Rules of Procedure. International Criminal Court Moot Court Competition ICC Moot Court Competition

Similar documents
Round of the Americas

Round of the Americas

Article I. Function. Article II. Organisation

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE LEIDEN-SARIN INTERNATIONAL AIR LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION (August 2015)

THE RULES OF THE EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS MOOT COURT COMPETITION

FRANK A. SCHRECK GAMING LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION

International & European Tax Moot Court Competition Official Rules

Official Rules of the National Professional Responsibility Moot Court Competition

42 nd Annual ROBERT F. WAGNER NATIONAL LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION

14TH NATIONAL IHL MOOT COURT COMPETITION (2017)

Asia-Pacific Moot Court Rounds 2017 OFFICIAL RULES (2017)

Rules of the European Human Rights Moot Court Competition

Asia-Pacific Moot Court Rounds 2013 OFFICIAL RULES (2013)

The Wilson Moot Official Rules 2018

2 nd DR. GURJEET SINGH MEMORIAL NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY AND JUDICIAL ACADEMY, ASSAM 20 th - 22 nd APRIL, 2018

Powered by TCPDF (

PRESENTED BY: APPELLATE MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2013 RULES

Centre for Competition Law and Policy. The National University of Advanced Legal Studies

LOCAL ARBITRATION MOOT COMPETITION 2017 PROCEDURAL RULES. TITLE I General Rules

ALL INDIA MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2018

COMPETITION, 2016 RULES & REGULATIONS THE TAMIL NADU DR. AMBEDKAR LAW UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE IN LAW CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU, INDIA

October 4, rd Annual Dean Jerome Prince Memorial Evidence Competition

International Migration and Refugee Law Moot Court VU Amsterdam Migration Law Clinic 2019 RULES

X NLS-TRILEGAL INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION MOOT, 2017

The Julius Alexander Isaac Diversity Moot Official Rules 2016 Black Law Students Association of Canada I. INTERPRETATION

European Law Moot Court The Rules

4th AURO NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2018 RULES OF THE COMPETITION

RULES AND REGULATIONS

(b) Participation is restricted to bona-fide law students either enrolled in the 3-year L L.B law course or the 5-year integrated law course.

PRESENTED BY: HOSTED BY: APPELLATE MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2011 COMPETITION RULES

STUDIES 2 ND VIVEKANANDA INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION 7 TH - 9 TH NOVEMBER, 2014 [1]

KSHAN 13 th NATIONAL TRIAL & APPELLATE MOOT COURT COMPETITION th, 17th & 18th MARCH 18 RULES

Table of ConTenTs. Rules 2-11

6 TH RGNUL NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2017

DR.AMBEDKAR GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE CHENNAI

Inaugural Hon. Michael Kirby Contract Law Moot. Melbourne, Australia September 2011 THE RULES

THE LASKIN 2018 OFFICIAL RULES

[Rules and Regulations]

6 TH RMLNLU SCC ONLINE COURT COMPETITION, 2018 RULES INTERNATIONAL MEDIA LAW MOOT. March 9 11, 2018

COMPETITION MANUAL. (Rules and Registration Form)

CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW AND JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL MOOT COMPETITION ON MARITIME ARBITRATION MARCH 2011 THE RULES MOOT DIRECTOR DMYTRO KOVAL

THE KERALA LAW ACADEMY MOOT COURT SOCIETY

RULES OF THE COMPETITION

RULES AND REGULATIONS

RULES OF THE COMPETITION

CONSTITUTION OF AN ORGANIZING COMMITTEE CONDUCT OF THE INTERNAL TRIAL ADVOCACY RANKING ROUNDS

The 7 th Annual Michael Kirby Contract Law Moot Melbourne, Australia September 2017 THE RULES

The 10 th Red Cross International Humanitarian Law (IHL) Moot (2016)

THE RULES WILLMS & SHIER ENVIRONMENTAL LAW MOOT OFFICIAL COMPETITION RULES 2017

NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2017 RULES

COMPETITION GUIDELINES

THE OFFICIAL BLACK LAW STUDENTS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA (BLSAC) JULIUS ISAAC ALEXANDER DIVERSITY MOOT RULES Academic Year

COMPETITION MANUAL. (Rules and Registration Form)

INSTITUTE OF LAW, JIWAJI UNIVERSITY NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2016

NATIONAL NATIVE AMERICAN LAW STUDENT ASSOCIATION ANNUAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION OFFICIAL RULES

NINTH JUSTICE HIDAYATULLAH MEMORIAL NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION (HNMCC), 2017

SURANA & SURANA NATIONAL CORPORATE LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2013 RULES AND REGULATIONS

CLOSING ARGUMENT COMPETITION 2014 RULES

2018 Tullis Moot Court Competition Rules

COMPETITION MANUAL. (Rules and Registration Form)

September 7 to September 9, 2018

(B) Serve as a point of contact between the Board and the University of Richmond School of Law (the Law School );

39 TH MORRIS B. MYEROWITZ MOOT COURT COMPETITION

APPENDIX B: BRIEF WRITING COMPETITION AMCA BRIEF WRITING COMPETITION RULES AMCA BRIEF WRITING COMPETITION CERTIFICATION FORM

4 TH UPES NATIONALTRIAL ADVOCACY COMPETITION RULES, 2018

WAVES In association with. West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata

3 rd INDRAPRASTHA NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2014 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Twelfth Annual WILLEM C. VIS INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION MOOT. Vienna, Austria. October March Oral Arguments March 2005

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Moot Competition 2017, 28-29_Oct_NLU Delhi

VITSOL NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION

ASCENT MOOT COURT COMPETITION RULES AND REGULATIONS

2010 BFSU Intellectual Property Moot Court Competition OFFICIAL RULES. January 2010

GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE MOOT COURT SOCIETY

Fourteenth Annual WILLEM C. VIS INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION MOOT. Vienna, Austria. October April 2007

1 ST GNLU MOOT ON SECURITIES

SYMBIOSIS LAW SCHOOL, NOIDA MOOT COURT SOCIETY NASCENT MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2015

Two team members may repeat and may have entered this event at a previous Region Leadership Conference.

RULES AND REGULATIONS

Student Government Association Constitution

I. INDIANA HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF COMPETITION

School of Law, CHRIST (Deemed to be University)

RULES OF THE 44 th ANNUAL NATIONAL TRIAL COMPETITION

ASIAN INSTITUTE OF FINANCE AWARD FOR ESSAYS ON PROFESSIONALISM IN THE FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY OFFICIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

MOOT COURT BOARD CONSTITUTION

KANSAS HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF COMPETITION Adopted by the Young Lawyers Section of the Kansas Bar Association January, 2015 RULES

2017 High School Moot International Criminal Court Competition Overview

5 th Dr.PARAS DIWAN MEMORIAL INTERNATIONAL ENERGY LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION. 2-5 APRIL Moot Court Asssociation College of Legal Studies UPES

Notre Dame Law School Moot Court Board Bylaws

7th GNLU International Moot Court Competition 2015

(DEEMED TO BE UNIVERSITY), NATIONAL TRIAL ADVOCACY AND JUDGMENT

PACE INTERNATIONAL LAW REVIEW

BYLAWS OF THE WISCONSIN LAW REVIEW

Sixteenth Annual WILLEM C. VIS INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION MOOT. Vienna, Austria. October April Oral Arguments 3-9 April 2009

Change the amount of time for the additional questions to three minutes.

Conduct of Chapter Meetings

ARCHDALE DEBATING COMPETITION

Fair Play Policy and Procedures

Competencies This event is composed of two (2) parts: completion of an objective test and a performance.

T EXAS HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL C OMPETITION R ULES OF THE C OMPETITION

STATUTE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL. -Edition 2007-

Transcription:

Rules of Procedure International Criminal Court Moot Court Competition 2015

Table of Contents Chapter 1: General Rules... 3 Art. 1 - Object... 3 Art. 2 - Subject... 3 Art. 3 - Interpretation of the Rules... 3 Art. 4 - Aim of the Competition... 3 Art. 5 - Participation... 3 Art. 6 - Team Composition... 4 Chapter 2: Administrative Provisions... 4 Art. 7 - Team Registration... 4 Art. 8 - International Panel of Evaluation... 4 Art. 9 - Problem-Solving Question... 5 Art. 10 - Registration Fee... 5 Art. 11 - Team Identification... 6 Art. 12 - Case Publication... 6 Chapter 3: Competition Structure... 6 Art. 13 - Structure... 6 Art. 14 - Semi-Final Round... 6 Art. 15 - Final Round... 6 Chapter 4: Memorial Provisions... 7 Art. 16 - Submission of the Memorials... 7 Art. 17 - Identification in Memorials... 7 Art. 18 - Memorial Format... 7 Art. 19 - Spacing... 7 Art. 20 - Word Limit... 7 Art. 21 - Order of Content... 8 Art. 23 - Footnotes... 8 Art. 24 - Scoring Structure Memorials... 8 Art. 25 - Plagiarism... 9 Chapter 5: Oral Round Provisions... 9 Art. 26 - Content... 9 Art. 27 - Appearance... 9 Art. 28 - Speakers... 9 Art. 29 - Communication... 9 Art. 30 - Raising Objections... 10 Art. 31 - Speaking Time... 10 Art. 32 - Rebuttal... 10 Art. 33 - Bench Composition... 10 Art. 34 - Role of the Bench Clerk... 11 Art. 35 - Scores Oral Pleadings... 11 Art. 36 - Penalties for Inappropriate Behaviour... 11 Art. 37 - Scouting... 11 Art. 38 - Competition Program Visits... 12 Chapter 6: The Awards... 12 Art. 39 - Categories of the Awards... 12 Chapter 7: The Organization... 12 Art. 40 - Organization... 12

Chapter 1: General Rules Art. 1 - Object a. The present rules ( Rules ) govern the International Criminal Court ( ICC ) Moot Court Competition 2015, held in the English language (hereinafter the Competition ), organized by the Grotius Centre for International Legal Studies Leiden University ( the Organization ). Art. 2 - Subject a. All teams participating in the Competition are presumed to have knowledge of and shall be subject to these Rules. Art. 3 - Interpretation of the Rules a. The Organization has the authority to interpret and amend the provisions contained in the Rules. b. The Organization reserves the right to make changes at any time before the commencement of the Main Round when necessary. Any changes made will be communicated to the participating teams on the website of the Organization (www.iccmoot.com). Art. 4 - Aim of the Competition The Competition aims to encourage university students to improve their knowledge of international criminal law in practice and in particular of the ICC, its mandate and its jurisprudence, by simulating ICC proceedings through arguing a hypothetical case. The Competition seeks to enhance knowledge about the Rome Statute, especially within countries that have yet to ratify it. In addition, the Competition provides participants with the opportunity to become familiar with The Hague based international institutions. Art. 5 - Participation a. I) 60 registrations (after the Preliminary Question Round): Each country and the Special Administrative Regions of Hong Kong and Macau, may be represented by a maximum of two (2) teams. If six (6) or more universities from one country register for the Competition, a maximum of three (3) teams may participate in the Main Round in The Hague, the Netherlands. II) >60 registrations (after the Preliminary Question Round): Each country and the Special Administrative Regions of Hong Kong and Macau, may be represented by a maximum of two (2) teams in the Main Round in The Hague, the Netherlands. b. Only actively enrolled students in undergraduate and postgraduate universities are eligible to participate. Exchange students may participate on behalf of their host university. c. Non-law students may be considered eligible, provided that they have the requisite legal knowledge. It is each team s responsibility to ensure that its team members have a level of legal knowledge suitable for the Competition. d. Students admitted to practice, including by having taken and passed the bar exam, are prohibited to participate. e. A student can participate in the Competition as a speaker only once. A student who has previously participated in the Competition as a speaker is not eligible to re-enter the Competition as a speaker, but is eligible to re-enter the Competition as a researcher and vice versa. 3

Art. 6 - Team Composition a. Each team will be comprised of three (3) speakers. Additionally, during the preparations, the team may include two (2) Researchers and two (2) coaches: one leading coach and one assistant coach. Article 5 restrictions shall not apply to the leading and assistant coaches. b. The maximum number of team representatives during the preparations for each team cannot exceed seven (7), and cannot exceed five (5) during the Hearings in The Hague, the Netherlands. If the amount of team members coming to The Hague exceeds five (5), and extra fee of 150,00 per person will be charged. Teams will receive the invoice for additional team members on 18 March 2015. The amount of Team Members may never exceed seven (7). c. The team may be comprised of fewer coaches or researchers (but not fewer speakers). d. Any changes in the team composition as it was at registration, must be submitted in writing before 20 April 2015. Any request for changes in team composition after this timeframe shall be rejected. However, the Organization reserves the right to allow team composition changes after this deadline in consideration of exceptional circumstances or in the interests or fairness of the Competition. e. Teams that qualified through the Preliminary Question Round are not allowed to change more than one team member for a new team member after their qualification. Teams must ensure that the team members that qualified, are also the actual team members participating in the Main Rounds. They are allowed, however, to cancel the participation of team members. In exceptional circumstances the Organization may accept more than one change of team member. f. The coach, or a team member appointed by the team, represents both the university as well as the team before the Organization. Chapter 2: Administrative Provisions Art. 7 - Team Registration a. Registration for the Competition will open at 10am Central European Time (CET) on 22 September 2014. b. Each team can register online via the Organization s Competition website (www.iccmoot.com). The deadline for registration is at 11am CET on 24 October 2014. c. Each team must submit a copy of the flight tickets of at least three participants on 25 February 2015, 2pm (CET) at the latest. Teams that require a visa to visit the Netherlands, must additionally submit a copy of the visas of the same thee participants on 25 February 2015, 2pm (CET). If a team fails to submit a copy of their visa and/or flight tickets, their registration will be canceled. Art. 8 - International Panel of Evaluation a. All participating teams shall nominate one (1) duly qualified person to be a member of the International Panel of Evaluation. The members of the International Panel of Evaluation will each evaluate three anonymous memorials (not including the memorials of the nominating team). The nominated person may in no way be involved with their nominating team, or its preparations. b. The deadline for the participating teams to inform the Organization of the name and details of the person appointed to be a panel member is 16 January 2015. No faculty members of the participating universities should be nominated. The Organization may waive a team s duty to nominate a panel member, or lift the restriction to nominate a

faculty member. The authority and discretion to grant waivers lies entirely with the Organization. c. Non-compliance with this article will result in 10 penalty points, to be deducted from the nominating team s total memorial score. Art. 9 - Problem-Solving Question a. In the event more teams than allowed from one country are seeking registration for the Competition, a special procedure in the form of a preliminary selection round may take place. Teams from States/regions mentioned in Article 40 are only allowed to participate in the International Rounds, after they qualified through the competitions mentioned in Article 40. If there is no official regional or national round yet, it may be organized by the competing universities. b. If no preliminary round is organized by any of the participating universities from the concerned country or if not all universities agree to participate in a preliminary selection round organized by one of the participating universities, each team from that country concerned shall receive from the Organization a problem-solving question on 24 October 2014 at 3pm CET. c. Each team concerned must submit its answer to the problem-solving question to the Organization on 31 October 2014 by 3pm CET. d. An answer submitted after the problem-solving question deadline specified, renders that team s registration automatically invalid. e. Each team will be notified of the result of its performance of the problem-solving question and their eligibility in the registration of the Competition on 7 November 2014. f. The registration fee mentioned in Article 9 is only paid by the teams who proceed to the Main-Round in The Hague. Art. 10 - Registration Fee a. The Organization will issue an invoice for payment of the registration fee to eligible teams after the confirmation of participation. b. Each team must pay their registration fee within fourteen (30) days after the date that the invoice was issued. The registration fee may be paid by credit card (for an extra fee of 5% of the registration fee). c. Incomplete payment of registration fee renders that particular registration application invalid. d. The registration fee will not be refunded under any circumstances. If a team cancels its participation before 1 December 2014, and registers for the next ICC Moot (2016) in 2015, the 2015 payment will be regarded as a payment for the 2016 Competition. The Registration fee will neither be refunded in case of cancellation mentioned in Article 7(c). e. Registered teams who do not need to participate in a preliminary round, will receive confirmation of registration by 24 October 2014. f. The registration fee for teams from developed countries is 900,00, for teams from developing countries 350,00, and teams from Newly Industrialized Countries (NIC s), 600,00. g. The list of developing countries per region can be found at: http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-classifications/country-and-lending-groups. The Newly Industrialized Countries are: Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, Philippines, South Africa, Thailand and Turkey. 5

Art. 11 - Team Identification a. In the interest of fairness and objectivity, each team shall be assigned an anonymous number upon their registration. b. This number will be emailed to each team by the Organization. c. This number becomes the team s identifier throughout the Competition. Art. 12 - Case Publication a. The Competition case (hereinafter: Case ) shall be sent to the registered teams at 4 pm CET on 7 November 2014. b. The deadline for each team to email any questions regarding the Case to the Organization is at 11 pm CET on 30 November 2014. Any questions submitted after this deadline will not be taken into account. Chapter 3: Competition Structure Art. 13 - Structure a. The International Round of the Competition shall have two (2) consecutive phases, each independently graded: a written round (Memorials) and an oral round (Hearings). After the first oral round (Main-Round), a Semi-Final Round and a Final Round will take place. b. Each team shall address the Case in the roles of the Government Counsel, Counsel for the Prosecution, and Legal Representative for Victims (Victims Counsel), one Memorial per role. c. Each team shall participate in six (6) oral rounds before the Bench in the roles of Government Counsel, Counsel for the Prosecution, and Victims Counsel. (Twice per role) d. The Memorials and oral pleadings shall reflect a deep knowledge of the ICC rules and case law, as well as of International Criminal Law in general. Art. 14 - Semi-Final Round a. The written and oral stages of the Main-Round are independently assessed. The sum of the scores obtained in both stages after the deduction of any penalty points will qualify the nine (9) best teams for the Semi-Final Round. b. The Semi-Final Round will consist only of an oral phase. The teams are free to choose which of their three speakers will represent their team at the Semi-Final Round. They are not bound by the role the speakers represented in the Main-Round. c. The results of the written Memorials and the result of the oral pleadings of the Main- Round will not be taken into account in assessing the final scores of the Semi-Final Round. The Bench will assess the substance of the arguments and the quality of the performance of the three teams. d. Each round is independent, thus, Semi-Final Round winners are the highest scoring teams in that round, regardless of scores in other rounds, and will advance to the Final Round. e. Semi-Final matchups will be predetermined by Main-Round ranking. a. Semi-Final Matchup: 1, 6, 9 th place teams. b. Semi-Final Matchup: 2, 5, 8 th place teams. c. Semi-Final Matchup: 3, 4, 7 th place teams. Art. 15 - Final Round a. The winner of each Semi-Final Round will proceed to the Final Round.

b. The Final Round of the Competition will, if possible, be held at the seat of the ICC in The Hague. It will consist of an oral phase only. c. The teams are free to choose which of their three speakers will represent their team at the Final Round. They are not bound by the role the speakers represented in the Main-Round or Semi-Final Rounds. d. The Bench of the Final Round will announce the winner of the Competition (to be picked at the discretion of the Bench). The team winning the Final Round will be the winner of the Competition, regardless of the scoring of the Memorials and the results of the team in the Main-Round and Semi-Final Round. Chapter 4: Memorial Provisions Art. 16 - Submission of the Memorials a. All teams, excluding the teams participating in Regional Rounds, must submit their three (3) Memorials for each role by email before 10am CET on 23 February 2015. b. Late delivery of Memorials is sanctioned with twenty (20) penalty points. c. The organizers of the Regional Rounds will submit the Memorials of the participating teams to the Organization, without giving the qualified teams the opportunity to change the memorials. d. Score sheets will be emailed to each team upon the cessation of the Competition. Art. 17 - Identification in Memorials a. Each team must omit the following references in their Memorials: 1. The names of team members; 2. The members and/or the university s country of residence; 3. Its nationality; and 4. The name of its university. b. Violations of this article will be sanctioned with fifty (50) penalty points. Art. 18 - Memorial Format a. Each team must submit its Memorial in Microsoft Word format, and Pdf format. b. Each team must submit its Memorials in size 12 Times New Roman font style. c. Each page must have a margin of at least 2 cm on every side of the text. d. Memorials must be continuously page-numbered, excluding the front-cover. e. Violations of this article are sanctioned with one (1) penalty point per violation, with a maximum of five (5) penalty points. Art. 19 - Spacing a. The text of the Memorial must be 1.5 spaced. b. Headings and subheadings of more than one line in length must be single spaced. c. Violations of this article are sanctioned with one (1) penalty point per violation, with a maximum of four (4) penalty points. Art. 20 - Word Limit Each Memorial must not exceed 10.000 words (including footnotes). Violations of this article are sanctioned by five (5) penalty points per 400 words. The 10.000 words include the statement of facts, issues, summary of arguments, written arguments, submissions and (optional) annexes, and exclude the front cover, title page, table of contents, list of abbreviations and index of authorities. 7

Art. 21 - Order of Content a. Each Memorial shall be presented in the following order: 1. Front cover; 2. Title page; 3. Table of contents; 4. List of abbreviations; 5. Index of authorities (list of sources); 6. Statement of facts; 7. Issues; 8. Summary of arguments; 9. Written arguments; 10. Submissions; 11. Optional: Annex (max two (2) pages); and 12. Back cover. b. Violations of this article are sanctioned by two (2) penalty points per violation. Art. 22 - Front Cover Requirements a. The front cover must contain the following information: 1. Team number; 2. Role (Government Counsel, Counsel for the Prosecution, and Victims Counsel); 3. Title of the Competition ( in the English language); 4. Year; and 5. Total word count. b. The front cover must be colour coded accordingly: 1. Red for Government Counsel. 2. Green for Counsel for the Prosecution. 3. Blue for Victims Counsel. c. A format for the front cover will be provided by the Organization. d. Violations of this article will be sanctioned with one (1) penalty point per violation, with a maximum of three (3) penalty points. Art. 23 - Footnotes a. Footnotes are to be in Times New Roman font style, size 10 font, single spaced. b. Spacing between each footnote shall be at least 1.5. c. Consistency in the reference to sources throughout the Memorial is required. A referred-to document should be easy to find using the footnote. d. All the sources referred to in footnotes must be included in the index of authorities. e. Footnotes must be uniform. f. Footnotes may not include any other text than the citation itself. g. Abbreviations of sources within footnotes are allowed. The abbreviation has to be announced in the footnote itself or in the index of authorities. h. Violations of this article are sanctioned with two (2) penalty points per violation, with a maximum of ten (10) penalty points. More than one violation of the same item of this Article, should be considered as one violation in total. Art. 24 - Scoring Structure Memorials a. Scores are awarded out of a maximum of 100 points. b. Scores are awarded for: 1. Organization, structure, and analysis of the issues: (20 points).

2. Use of facts and legal principles: (20 points). 3 Use of authorities and citations: (20 points). 4. Persuasiveness, ingenuity, logic and reasoning: (20 points). 5. Grammar, style, and clarity: (20 points). Art. 25 - Plagiarism Plagiarism in Memorials will be sanctioned with disqualification of the team. A team s disqualification is final and irrevocable. Chapter 5: Oral Round Provisions Art. 26 - Content a. Each team s oral pleadings must demonstrate an outstanding knowledge of the ICC Rules of Procedure and Evidence and the applicable international criminal law principles. b. The Hearings will have a maximum length of two (2) hours per session and shall reflect familiarity with ICC proceedings. Art. 27 - Appearance a. Each team scheduled to appear has a maximum of fifteen (15) minutes to appear before the bench from the start of the scheduled time. b. The Competition will proceed on an ex parte basis at the expiration of the fifteen (15) minutes. The Organization may decide to delay the start of the proceedings in exceptional circumstances. Art. 28 - Speakers a. Each team will have three (3) individual speakers. Every individual speaker of a team will represent in their pleadings the Government Counsel, or Counsel for the Prosecution or Victims Counsel. It is within the discretion of each team to decide which speaker will present the rebuttal. Researchers are not allowed to present the initial presentations or the rebuttal. b. Only two members of each team, two speakers, or one speaker and one researcher, are allowed to be present before the Bench. c. Each speaker will present in accordance with the time allocated under Articles 31 and 32. d. Verbatim reading of the Memorials during the Hearings is strictly prohibited. Art. 29 - Communication a. Communication between the speakers and the coaches, team members not presenting, or Competition spectators, is strictly prohibited during the Hearings. b. Only those present before the bench are permitted to communicate with each other, as long as they do not trouble the person speaking at that moment. c. The use of laptops or mobile phones during the Hearings is strictly prohibited, also when these items are solely used for measuring time. Speakers are allowed to use a watch ONLY. An exception can be made by the Organization for exceptional circumstances. d. Violations of this article are sanctioned with 50 points. 9

Art. 30 - Raising Objections a. The speakers are allowed to make a maximum of one objection per session to the exposition of the oralist of the other teams, as long as it is of an utmost importance for the procedure before the Bench and refers to the immediate argument of the pleading oralist. b. An objection is only permissible in the following situations: 1. When any speaker refers to events that are not mentioned in the case; or 2. Radical differences between oral arguments and arguments in the written Memorial; or 3. For any other ground deemed appropriate by the Bench. c. Once the reasons for the filed objection are expressed, the Bench Members are obliged to hear the arguments of the counterpart before deciding on the legality or illegality of the objection. d. The Bench will decide by unanimous vote on the admissibility or inadmissibility of the objection. In case of misusing the objection, (only) the speaker that objects will be sanctioned by a deduction of up to ten (10) discretionary penalty points. If the objecting team is correct, a deduction of up to ten (10) discretionary penalty points may be deducted of the score of the speaker that made the violation. e. The objection is not included in the time mentioned in Articles 31 and 32. Art. 31 - Speaking Time a. Presentation by: Government Counsel: 20 minutes. b. Presentation by Counsel for the Prosecution: 20 minutes. c. Presentation by Victims Counsel: 20 minutes. d. Questions posed by the Bench Members are included in the Speaking Time of the Presentations. Art. 32 - Rebuttal a. Rebuttal by Government Counsel: up to 10 minutes. b. Rebuttal by Counsel for the Prosecution: up to 10 minutes. c. Rebuttal by Victims Counsel: up to 10 minutes. d. Questions posed by the Bench Members are included in the Speaking Time of the Rebuttal. e. The Speakers are not allowed to introduce new issues in their rebuttal. f. Speakers may discuss in their rebuttal all arguments and issues raised by the opposing counsels during both their presentation and rebuttal. Art. 33 - Bench Composition a. Each Bench will be composed of one (1) or two (2) Member(s) and a President (appointed by the Organization or by consensus of the judges participating in the hearing) and shall be assisted by a bench clerk. b. An advisor of a participating team cannot be appointed as a Bench Member. c. Bench Members for the Oral Sessions can be distinct from the Bench evaluating the Memorials. All Bench Members must read the Case, as well as other explanatory documents that may be produced by the Case author. Though not compulsory, Bench Members may wear a judicial robe. d. Bench Members are not permitted to give their individual opinion outside the deliberation room on which team or student they personally consider the best participant. Bench Members are additionally not allowed to give the participating teams any feedback on details of the Case. e. During the oral rounds, the Bench shall ensure respect for the Rules and will assess the quality of the arguments. The Bench Members are encouraged to intervene with

appropriate questions during the oral pleading to further assess the knowledge and the preparation of the oralists. f. The Bench will follow its own Rules of Procedure within the framework of accepted norms of judicial practice, and with regard to questions of doubt or dispute in the procedure or facts. A decision of the Presiding Member of the Bench shall be final. g. The Bench Members shall mark the oral arguments in accordance with the scoring criteria provided for in these Rules. h. Team objections to a jury panel due to conflict of interest or prior relationship must be disclosed and communicated to the Bench Clerk prior to the commencement of the Hearing. Art. 34 - Role of the Bench Clerk a. The Bench Clerk is nominated by the Organization. b. The Bench Clerk is responsible for: 1. the collection of the score sheets and their delivery to the Organization; 2. briefing and advising the Bench Members on the Rules of Procedure contained herein; 3. keeping order during the Hearing; 4. facilitating the sessions development; 5. timekeeping. Art. 35 - Scores Oral Pleadings a. Scores are rewarded out of a maximum of 100 points. 70% of the score is based on the initial presentation, and 30% of the score is based on the rebuttal. b. Scores for the initial presentation are allocated as follows: 1. Organization, structure, and analysis of the issues: (20 points). 2. Use of facts and legal principles: (20 points). 3 Use of authorities and citations: (20 points). 4. Persuasiveness, ingenuity, logic and reasoning: (20 points). 5. Presentation: (20 points). c. Score sheets will be emailed to each team upon the cessation of the Competition. Art. 36 - Penalties for Inappropriate Behaviour a. Every team should maintain the fullest dignity and decorum not only in the Courtroom, but during the entire Competition. b. Inappropriate behaviour or blatant disregard for the procedures may result in the disqualification of the team or the team will be sanctioned by a deduction of fifteen (15) points. c. Inappropriate behaviour displayed by any observers of the Competition will result in them being escorted out of the Competition venue. Art. 37 - Scouting a. Scouting is forbidden at all times during the Competition. b. Scouting is defined as: 1. when a team or its members attend a Hearing in which they are not participants; 2. instances where students, coaches or spectators discuss with or pose questions of substantive issues of international criminal law to the judges. c. Violations of this article will result in disqualification. A team s disqualification is final and irrevocable 11

Art. 38 - Competition Program Visits a. Scheduled site visits to various institutions in The Hague are part of the education programme for participants. It is the students own responsibility to meet at designated meeting points and bring proper documentation to complete these visits. While failure to attend site visits once registered for the specific visit will have no bearing on the scoring procedure, it may result in loss of certificate of completion. Chapter 6: The Awards Art. 39 - Categories of the Awards b. The following awards will be given by the ICC after the Final Round: i. Winner; ii. First Runner-up; iii. Second Runner-up. c. The following awards will be given by the Organization: i. Best Memorial; ii. Best Government Counsel (team Scores of written and oral round for the Government Counsel); iii. Best Prosecutor (team Scores of written and oral round for the Prosecution); iv. Best Victims Counsel (team Scores of written and oral round for the Defense Counsel); v. Government Counsel (speaker Scores of oral round for the Government Counsel); vi. Best Prosecutor (speaker Scores of oral round for the Prosecution); vii. Best Victims Counsel (speaker Scores of oral round for the Defense Counsel); viii. Best Oralist of the Preliminary Rounds; ix. Best Non-Native English Speaking Team. A team is considered non-native if more than two out of three participating speakers are nationals of a non-english speaking country; and x. Honorable Mention: Selected by the Organization, for those who have demonstrated perseverance in the face of challenge. d. Upon completion of entire program, each participating team shall receive a certificate of participation. Chapter 7: The Organization Art. 40 - Organization a. The Main-Round, Semi-Final Rounds and the Final Round are organized by the Grotius Centre for International Legal Studies Leiden University (www.iccmoot.com). b. The Regional Round for the Americas and Caribbean is held in White Plains, New York, in the United States of America and is organized by Pace University Law School (www.pace.edu/school-of-law/icc). c. The National Round for China is organized by the China University of Political Science and Law (www.icc-trialcompetition.com). d. The National Round for Israel is organized by ALMA (http://www.alma-ihl.org/icccompetition).