stipulated that each of the above parties shall bear its own costs and fees.

Similar documents
Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research

PERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES. Member Electronic Vote/ . Alabama No No Yes No. Alaska No No No No

MEMORANDUM JUDGES SERVING AS ARBITRATORS AND MEDIATORS

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5

2016 Voter Registration Deadlines by State

THE PROCESS TO RENEW A JUDGMENT SHOULD BEGIN 6-8 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE

Campaign Finance E-Filing Systems by State WHAT IS REQUIRED? WHO MUST E-FILE? Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily).

Case 1:14-cv Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/14 Page 1 of 61 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:16-cv Document 3 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 66 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

The Victim Rights Law Center thanks Catherine Cambridge for her research assistance.

ACCESS TO STATE GOVERNMENT 1. Web Pages for State Laws, State Rules and State Departments of Health

The remaining legislative bodies have guides that help determine bill assignments. Table shows the criteria used to refer bills.

State Trial Courts with Incidental Appellate Jurisdiction, 2010

Complying with Electric Cooperative State Statutes

Rhoads Online State Appointment Rules Handy Guide

Notice N HCFB-1. March 25, Subject: FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY PROGRAM OBLIGATION AUTHORITY FISCAL YEAR (FY) Classification Code

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION [NOTICE ] Price Index Adjustments for Contribution and Expenditure Limitations and

National State Law Survey: Statute of Limitations 1

Security Breach Notification Chart

DATA BREACH CLAIMS IN THE US: An Overview of First Party Breach Requirements

Security Breach Notification Chart

Limitations on Contributions to Political Committees

NOTICE TO MEMBERS No January 2, 2018

12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment

Class Actions and the Refund of Unconstitutional Taxes. Revenue Laws Study Committee Trina Griffin, Research Division April 2, 2008

POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS. OUT-OF- STATE DONORS. INITIATIVE STATUTE.

State Complaint Information

GOVERNOR AG LEGISLATURE PUC DEQ

STATE LAWS SUMMARY: CHILD LABOR CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS BY STATE

2008 Changes to the Constitution of International Union UNITED STEELWORKERS

28 USC 152. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

ASSOCIATES OF VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA, INC. BYLAWS (A Nonprofit Corporation)

National Latino Peace Officers Association

The Electoral College And

Soybean Promotion and Research: Amend the Order to Adjust Representation on the United Soybean Board

Committee Consideration of Bills

Security Breach Notification Chart

Does your state have a MANDATORY rule requiring an attorney to designate a successor/surrogate/receiver in case of death or disability

TELEPHONE; STATISTICAL INFORMATION; PRISONS AND PRISONERS; LITIGATION; CORRECTIONS; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ISSUES

Security Breach Notification Chart

Alabama 2.5 months 2.5 months N/R N/R 3.5 months 3.5 months 3.5 months 3.5 months No No

Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund

State-by-State Chart of HIV-Specific Laws and Prosecutorial Tools

CASE 0:13-cv ADM-TNL Document 115 Filed 01/27/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Components of Population Change by State

Bylaws of the. Student Membership

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. State Voter Registration and Election Day Laws

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2010 Session

Federal Rate of Return. FY 2019 Update Texas Department of Transportation - Federal Affairs

INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY

How Many Illegal Aliens Currently Live in the United States?

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Records on David McIntosh Deputy Director of the Council on Competitiveness

UNIFORM NOTICE OF REGULATION A TIER 2 OFFERING Pursuant to Section 18(b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933

Democratic Convention *Saturday 1 March 2008 *Monday 25 August - Thursday 28 August District of Columbia Non-binding Primary

American Government. Workbook

Oregon enacts statute to make improper patent license demands a violation of its unlawful trade practices law

Case 1:16-cv MJW Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Registered Agents. Question by: Kristyne Tanaka. Date: 27 October 2010

New Census Estimates Show Slight Changes For Congressional Apportionment Now, But Point to Larger Changes by 2020

ADVANCEMENT, JURISDICTION-BY-JURISDICTION

Official Voter Information for General Election Statute Titles

Destruction of Paper Files. Date: September 12, [Destruction of Paper Files] [September 12, 2013]

Red, white, and blue. One for each state. Question 1 What are the colors of our flag? Question 2 What do the stars on the flag mean?

For jurisdictions that reject for punctuation errors, is the rejection based on a policy decision or due to statutory provisions?

Women in Federal and State-level Judgeships

Chapter 12: The Math of Democracy 12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment - SOLUTIONS

The Economic Impact of Spending for Operations and Construction in 2014 by AZA-Accredited Zoos and Aquariums

Employment debate in the context of NAFTA. September 2017

Incarcerated America Human Rights Watch Backgrounder April 2003

Lobbying: 10 Answers you need to know Venable LLP

7-45. Electronic Access to Legislative Documents. Legislative Documents

ACTION: Notice announcing addresses for summons and complaints. SUMMARY: Our Office of the General Counsel (OGC) is responsible for processing

Immigration Policy Brief August 2006

If you have questions, please or call

Electronic Access? State. Court Rules on Public Access? Materials/Info on the web?

Delegates: Understanding the numbers and the rules

Franklin D. Roosevelt. Pertaining to the. Campaign of 1928

YOU PAY FOR YOUR WRONG AND NO ONE ELSE S: THE ABOLITION OF JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY

U.S. Sentencing Commission Preliminary Crack Retroactivity Data Report Fair Sentencing Act

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office

2015 ANNUAL OUTCOME GOAL PLAN (WITH FY 2014 OUTCOMES) Prepared in compliance with Government Performance and Results Act

Intake 1 Total Requests Received 4

Election Year Restrictions on Mass Mailings by Members of Congress: How H.R Would Change Current Law

Terance Healy v. Attorney General Pennsylvania

Union Byte By Cherrie Bucknor and John Schmitt* January 2015

Background Information on Redistricting

Number of Bills Passed Per Issue

Intake 1 Total Requests Received 4

Records Retention. Date: June 13, [Records Retention] [ ]

Nominating Committee Policy

Call for Expedited Processing Procedures. Date: August 1, [Call for Expedited Processing Procedures] [August 1, 2013]

Texas and New Jersey are Best States for American E-Government

Fiscal Year (September 30, 2018) Requests by Intake and Case Status Intake 1 Case Review 6 Period

Map of the Foreign Born Population of the United States, 1900

Electronic Notarization

BONDS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS

The mission of NAESP is to lead in the advocacy and support for elementary and middle level principals and other education leaders in their

Do you consider FEIN's to be public or private information? Do you consider phone numbers to be private information?

Swarthmore College Alumni Association Constitution and Bylaws. The name of this Association shall be Swarthmore College Alumni Association.

Transcription:

CASE 0:13-cv-01751-ADM-TNL Document 156 Filed 03/24/17 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, and NATIONAL PORK PRODUCERS COUNCIL, v. Plaintiffs, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, and E. SCOTT PRUITT, Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE No. 13-cv-1751 (ADM/TNL) and Defendants, FOOD & WATER WATCH, ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT, AND IOWA CITIZENS FOR COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT, Intervenors. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties to the above entitled action through their undersigned attorneys that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this action shall be dismissed with prejudice. It is further stipulated that each of the above parties shall bear its own costs and fees.

CASE 0:13-cv-01751-ADM-TNL Document 156 Filed 03/24/17 Page 2 of 2 Dated March 24, 2017 GREGORY G. BROOKER Acting United States Attorney /s/ Michael B. Kimberly Michael B. Kimberly admitted pro hac vice Mayer Brown LLP 1999 K Street NW Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 263-3127 Counsel for Plaintiffs /s/ Tarah Heinzen Tarah Heinzen admitted pro hac vice Food & Water Watch 1616 P St. NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 683-2457 /s/ Pamela A. Marentette Pamela A. Marentette Assistant U.S. Attorney District of Minnesota Attorney I.D. No. 0389725 600 United States Courthouse 300 South Fourth Street Minneapolis, MN 55415 (612) 664-5600 Counsel for Defendants Counsel for Intervenors 2

CASE 0:13-cv-01751-ADM-TNL Document 156-1 Filed 03/24/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil No. 13-1751 (ADM/TNL) AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, and NATIONAL PORK PRODUCERS COUNCIL Plaintiffs, STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL v. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, and GINA McCARTHY, 1 Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and Defendants, FOOD & WATER WATCH, ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT, AND IOWA CITIZENS FOR COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT, Intervenors. WHEREAS, on July 5, 2013, Plaintiffs, the American Farm Bureau Federation ( AFBF ) and National Pork Producers Council ( NPPC ) (together, Plaintiffs ), filed their Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief ( Complaint ), alleging a claim under the Administrative Procedure Act and seeking an Order enjoining the U.S. 1 Scott Pruitt is now the Administrator of EPA. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Mr. Pruitt should be substituted for Gina McCarthy as defendant in this suit.

CASE 0:13-cv-01751-ADM-TNL Document 156-1 Filed 03/24/17 Page 2 of 9 Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ) from disclosing certain information (referred to herein as the disputed information ) in response to Freedom of Information Act ( FOIA ) requests submitted by Earthjustice (EPA-HQ-2012-001337) and the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Pew Charitable Trusts (EPA-HQ-2013-001516). WHEREAS, the disputed information consists of a set of 73 documents ( disputed information ) that EPA collected from twenty-seven state permitting authorities, eight state websites, EPA databases, and EPA regional offices, following the Agency s determination to compile reliable information about concentrated animal feeding operations ( CAFOs ) in the United States using existing data sources rather than promulgating a rule requiring CAFOs to submit information directly to EPA. WHEREAS, in this lawsuit, Plaintiffs allege that portions of the disputed information are protected by Exemption 6 of the FOIA, which pertains to [p]ersonnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(6). WHEREAS, the disputed information consists of data pertaining to animal feeding operations, which is aggregated by state, for the following states: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. WHEREAS, the disputed information was filed in the administrative record in this matter, at ECF. No. 69, Exhibits 16 and 32. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs, AFBF and NPPC, and Defendants, Administrator Scott Pruitt and EPA, wish to avoid any further litigation and controversy and to settle and

CASE 0:13-cv-01751-ADM-TNL Document 156-1 Filed 03/24/17 Page 3 of 9 compromise fully any and all claims and issues that have been raised, or could have been raised in this action, which have transpired prior to the execution of this Stipulation of Settlement and Dismissal ( Stipulation ). Now, therefore, the parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby settle and compromise the above-captioned lawsuit. The parties stipulate that this matter is hereby settled and compromised on the following terms: 1. Defendants agree that only the columns reflecting permit status, city, county, and 5-digit zip code in the disputed information, which, as defined above, consists of 73 documents set forth at ECF No. 69, Exhibits 16 and 32, will be released in response to the FOIAs requests at issue in this case, EPA-HQ-2012-001337 and EPA- HQ-2013-001516. All other columns and fields in the disputed information will be redacted pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(6). 2. Defendants have provided, and Plaintiffs have reviewed, the disputed information with the agreed-upon redactions, and those redactions are attached hereto as Exhibit A. 3. Defendants also agree to release the same redacted disputed information, as set forth in Exhibit A, in response to the following pending FOIA requests submitted to EPA Headquarters that seek the disputed information: (1) EPA-HQ-2013-006737; (2) EPA-HQ-2013-006604; (3) EPA-HQ-2013-004128; (4) EPA-HQ-2013-008906; (5) EPA-HQ-2013-007430; (6) EPA-HQ-2013-006913; (7) EPA-HQ-2013-004097; (8) EPA-HQ-2015-004064; (9) EPA-HQ-2015-006732; and (10) EPA-HQ-2016-008563. Defendants further agree to post the redacted disputed information, responsive to the

CASE 0:13-cv-01751-ADM-TNL Document 156-1 Filed 03/24/17 Page 4 of 9 FOIA requests identified in Paragraphs 1 and 3, to FOIAonline (www.foiaonline.regulations.gov), consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2)(D). 4. Within 7 calendar days of the execution of this Stipulation, Defendants will provide the redacted disputed information, set forth at Exhibit A, in response to the FOIA requests identified in Paragraphs 1 and 3 above. 5. Within 7 calendar days of the execution of this Stipulation, Defendants will request in writing that the FOIA requesters in EPA-HQ-2012-001337 and EPA-HQ- 2013-001516 return to EPA or destroy all copies of any previous responses to those FOIA requests and cease any further or ongoing dissemination of the same. 6. This Stipulation does not bind Defendants with respect to its response to any FOIA request other than the FOIA requests identified in Paragraphs 1 and 3 of this Stipulation. Within 7 calendar days of execution of this Stipulation, Defendants agree to provide written instruction to EPA s Regional and Headquarters FOIA coordinators that if they receive a FOIA request seeking the disputed information, as defined above, they are to respond by referring the requester(s) to FOIAonline and referencing the response provided to EPA-HQ-2012-001337 and EPA-HQ-2013-001516. This instruction will also be included in the training described below in paragraph 7. 7. Defendants agree to conduct training for managers in EPA s Office of Water and Regional and Headquarters FOIA coordinators regarding the Agency s obligations under the FOIA and the Privacy Act. Among other things, the training will focus on Exemption 6 of the FOIA, the Privacy Act, and other relevant privacy issues. The training will be conducted in the 2017 calendar year.

CASE 0:13-cv-01751-ADM-TNL Document 156-1 Filed 03/24/17 Page 5 of 9 8. Plaintiffs agree to dismiss this lawsuit with prejudice. Such dismissal shall be effected via the stipulation of voluntary dismissal with prejudice per Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) that is attached hereto as Exhibit B. The parties shall file with the Court such stipulation of dismissal within ten business days of execution of this Stipulation. 9. This Stipulation constitutes the full and complete satisfaction of any and all claims on behalf of Plaintiffs arising from (a) the allegations set forth in the complaint filed in this lawsuit and (b) any litigation or administrative proceeding that Plaintiffs have brought, could bring, or could have brought against Defendants regarding the specific FOIA requests identified in Paragraphs 1 and 3 of this Stipulation, including all claims for attorneys fees and costs. Any and all remaining claims and issues in this litigation are released and waived by all parties. 10. This Stipulation does not constitute an admission of liability or fault on the part of Defendants, the EPA, or its agents, servants, or employees, and this Stipulation shall not be construed as an admission of liability or fault. This Stipulation is entered into by both parties for the sole purpose of compromising disputed claims and avoiding the expenses and risks of further litigation. This Stipulation will not be used in any manner to establish liability for fees, amounts, or hourly rates, in any other case or proceeding. 11. This Stipulation is binding upon and inures to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 12. Each party will bear its own attorney s fees and costs.

CASE 0:13-cv-01751-ADM-TNL Document 156-1 Filed 03/24/17 Page 6 of 9 13. The undersigned attorneys are authorized to enter into this Stipulation of Settlement on behalf of their respective clients. 14. This Stipulation may be executed in counterparts as if executed by both parties on the same document. [Signatures next page]

CASE 0:13-cv-01751-ADM-TNL Document 156-1 Filed 03/24/17 Page 7 of 9

CASE 0:13-cv-01751-ADM-TNL Document 156-1 Filed 03/24/17 Page 8 of 9

CASE 0:13-cv-01751-ADM-TNL Document 156-1 Filed 03/24/17 Page 9 of 9