Azam Mani Khwaga dba Hickory Hollow Wine and Liquor vs. Alcoholic Beverage Commission

Similar documents
Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Valorie D. Thacker vs. Department of Safety

Follow this and additional works at:

Ben Miller dba Miller Enterprises vs. COMMERCE AND INSURANCE

Trey & Michael Torres vs. Safety

Humphreys Flowers, Inc. vs. AGRICULTURE

Follow this and additional works at:

Terry W. Rankin vs. COMMERCE AND INSURANCE

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, COMPLIANCE DIVISION, Petitioner, vs. FIRST CHOICE FUNDING, INC., Respondent

Tennessee Department of Financial Institutions, Compliance Division, Petitioner, vs. Charlton Hildreth, Respondent

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:

Vanessa Quilantan vs. Safety

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:

Mark Singer vs. Commerce and Insurance

Follow this and additional works at:

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, COMPLIANCE DIVISION, Petitioner, vs. FIDELITY HOME MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Respondent

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

BEFORE THE TENNESSEE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF HEARING REGARDING PETITION FOR DECLARATORY ORDER

William K. Bryant vs. Safety

Commerce and Insurance vs. KEITH ODENE DODD, Respondent

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY vs. One 1996 Honda Accord Vin Number 1HGCE1822TA , Date of Seizure: October 21, 2010, Claimant: Lesile Frazier

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at:

Gregory Candebat vs. Commerce And Insurance

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Robert M. Russell vs. Safety

TENNESSEE INSURANCE DIVISION, Petitioner, vs. Docket No.: J JAMES MICHAEL FOLEY, Respondent

Gregory Brunson vs. Safety

Cornelius Sorina vs. Safety

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY, Department/, Petitioner, vs. CSGP 06-52VINCENT TUROCY, Grievant/, Respondent

Gloria Sanchez vs. DHS

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

BOARD OF EDUCATION vs. NATASHA KRUITHOF, Respondent.

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Phone: = _ --~- =~

Gary F. Bickford vs. Safety

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at:

Commerce and Insurance vs. MEMPHIS SECURITY, INC., Respondent

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Instructions for Beer Permit Applicants

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY vs. KEVIN BEATY

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

CTAS e-li. Published on e-li ( November 20, 2018 Prohibited Acts

Tennessee Insurance Division, Petitioner, vs. John Porter Franklin, Jr., Respondent

Matthew McBee vs. Safety

Vaughn, Billy v. Kenneth Parsons d/b/a Performance Mechanical

Anderson Hutsell vs. Dept. of Health

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:

One 1994 Chevrole Pickup, VIN.: 1GCCS14W4R , SEIZED FROM: Trevor A. Coleman, DATE OF SEIZURE: March 12, 2012, CLAIMANT: Trevor A.

The Responsible Vendor Act of 2006

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Department/, Petitioner, vs. CSGP-07-14DOYLE WITCHER, Grievant/, Respondent

CUMBERLAND MANOR NURSING HOME, Petitioner, vs. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BUREAU OF HEALTH LICENSURE AND REGULATION, Respondent

TITLE 8 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES 1 CHAPTER 1 INTOXICATING LIQUORS

Daugherty, Darylin v. Walmart Associates, Inc.

Rulemaking Hearing Rule(s) Filing Form

First Regular Session Sixty-seventh General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED HOUSE SPONSORSHIP

TITLE 8 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES 1 CHAPTER 1 INTOXICATING LIQUORS

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Higgins, Patricia v. Five Points Healthcare, LLC, d.b.a. Willowbrook Home Health

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

DOCKET NO TEXAS ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE BEFORE THE STATE OFFICE COMMISSION, Petitioner V.

Williams, Mark v. Yates Services

SC REVENUE PROCEDURE #13-2. Applies to all periods open under the statute.

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN S SERVICES, Petitioner, vs. DARREN BIVINGS, Grievant.

McWherter, Jacquet v. Centurion Stone Products

Rucker, Tony v. Flexible Staffing Solutions of TN

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs, February 26, 2004

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Individual or Partnership Liquor License Application

STATE OF IOWA BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES DIVISION

Follow this and additional works at:

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Petitioner, vs. LINDA A. JOHNSON, Grievant

Noel, Darlene v. EAN Holdings, LLC

Follow this and additional works at:

Adams, Roy v. Beverly Park Place Health and Rehabilitation

Beers, John v. Rajendra Bhakta, d/b/a Ram Construction

Santiago, Manuel v. Wayne Johnson dba Omega Home Improvements

Follow this and additional works at:

Wilhite, Donna v. Lowes Millwork

Molitor, Leisa v. Shoe Show, Inc.

Beers, John v. Rajendra Bhakta d/b/a Ram Construction

NC General Statutes - Chapter 18B Article 5 1

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT vs. $ in U.S. CURRENCY, SEIZED FROM: MOISES SILVA, SEIZURE DATE: DECEMBER 9, 2009 CLAIMANT: MOISES SILVA

Follow this and additional works at:

Transcription:

University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 4-2-2014 Azam Mani Khwaga dba Hickory Hollow Wine and Liquor vs. Alcoholic Beverage Commission Follow this and additional works at: http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_lawopinions This Initial Order by the Administrative Judges of the Administrative Procedures Division, Tennessee Department of State, is a public document made available by the College of Law Library, and the Tennessee Department of State, Administrative Procedures Division. For more information about this public document, please contact administrative.procedures@tn.gov

Mailed On:4-2-2014 BEFORE THE TENNESSEE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE COMMISSION TENNESSEE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. DOCKET NO: 33.02123557J AZAM MANI KHWAGA d/b/a Hickory Hollow Wine and Liquor 5306 Hickory Hollow Parkway Antioch, TN 37013-3153 Permit No. 3727, Respondent. INITIAL ORDER This contested case was heard in Nashville, Tennessee on January 9, 2014, before Administrative Judge Kim Summers, assigned by the Secretary of State, Administrative Procedures Division, to sit for the Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Commission (ABC). Joshua Stepp, Staff Attorney, represented the TABC in this matter. The Respondent participated in the hearing on her own behalf. The issue in this matter is the Respondent s alleged violation of Tenn. Code Ann. 57-3- 404(b) and Tenn. Comp R. & Regs. 0100-03-.13. After consideration of the entire record, it is determined that only the violation of Tenn. Comp R. & Regs. 0100-03-.13 has been proven by a preponderance of the evidence. This determination is based upon the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.

SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE Six witnesses testified at the hearing: Mark Hutchens, Chief Law Enforcement Officer for the ABC; Juan Gomez, Special Agent for the ABC; Keith Bell, Director of the ABC; Ginna Winfree, Assistant Director; the Respondent; and the Respondent s husband, Kali Khwaga Sidiqi. The testimony presented on behalf of the Petitioner included the following when a business is sold, compliance with Tenn. Code Ann. 57-3-404(b) requires a paper sale of the existing inventory from the current owner of the retail business back to a wholesaler which will then resell the inventory to the new owner of the business. The testimony presented on behalf of the Respondent included the following they were not aware of the paper-sale requirement when they purchased the liquor store and assumed ownership of the existing inventory. The following seven exhibits were entered into evidence: EXHIBIT 1, Citation Narrative; EXHIBIT 2, picture of items for sale; EXHIBIT 3, Forfeiture Warrant; EXHIBIT 4, Affidavit in Support of Forfeiture Warrant; EXHIBIT 5, Inventory of Search; EXHIBIT 6, Citation; EXHIBIT 7, Invoices. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Hickory Hollow Wine and Liquor is a retail business that purchased its inventory from a wholesaler. 2. Kali Khwaga Sidiqi and Azam Mani Khwaga are husband and wife. Together they purchased Hickory Hollow Wine and Liquor in July 2010 for $140,000, which included the existing inventory. 2

3. Azam Mani Khwaga is the registered owner of the business, and Kali Khwaga Sidiqi manages the daily operations. 4. A renewal inspection of the business was conducted on June 4, 2013, by Special Agent Juan Gomez of the Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Commission (TABC). 5. At the time of the inspection, the business was offering for sale 17 bottles of wine at a discount of twenty percent 12 bottles of Highland Manor and 5 bottles of Glen Ellen Reserve. 6. After Special Agent Juan Gomez asked to review the invoices for these items, Kali Khwaga Sidiqi informed him that the invoices were not available because the items had been included with the purchase of the retail business. 7. These 17 bottles of wine were seized pursuant to a Forfeiture Warrant that was issued on June 5, 2013. 8. The invoices had still not been provided to the TABC at the time Special Agent Gomez wrote his report, which is not dated. 9. The TABC issued a citation on August 22, 2013, for seventeen counts of failure to purchase alcoholic beverages from a licensed wholesaler in violation of Tenn. Code Ann. 57-3- 404(b), at a fine of $300 per count, for a total fine of $5100; and one count of failure to maintain three years of records on licensed premises in violation of Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0100-03-.13(2), at $100 per count. 10. The Respondent made a timely request for a hearing on this citation. 11. It is the practice of the ABC to meet with the Parties to the sale of an existing retail liquor store to explain the paper-sale requirement that any inventory included in the sale of a retail business must be transferred to the new owner via a wholesaler. 3

12. The TABC requires the Parties to affirm compliance with the paper-sale requirement to obtain approval of the sale by the TABC and the new owner s license to operate. 13. The paper-sale requirement has not been formalized in a policy document or rule. 14. Based on the invoices produced by the Respondents at the hearing, the 12 bottles of Highland Manor were purchased by the prior owner of Hickory Hollow Wine and Liquor at least three years prior to the inspection, and the 5 bottles of Glen Ellen Reserve were purchased by the Respondents from a wholesaler in April 2013. APPLICABLE LAW 1. RULE 1360 4 1.02(3) of the Uniform Rules of Procedure for Hearing Contested Cases before State Administrative Agencies states, in pertinent part: The petitioner in a contested case proceeding is the moving party, i.e., the party who has initiated the proceedings. The petitioner usually bears the ultimate burden of proof. 2. Tenn. Code Ann. 57-3-404(b) provides the following requirements for the purchase of alcoholic beverages No retailer shall purchase any alcoholic beverages from anyone other than a licensed wholesaler, nor shall any wholesaler sell any alcoholic beverages to anyone other than a licensed retailer, or a licensed wholesaler; provided, that such alcoholic beverages sold by one (1) wholesaler to another wholesaler shall be transported by common carrier or by vehicle owned or leased and operated by either the consignor wholesaler or the consignee wholesaler. 3. Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0100-03-.13(2) provides the following requirements for the maintenance of business records All Licensees Must Keep Records Available Three Years. Each licensee shall keep, for at least three years, all purchase orders, invoices and all other records of all purchases and sales of alcoholic beverages made by such licensee. All such orders, invoices, and all other books and records pertaining to the licensee's operation shall be open for inspection to any authorized representative of the Alcoholic Beverage Commission or Department of Revenue during business hours and failure to make such available shall be deemed cause for revocation of his license. 4

4. Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0100-05-.04(1)(b) & (2)(e) provides the following with respect to the imposition of fines SCHEDULE OF RANGE OF FINES FOR VIOLATIONS BY RETAILERS LICENSED UNDER T.C.A. 57-3-204. (1) The following violations may result in fines from a minimum of one hundred dollars ($100.00) to a maximum seven hundred and fifty dollars. (b) Failure to maintain proper records as required by Rule 0100-03-.14(2). (2) The following violations may result in fines from a minimum of two hundred dollars ($200.00) to a maximum of seven hundred and fifty dollars ($750.00). (e) Purchasing alcoholic beverages from other than a licensed wholesaler contrary to T.C.A. 57-3-404(b). ANALYSIS and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The TABC does not contend that the inventory of Hickory Hollow Wine and Liquor was not initially purchased directly from a wholesaler as expressly required by Tenn. Code Ann. 57-3-404(b), but that the paper-sale process was not used to transfer the inventory when the Respondents purchased and became the new owners of the retail business. 2. The paper-sale process is not specified in Tenn. Code Ann. 57-3-404(b), and the requirement has not been formalized in either a rule or policy document that has been made available to the public. 3. Tenn. Code Ann. 57-3-404(b) does not expressly require any party, including a wholesaler, to participate in the paper-sale process. 4. Although it is the practice of the TABC to inform business owners of this papersale requirement at the time of the sales transaction and obtain a vow of compliance, there is no evidence in the record that the Respondents were made aware of this requirement when they purchased Hickory Hollow Wine and Liquor. 5

5. In any case, the paper-sale requirement would not apply to the 5 bottles of Glen Ellen Reserve that were purchased by the Respondents from a wholesaler in April 2013 6. The Department HAS NOT shown by a preponderance of the evidence that Respondent s actions constituted a violation of Tenn. Code Ann. 57-3-404(b). The citation for this alleged violation and the resulting $5100 fine are hereby OVERTURNED. 7. Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0100-03-.13(2) requires that invoices be retained for three years and be made available for inspection. No invoice was produced prior to the hearing for the 5 bottles of Glen Ellen Reserve that were purchased by the Respondents in April 2013. 8. The Department HAS shown by a preponderance of the evidence that Respondent s actions constituted a violation of Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0100-03-.13(2). The citation for this violation and the resulting $100 fine are hereby AFFIRMED. It is so ORDERED. This INITIAL ORDER entered and effective this the day of 2014. DKSummers KIM SUMMERS ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES DIVISION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE Filed in the Administrative Procedures Division, Office of the Secretary of State, this the day of 2014. J. RICHARD COLLIER, DIRECTOR ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES DIVISION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE 6