GRAY PETERSON, Appellant. CHARLES F. GARCIA, et al., Appellees

Similar documents
Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, CHARLES D.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNOPPOSED MOTION OF PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT CITIZEN CENTER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPENING BRIEF

MARTHA L. KING 1900 Plaza Drive Louisville, CO Telephone: (303) Direct: (303) Fax: (303)

JOINT MOTION TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 26(b) and 10th Cir. R. 27.5, the parties jointly

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT No JIM BEICKER, et al.,

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE COLORADO REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 02/10/2016 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. WILLIAM SEMPLE, et al.,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

GOVERNOR S MOTION TO STRIKE APPENDICES AND ASSOCIATED ARGUMENTS IN REPLY BRIEFS

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Case 1:18-cv CG-B Document 18 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 3

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, et al.

CASE NO IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT MEDICAL SUPPLY CHAIN, INC,

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2, No (and consolidated cases) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFFREY ALEXANDER STERLING, and JAMES RISEN,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No AARON C. BORING and CHRISTINE BORING, husband and wife respectively, Appellants,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

In The United States Court of Appeals For the Third Circuit

Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiff-Appellee, Defendants-Appellants.

Case: Document: 6 Filed: 11/03/2016 Pages: 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No (1:15-cv GBL-MSN)

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. EDWARD TUFFLY, AKA Bud Tuffly, Plaintiff-Appellant,

Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 08/29/2018 Page: 1. No OF COLORADO

CASE NOS , -1307, -1309, -1310, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiffs-Appellants, Decision Filed Mar. 5, 2014 ED PRIETO; COUNTY OF YOLO,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPELAS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROBERT F. MCDONNELL,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Case 1:13-cv WYD-MEH Document 29 Filed 02/26/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Enrique Garcia Mendoza, Agency Case No.

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. DAMIAN STINNIE, et al.,

No In the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit RICHARD DOUGLAS HACKFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case Nos , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT ARIOSA DIAGNOSTICS, INC., ILLUMINA, INC.,

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON APRIL 15, 2016] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Defendants-Appellees.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT APPELLEES RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANTS MOTION FOR INITIAL HEARING EN BANC

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case: Document: 16 Filed: 04/23/2012 Pages: 6. Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Case: Document: 26-1 Filed: 12/04/2014 Pages: 6 NO IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) )

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Case 1:17-cv WYD-MEH Document 9 Filed 09/22/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT IN RE TELES AG,

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

USCA No UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, SANTANA DRAPEAU, Appellant.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case No IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit DAVID JOHN SLATER, WILDLIFE PERSONALITIES, LTD.,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. Related Case Nos & CAPITAL CASE EXECUTION SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 27, 2017

WAIVER OF APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM. I,, the Respondent in. give up my right to have this Court appoint a Guardian Ad Litem

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. KRIS W. KOBACH, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 2:07-cr EEF-ALC Document 152 Filed 10/03/2008 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT APPELLANT S MOTION FOR RELEASE PENDING APPEAL

Case 2:10-cv DWA Document 164 Filed 10/23/14 Page 1 of 7

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

OFFICE OF THE CLERK B

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: Document: 37 Page: 1 Filed: 07/25/ , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

Follow this and additional works at:

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT NO Plaintiff/ Appellee, Defendant/ Appellant.

Case 1:13-cv KBJ Document 21 Filed 09/06/13 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

STATE DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS RESPONSES TO AMICUS BRIEF OF UNITED STATES AND FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. DAVID JACOBS; GARY HINDES, Appellants,

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Transcription:

Appellate Case: 11-1149 Document: 01018656366 01018656433 Date Filed: 06/10/2011 Page: 1 DOCKET NO. 11-1149 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ------------------------------------------------- GRAY PETERSON, v. Appellant CHARLES F. GARCIA, et al., Appellees ------------------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado (Civil Action No. 10-cv-00059- WDM-MEH) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MOTION OF NRA CIVIL RIGHTS DEFENSE FUND FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR AS AMICUS CURIAE Robert Dowlut Matthew Bower 11250 Waples Mill Road, 6N Fairfax, Virginia 22030-7400 703-267-1250 Counsel for Amicus Curiae NRA Civil Rights Defense Fund

Appellate Case: 11-1149 Document: 01018656366 01018656433 Date Filed: 06/10/2011 Page: 2 Comes now the NRA Civil Rights Defense Fund (hereafter fund) pursuant to Fed. Rule App. Procedure 29 and respectfully asks for leave to appear, by brief only, and file its amicus curiae brief (which is being tendered herewith), and in support thereof shows the following: 1. The NRA Civil Rights Defense Fund received consent to file its brief from counsel for the appellant and counsel for the Colorado Attorney General. Linda Davison, counsel for the City of Denver, refused to give consent. 2. The fund is an entity established pursuant to 501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code. 3. The fund is organized exclusively for the following purposes: A. Voluntarily to assist in the preservation and defense of the human, civil, and/or constitutional rights of the individual to keep and bear arms in a free society; B. To give financial aid gratuitously and to supply legal counsel, which counsel may or may not be directly employed by the fund, to such persons who may appear worthy thereof, who are suffering or are threatened legal injustice or infringement in their said human, civil, and constitutional rights, and who are unable to obtain such counsel or redress such injustice without assistance; C. To conduct inquiry and research, acquire, collate, compile, and publish information, facts, statistics, and scholarly works on the origins, development and current status of said human, civil, and constitutional rights, and the extent and adequacy of the protection of such rights; D. To encourage, sponsor, and facilitate the cultivation and understanding of the aforesaid human, civil, and constitutional rights which are protected by the 1

Appellate Case: 11-1149 Document: 01018656366 01018656433 Date Filed: 06/10/2011 Page: 3 constitution, statutes, and laws of the United States of America or the various states and territories thereof, or which are established by the common law, through the giving of lectures and the publication of addresses, essays, treatises, reports, and other literary and research works in the field of said human, civil, and constitutional rights; E. To make donations to organizations which qualify as exempt organizations under Section 501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code of the United States or the corresponding provision of any future Internal Revenue Law of the United States. 4. The fund has an interest in protecting the right to keep and bear arms. The fund filed amicus briefs in several cases, including Parker v. District of Columbia, 478 F.3d 370 (D.C. Cir. 2007). Parker was affirmed in the land mark case of District of Columbia v. Heller, 128 S.Ct. 2783, 171 L.Ed.2d 637, 554 U.S. 570 (2008). 5. Seven copies of the amicus curiae brief will be conditionally tendered for filing and an electronic copy of the brief was also submitted to the court. Wherefore, the NRA Civil Rights Defense Fund moves that this court grant its application for leave to appear, by brief only, and to file its amicus curiae brief. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Robert Dowlut Robert Dowlut /s/ Matthew Bower Matthew Bower 11250 Waples Mill Rd., 6N Fairfax, Virginia 22030-7400 (703) 267-1254 Attorney for Amicus Curiae NRA Civil Rights Defense Fund rdowlut@nrahq.org mbower@nrahq.org 2

Appellate Case: 11-1149 Document: 01018656366 01018656433 Date Filed: 06/10/2011 Page: 4 CERTIFICATION OF DIGITAL SUBMISSIONS AND ELECTRONIC SERVICE 1. There are no required privacy redactions to be made in this brief and every document submitted in PDF format is an exact copy of the hard copy filed with the Clerk. 2. The digital submission of this brief has been scanned for viruses with etrust Antivirus version 8.0.447.0, last updated 6/10/11, and this submission is free of viruses. 3. The hard copies of the foregoing submitted to the Clerk are exact copies of the version that is being electronically filed. Date: June 10, 2011 /s/matthew H Bower Matthew H. Bower Attorney for Amicus Curiae NRA Civil Rights Defense Fund National Rifle Association of America Office of the General Counsel 11250 Waples Mill Rd. Fairfax, VA 22030 mbower@nrahq.org 703-267-1250 3

Appellate Case: 11-1149 Document: 01018656366 01018656433 Date Filed: 06/10/2011 Page: 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit using the appellate CM/ECF system on June 10, 2011. Participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and will be served by the appellate CM/ECF system. Date: June 10, 2011 /s/matthew H Bower Matthew H. Bower 4