subpoenas and Requests for Information and Witnesses U.S. Army Litigation Division

References DODD 5405.2, Release of Official Information in Litigation and Testimony by DOD Personnel as Witnesses 32 C.F.R. 516, Subpart G, Release of Information and Appearance of Witnesses AR 27-40, Chapter 7, Release of Information and Appearance of Witnesses

Overview A Touhy request is a request for official information in support of litigation where the Government is not a party to the litigation applies to any request for witnesses, documents, or information for all types of litigation comes in the form of subpoena or letter asking SJA or legal advisor to locate the witness or evidence and coordinate production The SJA/Legal Advisor can handle most requests without LITDIV assistance LITDIV is always available to assist

Valid Request AR 27-40 requires that the information be sought in support of judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings Must request factual information (no opinion or expert) Must state nature and relevance of the information sought Must provide 14 days advanced notice If necessary, requestor presents Privacy Act waiver or court order, signed by judge or magistrate, for Privacy Act protected information

When to Deny Request is unduly burdensome or inappropriate under applicable court rules-7-5b(2) Disclosure inappropriate under procedural rules governing matter in which the request arose-7-5b (3) Disclosure would violate a statute, executive order, regulation, or directive-7-5b(4) Disclosure is not appropriate under relevant substantive law concerning privilege-7-5b(5) Disclosure interferes with enforcement proceedings, compromises constitutional rights, reveals identity of source or informant, discloses trade secrets-7-5b(7)

SJA unable to resolve LITDIV SJA Should Forward If... Involves affirmative litigation LITDIV Involves patents, copyrights, privately developed technological info, or trademarks IP Law Involves taxation KFLD Involves communication, transportation, or utility service proceedings REG Law Involves environmental law ELD Involves contract appeals before ASBCA KFLD Procurement fraud and qui tam PFD/KFLD Involves classified or sensitive information LITDIV Involves IG records LITDIV/TIG LEGAD Involves expert testimony LITDIV (MEDCOM can approve without forwarding)

Subpoenas Letter is the preferred method to request information, but... A federal court (competent jurisdiction) may issue a subpoena in order to compel the Army to produce witnesses or information State court and administrative subpoenas are treated as Touhy requests. Therefore, they must comply with AR 27-40 Do not ignore subpoenas. When request is denied: If Federal court action, contact local AUSA to enter appearance and argue reason that request was denied If State court action, provide court with 27-40 and letter indicating reason request was denied. SJA can ask AUSA to quash subpoena or stay proceedings pending resolution. Informal resolution is best COA

Witnesses Appears at the commander s discretion mission dependent No expense to the United States Army authorizes testimony, it does not compel If approved, presence voluntary subject to possible court order Approval sets left and right limits for testimony no opinion extent of expert testimony extent of classified disclosure Army-designated attorney must be present Court in Touhy held, even if authorized to testify, agency may direct witness not to answer if outside scope of approval

Questions 9