EY Regulatory Alert. Executive summary

Similar documents
EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

Role of Company Secretary In National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) & National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) By CS Jitesh Gupta

National Company Law Tribunal. HITESH BUCH & ASSOCIATES Company Secretaries

Sharing insights. News Alert 7 August, 2012

KSR & Co Company Secretaries LLP PRACTISING COMPANY SECRETARIES & TRADE MARK AGENTS COIMBATORE & CHENNAI

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

Global Employer Services Alert Harmonizing global & local perspectives. Recent key changes to India immigration. Issue no: GES/05/2018.

Section 94A of the Income-tax Act notifying Cyprus as a notified jurisdiction is constitutionally valid

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. W.P.(C) No.8693/2014. George. Versus. Advs. for UOI. HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

Delhi High Court decides on constitutional validity of amended section 145(2) and notified Income Computation and Disclosure Standards

Strengthening Corporate Governance

Global Employer Services Alert Harmonizing global & local perspectives. Recent Changes to Employment and Business Visa. Issue no: GES/23/2017

Arrangement /Compromise When a Company is a Going Concern

DRAFT RULES UNDER COMPANIES ACT 2013 CHAPTER XV COMPROMISES, ARRANGEMENT AND AMALGAMATIONS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No. of 2018

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL APPELLATE TRIBUNAL. CMA N P Viswanathan

Between the lines... Key Highlights. September, 2018

SECTION 138 NI ACT OUTSIDE THE PURVIEW OF MORATORIUM UNDER SECTION 14 OF IBC

Dangerous world. Practical steps for global companies to evaluate and address corruption risk

A STUDY ON THE IMPORTANCE OF NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL IN INDIA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL)NO OF 2017

OF THE PROFESSION AND TASKS AHEAD 24TH NOVEMBER 2016) 2017 AL SAJ CONVENTION CENTRE,TRIVANDRUM,KERALA,INDIA.

National Company Law Tribunal and Appellate Tribunal

INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM THE PRIMARY ORIGINS OF LAW: The Indian Constitution customary law case law, and Statutes (legislation).

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 [ARISING OUT OF SLP(CIVIL) NO OF 2018] VERSUS

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS PASSIVE EUTHANASIA, ISSUES GUIDELINES ON ADVANCE DIRECTIVES IN LANDMARK JUDGEMENT

TATA CLEANTECH CAPITAL LIMITED

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3067 OF Union of India Appellant

J U D G M E N T. 2. These two appeals have been filed against. the identically worded judgments of High Court. of Madhya Pradesh dated

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH, CHANDIGARH. In the matter of Scheme of Amalgamation of: Petitioner No.

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 213 of 2017

WORLD BANK REPORT ON DOING BUSINESS :INDIA ENFORCING CONTRACTS-

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 VERSUS V. RAMAKRISHNAN & ANR.

Key highlights of the immigration guidelines issued for foreign nationals coming to India

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Co. Pet. 8/2015

REGULATION MAKING POWER OF CERC

IIFL. The National Stock Exchange of India Limited. Exchange Plaza, 5th Floor Plot No. C-1, Block G Bandra Kuria Complex, Bandra (East) Mumbai

Impact of enforcement of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 on the sections to the Companies Act, 2013

How to prepare for Limited Insolvency Examination under IBC, Some Practical Tips

SERIOUS FRAUD INVESTIGATION OFFICE AND ITS POWERS UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 2013

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No OF 2018 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.

Australia and VFS Global extend visa service delivery in India and Nepal

Present: Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Rudreshwar Singh, Mr. Swapnil Gupta, Mr. Ujjal Banerjee and Ms. Ankita Sinha, Advocates

THE COMMERCIAL COURTS, COMMERCIAL DIVISION AND COMMERCIAL APPELLATE DIVISION OF HIGH COURTS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2018

Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi

New Zealand Sport & Recreation Sector. An overview of the labour market test and when it is needed under the Essential Skills instructions

THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961

LEGAL SUITE INSIDE THIS ISSUE. Enforcement of Foreign Judgments from courts of Non Reciprocating Territories

EY UK Additional information

Insolvency Professionals to act as Interim Resolution Professionals and Liquidators (Recommendation) (Second) Guidelines, 2018

Regd. Off.: First Floor, Malkani Chambers, Off. Nehru Road, Vile Parle (East), Mumbai NOTICE

MEHTA & MEHTA. Powers vested with Supreme Court by 9 th August Dipti Mehta LEGAL & ADVISORY ARTICLE.

NOTICE NOTICE Aditya Birla Health Insurance Co. Limited at a shorter notice ORDINARY BUSINESS: "RESOLVED THAT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 W.P.(C) 1458/2008

EY GEORGIA TAX & LAW BRIEF

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No of 2013

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

1 of 16. Notified Earlier Notified on March 26, 2013 Not Notified

Page 1 HLE ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED

Versus. 1. M/s Skyhigh Infraland Pvt.Ltd., SCO No.5, First Floor, HUDA Shopping Complex, Sector 8, Karnal

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 181 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. Judgment reserved on: Judgment pronounced on:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA

THE ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2012 BILL AS INTRODUCED IN THE RAJYA SABHA. Bill No. XXXII of 2012

M A R C H The design of India s insolvency code

THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS ACT, 1985 ACT NO. 13 OF 1985 [27th February, 1985.]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

Metropolitan Transport... vs The Presiding Officer on 15 March, Metropolitan Transport... vs The Presiding Officer on 15 March, 2004

AS INTRODUCED IN THE RAJYA SABHA THE ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL BILL, 2005 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras. Dated: Coram:

An Act to provide for efficient use of energy and its conservation and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.

Executive Summary Case No 140 of 2017

Bar & Bench (

DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL: AN ANALYSIS

Winding up. Tribunal. Voluntary (Now governed by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code)

THE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF TECHNOLOGY (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2010

Reporting of Frauds by Auditor. Amendments. Omnibus approval of Audit Committee for Related Party Transactions. Pantomath Advisory Services Group

Through : Mr. A.K.Singla, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Pankaj Gupta and Ms.Promila K.Dhar Advocates. Versus

EY GEORGIA TAX & LAW BRIEF

THE EDUCATIONAL TRIBUNALS BILL, 2010

Getting the foundations right. Mobility Services: Global Immigration

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 33 of Alongwith Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 34 of 2017

PUNJAB STATE ROAD SAFETY COUNCIL RULES 2008

TERMS OF REFERENCE. RECKITT BENCKISER GROUP plc AUDIT COMMITTEE. Adopted by resolution on 28 July 2016

22 nd Year of Publication. A monthly publication from South Indian Bank. To kindle interest in economic affairs... To empower the student community...

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : APPOINTMENT MATTER Date of decision: 11th July, 2012 W.P.(C) No.1343/1998.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7262/2014

Court No Case :- WRIT - C No of 2017

KOLTE-PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD.

24 Appeals and Revision

Notice of Annual General Meeting

[Polity] Courts System of India

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P.(C) 3694/2010 & CM No.7394/2010 (for interim relief) Versus

4. Appointment of Mr. Jayesh Sule (DIN ) as Whole Time Director designated as WTD & COO

Case No.3 of Shri P.Subrahmanyam, Chairman Shri Venkat Chary, Member, Shri Jayant Deo, Member.

MORSES CLUB PLC ( the Company ) Audit Committee Terms of Reference

SEC. 1 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY 3

* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1089/2013 & CM No.2073/2013. Versus

Canadian Immigration: A Historical and Legal Perspective

Transcription:

21 May 2015 EY Regulatory Alert Supreme Court approves the formation of National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). Executive summary This alert summarizes the provisions upheld by the Supreme Court ( SC ) towards formation of NCLT and NCLAT and the impact of key changes due to the Companies Act, 2013 ( Cos Act, 2013 ) vis-a-vis. the existing provisions of corporate restructuring through schemes of arrangement under a High Court process as per the Companies Act, 1956 ( Cos Act, 1956 ).

Background and facts Prior to Cos Act, 2013 The provisions for formation of NCLT and NCLAT were first incorporated by the Legislature in the Cos Act, 1956 in the year 2002. Writ petition was filed by the Madras Bar Association ( the Petitioner ) with the Madras High Court challenging the constitutional validity of the NCLT and NCLAT. The Madras High Court in its judgement in the year 2004 ( 2004 Judgement ) upheld that the creation of NCLT and vesting the powers hitherto exercised by the High Court and the Company Law Board in the said Tribunal was not unconstitutional. However, the Madras High Court pointed out certain defects in provisions dealing with the operational part of NCLT. It also held that unless the said provisions are appropriately amended by removing the defects, it would be unconstitutional to transfer the jurisdiction of High Court, Company Law Board to NCLT and NCLAT. Aggrieved, both parties, i.e the Petitioner and the Union of India ( UOI ) filed an appeal against the said 2004 Judgement in the SC. This appeal filed against the 2004 Judgement in SC was disposed-off in the year 2010 by the Constitution Bench of SC in Union of India v. R Gandhi, President Madras Bar Association 1 ( 2010 Judgement ) which upheld the 2004 Judgement on both counts: - Constitutional validity of NCLT/NCLAT; and - Existence of defects in the operational part and the need to make amendments in the relevant provisions of Cos Act, 1956. After Cos Act, 2013 Though the verdict of the Constitutional Bench came in the year 2010, NCLT and NCLAT were not formed immediately and the matter got stuck into imbroglio of one kind or the other including a still pending Writ Petition No. 267/2012 before SC. During the interim period, the Parliament introduced the Indian Companies Act, 2013 ( Cos Act, 2013 ) containing similar provisions regarding NCLT and NCLAT. The said provisions dealing with NCLT and NCLAT have not been made effective till date. The Petitioner again challenged the provisions of NCLT and NCLAT of Cos Act, 2013 by way of a Writ Petition 2 ( Present Writ Petition ) in the SC mainly on the ground that these provisions suffer from the vice of unconstitutionality as well as the application of the ratio in 2010 Judgement. SC judgement in brief The Present Writ Petition was heard by the SC where it categorised the challenges put forth in three categories, as under: i. Challenge to the validity of the constitution of NCLT and NCLAT; ii. Challenge to the prescription of qualifications etc. of President / Chairman and Members of the NCLT/NCLAT; iii. Challenge to the structure of the Selection Committee for appointment of President/Members of the NCLT and Chairperson/Members of the NCLAT. The SC squarely applied the 2010 Judgement to this case and upheld the Constitutional validity of NCLT and NCLAT mentioned under point (i) above in its judgement dated 14 May 2015 ( SC Judgement 2015 ). As regards issues (ii) and (iii), the SC referring to the 2010 Judgement held 1 (2010) 11 SCC 1 2 Writ Petition (C) No. 1072 of 2013

that the provisions regarding establishment of NCLT and NCLAT contained in Cos Act, 2013 are not valid till the point they are not fully realigned as per the directions given in the 2010 Judgement. Further, SC has held that the technical members in NCLT / NCLAT should be of a rank equivalent to a Secretary or An Additional Secretary in the government of India, as opposed to a Joint Secretary as contemplated in the Cos Act, 2013. NCLT and NCLAT are adequately manned and start functioning in the near future. Conclusion Though the SC Judgement 2015 has given directions to expedite the provisions of NCLT and NCLAT, the pending Writ Petition No 276/2012 also needs to be settled in order to avoid any future road blocks. It has also put its stamp of approval to the directions given under the 2010 Judgement with regard to the Selection Committee, with the caveat that the Chairperson of the Selection Committee being Chief Justice of India or his nominee should have a casting vote. Steps taken so far Apart from the above, in SC Judgement 2015, SC has also considered the following steps taken till date towards setting up of NCLT and NCLAT: Thus, in order for NCLT to take over the functions currently performed by the High Court, the following needs to be addressed: - Settlement of the pending Writ Petition No 276/2012, - Completion of setup of NCLT and NCLAT; and - Notification of the relevant provisions which include provisions of Chapter XV - Compromises, arrangements and amalgamations under sections 230-240 of Cos Act, 2013 and corresponding rules. Approvals taken for creation of various positions in NCLT and NCLAT; Draft Rules on various matters prepared to place before appropriate authorities, inter alia including: - rules, remuneration and recruitment of NCLT/NCLAT members; - schemes of compromises/arrangements, and - rehabilitation of sick companies Space for Principal Bench and other Benches of NCLT at Delhi; Process initiated for set up of infrastructure; Allocation of budget heads for meeting the expenditure; and Surrender of allocated funds in 2014-2015 in view of the delay in settling up the Tribunals. Amongst aforesaid steps, SC also directed that UOI shall take remedial measures as per directions in this judgement at the earliest, so that the Upon notification of the aforesaid provisions of Chapter XV -Compromises, arrangements and amalgamations, the current procedural aspects pertaining to schemes of arrangement would undergo changes which include: i. Threshold limits provided for objections to schemes by any shareholder / creditor; ii. Threshold limits provided for obtaining dispensation from holding creditors meeting; iii. Intimation of compromise/ arrangement to be given to various authorities; iv. Mandatory requirement of auditor s certificate on accounting; v. Provision for indicating Appointed Date in schemes; vi. Exit route to be provided to dissenting shareholders; and vii. Specific provisions for merger of Specified Companies.

Comments The SC Judgement 2015 has upheld the constitutional validity for setting up the NCLT and the NCLAT and has also ensured that the judiciary has a greater role to play than the executive. Due to the petitions filed with the SC, the notification of a large number of sections including provisions for schemes of arrangements involving mergers, demergers etc. under the Cos Act, 2013, haven t been notified yet due to delay in setting up the NCLT. Once the NCLT, is set up it will not just replace the Company Law Board (CLB), but will also take care of cases that are with the High Courts, the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) and the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (AAIFR).

Our offices Ahmedabad 2nd floor, Shivalik Ishaan Near. C.N Vidhyalaya Ambawadi, Ahmedabad 380 015 Tel: + 91 79 6608 3800 Fax: + 91 79 6608 3900 Bengaluru 6th, 12th & 13th floor U B City Canberra Block No.24, Vittal Mallya Road Bengaluru 560 001 Tel: + 91 80 4027 5000 + 91 80 6727 5000 Fax: + 91 80 2210 6000 + 91 80 2224 0695 Prestige Emerald, No. 4, 1st Floor, Madras Bank Road, Lavelle Road Junction, Bangalore - 560001 Chandigarh 1st Floor SCO: 166-167 Sectr 9-C, Madhya Marg Chandigarh 160 009 Tel: + 91 172 671 7800 Fax: + 91 172 671 7888 Chennai Tidel Park, 6th & 7th Floor A Block (Module 601,701-702) No.4, Rajiv Gandhi Salai Taramani Chennai 600 113 Tel: + 91 44 6654 8100 Fax: + 91 44 2254 0120 Hyderabad Oval Office 18, ilabs Centre, Hitech City, Madhapur, Hyderabad 500 081 Tel: + 91 40 6736 2000 Fax: + 91 40 6736 2200 Kochi 9th Floor ABAD Nucleus NH-49, Maradu PO, Kochi 682 304 Tel: + 91 484 304 4000 Fax: + 91 484 270 5393 Mumbai 14th Floor, The Ruby 29 Senapati Bapat Marg Dadar (west) Mumbai 400 028 Tel + 91 22 6192 0000 Fax + 91 22 6192 1000 5th Floor Block B-2, Nirlon Knowledge Park Off. Western Express Highway Goregaon (E) Mumbai 400 063 Tel: + 91 22 6192 0000 Fax: + 91 22 6192 3000 NCR Golf View Corporate Tower B Near DLF Golf Course, Sector 42 Gurgaon 122 002 Tel: + 91 124 464 4000 Fax: + 91 124 464 4050 6th floor, HT House 18-20 Kasturba Gandhi Marg New Delhi 110 001 Tel: + 91 11 4363 3000 Fax: + 91 11 4363 3200 4th & 5th Floor, Plot No 2B, Tower 2, Sector 126, Noida 201 304 Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P. India Tel: + 91 120 671 7000 Fax: + 91 120 671 7171 Pune C 401, 4th floor Panchshil Tech Park Yerwada (Near Don Bosco School) Pune 411 006 Tel: + 91 20 6603 6000 Fax: + 91 20 6601 5900 Ernst & Young LLP EY Assurance Tax Transactions Advisory About EY EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services. The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and confidence in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of our stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building a better working world for our people, for our clients and for our communities. EY refers to the global organization and may refer to one or more of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. For more information about our organization, please visit ey.com. Ernst & Young LLP is one of the Indian client serving member firms of EYGM Limited. For more information about our organization, please visit www.ey.com/in. Ernst & Young LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership, registered under the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 in India, having its registered office at 22 Camac Street, 3rd Floor, Block C, Kolkata 700016. 2014 Ernst & Young LLP. Published in India. All Rights Reserved. ED None This publication contains information in summary form and is therefore intended for general guidance only. It is not intended to be a substitute for detailed research or the exercise of professional judgment. Neither Ernst & Young LLP nor any other member of the global Ernst & Young organization can accept any responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any material in this publication. On any specific matter, reference should be made to the appropriate advisor. Kolkata 22, Camac Street 3rd Floor, Block C Kolkata 700 016 Tel: + 91 33 6615 3400 Fax: + 91 33 2281 7750 EY refers to global organization, and/or one or more of the independent member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited Join India Tax Insights from EY on