Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

Similar documents
Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 88 Filed: 07/06/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1135

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 169 Filed: 12/01/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:2786

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 117 Filed: 08/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:706

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 52 Filed: 12/23/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:463

Case 3:09-cv JPG-PMF Document 47 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #466

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. TJ H Case No. 5:15-cv ~jc~-gjs


Case 2:08-cv SHM-dkv Document 327 Filed 06/23/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 8969

Case 2:16-cv JMA-SIL Document 5 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 7:16-cv KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:16-CV MHC

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 47 Filed: 10/11/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:299

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. ORDER This matter came before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Modification of

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING NOTICE, AND SCHEDULING FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:15-cv VAB Document 46 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 52

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 25 Filed: 10/18/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:156 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case: 4:16-cv JAR Doc. #: 97 Filed: 12/13/18 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 2279

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 214 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 8

Case: 4:14-md RWS Doc. #: 164 Filed: 12/18/15 Page: 1 of 8 PageID #: 1284

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

Case 5:12-cv SOH Document 457 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12296

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 109 Filed: 10/26/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1837

Case: 1: 1 0-cv Document #: 77 Filed: 03/22/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:569

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OFPENNSVLVAJ'ELA ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 382 Filed: 03/08/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:7778

Case 7:12-cv VB Document 109 Filed 08/01/14 Page 1 of 9

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 3:12-cv DRH-SCW Document 942 Filed 09/04/18 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #40056

Case Case 1:10-cv AKH Document Document Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

Case 3:14-cv SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 0:11-cv CMA Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2015 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case3:14-cv MMC Document53 Filed06/26/15 Page1 of 10

SUSAN DOHERTY and DWIGHT SIMONSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. l:10-cv nlh-kmw

Case 1:17-cv MGC Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/28/2018 Page 1 of 21

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: //y/20/0

Case 0:16-cv WPD Document 101 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/24/2017 Page 1 of 12

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF CLASS NOTICE AND SCHEDULING A FINAL FAIRNESS HEARING

Currently before the Court for preliminary approval is a settlement (the

Your legal rights may be affected even if you do not act. Please read this Notice carefully. YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:15-cv JMA-SIL Document 50-1 Filed 12/29/16 Page 1 of 56 PageID #: 287 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:14-cv VEC Document 259 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiff, j Judge: Hon. Joan M. Lewis ) ) )

Case 2:15-cv LDD Document 54 Filed 12/12/16 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:17-cv WGY Document 65 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 11

Case4:13-cv YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case3:12-cv WHO Document276 Filed02/14/14 Page1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 13

: 04 MD 1653 (LAK) CORRECTED ORDER CONCERNING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT BNL AND THE CREDIT SUISSE DEFENDANTS

4:12-cv GAD-DRG Doc # Filed 09/21/15 Pg 1 of 82 Pg ID 4165 EXHIBIT 2

Case: 4:16-cv ERW Doc. #: 95 Filed: 12/15/17 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 734

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND JUDGMENT GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING CLAIMS

Case 0:13-cv MGC Document 77-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2015 Page 1 of 55 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 84 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:16-cv BCM Document 25-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:15-cv JFK Document 114 Filed 11/05/18 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:15-cv JFK Document Filed 10/30/18 Page 2 of 13

Case 3:17-cv JAG Document 41 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 258

Case 1:15-cv YK Document 84 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

1631 Zimmerman Trail 319 Maverick St. Billings, MT San Antonio, TX T: (406) T: (210) F: (406) F: (210)

Case 2:11-cv CMR Document 30 Filed 05/07/12 Page 1 of 7

mg Doc 4808 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 08:51:55 Main Document Pg 1 of 12

Case 2:03-cv RCJ-PAL Document 2907 Filed 06/05/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv WTL-MPB Document 72 Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 736

FINALLY CERTIFYING A CLASS

Case 1:15-cv ELR Document 60 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 21

Case 3:11-md DMS-RBB Document 108 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 12

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

EXHIBIT 1

Transcription:

Case: 1:14-cv-01741 Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JASON DOUGLAS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, THE WESTERN UNION COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Defendant. Case No. 14-cv-1741 Hon. Gary Feinerman Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER Having considered Plaintiff s Motion For Preliminary Approval Of Class Action Settlement (the Motion, the parties arguments and submissions concerning the Motion, and the applicable facts and law, the Court hereby finds and orders as follows: 1. Except as otherwise provided below, all capitalized terms used in this Preliminary Approval Order shall have the meanings and/or definitions given them in the Settlement Agreement and Release ( Agreement, attached to the Motion as Exhibit 1. 2. The Court preliminarily approves the Agreement subject to the Fairness Hearing, the purpose of which will be to decide whether to grant final approval to the Settlement Agreement reached by the Parties (the Settlement. For purposes of preliminary approval only, the Court finds that the Agreement, the Settlement set forth therein and all exhibits attached thereto and/or to Plaintiff s Motion For Preliminary Approval Of Class Action Settlement are fair, reasonable, and adequate, entered into in good faith, free of collusion to the detriment of the Settlement Class and within the range of possible judicial approval to warrant sending notice of

Case: 1:14-cv-01741 Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 2 of 10 PageID #:315 Douglas v. The Western Union Company (the Litigation and the proposed Settlement to the Settlement Class and to hold a full hearing on the proposed Settlement. 3. For settlement purposes only, conditioned upon final certification of the proposed class and upon Final Judgment, the Court finds that the Litigation may be maintained on behalf of the following class: All Persons in the United States who received one or more unsolicited text messages sent by or on behalf of Western Union between March 12, 2010 and the date of Preliminary Approval The following individuals and entities are specifically excluded from the Settlement Class: (i The Western Union Company, its parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, officers, directors, distributors, retailers, and resellers; (ii any person or entity who purchased the Product for purpose of resale; (iii the judge to whom this case is assigned and any immediate family members thereof; or (iv any Person who has submitted a valid request for exclusion. 4. The Court recognizes that Defendant The Western Union Company ( Defendant reserves all of its defenses and objections against and rights to oppose any request for class certification in the event that the proposed Settlement does not become Final for any reason. Defendant also reserves all its defenses to the merits of the claims asserted in the event the Settlement does not become Final for any reason. 5. For settlement purposes only, the Court preliminarily appoints Plaintiff Jason Douglas ( Plaintiff as representative of the Settlement Class. 6. For settlement purposes only, the Court preliminarily appoints the following attorney to act as Class Counsel for the Settlement Class: Joseph J. Siprut SIPRUT PC 17 North State Street Suite 1600 Chicago, Illinois 60602-2-

Case: 1:14-cv-01741 Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 3 of 10 PageID #:316 7. The Court appoints Epiq Systems, Inc. as the Settlement Administrator, who will be an agent of the Court and subject to the Court s supervision and direction as circumstances may require. 8. Notice shall be provided to the Settlement Class by December 23, 2015 within forty-five (45 days after entry of this Order (the Notice Date. Notice shall be in a form substantially the same as the Notice attached to the Motion as Exhibits 3 through 6 and shall be effectuated as follows: a. Within fourteen (14 days after entry of this Order, Defendant shall provide the Settlement Administrator with the list of members of the Settlement Class (the List ; b. Within forty-five (45 days after entry of this Order, the Settlement Administrator shall cause direct notice, in the form of Exhibit 3 attached to the Motion, to be sent via email to members of the Settlement Class for whom e- mail addresses are provided on the List. c. Within forty-five (45 days after entry of this Order, the Settlement Administrator shall cause direct notice, in the form of Exhibit 4 attached to the Motion, to be sent via U.S. Mail at the address provided on the List to members of the Settlement Class for whom physical addresses are provided on the List. 9. The form and content of the Notice are fair and reasonable, and Notice shall be disseminated to the Settlement Class as due process and Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require and in accordance with the Agreement. -3-

Case: 1:14-cv-01741 Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 4 of 10 PageID #:317 10. The Court finds that the Notice and Notice Plan meet the requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and due process, constitute the best notice practicable under the circumstances, and constitute due and sufficient notice to all potential members of the Settlement Class. The Notice is reasonably calculated, under the circumstance, to apprise the Settlement Class: (a of the pendency of the Litigation and the essential terms of the Settlement; (b of the procedures for allocating the Settlement Fund; (c of any requested amounts for Attorneys Fee Award and Incentive Awards; (d of their right to exclude themselves from the Settlement Class and the proposed Settlement; (e that any judgment, whether favorable or not, will bind all members of the Settlement Class who do not request exclusion; (f that any member of the Settlement Class who does not request exclusion may object to the Settlement, the request for attorneys fees and costs and/or the service award and, if he or she desires, enter an appearance personally or through counsel; and (g prominently display the address of Class Counsel and the Settlement Administrator as well as the procedure for making inquiries. The Court further finds that the notices are written in plain English and are readily understandable by members of the Settlement Class. 11. By March 30, 2016, the Settlement Administrator shall file a declaration with the Court attesting to the: (a completion of Notice, including publication and, if applicable, sending Direct Notice; and (b number of valid claims, opt-outs, and objections. 12. The Court approves the Claim Form in substantially the same form as the Claim Form attached to the Motion as Exhibit 6. Any member of the Settlement Class who wishes to receive benefits under the Agreement must sign and return a complete and timely Claim Form in compliance with the process set forth in the Agreement, and such Claim Form shall be postmarked or submitted online no later than sixty (60 days after the Notice Date. Any -4-

Case: 1:14-cv-01741 Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 5 of 10 PageID #:318 Settlement Class Member who does not submit a complete and timely Claim Form in compliance with the Agreement shall not be entitled to any benefits under the Settlement, but nonetheless shall be barred by the release provisions of the Agreement and the Final Judgment and shall be deemed to have released the Released Parties from the Released Claims. 13. Any member of the Settlement Class who wishes to opt out or exclude himself or herself from the Settlement Class must submit an appropriate, timely request for exclusion sent to the Settlement Administrator at the address on the Notice and to be postmarked no later than sixty (60 days after the Notice Date (the Opt-Out/Objection Deadline. The opt-out request must (a identify the member of the Settlement Class by name, address, and phone number and (b state that he or she wishes to be excluded from the Settlement Class. A timely and valid request to opt out of the Settlement Class shall preclude the person opting out from participating in the proposed Settlement and he or she will be unaffected by the Agreement. The Settlement Administrator shall compile a list of all members of the Settlement Class who properly and timely submit an opt-out request (the Exclusion List. 14. Any member of the Settlement Class who does not submit a timely and valid written request for exclusion shall be bound by all subsequent proceedings, orders and judgments in this Litigation, regardless of whether he or she currently is, or subsequently becomes, a plaintiff in any other lawsuit, arbitration or other proceeding against any of the Released Parties asserting any of the Released Claims. 15. The Settlement Administrator shall provide the Exclusion List to Class Counsel and Defendant s Counsel no later seven (7 days after the Opt-Out/Objection Deadline and shall file the Exclusion List along with an affidavit attesting to the completeness and accuracy thereof with the Court no later than March 30, 2016. -5-

Case: 1:14-cv-01741 Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 6 of 10 PageID #:319 16. Any Settlement Class Member who does not properly and timely submit an optout request and who wishes to object to the fairness, reasonableness or adequacy of the Agreement or the proposed Settlement or who wishes to object to the award of attorneys fees and expenses or Plaintiff s service award must file with the Court and serve on Class Counsel and Defendant s Counsel, postmarked no later than the Opt-Out/Objection Deadline, a written statement of the objection signed by the Settlement Class Member containing all of the following information: (a A caption or title that identifies it as Objection to Class Settlement in Douglas v. The Western Union Company (Case No. 14-cv-1741; (b The objector s full name, address, email address, telephone number, and his or her counsel s name, address, email address, and telephone number; (c A written statement detailing each objection, the facts supporting them, the legal basis on which they are based, and the relief requested; and (d A written statement detailing whether he or she intends to appear at the Fairness Hearing, either with or without counsel. 17. Any objections must be appropriately filed with the Court no later than the Opt- Out/Objection Deadline, or alternatively they must be mailed to the Court at the address below and postmarked no later than the Opt-Out/Objection Deadline. Clerk of Court United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois 219 South Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60604 Attention: Douglas v. The Western Union Company, Case No. 14-cv-1741 A copy of the objection, postmarked no later than the Opt-Out/Objection Deadline, must also be mailed to the Settlement Administrator at the post office box described further below. -6-

Case: 1:14-cv-01741 Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 7 of 10 PageID #:320 18. No person shall be heard and no paper or brief submitted by any objector shall be received or considered by the Court unless such person has filed with the Clerk of Court the written statement of objections as described above, together with copies of any supporting materials, papers or briefs. Any Settlement Class Member who without good cause does not file a written objection in the time and manner described above shall be: (a deemed to have waived and forfeited any objections to the proposed Settlement; (b foreclosed from raising any objection to the proposed Settlement at the Fairness Hearing; (c bound by all of the terms of the Agreement and by all proceedings, orders and judgments by the Court; and (d foreclosed from seeking any adjudication or review of the Settlement by appeal or otherwise. 19. Any objecting Settlement Class Member who intends to appear at the Fairness Hearing, either with or without counsel, must also file a notice of intention to appear with the Court postmarked no later than the Opt-Out/Objection Deadline, which notice shall be filed with, or mailed to, the Clerk of the Court, with copy to the Settlement Administrator, as set forth above. (a If the objecting Settlement Class Member intends to appear at the Fairness Hearing through counsel, he or she must also identify any attorney representing the objector who will appear at the Fairness Hearing and include the attorney(s name, address, phone number, e- mail address and state bar(s to which counsel is admitted. Any attorney hired by a Settlement Class Member for the purpose of objecting to the Agreement or to the proposed Settlement or to the attorneys fees and expenses will be at the Settlement Class Member s own expense; and (b If the objecting Settlement Class Member intends to request the Court allow the Class Member to call witnesses at the Fairness Hearing, the objecting Class Member must provide a list of any such witnesses together with a brief summary of each witness s -7-

Case: 1:14-cv-01741 Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 8 of 10 PageID #:321 expected testimony no later than March 30, 2016. If a witness without good cause is not identified in the notice of appearance, such witness shall not be permitted to object or appear at the Fairness Hearing. 20. The Settlement Administrator will establish a post office box to be used for receiving requests for exclusion or objections, Claim Forms and any other communications relating to this Settlement. 21. The Court preliminarily enjoins all members of the Settlement Class unless and until they have timely excluded themselves from the Settlement Class from (i filing, commencing, prosecuting, intervening in or participating as plaintiff, claimant or class member in any other lawsuit or arbitration proceeding in any jurisdiction based on, relating to or arising out of the claims and causes of action or the facts and circumstances giving rise to the Litigation and/or the Released Claims; and (ii filing, commencing, participating in or prosecuting a lawsuit or arbitration proceeding as a class action on behalf of any member of the Settlement Class who has not timely excluded himself or herself (including by seeking to amend a pending complaint to include class allegations or seeking class certification in a pending action, based on, relating to or arising out of the claims and causes of action or the facts and circumstances giving rise to the Litigation and/or the Released Claims. Any Person who knowingly violates such injunction shall pay the attorneys fees and costs incurred by Western Union, any other Released Person and Class Counsel as a result of the violation. This Order is not intended to prevent members of the Settlement Class from participating in any action or investigation initiated by a state or federal agency. 22. A hearing to determine (a whether the Settlement Class should be finally certified pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and (b whether the -8-

Case: 1:14-cv-01741 Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 9 of 10 PageID #:322 proposed Settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate (the Fairness Hearing shall be conducted in the United States Courthouse, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60604, Courtroom 2125, commencing on April 8, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. 23. The Court may reschedule the Fairness Hearing without further written notice. If the Fairness Hearing is rescheduled from the currently scheduled date, information regarding a rescheduled Fairness Hearing will be posted on the Court s docket and on the settlement website. 24. Papers in support of the final approval of the Settlement, including responses to objections, shall be filed with the Court no later than March 30, 2016. 25. An application of Class Counsel for an award of fees and expenses shall be filed with the Court no later than fourteen (14 days before the Opt-Out/Objection Deadline. 26. All discovery and other pre-trial proceedings in this Litigation are stayed and suspended pending the Fairness Hearing, except such actions as may be necessary to implement the Agreement and this Order. 27. Defendant shall file proof of compliance with the notice requirements of The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 ( CAFA, 28 U.S.C. 1715(b, no later than March 30, 2016. 28. This Order shall become null and void, and shall be without prejudice to the rights of the Parties, all of whom shall be restored to their respective positions existing immediately before this Court entered this Order, if (a the proposed Settlement is not finally approved by the Court, or does not become Final, pursuant to the terms of the Agreement or (b the proposed Settlement is terminated in accordance with the Agreement or does not become effective as required by the terms of the Agreement for any other reason. In any such event, the proposed Settlement and Agreement shall become null and void and be of no further force and effect, and -9-

Case: 1:14-cv-01741 Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 10 of 10 PageID #:323 neither the Agreement nor the Court s orders, including this Order, shall be used or referred to for any purpose whatsoever. 29. Neither the Agreement, nor any of its terms or provisions, nor any of its exhibits, nor any of the negotiations or proceedings connected with it, nor this Order shall be construed as an admission or concession by any Defendant of the truth of any of the allegations in the Litigation, or of any liability, fault, or wrongdoing of any kind, or of the appropriateness of the certification of the Settlement Class for purposes other than for settlement. This Order shall not be construed or used as an admission, concession or declaration by or against any of the Released Parties of any fault, wrongdoing, breach, or liability. 30. The terms and provisions of the Agreement may be amended by agreement of the Parties in writing or with approval of the Court without further notice to the Settlement Class, if such changes are consistent with this Order and do not limit the rights of the Settlement Class. IT IS SO ORDERED: 11/10/2015 The Honorable Gary Feinerman, United States District Court Judge, Northern District Of Illinois, Eastern Division -10-