Case: 1:12-cv WAL-GWC Document #: 47 Filed: 03/06/13 Page 1 of 6 DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST.

Similar documents
Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 10 Filed 08/28/17 Page 1 of 5 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:13-cv KBF Document 26 Filed 06/24/13 Page 1 of 9

On December 19, 2012, plaintiff Morad Ghodooshim filed this. class-action suit against Qiao Xing Mobile Communication Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants. Plaintiff, Defendants.

Case 5: 14cv01435BLF Document5l FDeclO8/11/14 Pagel of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ORDER APPOINTING LEAD PLAINTIFF AND APPROVING LEAD AND LIAISON COUNSEL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. Case No. CIV M ORDER

Case 1:12-cv NRB Document 6 Filed 07/24/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

USDSSDNY - DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED:

Case 8:09-cv PJM Document 24 Filed 08/13/09 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND MEMORANDUM OPINION

Case 2:15-cv JAK-AJW Document 26 Filed 07/07/15 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:233

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 1:09-cv RMB Document 16 Filed 03/13/2009 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:11-cv WHP Document 24 Filed 06/20/11 Page 1 of 9 USDC SDNY - DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED

Case 1:17-cv NRB Document 20 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 4:13-cv Document 23 Filed in TXSD on 06/24/13 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Plaintiff.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 1:13-cv KBF Document 18 Filed 06/24/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 3:10-cv BTM -BLM Document 33 Filed 08/08/11 Page 1 of 14

Plaintiff, 08 Civ (JGK) The plaintiffs, investors who purchased or otherwise. acquired American Depository Shares of the China-based solar

Case 4:18-cv JSW Document 18 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

plaintiff of: Harold Unschuld, John Catalono, Ricardo Alvarado,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ORDER

O r SAL. a C (Ei[EDON' CM I. BY u 4 AUG 2007 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Proceedings :

Case 6:13-cv MHS Document 14 Filed 05/14/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 61 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv TPG Document 22 Filed 12/06/11 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:11-cv JPO Document 38 Filed 02/06/12 Page 1 of 9. claim to have suffered damages in connection with purchases of Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd.

Case 3:13-cv BEN-RBB Document 44 Filed 10/24/13 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:16-cv RS Document 36 Filed 11/02/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA I.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Plaintiff, - against - 09 Civ (DAB) ORDER. Plaintiff, - against - 09 Civ (DAB) ORDER. Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO : MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, SECTION : "R"(5) INC., ET AL.

1 TIME: 2:00 P.M. Andrew M. Schatz

DECISION AND ORDER. System ("Fulton County"), Wayne County Employees' Retirement System ("Wayne

Case 2:12-cv JFB-ETB Document 26 Filed 06/19/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 158 CV (JFB)(ETB)

Case 1:14-cv WHP Document 41 Filed 05/08/15 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:17-cv NRB Document 23 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:10-cv DAB Document 47 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of against - 10 Civ (DAB) ORDER FUQI INTERNATIONAL, INC, et al.

Case 2:13-cv BMS Document 30 Filed 04/10/14 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM

Case: 1:12-cv WAL-GWC Document #: 1 FãHed: /12 Page 1 of 14 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ST.

Notice of Motion and Motion to Appoint UFCW Local 56 Retail Meat

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

Case 6:13-cv MHS Document 19 Filed 06/14/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 204

MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTION OF PLAINTIFFS JAMES M. GARFINKEL AND RALPH ESPOSITO AND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETT S. Memorandum in Explanation August 7, 200 1

Case 1:14-cv WHP Document 103 Filed 08/23/17 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

United States District Court

In this securities class action suit filed against. Lockheed Martin Corporation and three Lockheed executives, the

Case 0:10-cv WJZ Document 36 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/24/2010 Page 2 of 9

The parties to this case, through their respective counsel, have conferred by regarding

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:08-cv GAF-RC Document 57 Filed 12/01/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:05-cv SRC-CLW Document 992 Filed 04/29/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 65902

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Defendants. X ROSIE L. BROOKS, Individually And On Behalf of All Others Similarly Civil Action No. Situated, Defendants. X

Case 1:15-cv LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:17-cv FB-CLP Document 77 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1513

C Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 5:12-cv SOH Document 404 Filed 09/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 10935

Case 1:18-cv ABJ Document 19 Filed 02/13/18 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Defendants.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel

Case: 1:12-cv WAL-GWC Document #: 9 Filed: 01/04/13 Page 1 of 9 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST.

Case 2:10-cv MMM -PJW Document 20 Filed 01/21/11 Page 1 of 13 Page ID #:294

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. ORDER v. Freeport-McMoran Incorporated, et al., Defendants.

Case 1:08-cv RMB Document 24 Filed 05/12/2008 Page 1 of 15. x : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : x

Case 2:16-cv CDJ Document 29 Filed 08/09/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

United States District Court

Through the Private Securities. U.S.C. 78u-4 ( PSLRA ), and the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998, 15 U.S.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-CV DT DISTRICT JUDGE PAUL D.

THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE Continuing Legal Education

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:13-cv ER

Case 1:12-cv CMA Document 132 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/02/2013 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:13-cv GBL-TCB Document 33 Filed 05/11/15 Page 1 of 17 PageID# 2015

Case 2:14-cv RJS Document 67 Filed 11/03/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff,

Case 1:10-cv ER-SRF Document 824 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:10-cv AKH Document 68 Filed 03/25/11 Page 1 of 12. Plaintiff, Defendant.

Case 1:08-cv JTC Document 127 Filed 01/14/14 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION DOCKET NO. 3:08-cv MOC-DSC

Case 6:13-cv RWS-KNM Document 152 Filed 03/08/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 4364

Notice of Motion and Motion to Consolidate Related Actions Against

Case 1:13-cv KBF Document 28 Filed 06/24/13 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. x ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) x

Case 1:12-cv NRB Document 12 Filed 08/10/12 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case: 4:15-cv JAR Doc. #: 27 Filed: 08/19/16 Page: 1 of 6 PageID #: 80

Case 3:16-cv CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423

THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, JUDGE PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO REMAND [19]

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2011 Page 1 of 8

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX

Case 1:11-cv ALC-AJP Document 175 Filed 04/26/12 Page 1 of 5 Please visit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,

Case: 5:17-cv SL Doc #: 22 Filed: 12/01/17 1 of 9. PageID #: 1107 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION. THOMAS C. and PAMELA McINTOSH

Transcription:

Case: -WAL-GWC Document #: 47 Filed: 03/06/13 Page 1 of 6 DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX FAYUN LUO, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs, QIAO XING UNIVERSAL RESOURCES, INC., RUI LIN WU and JIUJIU JIANG, Defendants. TO: Joel H. Holt, Esq. Natalie Nelson Tang How, Esq. Lisa M. Komives, Esq. Alan R. Feurstein, Esq. ORDER THIS MATTER came before the Court upon the Motion of Xiaolin Chi to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Approve Lead Plaintiff s Selection of Counsel (ECF No. 7) ; the motion of Anna Bombrini, Francesca Bombrini, Andrea Romanazzi, Francesco Modesti, and Ernesto Pucci (collectively, the Romanazzi Investor Group) for appointment as Lead Plaintiff and appointment of Lead Counsel and Liaison Counsel (ECF No. 10); Massimiliano Giannotti s Motion for Appointment as Lead Plaintiff and Approval of Lead Counsel (ECF No. 13); and, Motion of Robert Reagan to be Appointed as Lead Plaintiff and for Approval of his Selection of Counsel (ECF No. 14). 1 1 In the Stipulation and Joint Notice of Supplemental Information re November 28, 2012, Status Conference (ECF No. 41), filed by Movants Chi and the Romanazzi Investor Group, on December 10, 2012, said Movants stipulate to the undersigned ruling upon these pending motions. (For reasons unknown, Movant

Case: -WAL-GWC Document #: 47 Filed: 03/06/13 Page 2 of 6 Page 2 This matter is a securities class action brought pursuant to Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. Comp. (ECF No. 1) at paras. 1-2. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) governs the selection of lead plaintiff. The PSLRA provides a "rebuttable presumption" that the most "adequate plaintiff to serve as Lead Plaintiff is the "person or group of persons" that: (aa) has either filed the complaint or made a motion in response to a notice under subparagraph (A)(i); (bb) in the determination of the Court, has the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class; and (cc) otherwise satisfies the requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 15 U.S.C. 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(iii)(I). This presumption maybe rebutted only upon proof by a member of the purported plaintiff class that the presumptively most adequate plaintiff (aa) will not fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class; or (bb) is subject to unique defenses that render such plaintiff incapable of adequately representing the class. 15 U.S.C. 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(iii)(II). The Court finds that each of the motions is timely and must be considered. 15 U.S.C. 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(i) ( Not later than 90 days after the date on which a notice is published... the court shall consider any motion made by a purported class member in response to the notice.... ). Massimiliano Giannotti s motion was not mentioned nor did he join or not join the stipulation.) Movant Robert Reagan filed a Notice of Non-Joinder in the said stipulation (ECF No. 42). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), nondispositive matters may be determined by a magistrate judge. The appointment of a Lead Plaintiff is not a dispositive matter. Ross v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co., No. 2:05-CV-819, 2007 WL 895073 at *3 (S.D. Ohio March 22, 2007). Thus, the undersigned has jurisdiction to decide the motions whether or not any of the movants so stipulate.

Case: -WAL-GWC Document #: 47 Filed: 03/06/13 Page 3 of 6 Page 3 Each movant claims that he/they has/have the largest financial interest in the matter. Movant Xiaolin Chi represents that he expended total net funds of $3,429,222.43, and suffered losses of $2,587,930.35. Mem. of Law in Support of Mot. of Xiaolin Chi to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Approve Lead Plaintiff s Selection of Counsel (ECF No. 8) at 5 and Ex. 3. Movant Romanazzi Investor Group states that they suffered losses of approximately $429,301.39 during the Class Period.... Mem. of Law in Support of Mot. of the Romanazzi Investor Group for Appointment as Lead Plaintiff and Appointment of Lead Counsel and Liason Counsel (ECF No. 11) at 2 and Declaration of Kenneth M. Rehns and exhibits (ECF No. 12). Movant Massimiliano Giannotti claims that he purchased 150,000 shares and 150,000 net shares, expending $221,443.79 on Qiao Xing during the Class Period and suffering losses of $200,840.99... Mem. of Law in Support of Massimiliano Giannotti s Mot. for Appointment as Lead Plaintiff and Approval of Lead Counsel (ECF No. 15) at 6 and Feuerstein Declaration and exhibits (ECF No. 17). Movant Robert Reagan asserts that [d]uring the Class Period, Movant suffered losses of approximately $208,000. Mem. of Law in Support of Robert Reagan s Mot. to be Ap pointed as Lead Plaintiff and for Approval of his Selection of Counsel (ECF No. 16) at 5 and Ex. B. Having reviewed the motions and accompanying memoranda and exhibits, the Court finds that Movant Xiaolin Chi has established a rebuttable presumption that he is the most adequate to serve as Lead Plainti ff as outlined in 15 U.S.C. 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(iii)(I). He clearly has the greatest financial interest among the movants. His claims are typical of

Case: -WAL-GWC Document #: 47 Filed: 03/06/13 Page 4 of 6 Page 4 the class because they arise from the same series of events and are based on the same legal theories as those of all purported class members. In re Vicuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Securities Litigation, 225 F.R.D. 508, 512 (E.D. Pa. 2004). In addition, Chi has chosen counsel who have extensive experience in this type of litigation and will adequately represent the class. Id. at 511 ( The adequacy determination is made in context with the movant s choice of lead counsel. ) (citation omitted) ). The Court further finds that Movants Romanazzi Investor Group and Robert Reagan have not provided any proof that Chi will not fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class or that he is subject to unique defenses as required to rebut the presumption. As Chi notes, he is not a complete in and out trader. Xiaolin Chi s Reply Mem. of Law in further Support of his Lead Plaintiff Mot. (ECF No. 26) at 2-3, 7. He retains over a million shares. Id. at 3, 7. Even discounting any losses suffered by Chi prior to the date of disclosure, Chi suffered the greatest losses. See, e.g., Bensley v. FalconStor Software, Inc., 277 F.R.D. 231, 239 (E.D.N.Y. 2011) ( [M]any courts have not consid ered losses suffered as a result of sales prior to the date of the disclosures ) (citations omitted) ). The Court also declines Romanazzi Investor Group s invitation to find that Chi is a day-trader and thus an atypical class member or subject to unique defe nses. See Mem. in further Support of Mot. of the Romanazzi Investor Group for Appointment as Lead Plaintiff and Appointment of Lead Counsel and in Opposition to the Competing Mots. (ECF No. 23) at 4 (citing Applestein v. Medivation, Inc., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98255, 9-10 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 17,

Case: -WAL-GWC Document #: 47 Filed: 03/06/13 Page 5 of 6 Page 5 2010)). It is not clear from the evidence that Chi is a day trader. Moreover, even if he were, the Court agrees with the United States District Court of New York, Southern District, that day and momentum traders have the same incentives to prove defendants liability as all other class members... Prefontaine v. Research in Motion, Ltd., No. 11 Civ. 4068(RJS), 2012 WL 104770 at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 5, 2012) (slip copy) ( quoting In re Initial Public Offering Sec. Litig., 227 F.R.D. 65, 108 (S.D.NY. 2004), rev d on other grounds, 471 F.3d 24 (2d Cir. 2006)). Like the Prefontaine court, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the Court presumes that [Chi] has the same incentive to prove defendants liability as all other class members whether or not he engaged in day trading. Prefontaine, 2012 WL 104770 at *4. Based upon the foregoing, the Court will appoint Xiaolin Chi as Lead Plaintiff and approve his selection of counsel as Lead Counsel. WHEREFORE, it is now hereby ORDERED : 1. Motion of Xiaolin Chi to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Approve Lead Plaintiff s Selection of Counsel (ECF No. 7) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff Xiaolin Chi is appointed as Lead Plaintiff. 3. Plaintiff Xiaolin Chi s selection of counsel, The Rosen Law Firm, P.A., is appointed as Lead Counsel and The Law Offices of Joel Holt is appointed as Liaison Counsel.

Case: -WAL-GWC Document #: 47 Filed: 03/06/13 Page 6 of 6 Page 6 4. Lead Counsel shall manage the prosecution of this litigation. Lead Counsel are to avoid duplicative or unproductive activities and are vested by the Court with the responsibilities that include, without limitation, the following: (1) to prepare all pleadings, (2) to direct and coordinate the briefing and arguing of motions in accordance with the schedule set by the orders and rules of the Court, (3) to initiate and direct discovery, (4) to prepare the case for trial, and (5) to engage in settlement negotiations on behalf of Lead Plaintiff and Class. 5. The motion of Anna Bombrini, Francesca Bombrini, Andrea Romanazzi, Francesco Modesti, and Ernesto Pucci (collectively, the Romanazzi Investor Group) for appointment as Lead Plaintiff and appointment of Lead Counsel and Liaison Counsel (ECF No. 10) is DENIED. 6. Massimiliano Giannotti s Motion for Appointment as Lead Plaintiff and Approval of Lead Counsel (ECF No. 13) is DENIED. 7. Motion of Robert Reagan to be Appointed as Lead Plaintiff and for Approval of his Selection of Counsel (ECF No. 14) is DENIED. ENTER: Dated: March 6, 2013 /s/ George W. Cannon, Jr. GEORGE W. CANNON, JR. MAGISTRATE JUDGE