In this lecture we will cover the following voting methods and fairness criterion.

Similar documents
Today s plan: Section : Plurality with Elimination Method and a second Fairness Criterion: The Monotocity Criterion.

Section 3: The Borda Count Method. Example 4: Using the preference schedule from Example 3, identify the Borda candidate.

12.2 Defects in Voting Methods

Chapter 1 Practice Test Questions

Voting Criteria: Majority Criterion Condorcet Criterion Monotonicity Criterion Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion

The Mathematics of Voting

Fairness Criteria. Majority Criterion: If a candidate receives a majority of the first place votes, that candidate should win the election.

Arrow s Impossibility Theorem

Majority- more than half of the votes Plurality- the most first place votes. The Majority Criterion

Fairness Criteria. Review: Election Methods

1.6 Arrow s Impossibility Theorem

The Mathematics of Voting. The Mathematics of Voting

Write all responses on separate paper. Use complete sentences, charts and diagrams, as appropriate.

The Impossibilities of Voting

Measuring Fairness. Paul Koester () MA 111, Voting Theory September 7, / 25

Sect 13.2 Flaws of Voting Methods

Head-to-Head Winner. To decide if a Head-to-Head winner exists: Every candidate is matched on a one-on-one basis with every other candidate.

: It is mathematically impossible for a democratic voting method to satisfy all of the fairness criteria was proven in 1949.

Exercises For DATA AND DECISIONS. Part I Voting

Section Voting Methods. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Introduction: The Mathematics of Voting

Elections with Only 2 Alternatives

Math116Chap1VotingPart2.notebook January 12, Part II. Other Methods of Voting and Other "Fairness Criteria"

Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Lesson Plan

MATH 1340 Mathematics & Politics

Math for Liberal Arts MAT 110: Chapter 12 Notes

Section Voting Methods. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Voting: Issues, Problems, and Systems, Continued

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Section Voting Methods. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Voting: Issues, Problems, and Systems, Continued. Voting II 1/27

The search for a perfect voting system. MATH 105: Contemporary Mathematics. University of Louisville. October 31, 2017

9.3 Other Voting Systems for Three or More Candidates

n(n 1) 2 C = total population total number of seats amount of increase original amount

Make the Math Club Great Again! The Mathematics of Democratic Voting

Social Choice: The Impossible Dream. Check off these skills when you feel that you have mastered them.

Josh Engwer (TTU) Voting Methods 15 July / 49

Syllabus update: Now keeping best 3 of 4 tests

The Plurality and Borda Count Methods

Intro to Contemporary Math

Economics 470 Some Notes on Simple Alternatives to Majority Rule

The Plurality and Borda Count Methods

The actual midterm will probably not be multiple choice. You should also study your notes, the textbook, and the homework.

Recall: Properties of ranking rules. Recall: Properties of ranking rules. Kenneth Arrow. Recall: Properties of ranking rules. Strategically vulnerable

The Mathematics of Voting

Desirable properties of social choice procedures. We now outline a number of properties that are desirable for these social choice procedures:

Voting Systems. High School Circle I. June 4, 2017

Grade 6 Math Circles Winter February 27/28 The Mathematics of Voting - Solutions

Section 7.1: Voting Systems. Plurality Method The candidate who receives the greatest number of votes is the winner.

Math for Liberal Studies

Mathematical Thinking. Chapter 9 Voting Systems

In deciding upon a winner, there is always one main goal: to reflect the preferences of the people in the most fair way possible.

Math Circle Voting Methods Practice. March 31, 2013

Grade 7/8 Math Circles Winter March 6/7/8 The Mathematics of Voting

Name Date I. Consider the preference schedule in an election with 5 candidates.

answers to some of the sample exercises : Public Choice

Chapter 10. The Manipulability of Voting Systems. For All Practical Purposes: Effective Teaching. Chapter Briefing

Computational Social Choice: Spring 2007

Voting Methods

The Manipulability of Voting Systems. Check off these skills when you feel that you have mastered them.

The Plurality and Borda Count Methods

Many Social Choice Rules

Social welfare functions

that changes needed to be made when electing their Presidential nominee. Iowa, at the time had a

PROBLEM SET #2: VOTING RULES

Lecture 16: Voting systems

Voting Criteria April

(67686) Mathematical Foundations of AI June 18, Lecture 6

Find the winner of the election using majority rule given the results below: Choices (ABC) (ACB) (BAC) (BCA) (CAB) (CBA) Number of Votes

(c) 2013 Janice L. Epstein Voting Methods 1

Math for Liberal Studies

In deciding upon a winner, there is always one main goal: to reflect the preferences of the people in the most fair way possible.

The Iowa Caucuses. (See Attached Page Below) B R C T R B R R C C B C T T T B

The Mathematics of Elections

Voting in Maine s Ranked Choice Election. A non-partisan guide to ranked choice elections

Mathematics of Voting Systems. Tanya Leise Mathematics & Statistics Amherst College

Practice TEST: Chapter 14

Voting rules: (Dixit and Skeath, ch 14) Recall parkland provision decision:

SOCIAL CHOICES (Voting Methods) THE PROBLEM. Social Choice and Voting. Terminologies

How should we count the votes?

1.1 The Basic Elements of an Election 1.2 The Plurality Method

Voting Lecture 3: 2-Candidate Voting Spring Morgan Schreffler Office: POT Teaching.

Vote for Best Candy...

Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Lesson Plan

Introduction to Theory of Voting. Chapter 2 of Computational Social Choice by William Zwicker

Homework 7 Answers PS 30 November 2013

2-Candidate Voting Method: Majority Rule

Reality Math Sam Kaplan, The University of North Carolina at Asheville Dot Sulock, The University of North Carolina at Asheville

Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream

Lecture 12: Topics in Voting Theory

Number of voters st choice B A D A B C 2 nd choice C D B B A D 3 rd choice A C C D C A 4 th choice D B A C D B

Presidential Election Democrat Grover Cleveland versus Benjamin Harrison. ************************************ Difference of 100,456

Voting. Hannu Nurmi. Game Theory and Models of Voting. Public Choice Research Centre and Department of Political Science University of Turku

The Mathematics of Voting Transcript

2012 Best Picture 1. Votes st place A Z L 2nd place L L Z 3rd place Z A A

Explaining the Impossible: Kenneth Arrow s Nobel Prize Winning Theorem on Elections

CSC304 Lecture 14. Begin Computational Social Choice: Voting 1: Introduction, Axioms, Rules. CSC304 - Nisarg Shah 1

The Math of Rational Choice - Math 100 Spring 2015

Constructing voting paradoxes with logic and symmetry

Rock the Vote or Vote The Rock

Transcription:

In this lecture we will cover the following voting methods and fairness criterion. Borda Count Method Plurality-with-Elimination Method Monotonicity Criterion 1

Borda Count Method In the Borda Count Method each place on the ballot is assigned points. The alternative receiving the most points wins. Borda point assignment for n alternatives Last place Next-to-last place 1 point 2 points Third place Second place First place n-2 points n-1 points n points 2

MAC Election Borda Count Nbr of voters 14 10 8 4 1 1 st choice: A: C: D: B: C: 2 nd choice: B: B: C: D: D: 3 rd choice: C: D: B: C: B: 4 th choice: D: A: A: A: A: Totals A: B: C: D: Winner 3

Problems with Borda Count Math Lovers Club Election The 11 members of the Math Lovers Club choose a president from among four candidates by preference ballot. MLC Election Borda Count Nbr of voters 6 2 3 1 st choice: 4 A: B: C: 2 nd choice: 3 B: C: D: 3 rd choice: 2 C: D: B: 4 th choice: 1 D: A: A: Totals: A: B: C: D: What does A think of this? Winner: 4

Observations Disadvantages of the Borda Count Method o Borda count method violates the majority criterion. o Consequently, Borda count method violates the Condorcet criterion. (Why? Explain.) Advantages of the Borda Count Method o Borda Count Method uses all the available voter preferences, not just first choices. o Borda Count Method often produces the best compromise winner. So far, we have two voting methods applied to the MAC election and two different winners! Voting Method Winner Plurality Borda Count Alisha Boris 5

Round 1 Plurality-with-Elimination Method Count for each candidate. If a candidate has a majority, then that candidate is the winner. Otherwise, eliminate candidate(s) with fewest and simplify preference schedule. Round 2 Count for each candidate. If a candidate has a majority, then that candidate is the winner Otherwise, eliminate candidate(s) with fewest and simplify preference schedule. Rounds 3, 4, etc.: Repeat above steps; eventually, some candidate will have a majority of. 6

MAC Election Plurality-with-Elimination Number of voters 14 10 8 4 1 1 st choice A C D B C 2 nd choice B B C D D 3 rd choice C D B C B 4 th choice D A A A A 1. Candidates A B C D 2. Candidates Winner: 3. Candidates 7

Example: Young Liberals Election The UAB Young Liberals elect a president of their club from among five candidates A, B, C, D, and E using the plurality-with-elimination method. There are 24 preference ballots. YL Election Preference Schedule Number of voters 8 6 2 3 5 1 st choice A B C D E 2 nd choice B D A E A 3 rd choice C E E A D 4 th choice D C B C B 5 th choice E A D B C What is the maximum number of rounds that might be needed to decide the winner of this election by the plurality-with-elimination method? 8

YL Election Preference Schedule Number of voters 8 6 2 3 5 1 st choice A B C D E 2 nd choice B D A E A 3 rd choice C E E A D 4 th choice D C B C B 5 th choice E A D B C 1. Candidates A B C D E 2. Candidates 3. Candidates Winner: 4. Candidates 9

Problems with Plurality-with-Elimination The UAB Young Conservatives elect a president of their club from among three candidates A, B, and C using the plurality-withelimination method. There are 29 preference ballots. YC Election Preference Schedule Number of voters 7 8 10 4 1 st choice A B C A 2 nd choice B C A C 3 rd choice C A B B 1. Candidates A B C Winner: 2. Candidates 10

Because of election irregularities, the original election is declared void. Meanwhile, candidate C convinces the 4 voters represented by the last column of the preference schedule that she is better than candidate A. They switch their preference order to C, A, B. The reelection results are as follows. YC Re-Election Preference Schedule Number of voters 7 8 14 1 st choice A B C 2 nd choice B C A 3 rd choice C A B 1. Candidates A B C Winner: 2. Candidates 11

This is quite a shock to C! C had the original YC election won All changes in votes were only in C s favor C loses the re-election! Is this fair? Monotonicity Criterion If an alternative X is the winner of an election, and, in a reelection, all the voters who change their preferences do so in a way that is favorable only to X, then X should still be the winner of the election. The plurality-with-elimination method violates the monotonicity criterion. The plurality-with-elimination method also violates the Condorcet criterion. (Exercise) 12

Voting Method Plurality Borda Count Plurality-with- Elimination Summary of Voting Methods and Fairness Criteria Fairness Criterion Satisfied Violated Majority Monotonicity Condorcet Monotonicity Majority Condorcet Majority Monotonicity Condorcet In the MAC election, we have used three voting methods and have three different winners! Voting Method Plurality Borda Count Plurality-with- Elimination Winner Alisha Boris Dave 13