Liste de lectures en Relations internationales Examen rétrospectif

Similar documents
POLITICAL SCIENCE 240/IRGN 254: International Relations Theory. The following books are available for purchase at the UCSD bookstore:

International Relations Theory Political Science 440 Northwestern University Winter 2010 Thursday 2-5pm, Ripton Room, Scott Hall

Graduate Seminar on International Relations Political Science (PSCI) 5013/7013 Spring 2007

DIPL 6000: Section AA International Relations Theory

Guidelines for Comprehensive Exams in International Relations Department of Political Science Pennsylvania State University.

Final Syllabus, January 27, (Subject to slight revisions.)

Syllabus International Cooperation

RPOS 370: International Relations Theory

FOREIGN POLICY ANALYSIS

RPOS 370: International Relations Theory

440 IR Theory Winter 2014

CONTENDING THEORIES IN INTERNATIONAL POLITICS

THEORY OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Political Science 217/317 International Organization

Class Participation (35%) Please do readings in advance and be prepared to discuss in class.

Introduction to International Relations Political Science S1601Q Columbia University Summer 2013

Yale University Department of Political Science International Relations Reading List GENERAL THEORY

POLITICAL SCIENCE 240/IRGN 254 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY Fall 2011 Thursday, 12:00 PM-2:50 PM, SSB 104

POLITICAL SCIENCE 240 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY Winter 2014 Tuesdays, 9:00 AM-11:50 AM, SSB 104

Political Science 7940: Seminar in International Politics

International Relations. Dr Markus Pauli , Semester 1

440 IR Theory Fall 2011

International Politics Draft syllabus

POLITICAL SCIENCE 240 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY Spring 2018

Approaches to the Study of International Relations

RPOS/RPAD 583: Global Governance

RPOS 570: International Relations Field Seminar

GOVT 102 Introduction to International Politics Spring 2010 MW 11:00am-12:15pm Kirby 204

International Politics (draft)

International Relations: The Great Debates Volume I

Robert O. Keohane After Hegemony. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (ISBN: ).

Readings in International Relations

SNU/GSIS : Understanding International Cooperation Fall 2017 Tuesday 9:30am-12:20pm Building 140-1, Room 101

Draft Syllabus. International Relations (Govt ) June 04-July 06, Meeting Location: ICC 104 A. Farid Tookhy

International Relations Field Seminar

INTRODUCTION TO INTERNATIONAL POLITICS Govt 204 Summer Sue Peterson Morton 13 Office Hours: M 2-3, W

Course Description. Grades/Assignments. Class Discussion. Weekly Response Papers

POLS 503: International Relations Theory Wednesday, 05:00-07:25 pm, BEC C104

INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS CORE SEMINAR POLI 540, Spring 2005 M 1:30-4:30 PM, 283 Baker Hall

International Relations

Public Policy 429 FOUNDATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY

INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY

SEMINAR IN WORLD POLITICS PLSC 650 Spring 2015

GOVT INTRODUCTION TO INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

GOVERNMENT 426 CONFLICT & COOPERATION IN WORLD POLITICS Spring 1996 Tuesday 2:15-4:05 p.m. Healy 106

International Relations Theory POLI 802/603

POS 560: International Relations

ALEXANDER WENDT. Department of Political Science Ohio State University 2140 Derby Hall Columbus, OH

Topics in International Relations and Security Studies Seminar, 1 st term

Political Science 372/572: Field Seminar in International Relations Tuesday 14:00-16:40, Fenno Room (Harkness 329)

PS 240: International Relations Theory Instructor: David A. Lake Winter 2019 Office: SSB 372. SSB 333 Phone:

Advanced Master in Legal Studies

ALEXANDER WENDT. Department of Political Science Ohio State University 2140 Derby Hall Columbus, OH (home phone)

Essential Readings in World Politics

International Relations Comprehensive Examination Guidance and Reading List (as of August 2013)

Introduction to International Relations

GOVT 102 Introduction to International Politics Spring 2011 Section 01: Tues/Thurs 9:30-10:45am Section 02: Tues/Thurs 11:00am-12:15pm Kirby 107

International Organizations Fall 2012 GOV 388L

INTL. RELATIONS IN THE AGE OF GLOBALIZATION

Schedule in Detail for Western International Relations Theory

Spring 2013 Theories of International Relations SA Professor Jakub Grygiel 1/10/2013

Approaches to the Study of International Relations

POSC 6601: 701 Core Seminar in International Politics. Professor H. R. Friman Tuesday 4:00-6:40 pm Wehr Physics 423 (tel: )

Political Science 857 Fall 2018 Tuesday 1:20-3:15 PM 422 North Hall. Andrew Kydd 322c North Hall Office hours: Monday 1:00-3:00pm

Political Science 240/IRGN 254 International Relations Theory

POL 671, Proseminar in International Relations Fall 2008, Thursday 9-11:50 am, Harrison 110 COURSE DESCRIPTION

Political Science 630: Seminar in International Relations Theory. Course Description and Syllabus.

The third debate: Neorealism versus Neoliberalism and their views on cooperation

Dr. Marcus Holmes

COURSE DESCRIPTION: COURSE REQUIREMENTS:

THEORIES AND RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Power in World Politics

GOVT : International Relations George Mason University Spring 2018

POSC 249 Theories of International Relations Mo/Wed/Fri 4a

ProSeminar in International Relations Theory Political Science 5300, Fall 2009

PS Proseminar in International Relations Theory (Spring 2009)

PSC 346: Individuals and World Politics

Political Science 272: Theories of International Relations Spring 2010 Thurs.-Tues., 9:40-10:55.

Concordia University Political Science 687A/A Knowledge in IR

International Relations Paradigms By Dr. John T. Ackerman, Lt Col Barak J. Carlson (PhD), and Major Young I. Han

Enter course code here from Catalog (assigned by Portland Registration)

SEMINAR IN INTERNATIONAL POLITICS

THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO Department of Political Science

Pınar Bilgin. A328B (290) Wednesday 10:30-12:00 and by appointment.

Introduction to International Relations

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION Graduate Seminar POLS 326

Political Science 270 Mechanisms of International Relations

POL 230 Theories of International Relations Spring 2010

PS 232 Spring REQUIREMENTS: There are two assignments:

Course Information University of Nebraska at Omaha. Number: Introduction to International Relations

Graduate Seminar in International Relations: Theories and Approaches Govt Spring 2004

Introduction to International Relations

I. Aims and Objectives

Syllabus International Security

International Relations Theory

Political Science 660 Proseminar on World Politics. Jim Morrow Fall ISR W 1:00-4: Walker Room

University of Waterloo PSCI 657 International Organizations Winter :30-5:20 Wednesday, EV1 225

Political Science 572: International Political Economy Fall 2008; Room 1171 BSB Tuesday 6:00-8:30 PM

International Politics of Economic Relations

Yale University Department of Political Science. INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 1 PLSC 695 Spring 2017 Syllabus (January 17, 2017, version)

Transcription:

Méthodologie Liste de lectures en Relations internationales Examen rétrospectif GOERTZ, Gary, Social Science Concepts : A User s Guide, Princeton : Princeton University Press, 2005. HARVEY, Frank P. et BRECHER, Michael (dir.), Evaluating Methodology in International Studies, The University of Michigan Press, 2005 JACKSON, Patrick Thaddeus, The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and its Implications for the Study of World Politics, Routledge, 2010. KING, Gary, Robert O. KEOHANE et Sidney VERBA, Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton University Press, 1994. MILLIKEN, Jennifer, «The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods», European Journal of International Relations, 5(2), 1999: 225-254. Débats théoriques AXELROD, Robert, Donnant-donnant. Théorie du comportement coopératif, Odile-Jacob, 1992, Chapitres 1, 2, 3, 6 et 7. BARNETT, Michael et Raymond DUVALL, «Power in International Politics», International Organization, 59(1), 2005: 39-75. BEITZ, Charles R., Political Theory and International Relations, Princeton University Press, 1999 [1979], chapitres 1 à 5. BUENO DE MESQUITA, Bruce, Alastair SMITH, Randolph M. SIVERSON et James D. MORROW, The Logic of Political Survival, The MIT Press, 2004, Partie 1. BULL, Hedley. The Anarchical Society. Columbia University Press, 1977, chapitres 1 à 4. BUZAN, Barry, «The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR», Review of International Studies, 27(3), 2001: 471-488. CARR, E. H., The Twenty Years Crisis 1919-1939, Palgrave, 2001 (1939), Chapitres 1, 2, 5 et 6. CHAN, Steve, «In Search of Democratic Peace: problems and Promise», Mershon International Studies Review 41(1) 1997: 59-91. COX, Robert W. et Timothy J. SINCLAIR, Approaches to World Order, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996, chapitres 6 et 7. DER DERIAN, James et Michael J. SHAPIRO (dir.), International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics, Lexington Books, 1989, chapitres 1, 2, 13 et 14. DOYLE, Michael W, «Liberalism and World Politics», American Political Science Review, 80(4), 1986: 1151-1169. DUNNE, Tim, Lene HANSEN et Colin WIGHT, «The End of International Relations Theory?», European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 2013: 405-425. 1

ELMAN, Colin et Miriam Fendius ELMAN (dir), Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field, Cambridge (MA), The MIT Press, 2003. GRIECO, Joseph M., «Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism», International Organization, 42(3), 1988: 485-507. GUZZINI, Stefano, «A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations», European Journal of International Relations, 6(2), 2000: 147-182. HELLMANN, Gunther, Friedrich KRATOCHWIL, Yosef LAPID, Andrew MORAVCSIK, Iver B. NEUMANN, Steve SMITH, Frank HARVEY et Joel COBB, «Are Dialogue and Synthesis Possible in International Relations?», International Studies Review, 5(1), 2003: 123-153. HOLLIS, Martin et Steve SMITH, Explaining and Understanding International Relations, Clarendon, 1990, chapitres 1 et 9. HOPF, Ted «The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory», International Security, 23(1) 1998 : 171-200. JERVIS, Robert, System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life, Princeton University Press, 1997, chapitres 1 et 2. KEOHANE, Robert O. (dir.), Neorealism and Its Critics, Columbia University Press, 1986. KEOHANE, Robert O. et Lisa L. MARTIN, «The Promise of Institutionalist Theory», International Security, 20(1), 1995: 39-51. LAKE, David A. et Robert POWELL (dir.), Strategic Choice and International Relations, Princeton University Press, 1999, chapitre 1. LAKE, David A., «Anarchy, Hierarchy, and the Variety of International Relations», International Organization, 50(1), 1996: 1-33. LAKE, David A., «Why isms Are Evil: Theory, Epistemology, and Academic Sects as Impediments to Understanding and Progress», International Studies Quarterly, 55(2), 2011: 465-480. LAPID, Yosef, «The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post- Positivist Era», International Studies Quarterly, 33(3), 1989: 235-254. LEGRO Jeffrey et Andrew MORAVCSIK, «Is Anybody Still a Realist?», International Security, 24(2), 1999: 5 55. MEARSHEIMER, John, «The False Promise of International Institutions», International Security, 19(3), 1994: 5-49. MORAVSCIK, Andrew, «Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics», International Organization, 51(4), 1997: 513-553. MORGENTHAU, Hans J., Kenneth W. THOMPSON et David CLINTON, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, McGraw Hill, 7 e édition, 2006, chapitres 1, 2,3 4, 8, 11, 12, 13 et 14. MORROW, James D. "Social Choice and System Structure in World Politics", World Politics, 41(1), 1988: 75-97. ONUF, Nicholas et Frank KLINK, «Anarchy, Authority, Rule», International Studies Quarterly, 33(2), 1989: 149-173. 2

PATOMÄKI, Heikki et Colin WIGHT, «After Postpositivism? The Promises of Critical Realism», International Studies Quarterly, 44(2), 2000: 213-237. POULIOT, Vincent, «The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities,», International Organization, 62 (2), 2008: 257-288. POWELL, Robert, «Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory», American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1991: 1303-1320. PRICE, Richard et Christian REUS-SMIT, «Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism», European Journal of International Relations, 4(3), 1998: 259-294. RISSE, Thomas, «Let s Argue! Communicative Action in World Politics», International Organization, 54(1), 2000: 1-39. RUSSETT, Bruce M. et John R. ONEAL, «The Kantian Peace: the Pacific Benefits of Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885-1992», World Politics, 52(1), 1999: 1-37. SMITH, Steve, «The Discipline of International Relations: Still an American Social Science?», The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 2(3), 2000: 374-402. TICKNER, J. Ann, «You Just Don't Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists», International Studies Quarterly, 41(4), 1997: 611-632. WAEVER, Ole, «The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European developments in International Relations», International Organization, 52(4), 1998: 687-727. WALTZ, Kenneth N., Theory of International Politics, Addison-Wesley, 1979, chapitres 1 à 6. WENDT, Alexander E., «The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory», International Organization, 41(3), 1987: 335-370. WENDT, Alexander, «Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics», International Organization, 46(2), 1992: 391-425. WIGHT, Colin, «They Shoot Dead Horses Don't They? Locating Agency in the Agent- Structure Problematique», European Journal of International Relations, 5(1), 1999: 109-142. Sécurité internationale ACHEN, Christopher et Duncan SNIDAL, «Rational Deterrence Theory and Comparative Case Studies», World Politics, 41(2), 1989: 143-169. ADLER, Emanuel et Michael N. BARNETT, «Governing Anarchy: A Research Agenda for the Study of Security Communities», Ethics & International Affairs, 10(1), 1996: 63-98. ARON, Raymond, Paix et guerre entre les nations, Calmann-Lévy, 1962, Introduction et chapitres 1 à 6. BALDWIN, David A., «Security Studies and the End of the Cold War», World Politics, 48(1). 1995: 117-141. BALZACQ, Thierry, «The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context», European Journal of International Relations, 11(2), 2005: 171-201. BUENO DE MESQQUITA, Bruce et David LALMAN, «Reason and War», American Political Science Review, 80(4), 1986: 1113-1129. 3

BUZAN, Barry, Ole WAEVER et Jaap DE WILDE, Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Lynne Riener, 1998. EVANGELISTA, Matthew, «The Paradox of State Strength: Transnational Relations, Domestic Structures, and Security Policy in Russia and the Soviet Union», International Organization, 49(1), 1995: 1-38. FEARON, James, «Rationalist Explanations for War», International Organization, 49(3), 1995: 379-414. FEARON, James D. et David D. LAITIN, «Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War», American Political Science Review, 97(1), 2003: 75-90. GARTZKE, Erik. «War is in the Error Term», International Organization, 53(3) 1999: 567-587. GILPIN, Robert, War and Change in World Politics, Cambridge University Press, 1983, chapitres 1, 2, 4 et 6. GUZZINI, Stefano, «The Concept of Power: A Constructivist Analysis», Millennium, 33(3), 2005: 495-522. JAMES, Patrick, «Structural Realism and the Causes of War», Mershon International Studies Review, 39(2), 1995: 181-208. JOHNSTON, Alastair Iain, «Thinking about Strategic Culture», International Security, 19(4), 1995: 32-64. KRASNER, Stephen, «Compromising Westphalia», International Security, 20(3), 1995: 115-151. LITTLE, Richard, «Deconstructing the Balance of Power: Two Traditions of Thought», Review of International Studies, 15(2), 1989: 87-100. MCDONALD, Matt, «Securitization and the Construction of Security», European Journal of International Relations, 14(4), 2008: 563-587. MEARSHEIMER, John, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, W.W. Norton, 2001, chapitres 1 et 8 MERCER, Jonathan, «Anarchy and Identity», International Organization, 49(2), 1995: 229-252. NYE, Joseph S., «Soft Power», Foreign Policy, 80, 1990: 153-171. ORGANSKI, A.F.K. et Jacek KUGLER, The War Ledger, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1981, chapitre 1. PAPE, Robert A., «The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism», American Political Science Review, 97(3) 2003: 343-361. PARIS, Roland, «Human Security: Paradigm Shift or Hot Air?», International Security, 26(2), 2002: 87-102. POWELL, Robert, «War as a Commitment Problem», International Organization, 60(1), 2006: 169-203. REED, William, «A Unified Statistical Model of Conflict Onset and Escalation», American Journal of Political Science, 44(1), 2000: 84-93 4

SAMBANIS, Nicholas, «What Is Civil War? Conceptual and Empirical Complexities of an Operational Definition», Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48(6), 2004: 814-58. SCHWELLER, Randall, «Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In», International Security, 19(1), 1994: 72-107. VAN EVERA, Stephen, «Offense, Defense, and the Causes of War», International Security, 22(4), 1998: 5-43. WALT, Stephen M., The Origins of Alliances, Cornell University Press, 1987, chapitres 1 et 2 WALZER, Michael, Just and Unjust Wars, Basic Books, 1992. Économie politique internationale BALDWIN, David, «The Sanctions Debate and the Logic of Choice», International Security, 24(3), 1999: 80-107. BALDWIN, Richard E., «The Causes of Regionalism», The World Economy, 20(7), 1997: 865-888. BUENO DE MESQUITA, Bruce et Alastair SMITH, «A Political Economy of Aid», International Organization, 63(2), 2009: 309-340. CHWIEROTH, Jeffrey, «Testing and Measuring the Role of Ideas: The Case of Neoliberalism in the International Monetary Fund», International Studies Quarterly, 51(1), 2007: 5-30. GILPIN, Robert, The Political Economy of International Relations, Princeton University Press, 1987. KEOHANE, Robert O., After Hegemony. Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton (NJ), Princeton University Press, 2005, chapitres 1 à 7 et 11. KEOHANE, Robert O. et Joseph NYE, Power and Interdependence, Foresman, 2 e edition, 1989, chapitres 1 à 3. LAKE, David A., «Open Economy Politics: A Critical Review», The Review of International Organizations, 4(3), 2009: 219-44. LAKE, David A., «Leadership, Hegemony, and the International Economy: Naked Emperor or Tattered Monarch with Potential?», International Studies Quarterly, 37(4), 1993: 459-489. MANSFIELD, Edward D. et Helen V. MILNER, «The New Wave of Regionalism», International Organization, 53(3), 1999: 589-627. MILNER, Helen V., «The Political Economy of International Trade», Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 1999: 91-114. ROGOWSKI, Ronald, «Political Cleavages and Changing Exposure to Trade», American Political Science Review, 81(4), 1987: 1121-1137. SIMMONS, Beth et Zachary ELKINS. «The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy», American Political Science Review 98(1), 2004: 171-189. STRANGE, Susan, «The Persistent Myth of Lost Hegemony», International Organization, 41(4), 1987: 551-574. 5

WALLERSTEIN, Immanuel, World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction, Duke University Press, 2004. Institutions internationales ABBOTT, Kenneth W. et Duncan SNIDAL, «Why States Act Through Formal International Organizations», Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42(1), 1998: 3-32. ABBOTT, Kenneth, Robert KEOHANE, Andrew MORAVCSIK, Anne-Marie SLAUGHTER et Duncan SNIDAL, «The Concept of Legalization», International Organization, 54(2), 2000: 401-419. BARNETT, Michael et Martha FINNEMORE, «The Politics, Power and Pathologies of International Organizations», International Organization, 53(4), 1999: 699-732. BEARCE, David et Stacy BONDANELLA, «Intergovernmental Organizations, Socialization, and Member-State Interest Convergence», International Organization, 61(4), 2007: 703-733. BREITMEIER, Helmut, Arild UNDERDAL et Orang R. YOUNG, «The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Comparing and Contrasting Findings from Quantitative Research», International Studies Review, 13(1), 2011: 1-27. CHANDLER, David, «Building Global Civil Society from Below?», Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 33(2), 2004: 313-339. CHECKEL, Jeffrey «International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework», International Organization 59(4) 2005: 801-826. CORTELL, Andrew et James DAVIS, «How Do International Institutions Matter? The Domestic Impact of International Rules and Norms», International Studies Quarterly, 40(4), 1996: 451-478. FINNEMORE, Martha et Kathryn SIKKINK, «International Norm Dynamics and Political Change», International Organization, 52(4), 1998: 887-917. HAAS, Ernst B. «Why Collaborate», World Politics, 32(3), 1980: 357-405. HAAS, Peter, «Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination», International Organization, 46(1), 1992: 1-35. HAFNER-BURTON, Emilie, Miles KAHLER et Alexander H. MONTGOMERY, «Network Analysis for International Relations», International Organization, 63(3), 2009: 559-592. HAWKINS, Darren G., David A. LAKE, Daniel L. NIELSON et Michael J. TIERNEY, Delegation and Agency in International Organizations, Cambridge University Press, 2006, chapitre 1. KECK, Margaret et Kathryn SIKKINK, «Transnational Advocacy Networks in International and Regional Politics», International Social Science Journal, 51(159), 1999: 89-101. KEOHANE, Robert O., «International Institutions: Two Approaches», International Studies Quarterly, 32(4), 1989: 379-396. KOREMENOS, Barbara, Charles LIPSON et Duncan SNIDAL, «The Rational Design of International Institutions», International Organization, 55(4), 2001: 761-799. KRASNER, Stephen D. (dir.), International Regimes, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1983. 6

LEGRO, Jeffrey W., «Which Norms Matter? Revisiting the Failure of Internationalism», International Organization, 51(1), 1997: 31-63. MARTIN, Lisa L. & Beth A. SIMMONS, «Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions», International Organization, 52(4), 1998: 729-757. PEVEHOUSE, Jon C., «Democracy from the Outside-In: International Organizations and Democratization», International Organization, 56(3), 2002: 515-550. RAUSTIALA, Kal, and David G. VICTOR. «The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources», International organization 58.02 (2004): 277-309. RISSE-KAPPEN, Thomas (dir.), Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures, and International Institutions, Cambridge University Press, 1995. ROSENAU, James N., «Governance in the Twenty-first Century», Global Governance, 1(1), 1995: 13-43. RUGGIE, John Gerard, «Multilateralism: the Anatomy of an Institution», International Organization, 46(3), 1992: 561-598. Analyse de la politique étrangère ALLISON, Graham, «Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis», American Political Science Review, 63(3), 1969: 689-718. CAMPBELL, David, Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1998, chapitres 1 à 4. CLARK, David, «Trading Butter for Guns: Domestic Imperatives for Foreign Policy Substitution», Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45(5), 2001: 636-660. DOTY, Roxanne Lynn, «Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of US Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines», International Studies Quarterly, 37(3), 1993: 297-320. GOLDSTEIN, Judith et KEOHANE, Robert O. (dir.), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change, Cornell University Press, 1993, chapitre 1. GEORGE, Alexander et KEOHANE, Robert, «The Concept of National Interests: Uses and Limitations», dans GEORGE, Alexander (dir.), Presidential Decision-Making in Foreign Policy, Boulder: Westview Press, 1980, pp. 217-237. GEORGE, Alexander, «The Causal Nexus Between Cognitive Beliefs and Decision-Making Behavior: The Operational Code Belief System», dans Lawrence S. Falkowski (dir.), Psychological Models in International Politics, Boulder: Westview Press, 1979: 95-124. GOUREVITCH, Peter, «The Second Image Reversed: the International Sources of Domestic Politics», International Organization, 32(4), 1978: 881-912. GOWA, Joanne, «Politics at the Water s Edge: Parties, Voters and the Use of Force Abroad», International Organization, 52(2), 1998: 307-324. HERMANN, Margaret, «Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior Using the Personal Characteristics of Political Leaders», International Studies Quarterly, 24(1), 1980: 7-46. HOLSTI, Kalevi J. «National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy», International Studies Quarterly, 14(3), 1970: 233-309. 7

HOLSTI, Ole R., «Public opinion and Foreign Policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippmann Consensus Mershon Series: Research Programs and Debates», International studies quarterly, 36(4), 1992: 439-466. HUDSON, Valerie et VORE, C. S., «Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow», Mershon International Studies Reviews, 39(2), 1995: 209-238. SCHAFER, Mark et Scott CRICHLOW. «The Process- Outcome Connection in Foreign Policy Decision Making: A Quantitative Study Building on Groupthink», International Studies Quarterly, 46)1), 2002: 45-68. JENTLESON, Bruce, «The Pretty Prudent Public: Post Post-Vietnam American Opinion on the Use of Military Force», International Studies Quarterly, 36(1), 1992: 49-73. JERVIS, Robert, «Hypotheses on Misperception», World Politics, 20(3), 1968: 454-479. KATZENSTEIN, Peter J., «International Relations and Domestic Structures», International Organization, 30(1), 1976: 1-45. KRASNER, Stephen, Defending the National Interest, Princeton University Press, 1978, Ch. 1, 2, 3 pp. 5-90). LEVY, Jack, «Prospect Theory, Rational Choice and International Relations», International Studies Quarterly, 41(1), 1997: 87-112. MASTANDUNO, Michael, David LAKE et John IKENBERRY, «Toward a Realist Theory of State Action», International Studies Quarterly, 33(4), 1989: 457-474. MCDERMOTT, Rose, «New Directions for Experimental Work in International Relations», International Studies Quarterly, 55(2), 2011: 503-520. MERCER, Jonathan, «Emotional Beliefs», International Organization, 64, 2010: 1-31. MILNER, Helen V. et B. Peter ROSENDORFF, «Trade Negotiations, Information and Domestic Politics: The Role of Domestic Groups», Economics & Politics, 8(2), 1996: 145-189. MINTZ, Alex, «How Do Leaders Make Decision? A Poliheuristic Perspective», Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48(1), 2004: 3-13. OSTROM, Charles et Brian JOB, «The President and the Political Use of Force», American Political Science Review, 80(2), 1986: 452-566. PUTNAM, Robert, «Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: the Logic of Two-Level Games», International Organization, 42(3), 1988: 427-460. RISSE-KAPPEN, Thomas, «Public Opinion, Domestic Structure, and Foreign Policy in Liberal Democracies», World Politics, 43(4), 1991: 479-512. ROSE, Gideon, «Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy», World Politics, 51(1), 1998: 144-172. SNYDER, Jack, «Imperial Temptations», The National Interest, 71, 2003: 29-40. 8