IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:11-cv CRW-TJS Document 1 Filed 04/06/11 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

CASE NO. 5:00-CV COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION ON BEHALF OF JACKQULINE STOKES

Case 4:07-cv JLH Document 1 Filed 06/29/2007 ( Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

NATURE OF THE ACTION. This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII CV

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/29/16 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 3:04-cv RLA Document 1-1 Filed 09/30/2004 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT! WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN! SOUTHERN DIVISION!

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

This is an action under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008

Case 1:18-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 168 Filed 10/20/2005 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 1:11-cv LG-JCG Document 2 Filed 11/17/11 Page 1 of 7

) I ClV a S - BUN. 18 This is an action under Title VII ofthe Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil

Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/03/09 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:2

FILED. , #, Case 5:05-cv WRF Document 29 Filed 06/06/2006Page 1 of 9 JUN COMMISSION, Plaintiff, ALICIA MANSEL, Civil Action No.

Case: 1:06-cv JRA Doc #: 28 Filed: 05/08/09 1 of 9. PageID #: 220

Case 2:14-cv MPK Document 1 Filed 04/22/14 Page 1 of 6

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/20/17 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:16-cv JTM-TJJ Document 1 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

PLAINTIFF AVA SMITH- THOMPSON S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT SARA LEE CORPORATION

)

COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demand)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case: 5:15-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2

Case 2:09-cv BSJ-RLE Document 67 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HA WAIl. Case No.: NATURE OF THE ACTION AND JURISDICTION

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9

-CIVIL RIGHTS EMPLOYMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION

Case 5:14-cv DAE Document 4 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 4:16-cv JEG-CFB Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 13

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS eu,:".' IJ~:'LD~~?~:~~URT EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~,~,~,,.c~...,... ~~"~ ~ " FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLI~ SEP -9 ;i ~ [~: 0~ CBA~OTTE OIVlSlON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA DAVENPORT DIVISION. Nature Of The Action

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND NATURE OF ACTION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

Case 4:04-cv LLP Document 1 Filed 12/28/2004 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA.

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

Case 7:17-cv KMK Document 1 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

From Article at GetOutOfDebt.org

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, WESTERN DIVISION

2. One of the defendant in the case is Parker & Gould (P&G). What is exactly P&G?

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11

Case 3:15-cv EDL Document 1 Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 3:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/30/19 Page 1 of 17

Case 3:06-cv JAP-TJB Document 1 Filed 03/27/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 5:17-cv Document 2 Filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION NO. } 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 13

)

.JAh : Plaintiff Salah Williams, residir,g at 129 Chancellor Avenue in the City of Newark,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION

Case 1:06-cv LTB-CBS Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case5:11-cv EJD Document28 Filed09/09/11 Page1 of 10

ORIGINAL COMPLAINT OF THE UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT:

Case 8:04-cv SCB-TBM Document 32 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 1 of 6

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON IN THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1

COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

IN TI-[E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. ..-ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION n/k/a DISH, LTD.,

9:12-cv PMD-BHH Date Filed 09/17/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/24/18 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1. Deadline UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 5:09-cv JMH Document 1 Filed 10/26/2009 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:07-cv NLH-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 12

Case 8:11-cv PJM Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintitl, Defendants. COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT. Brooklyn in which he was serving out the last months of his prison sentence to a

5:06cv1684 JUDGE HICKS MAG. JUDGE HORNSBY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/04/15 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DIVISION OF OHIO EASTERN DISTRICT

Case 9:06-cv RHC Document 1 Filed 02/28/2006 Page 1 of 7

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION FILED DEC 1 2 2005 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, PlaintITf, CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-4176 GEORGE CLARK, JR., RICKEY JOHNSON, and JAMES MEIER, Plaintiffsllntervenors, INTERVENORS' COMPLAINT vs. SARA LEE CORPORATION, d/b/a SARA LEE BAKERY GROUP, Jury Trial Demanded Defendant. NATURE OF THE ACTION This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, SDCL Chapter 20-12 on Human Rights, and other tort actions under South Dakota law to correct unlawful employment practices on the basis of constructive wrongful termination, retaliation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, inter alia on the basis of race, in that Plaintiffs were denied promotions because of their race, and then suffered retaliation for bringing their complaints. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 451,1331, 1337, 1343, and 1345. This action by the Plaintiffs/Intervenors is authorized and instituted pursuant to Section 706 (f(1 oftitle VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f(1. This Court has supplemental jurisdiction,

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367, to address violations of Intervenors' pendant claims under South Dakota law. 2. The employment practices alleged to be unlawful have been committed within the jurisdiction of the United State District Court for the Southern District of South Dakota. PARTIES 3. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "EEOC", is the agency of the United State of America charged with administration, interpretation, and enforcement of Title VII, and is expressly authorized to bring this action. The EEOC filed suit in U.S. District Court on September 26, 2006. 4. Plaintiffs/Intervenors, George Clark, Jr., Rickey Johnson, and James Meier are African Americans who were employed by Defendant Sara Lee Corporation d/b/a Sara Lee Bakery Group in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, at all relevant times under the definitions of Title VII and South Dakota law. 5. At all relevant times, the Defendant Sara Lee Corporation has continuously been a foreign corporation doing business in the State of South Dakota and the City of Sioux Falls, and has continually had at least 15 employees. 6. At all relevant times, the Defendant has continuously engaged in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Sections 701 (b, (g and (h of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e(b, (g and (h. STATEMENT OF CLAIMS 7. More than thirty days prior to the institution of this lawsuit, Intervenors filed charges with the EEOC, alleging violation of Title VII by Defendant. The EEOC issued a determination that Defendant had discriminated against Plaintiff/Intervenor James

Meier on May 31, 2005, and against Plaintiffs/Intervenors Rickey Johnson and George Clark, Jr. on June 5, 2006 by subjecting them to racial discrimination. All conditions precedent to the institution of this lawsuit have been fulfilled. 8. Defendant subjected Plaintiffs/Intervenors to racial discrimination by excluding them from supervisory jobs and giving those jobs to workers who were not African American, but who also were less qualified; Defendant further punished Plaintiffs for contacting Defendant's Human Resources Department, in addition to contacting the Union and governmental entities. With respect to Plaintiffs Johnson and Meier, Defendant placed another supervisor who was selling illegal drugs and asking Johnson and Meier to sell drugs that the supervisor wanted to supply. Plaintiffs refused and reported the requests to Defendant's management. Defendant retaliated by allowing the supervisor to create a hostile work environment for Meier and Johnson, resulting in constructive discharge and ultimately causing them severe emotional distress. COUNT I 9. Defendant's actions and omissions constitute unfair and discriminatory practice and employment as defined under SDCL Chapter 20-13. 10. That unlawful employment actions of Defendant have proximately caused and will continue to cause loss of employability, emotional distress and loss of enjoyment of life. 11. That Defendant Sara Lee is responsible for the acts of their supervisors by reasons of respondeat superior under South Dakota law. COUNT II 12. That as a result of Defendant's unlawful actions and omissions,

Plaintiffs/Intervenors came under severe emotional distress, requiring medical and clinical treatment. 13. That Defendant's acts were deliberate, willful and wanton, with the intent of causing Plaintiffs/lntervenors severe emotional distress under South Dakota law. 14. That Defendant's actions were the legal cause of psychological injury, requiring extensive care and treatment for the Plaintiffs/lntervenors. 15. That Defendant's acts were malicious, fraudulent and oppressive, giving rise to a claim for punitive damages to Plaintiffs/lntervenors. COUNT III 16. That Defendant's actions constitute deceit within the meaning of SDCL 20-10-1 and 20-10-2. 17. That Defendant's actions also constitute deceit within intent to defraud a particular class of persons under SDCL 20-10-3. 18. That Defendant's actions were the legal cause of wages, employability, mental anguish and severe emotional distress, severe and permanent injuries, including medical, hospital and therapeutic treatment, pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life. 19. That Defendant's combined actions were malicious, fraudulent and oppressive from which Plaintiffs/lntervenors have a claim for punitive damages under South Dakota law. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs/lntervenors respectfully request that this Court:

(a Order Defendant to pay for actual damages for past and future pecuniary losses, severe and permanent injuries, medical, hospital and therapeutic treatment and expense, permanent disability, and loss of earnings. (b Order Defendant to pay for damages for emotional distress, pain and suffering, and loss of enjoyment of life. (c Order Defendant to pay punitive damages under South Dakota law in an amount to be determined at trial. Plaintiffs/Intervenors request a separate hearing for discovery and trial of punitive damages under SDCL 21-1- 4.1. (d Order Defendant to pay for Plaintiffs/Intervenors' attorney fees and costs under state and federal law. (e Order such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and equitable. Dated at Sioux Falls, South Dakota this 1ih day of December, 2006. HOY TRII-\lv,/..-t:J-\7'ZOF LCe.. Hoy. Russell Stree Falls, SO 5710 (60 334-8900 On of the Attorneys for PlaintiffS/Intervenors