Is corruption getting better or worse? Citizens views

Similar documents
PEOPLE AND CORRUPTION: LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN. Global Corruption Barometer

GCB Survey. Some of Most of

Global Corruption Barometer 2010 New Zealand Results

Zimbabweans see corruption on the increase, feel helpless to fight it

TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL KENYA

After more than a decade of fighting corruption, how much progress?

How s Life in the United States?

Corruption in Kenya, 2005: Is NARC Fulfilling Its Campaign Promise?

Nigerians optimistic about economic outlook despite persistent poverty, inadequate services

RESULTS FROM THE AFROBAROMETER ROUND 5 SURVEY IN SWAZILAND

Is Malawi losing the battle against Cashgate?

How s Life in New Zealand?

How s Life in the United Kingdom?

Tanzanians perceive ineffective fight against corruption, say citizens have a role to play

8. Perceptions of Business Environment and Crime Trends

Institutional information. Concepts and definitions

The SELDI Corruption Monitoring System: Overview of Methodology and Select Indicators in Nine SEE Countries 2014

How s Life in Hungary?

In Tanzania, anti-corruption efforts seen as paying dividends, need citizen engagement

How s Life in the Slovak Republic?

How s Life in Canada?

How s Life in Turkey?

Summary of the Results of the 2015 Integrity Survey of the State Audit Office of Hungary

How s Life in France?

Special Eurobarometer 470. Summary. Corruption

Chile s average level of current well-being: Comparative strengths and weaknesses

Korea s average level of current well-being: Comparative strengths and weaknesses

How s Life in Switzerland?

PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF CORRUPTION

Ipsos MORI April 2018 Political Monitor

Combating Corruption in Tanzania: Perception and Experience

How s Life in Sweden?

How s Life in Austria?

The Social Contract Center Research, Monitoring and Governance Unit

How s Life in Poland?

How s Life in Belgium?

STUDY OF PRIVATE SECTOR PERCEPTIONS OF CORRUPTION

How s Life in Iceland?

How s Life in Finland?

How s Life in Greece?

How s Life in Norway?

1. Global Disparities Overview

How s Life in Ireland?

How s Life in the Netherlands?

How s Life in Slovenia?

How s Life in Estonia?

NATIONAL CORRUPTION BAROMETER SURVEY (NCBS) 2016

Attitudes towards parties, elections and the IEC in South Africa

Italy s average level of current well-being: Comparative strengths and weaknesses

Spain s average level of current well-being: Comparative strengths and weaknesses

Dorling, D. (2017) The Election Result in Three Graphs, Public Sector Focus, July/August, pp.66-67,

How s Life in Australia?

Security Issues in Nairobi Trends from the Interviewer Exercise Surveys ( )

Gifts, Hospitality & Anti-Bribery Policy

MALTA SUMMARY COUNTRY ANALYSIS

Iraq Mood Improving Despite Divisions General Overview January-March 2014 Survey Findings. Page 1

Japan s average level of current well-being: Comparative strengths and weaknesses

BUSINESS INTEGRITY POLICY

How s Life in the Czech Republic?

Unravelling Child Discrimination

Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC) BURUNDI

ANNUAL SURVEY REPORT: REGIONAL OVERVIEW

CORRUPTION & POVERTY IN NIGERIA

DAILY LIVES AND CORRUPTION: PUBLIC OPINION IN EAST AFRICA

How s Life in Germany?

How s Life in Mexico?

How s Life in Portugal?

ANNUAL SURVEY REPORT: ARMENIA

The Sudan Consortium African and International Civil Society Action for Sudan. Sudan Public Opinion Poll Khartoum State

Children's Referendum Poll

Economic and Social Council

Anti-corruption policy and its implementation in Estonia

Poll Results: Electoral Reform & Political Cooperation

MONGOLIA: TRENDS IN CORRUPTION ATTITUDES

CORRUPTION IN THE STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

ANNUAL SURVEY REPORT: AZERBAIJAN

Is the Internet an Effective Mechanism for Reducing Corruption Experience? Evidence from a Cross-Section of Countries

TAIWAN. CSES Module 5 Pretest Report: August 31, Table of Contents

How s Life in Denmark?

Human Development Indices and Indicators: 2018 Statistical Update. Eritrea

ARTICLES. Poverty and prosperity among Britain s ethnic minorities. Richard Berthoud

Photo by photographer Batsaikhan.G

Evidence from Randomized Evaluations of Governance Programs. Cristobal Marshall

Executive summary 2013:2

Human Development Indices and Indicators: 2018 Statistical Update. Pakistan

Boris Divjak Director of U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre (Bergen, Norway) Transparency International School on Integrity, Vilnius 07 July 2015

Independence, Accountability and Quality of the Judiciary. Performance Indicators 2017

Public Attitudes Survey Bulletin

"Corruption" Andrei Schleifer and Robert Vishny. August Andrei Schleifer and Robert Vishny () Corruption August / 11

Nigeria heads for closest election on record

The ITV Management Board is ultimately responsible for overseeing compliance with this policy.

Human Development Indices and Indicators: 2018 Statistical Update. Cambodia

Human Development Indices and Indicators: 2018 Statistical Update. Indonesia

Oxfam Education

Telephone Survey. Contents *

Motivations and Barriers: Exploring Voting Behaviour in British Columbia

Preliminary Analysis of LAPOP s National Survey in Guyana, 2016

8. REGIONAL DISPARITIES IN GDP PER CAPITA

President s performance, citizenship, land ownership and the TRC s mandates: What do Liberians say?

Namibians Public Policy Preferences

Transcription:

Is corruption getting better or worse? Citizens views Region at a glance: How do people think corruption has changed in the last 12 months? Rising corruption: How many people think corruption has increased? The percentage of people who say corruption has increased a lot or somewhat over the past 12 months. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 84% 70% 61% 92% 75% 64% 15% think corruption has decreased 51% 61% think corruption has increased 19% think corruption has stayed the same 28% 26% Don t know The survey asks people if they think the level of corruption has increased a lot, increased somewhat, stayed the same, decreased somewhat, or decreased a lot in the last 12 months. Base: All respondents.

Which services do people pay bribes for? Percentage of service users who paid a bribe in the past 12 months. The size of the circle corresponds to the proportion of service users who paid a bribe. 1-5% 6-15% 16-30% 31-45% 46-60% 61%+ Country Public school Public hospital ID, voter s card, permit Utilities Police Courts Q. And how often, if ever, did you have to pay a bribe, give a gift, or do a favour for A. A teacher or school official?; B. A health worker or clinic or hospital staff; C. A government official in order to get the document?; D. A government official in order to get the [Utilities] services?; E. A police officer?; F. A judge or court official?. Base: Respondents who had contact with each service in the past 12 months, excluding missing responses. An asterisk (*) denotes a service base size of less than 60 respondents. These results are not shown as there are too few respondents to be considered statistically reliable.

Overview of Corruption A Citizen Scorecard The anti-corruption performance of the government and the country s corruption risks are rated by citizens as: Negative/High risk Mediocre/Medium risk This infographic summarises the country results for five key corruption questions presented in this report. For each question, countries are categorised as either red, amber or green depending on how positively or negatively respondents from that country responded. Countries are ordered from those who score the best according to their citizens to those who score the worst. See the methodology note for the full description of how the colours are assigned. Positive/Low risk Country How has the level of corruption changed? How corrupt is the public sector? How is the government doing at fighting corruption? How many people paid a bribe? Do people feel empowered to fight corruption? These groupings are meant to be indicative, and regionally contextual. It is important to keep in mind that they are based on the subjective perceptions and experiences of citizens in each country rather than on an assessment against a common objective benchmark.

Who has to pay bribes? PEOPLE LIVING IN RURAL AREAS ARE MORE AFFECTED More than a third of people living in rural areas had to bribe for basic services, compared to a quarter of urban citizens. ALMOST 1 in 3 people In the Middle East and North Africa have paid a bribe in the last year to access basic services like medicine, education or water. This is equivalent to around 50 million people. urban rural 25% 39% Bribery often hurts the poorest most Younger people are being hit harder In 5 of the 9 countries we surveyed, poorer citizens were more likely than richer citizens to pay bribes - sometimes three times as likely. People younger than 35 are more likely to have to pay a bribe to access a public service. 33% 30% 22% 66% 63% % of poorest people paid to bribe 18-34 35-54 55+ % of richest people paid to bribe Men more likely than women to pay bribes 34% OF MEN PAID A BRIBE 26% OF WOMEN PAID A BRIBE One third of men have paid a bribe, compared to one quarter of women. 38% 31% 23% 18% 19% 12% 6% 9% Results are based on those who have come into contact with at least one of the six public services in the past 12 months. Please see the methodology notes for a full description of how these results are calculated.

What do people think about corruption? key findings Corruption is perceived to be increasing 61% of people think corruption has increased in the last year. COURTS ARE THE WORST, POLICE AREN T MUCH BETTER Almost 1 in 3 who dealt with the courts paid a bribe 1 in 4 people who dealt with police paid a bribe Victims ARE INTIMIDATED INTO SILENCE Bribery is widespread Nearly 1 in 3 Only 1 in 5 bribe payers report the incident paid a bribe in the last year, or around 50 million people Governments are failing to fight corruption 68% say their government is doing badly 26% say their government is doing well 2 in 5 who do report corruption suffer retaliation 30% Almost fear retaliation if they speak out about corruption a third say people in the region don t report corruption because they fear the consequences.