UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:06-cv RSM Document 30 Filed 05/04/2006 Page 1 of 6

The Equal Pay Act of 1963

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/20/17 Page 1 of 13

Case 3:12-cv M Document 6 Filed 11/07/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID 18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Hon.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. -v- Civil No. 3:12-cv-4176

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3:14-cv JFA Date Filed 10/03/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 9

The Equal Pay Act of 1963

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case Number: CIV-MARTINEZ-GOODMAN DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS YOUR YELLOW PAGES. INC., CITY PAGES. INC..

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

underpaid overtime compensation, and such other relief available by law. Plaintiffs, against INC.; ARLETE TURTURRO, jointly and severally,

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/07/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Defendants.

Case 1:14-cv CRC Document 222 Filed 10/03/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

Case: 3:11-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/23/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 5:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 3:10-cv HEH Document 1 Filed 08/19/10 Page 1 of 7

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ingles Markets, Inc. Doc. 6 Case 1:06-cv LHT-DLH Document 6 Filed 04/28/2006 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/05/18 Page 1 of 18

Plaintiff, Defendant.

Case 2:15-cv GMN-PAL Document 62 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:18-cv AJN Document 6 Filed 09/29/18 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Sample STATE OF NEW YORK CREDITOR. ,, SUMMONS Plaintiff, Index No. -vs- Date Filed: DEBTOR d/b/a. ,, Defendant. TO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT:

Case: 1:12-cv CAB Doc #: 4 Filed: 07/31/12 1 of 8. PageID #: 84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO.

Case 2:06-cv RSM Document 26 Filed 04/17/2006 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/31/17 Page 1 of 14

Case 9:17-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2017 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. CONSENT OF DEFENDANT SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

INDIVIDUAL, COLLECTIVE, AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 15

Case 1:13-cv LEK-KSC Document 1 Filed 12/18/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:12-cv Document 2-1 Filed 12/20/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Defendant.

2:14-cv DCN Date Filed 10/23/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/22/12 Page 1 of 32 PageID #:1

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1. Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer

4:18-cv RBH Date Filed 05/24/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION

Attorneys for Plaintiff STEVE THOMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEVE THOMA

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/23/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

& Associates, P.C., upon their knowledge and belief, and as against Senator Construction

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/01/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

Case 1:10-cv FB-SMG Document 100 Filed 09/24/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 2229

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Judge COMPLAINT

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 8-1 Filed: 09/06/17 Page 397 of 420 PageID #:481

Case 1:10-cv RJL Document 3-1 Filed 03/22/10 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 7:18-cv CS Document 15 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 23

Case 4:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/18/10 Page 1 of 9

Case 5:18-cv UJH-MHH Document 1 Filed 09/19/18 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:14-cv JFW-AGR Document 1 Filed 06/10/14 Page 1 of 18 Page ID #:1

Plaintiff, COLLECTIVE ACTION v. PURSUANT TO 29 U.S.C. 216(b)

Case 1:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/15/19 Page 1 of 23 ECF CASE NATURE OF THE ACTION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/26/ :03 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/26/2016

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rochdale Village, Inc.

P H I L L I P S DAYES

Case 1:08-cv RJL Document 3 Filed 12/15/2008 Page 1 of 38

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/20/17 Page 1 of 25

Case 2:15-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:11-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/09/11 Page 1 of 11

Case 4:12-cv Document 209 Filed in TXSD on 07/02/14 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

1 ORDER AND JUDGMENT CASE NO. CV JAK (MANX) Dockets.Justia.com

Case 1:18-cv ER Document 72 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 2:16-cv JAR-JPO Document 69 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 01/20/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Sample required format for Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale (with provisions for attorney s fee and additional allowance)

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 8:10-cv RWT Document 77 Filed 03/09/12 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1

4. Prepare Wage Deduction Summons (see Wage Deduction Summons form and Service Page, which must accompany the Wage Deduction Summons).

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 1 of 23. Plaintiff,

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

6:15-cv MGL Date Filed 10/13/15 Entry Number 26 Page 1 of 13

1. OVERTIME COMPENSATION AND

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 3:18-cv LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 07/16/18 PageID.1 Page 1 of 24

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

Case 7:17-cv MFU Document 1 Filed 02/17/17 Page 1 of 9 Pageid#: 1

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND LIMITED RELEASE OF CLAIMS

Case 1:03-cv LJM-TAB Document 745 Filed 05/22/07 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 8174

Case 1:11-cv RJS Document 267 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 11

7:14-cv TMC Date Filed 10/21/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 13

2:17-cv DCN Date Filed 09/10/17 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 9

"Defendants"), to recover damages for egregious. Plaintiffs, -against- counsel, brings this action against FIVE BROTHERS AUTO SPA AND LUBE

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/08/17 Page 1 of 21

EEOC v. Mcdonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

PRECIOUS METALS STORAGE AGREEMENT

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/01/18 Page 1 of 21

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs Li Rong Gao and Xiao Hong Zheng (collectively, Plaintiffs ), individually and

Transcription:

-JEM Hilda L. Solis v. JNB Inc et al Doc. 1 1 1 1 1 Lawrence Brewster Regional Solicitor Daniel J. Chasek Associate Regional Solicitor Luis A. Garcia, Trial Attorney (CSBN #1 Office of the Solicitor (SOL# United States Department of Labor 0 So. Figueroa St., Suite 0 Los Angeles, California 001-1 Telephone: ( -1 Facsimile: ( - garcia.luis.a@dol.gov Attorneys for the Plaintiff Secretary of Labor HILDA L. SOLIS, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, JNB, INC., a California corporation; POP CORN, INC., a California corporation; and KWANG WON KIM a.k.a. DANIEL KIM, Individually, and as the Managing Agent of the Corporate Defendants, Defendants. Case No. CV - VBF (JEMx [Proposed] FIRST AMENDED DEFAULT JUDGMENT BY THE COURT The plaintiff, Hilda L. Solis, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor ( Plaintiff or Secretary, has filed her Complaint for Injunctive Relief and to Recover Amounts Due Under the Fair Labor Standards Act ( Complaint herein; and the defendants JNB, INC., a California corporation ( JNB, POP CORN, INC., a California corporation ( POP CORN, and KWANG WON KIM a.k.a. DANIEL KIM ( KIM, Individually, and as the Managing Agent of the Corporate Defendants (hereafter collectively referred to as the Defendants have been duly served with Summons FIRST AMENDED DEFAULT JUDGMENT BY THE COURT Page 1 of Dockets.Justia.com

1 1 1 1 and a copy of Plaintiff s Complaint; and the default of the Defendants has been entered for failure to serve or file any answer of other pleading; and the Plaintiff has served and filed the Plaintiff s Application for Default Judgment by the Court ( Application, along with a supporting Declaration of the Plaintiff s investigator, Assistant District Director Eric Williams, which verifies the allegations of the plaintiff s Complaint, including the minimum wages and overtime compensation due; now therefore, it is on Application of the Plaintiff and for cause shown: ORDERED that Plaintiff s Application be, and hereby is, granted in full and that judgment by default be entered in favor of the Plaintiff and against the Defendants in accordance with the prayer for relief in Plaintiff s Complaint herein; and it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants, their officers, agents, servants, and employees and those persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this order (by personal service or otherwise be, and they hereby are, permanently enjoined and restrained from violating the provisions of Sections 1(a(1, 1(a( and 1(a( of the Fair Labor Standards Act of, as amended ( U.S.C. 1, et seq. herein called the FLSA, U.S.C. (a(1, (a(, and (a(, in any of the following manners: 1. Defendants shall not, contrary to FLSA, U.S.C., pay any employee who in any workweek is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, within the meaning of the FLSA, or is employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, within the meaning of FLSA (s, U.S.C. (s, engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, within the meaning of the FLSA, employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, within the meaning of FLSA (s, wages at a rate less than $. an hour (or at a rate less than such other applicable minimum rate as may hereafter become effective pursuant to any amendment to the FLSA. FIRST AMENDED DEFAULT JUDGMENT BY THE COURT Page of

1 1 1 1. Defendants shall not, contrary to FLSA, U.S.C., employ any employee who in any workweek is engaged in commerce or the production of goods for commerce, within the meaning of the FLSA, or employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, within the meaning of Section (s of the FLSA, U.S.C. (s, for a workweek longer than 0 hours unless the employee is paid for his or employment in excess of 0 hours in such workweek at a rate not less than one and one half the employee s regular rate at which he or she is employed.. Defendants shall not fail to make, keep, make available to authorized agents of Plaintiff for inspection, transcription, and/or copying, upon their demand for such access, and preserve records of employees and of the wages, hours, and other conditions and practices of employment maintained, as prescribed by regulations issued, and from time to time amended, pursuant to FLSA (c and 1(a(, U.S.C. 1(c and (a( and the implementing regulations found in Title, Code of Federal Regulations, Part.. Defendants shall not fail to preserve for a period of two years and make available (to authorized agents of the plaintiff for inspection, transcription, and/or copying upon their demand for such access order, shipping, and billing records made or retained in the usual course of business operations by defendant(s, as prescribed by regulations issued, and from time to time amended, pursuant to FLSA, U.S.C. 1 and found in Title, Code of Federal Regulations, Part, at.(b.. Defendants shall not, contrary to FLSA 1(a(1, U.S.C. (a(1, transport, offer for transportation, ship, deliver, or sell in commerce (or ship, deliver, or sell with knowledge or reason to believe that shipment, delivery, or sale in commerce is intended goods in the production of which any employee has been employed in violation of FLSA and/or, U.S.C. and/or, and it is further FIRST AMENDED DEFAULT JUDGMENT BY THE COURT Page of

1 1 1 1 ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants, jointly and severally shall not continue to withhold $,0., the unpaid balance of $,1., in unpaid minimum wage and overtime compensation found due under the FLSA to employees of Defendants for the period of time from January 1, 0 to March,, as set forth in the exhibit that is attached hereto, marked Exhibit 1, and made a part hereof, showing the names of each employee and listing on the same line thereof the period of such employment covered therein for the employee and the gross backwage amount due the employee; and it is further, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Plaintiff shall also have and recover from the Defendants, jointly and severally, the additional amount of $,1. as and for liquidated damages hereby found due under the FLSA; and it is further, ORDERED that Plaintiff shall allocate and distribute the remittances, or the proceeds thereof, as soon as practicable, to the persons named in the attached Exhibit 1, or to their estates if that be necessary, in her sole discretion. The Secretary shall be responsible for deducting from the amounts paid to said persons the employees= share of F.I.C.A. and federal income taxes, and for remitting said deductions to the appropriate federal agencies. Any money not so paid within a period of three ( years from the date of its receipt, because of an inability to locate the proper persons or because of their refusal to accept it, shall be deposited by the Secretary in a special deposit account for payment to the proper persons and upon such inability to pay within three ( years, shall then be deposited in the Treasury of the United States, as miscellaneous receipts, pursuant to U.S.C. (c; and, it is further FIRST AMENDED DEFAULT JUDGMENT BY THE COURT Page of

1 1 1 1 ORDERED that pursuant to the immediately preceding three paragraphs and within twenty ( days of entry of this First Amended Default Judgment by the Court, Defendants shall not fail to deliver a certified or cashier s check or money order, made payable to Wage and Hour, Div. of Labor, in the amount of $,.1, in payment of the aforesaid unpaid minimum wage and overtime compensation and liquidated damages to Plaintiff s authorized representatives at: U.S. Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division West Covina District Office 0 North Barranca Avenue, Suite 0 West Covina, CA 1 ORDERED that the filing, pursuit, and/or resolution of this proceeding with entry of this First Amended Default Judgment by the Court shall not act as or be asserted as a bar to any action under FLSA, U.S.C., as to any employee not named, and it is further ORDERED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action for the purpose of enforcing this First Amended Default Judgment by the Court. SO ORDERED. Dated: -- HON. VALARIE BAKER FAIRBANK U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE FIRST AMENDED DEFAULT JUDGMENT BY THE COURT Page of