International Consortium for Court Excellence

Similar documents
HUMAN RIGHTS ADVISORY BOARD TERMS OF REFERENCE NOVEMBER 2016

FINAL DOCUMENT. Global Harmonization Task Force

REGULAR PROCESS FOR THE GLOBAL REPORTING AND ASSESSMENT OF THE STATE OF THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT, INCLUDING SOCIO-ECONOMIC ISSUES

Council of Academic Public Health Institutions Australia Incorporated. Constitution and Rules (as amended at the AGM on 23 October 2018)

International Sociological Association Research Committee on Sociology of Youth RC 34 Statutes

IMCA HOLDINGS LIMITED

RTO Policy 5: Complaints and Appeals

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT AND THE STUC:

2. CGAP s governance structure comprises a Council of Governors, an Executive Committee, and an Operational Team.

CHAPTER 14 CONSULTATIONS AND DISPUTE SETTLEMENT. Article 1: Definitions

Advance unedited version. Draft decision -/CMP.3. Adaptation Fund

JOB DESCRIPTION AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL SECRETARIAT (AIIS)

MODUS OPERANDI OF THE PROGRAMME COORDINATING BOARD OF THE JOINT UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS)

Advisory Committee Terms of Reference

PROCEDURES USED BY THE OIE TO SET STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL TRADE, WITH A FOCUS ON THE TERRESTRIAL

SUMMARY OF MEMBER FEEDBACK

CONSTITUTION OF THE ASEAN LAW ASSOCIATION (Incorporating amendments as at 1st June 2004)

1. Organization. 2. Mission.

National Chapter Accreditation and Individual Member Appointment Policy

Title 1: Recitals, background and context

7 Articles of Association

NHS England Clinical Priorities Advisory Group: Terms of Reference. Clinical Priorities Advisory Group: Terms of Reference

October (hereinafter the MoU ) between

NATIONAL GROUP REGULATIONS

GOVERNANCE CHARTER TULSA CITY & COUNTY CONTINUUM OF CARE PREAMBLE

Professional Qualifications Advisory Committee Charter

By-laws Australian Water Association Limited, ACN

Governance of Australia s Official Statistics System

Constitution of the International Chamber of Commerce

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR TRADE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

CUEE GOVERNANCE POLICY

2. Rules of Procedure (supplementing the Terms of Reference)

Southeast Florida Regional Partnership

STATE%OIL%AND%GAS%REGULATORY%EXCHANGE% % MISSION%STATEMENT%! The! STATE! OIL! AND! GAS! REGULATORY! EXCHANGE! (EXCHANGE)! is! an! outreach!

Purpose Expectations Membership

March Addis Ababa Ethiopia

STAR-IDAZ International Research Consortium Governance Structure and Modus Operandi

ACADEMY OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS CENTRAL & EASTERN EUROPE CHAPTER CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS CONSTITUTION ARTICLE I - ORGANIZATION

Constitution and By-Laws Caribbean MicroFinance Alliance

American Bar Association Law Student Division Bylaws

CHAPTER 28 DISPUTE SETTLEMENT. Section A: Dispute Settlement

ICSA Guidance on Terms of Reference Nomination Committee

A Way Home for Tulsa. Governance Charter. for the Tulsa City & County Continuum of Care

A Way Home for Tulsa. Governance Charter. for the Tulsa City & County Continuum of Care

THE NEW GOVERNANCE MODEL EXPLAINED

1.1 General: Name. The name of the Chapter is the Washington Chapter of the American Planning Association.

UNWTO Commission for Africa Fifty-fourth meeting Tunis, Tunisia, 24 April 2013

RULES OF PROCEDURE Central Review Board

Selection and appointment of a mandate holder

SPORTS DIRECT INTERNATIONAL PLC (THE COMPANY) Adopted by the board on 6 September 2017

December IFRS Foundation. Constitution. Effective from 1 December 2016

PARTICIPATION IN NATIONAL MIRROR COMMITTEES AND ISO STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEES

Bylaws of the California Federation of Interpreters Local of The NewsGuild-CWA

ROYAL AUSTRALASIAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS. Division: Fellowship and Standards Ref. No. FES-FEL-018

Approved by the CDIC Board of Directors: March 8, 2006 Amended: December 5, 2007 Amended: March 5, 2008 Amended: March 2, 2011 Amended: March 5, 2014

IEEE Power & Energy Society Bylaws

The Conflict-Free Gold Standard:

BOARD OF DIRECTORS: Description & Role (Approved, Executive Committee 2/15/2007; Revised/Approved 10/19/2011)

July 2018 GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE CHARTER 1. PURPOSE 2. MEMBERSHIP

Objectives of this presentation

Pennsylvania Asthma Partnership: Guidelines

CONSTITUTION PREAMBLE DEFINITIONS

Joint Committee: Rules of Procedure (revised version November 2014)

Issue Paper. Revisions to Energy Imbalance Market Governance Documents

(IFBPW) otherwise called BPW INTERNATIONAL PROCEDURE MANUAL PURPOSE: Amendments to this Procedure Manual are subject to Regulation R21 which states:

Modus operandi of the Scientific and Technical Review Panel (STRP)

Framework Convention on Climate Change

Board Charter Approved 26 April 2016

PROCEDURES MANUAL FOR DISTRICT 17

Statutes The Organisation for the Code of Conduct for the Protection of Children from Sexual Exploitation in Travel and Tourism

NASEDoVoC By-Laws September 11, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE EMERGENCY DONATIONS AND VOLUNTEER COORDINATORS (NASEDoVoC) BY-LAWS

1. Introduction. 2. Updates since July Update SBP Governance Transition Process November 2017

IAF/ILAC Multi-Lateral Mutual Recognition Arrangements (Arrangements): Requirements and Procedures for Evaluation of a Regional Group

ECC. Rules of Procedure for the Electronic Communications Committee. (and its subordinate entities) Edition 15

AIJA Pocket Guide INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONALE DES JEUNES AVOCATS

FSB Procedural Guidelines

South Australian Employment Tribunal Bill 2014

REMUNERATION COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE THE BRITISH UNITED PROVIDENT ASSOCIATION LIMITED REMUNERATION COMMITTEE. Terms of Reference

STOCK SPIRITS GROUP PLC NOMINATION COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE

Nominations Committee

Consortium Constitution

Terms of Reference - Nominations and Appointment Committee Council of Governors

Multnomah County Public Health Advisory Board By-Laws

Railway Industry Supplier Approval Scheme. RISAS Board Arrangements

17229/09 LK/mg 1 DG C I

NEST Coordinating Center (NESTcc) Charter. Article I: Name, Preamble, Mission, and Vision

WT/GC/W/ November ( ) Page: 1/4. General Council December Original: English

Global Measures of Court Performance in Victoria

PROFESSIONAL STAFF ADVISORY COUNCIL BYLAWS. Table of Contents

SCHEME OF JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS COMMISSION BILL 2016

MINAMATA CONVENTION ON MERCURY

1/15/07 3:14 AM Page 7 C M Y CM MY CY CMY K APEC at a Glance Composite

SCR Local Enterprise Partnership Terms of Reference

Articles of Association

Regional Consultation on The National Action and Coordinating Groups against Violence against Children (NACG) Solidarity for the Children of SAARC

JUSTICE Strategic Plan

Standards Committee Subcommittee Organization and Procedures March 10, 2008

NORTHERN IRELAND POLICING BOARD STRATEGIC OUTCOMES FOR POLICING IN NORTHERN IRELAND

1. About Eastern Partnership Civil Society Facility project:

International Federation of Automatic Control. IFAC Constitution. and By-Laws

Transcription:

International Consortium for Court Excellence Governance Policy December 2015 1. What is the International Consortium for Court Excellence? 1.1 The International Consortium for Court Excellence (the Consortium ) currently consists of international judicial institutions with expertise in court or tribunal and judicial administration. Representing significant international experience in the application of court quality management models, they have joined to promote court excellence. 1 1.2 The Consortium has developed an International Framework for Court Excellence (the Framework ). The Framework assesses a court s performance against seven areas of excellence, and provides guidance for courts and tribunals to improve their performance. It utilises recognised organisational improvement methodologies while reflecting the special issues that courts face. 1.3 The Framework also incorporates links to case studies, court performance improvement processes and a range of available tools to measure court performance and development. 1.4 The Consortium regularly edits and revises the Framework to reflect new systems and initiatives directed at improving how courts and tribunals deliver services. It also promotes the Framework, provides educational assistance in the form of conferences, workshops/forums and consulting services. The Consortium also undertakes research and develops new resources in relation to the Framework including accreditation and certification processes. 1.5 The Framework represents a process for an all-encompassing approach to achieving court excellence rather than simply addressing limited aspects of court activity. As a result, it applies to all courts and tribunals and is equally effective for large urban courts and tribunals and smaller rural or remote courts and tribunals. 1 Reference to courts also includes tribunals.

2. Goal of the Consortium 2.1 The goal of the Consortium is the development and maintenance of a framework of values, concepts and tools by which courts and tribunals worldwide can voluntarily assess and improve the quality of justice and court and tribunal administration they deliver. 3. Values of the Consortium 3.1 The Consortium seeks to support all courts and tribunals to uphold the ten core values of courts. These are: equality before the law, fairness, impartiality, independence of decision-making, competence, integrity, transparency, accessibility, timeliness and certainty. 3.2 The Consortium also seeks to follow those values in its own operations. Specifically, the Consortium values are: Equality - To encourage and facilitate court excellence in all jurisdictions, developing and developed countries, small and large jurisdictions alike, by providing guidance and assistance to implementing jurisdictions. Accessibility To provide advice, materials and case studies, and to conduct workshops that aid in the training and education of courts and tribunals that are implementing the Framework. Competence To encourage and support innovation and improvement for all courts and tribunals striving to provide the highest quality in the administration of justice. Integrity To provide a transparent, structured approach to achieving courts excellence that is reviewed on a continuous basis and incorporates member feedback. Certainty To ensure the integrity of the Framework as the benchmark methodology for achieving court excellence whilst allowing courts the flexibility to apply or adjust the Framework to meet their circumstances. 4. Governance 4.1 The Consortium comprises the Executive Committee, supported by the Secretariat and members. 4.2 The Consortium is currently a non-incorporated group of organisations and courts that have an interest in the promotion of excellence in court and judicial administration. 4.3 The copyright in the Framework and supporting material produced by the Consortium is held by the National Center for State Courts USA for the use and production of founding members of the Consortium. 2

5. The Executive Committee 5.1 The Executive Committee governs the work of the Consortium. 5.2 The Executive Committee drives promotion of the use of the Framework. The Executive Committee is responsible for refining the Framework and its related resources, and promoting the Consortium s goals. The Executive Committee also actively participates, in person and online, in the Consortium s work and provides support, collaboration, education, research and development of the Framework and court excellence tools. 5.3 Executive Committee members also run workshops and training on the Framework for other interested judicial institutions. Executive Committee members contribute to the objectives of the Consortium and ensure that programs and future plans of their organisation support the Consortium s court excellence objectives. 5.4 The Executive Committee is made up of representatives of the four founding members that are the permanent members of the Consortium: The National Center for State Courts (NCSC); Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration (AIJA); State Courts, Singapore; and Federal Judicial Center (FJC). 5.5 The Executive Committee may by consensus appoint up to three additional members to become term members of the Executive Committee in the first instance for up to two years. Term members may be reappointed by the Executive Committee for an additional term of not more than one year. To be appointed as a term member of the Executive Committee, the individual must be the nominated representative of a member organisation of the Consortium and must also have been nominated by a permanent member of the Executive Committee. The term member must commit to supporting the work of the Executive Committee. 5.6 The four permanent members of the Consortium will endeavour to ensure the composition of the Executive Committee reflects a broad range of geographical regions including Asia-Pacific, Europe, Middle East/Africa and North/South/Central America. 5.7 The Chair of the Executive Committee will be nominated and appointed from the permanent members for a term of three years. The appointment of the Chair will be by rotation in alphabetical order. The role of the Chair of the Executive Committee is to chair Executive Committee Meetings and act as the head representative of the Consortium. 3

5.8 The Executive Committee will meet via telephone conference (or equivalent) not less than twice per calendar year but conducts its business primarily by email. 6. The Members 6.1 Membership of the Consortium is governed by a Membership Policy*. In summary, the members of the Consortium comprise: a. The Founding Members that developed the Framework and are dedicated to its continual development. They are the permanent members of the Executive Committee. b. Members by Application which comprise three categories: 7. Consortium Support i. Implementing Members are courts or tribunals or court/tribunal systems that have an active interest in the Framework and its implementation, assist the Consortium fulfilling its objectives including promoting use of the Framework and have shown evidence of significant use of the Framework. ii. Associate Members are courts or tribunals or court/tribunal systems that have an active interest in the Framework, assist the Consortium in fulfilling its objectives, and promote use of the Framework. Associate Members will not be as further advanced in implementation of the Framework as Implementing Members but will have begun to implement or have firm plans to implement or have implemented in a limited manner. iii. Affiliated Judicial Institutions are institutions that provide active support and assistance to judges, courts/tribunals and court/tribunal systems but do not have direct responsibility for implementing the Framework in courts/tribunals or court/tribunal systems. They support the goals of the Consortium and implementation of the Framework and seek to assist and support the promotion of the Framework. 7.1 The Executive Committee is supported by a Secretariat located at the AIJA in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. The Secretariat is funded jointly by the AIJA and NCSC. 7.2 The Secretariat comprises a Secretary (on a voluntary basis) and an Assistant Secretary, working 2 days per week. The Executive Director of the AIJA is ex officio Secretary for the Consortium. 4

7.3 The role of the Secretary is to manage the activities and administration of the Secretariat in its support of the Consortium. 7.4 The Secretariat is responsible for: Maintaining a register of members to the Consortium. Maintaining data on the implementation of the Framework and key developments across the world. Developing up-to-date material for the Consortium website. Drafting up to four newsletters per year on developments and implementation of the Framework internationally. Establishing effective networks with key stakeholders so that members are actively engaged in the development of the Framework. Assisting members with accessing relevant information and facilitating the exchange of case studies. Undertaking research for the Executive Committee as required. Providing Secretariat support to the Executive Committee including taking minutes and following up on action items. Producing bi-monthly progress reports for the Executive Committee. 7.5 These arrangements may be varied by agreement of the Executive Committee from time to time. * Membership Policy December 2015 (attached) 5