IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA DEPARTMENT 34 STANDING ORDER RE: ISSUE CONFERENCE

Similar documents
DEPARTMENT C9 PROCEDURES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

Case 1:11-cv MGC Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/17/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

LEWIS A. KAPLAN United States District Judge United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007

Superior Court of California County of Orange

Superior Court of California County of Orange

Superior Court of California County of Orange County

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE. JUDGE MELISSA R. McCORMICK DEPARTMENT C13. CLERK: Alma Bovard COURT ATTENDANT: As Assigned

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DISTRICT JUDGE EDWARD J. DAVILA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge. Courtroom Deputy Clerk

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT FIVE JUDGE COLLEEN K. STERNE. Departmental Requirements and Procedures

JUSTICE JEFFREY K. OING PART 48 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES

Superior Court of California County of Orange

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT LAW DIVISION JUDGE RAYMOND W. MITCHELL STANDING ORDER.

ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT C 10 CIVIL LAW AND MOTION AND TRIAL PROCEDURES JUDGE LINDA S. MARKS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1. CIVIL RULES GENERAL PROVISIONS ADMINISTRATION OF CIVIL LITIGATION MARIN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT - UNIFORM LOCAL RULES

PRETRIAL ORDER (JURY TRIALS)

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT

THE HONORABLE MEL DICKSTEIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT PRACTICE POINTERS & PREFERENCES

DEPARTMENT C26 GUIDELINES HONORABLE GREGORY H. LEWIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - EASTERN DIVISION

Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Nassau IAS Trial Part 22 Part Rules Updated: January 25, 2018

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE DEBORAH A. BATTS

Case 1:15-cv LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

DEPARTMENT 34. Michael Paul Linfield. Telephone: (213)

PERSONAL INJURY COURTS (DEPTS. 91, 92, 93 AND 97) FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN

STATE OF GEORGIA! i,- 1 ii tu 1, Rs I fa~~~~~,

Practices for Part 3

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT-LAW DIVISION COMMERCIAL CALENDAR V Judge Joan E. Powell

Department 16 has prepared this document to assist counsel in scheduling motions and reporters in Department 16.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION. via telephone (check one) /

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Case: 2:06-cv ALM-TPK Doc #: 460 Filed: 09/25/15 Page: 1 of 12 PAGEID #: 15864

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S.

P R E T R I A L O R D E R

2:15-cr VAR-MKM Doc # 10 Filed 09/24/15 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

CALENDAR Q. JUDGE PATRICK J. SHERLOCK 2007 RICHARD J. DALEY CENTER CHICAGO, ILLINOIS fax

COURT RULES OF THE HONORABLE RICHARD MOTT, J.S.C. 401 Union Street Columbia County Courthouse (Temporary)

P R E T R I A L O R D E R

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES

Filed & Entered: 03/14/2016

Superior Court of California County of Orange

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

CASE NUMBER: UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

PART RULES HONORABLE MARIA G. ROSA New York State Supreme Court Dutchess County Supreme Court 10 Market Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, ORANGE COUNTY DEPARTMENT C17 LAW AND MOTION AND TRIAL PROCEDURES JUDGE GLENDA SANDERS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

COMMERCIAL CALENDAR N (Effective November 17, 2010)

LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT POLICY REGARDING NORMAL AVAILABILITY OF OFFICIAL COURT REPORTERS AND PRIVATELY ARRANGED COURT REPORTERS

PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES & PROTOCOL FOR JURY TRIALS & REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Revised March 2, 2018 (to correct web link only)

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS PERSONAL INJURY COURTS (DEPTS. 91, 92, 93, 97 & 98)

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA. Case No.

COMMERCIAL CALENDAR N (Effective February 8, 2013)

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE LOUIS L. STANTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendant/s.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/27/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/27/2018

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. Case No. 51-

PREPARING FOR TRIAL. 3. Opponent s experts identified, complete Rule 26 responses received and, if possible and necessary, experts have been deposed.

Wyoming Judges Benchbook

JUDGE GABRIELLE N. SANDERS Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations For Osceola County Civil Division 60-G, Courtroom 4B

UNIFORM STANDING ORDER FOR ALL COMMERCIAL CALENDARS

COMMERCIAL CALENDAR I (Effective January 30, 2012)

THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR CHARLOTTE COUNTY,

SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY IAS PART 14 PART MATRIMONIAL RULES & PROCEDURES (revised 05/23/17)

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LUZERNE COUNTY

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR JUDGE/COMMISSIONER BENCH BOOK. JUDGE/COMMISSIONER: Jennifer Valencia Second District Court

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Nevada CASE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SHEET

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

Los Angeles Superior Court Limited Jurisdiction Department 77

P R E T R I A L O R D E R

I Have A Case in Court, Now What? San Mateo County Superior Court

CBA Municipal Court Pro Bono Panel Program Municipal Procedure Guide 1 February 2011

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL CIVIL DIVISION

CASE NUMBER: DIV 71. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:

THERE ARE NO SUBMITTED MOTIONS IN THIS PART AND ALL MOTIONS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, MUST BE ORALLY ARGUED.

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 3 CIVIL RULES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Judicial Assistant s > ALWAYS copy opposing counsel(s) on correspondence to the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

ONONDAGA COUNTY JUSTICES AND LOCAL RULES

vs. OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS DISCOVERY AND DOCKET CONTROL PLAN FOR LEVEL 3 CASE ( PLAN )

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. : Plaintiff : vs. : FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER : Case No. Defendant :

MISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUITS DIVISION 12 JURY TRIAL GUIDELINES AND DIVISION RULES

RULE 7: CALENDAR CALL AND PRETRIAL MEMORANDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,

STANDING ORDER FOR CALENDAR Y * Room 2101

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR CIVIL CASES. Lorna G. Schofield United States District Judge

NEW YORK COUNTY SUPREME COURT, CIVIL BRANCH

Judicial Practice Preferences Circuit Civil/Section 11

E-FILED: Jun 13, :57 PM, Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara, Case #1-13-CV Filing #G-84481

HONORABLE KEITH MEYER 315 COURT STREET, ROOM 468 CLEARWATER, FL Judicial Practice Preferences Circuit Civil

LOCAL RULES of the COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CLARION COUNTY

Transcription:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA DEPARTMENT 34 STANDING ORDER RE: ISSUE CONFERENCE The following Orders are made with reference to the Issue Conference. Dates and filing deadlines set forth herein may be changed only by order of the court. 1. COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE. Each party taking part in the trial shall file an issue conference statement in accordance with local rule 3.11, with only the exceptions set forth below. 2. TIME FOR FILING. Issue conference statements shall be filed by all parties no later than 10 calendar days before the scheduled conference. They may not exceed 10 pages in length. 3. VOIR DIRE. Each side shall file or lodge proposed voir dire examination questions and a proposed statement of the case for prospeive jurors. The Court will, at the issue conference, seek to resolve issues relating to jury seleion. 4. JURY INSTRUCTIONS. Only plaintiff need file or lodge proposed jury instruions. As to standard, unmodified, CACI instruions only the index described in Calif. Rule of Court 2.1055(b(3, as opposed to copies of the instruions, should be provided at this time. Proposed special instruions should be on a separate 1

sheet per instruion. At the issue conference, the Court will provide dates for the exchange of objeions to such instruions as well as for proposed additional instruions from other parties and will set a deadline for the parties to meet and confer regarding differences on the subje. 5. MOTIONS IN LIMINE. No later than 30 calendar days before the issue conference, any party wishing to file a motion in limine must meet and confer with the other parties to see if they can reach agreement without the necessity of a motion. If the meet and confer does not resolve the matter, then any party wishing to file any motions in limine is to file and serve those motions in limine no later than 15 calendar days before the issue conference. If more than two motions in limine are filed by a party, a binder containing the motions (separated by tabs and an index of the motions shall be provided. Other parties are to review those motions and joinder in the motions will be unnecessary; any party may, at its later oral request, be deemed, for the record, to have joined in any motion. Opposition to any motions shall be filed and served 5 calendar days before the conference. Both the motions and opposition should consist only of a brief synopsis of the parties positions. Opposed motions shall, if requested at the conference, be set by the Court for separate hearing with a schedule for full briefing established. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a list of sua sponte rulings by the Court for which it is not necessary to file a motion in limine; counsel are requested not to file duplicate motions but may file opposition to the sua sponte rulings. Counsel are expeed to be familiar with Kelly v. New West Federal Savings (1996 49 Cal. App. 4th 659 and Amtower v. Photon Dynamics, Inc., (2008158 Cal. App. 4th 1582, 1593-95. 2

6. WITNESS LISTS. Witness lists in or attached to issue conference statements should not be exaggerated. Only witnesses that a party expes to aually call should be listed, with a brief synopsis of the proposed testimony. In addition to the list contained in the issue conference statements, each list should also be prepared in the form attached as Exhibit B to this Order and a copy should be sent, in MS Word format, to Dept34@contracosta.courts.ca.gov. Witnesses should be listed last name first. Titles (e.g. Dr., Officer should be placed after the comma following the last name. A copy of that e-mail should be sent to all counsel. Counsel should include in their witness list the amount of time they expe to spend on dire examination of each witness. The amount of time should be stated in minutes (not days or hours. Counsel must also be prepared to state at the issue conference how much time they will require for cross-examination of each witness identified on the other party s list. Failure to list a witness that a party in good faith later determines to call will not bar calling that witness. At the conference the Court will make separate arrangements for preparation of a joint list, for jury seleion purposes, of possible witnesses and persons or entities who might otherwise be mentioned at trial. 7. EXHIBIT LISTS. Prior to the issue conference, the parties are to meet and confer to determine how the exhibits will be numbered. Parties may either retain the numbers assigned in deposition (if non-duplicative or may assign new blocks of numbers to each side. All sides should use numbers; none should use letters. At trial the court expes that when an exhibit is used it will already have been 3

marked and identified on the exhibit list (see below and that all counsel will have a pre-marked copy. Exhibit lists should be in a form identifying only admissible evidence in a singular fashion. Entries such as files of ABC Company, all manufauring formulas or photos of injuries are not acceptable. The parties shall meet and confer and seek to agree, to the maximum extent possible, with respe to those documents as to which there will be no objeion at trial. Unless otherwise ordered at the issue conference, the parties shall jointly provide the clerk on the first morning of trial, an exhibit list (including all parties exhibits in the following format: # Description Date of Document Objeion to Admission? (Y/N Date Identified Date Offered Date Admitted (The end of the exhibit list should include some pages with the table not filled out -- to accommodate any documents used at trial that were not previously identified. All counsel shall cooperate and assist in preparation of that list, exchanging data in eleronic form where appropriate. A copy of the exhibit list shall also be e-mailed to the court (in MS Word format with a copy to all counsel at Dept34@contracosta.courts.ca.gov on or before the morning of trial. Counsel will be required to provide two sets of exhibit binders to the Court. One is for use by the witnesses; one is for use by the Court. The spine of each binder shall identify the range of exhibit numbers contained in that binder. Binders should not be filled to capacity; there should be room for additional exhibits if any 4

need to be added later. 8. COURTESY COPIES. All parties shall deliver courtesy copies of their issue conference statements, as well as related issue conference papers such as motions in limine or oppositions thereto, to the chambers of Department 34 no later than the day of filing. Courtesy copies are also to be emailed to Dept34@contracosta.courts.ca.gov. All such emails shall show copies going to all counsel in the case, and are to be captioned with the case name, case number, and a description of the document being emailed (e.g. Plaintiff s Issue Conference Statement. Dated: February 26, 2016 George V. Spanos Judge of the Superior Court 5

Exhibit A Sua Sponte rulings of the Court for Trial 1. No witness may be called, except with Court permission in exceptional circumstances, unless notice has been given to all parties of the date when the witness will testify. Such notice shall be given no later than at the end of the court day preceding the court day the witness is to testify. (For example, notice for a Tuesday witness is to be given at or before adjournment of the Friday session. 2. All witnesses will be excluded from the courtroom, unless otherwise ordered, excepting those for whom an exception exists at law (e.g. parties and corporate representatives. 3. Evidence of, or reference to, settlement negotiations, mediation, and materials related thereto which are privileged under the evidence code or by agreement of the parties shall not be allowed. 4. Evidence of, or reference to, insurance, or the fa that an attorney is employed, or has been compensated, by an insurance company, shall not be allowed. 5. Evidence of, or reference to, other claims or aions against any party to the litigation shall not be allowed without the express permission of the Court. 6. Evidence of, or reference to, the financial position or wealth, or lack thereof, of any party to the litigation, shall not be allowed without the permission of the Court. 7. Generalized motions in limine regarding evidence not produced in discovery will not be granted. Where parties expe a dispute regarding the admission of evidence they should advise the Court at the earliest opportunity. If an issue arises at trial, each party must be prepared to share with the Court the aual discovery record. 8. Generalized motions in limine to exclude speculative expert testimony, or exclude hearsay testimony, or exclude expert testimony that exceeds the scope of the expert designation, or exclude expert opinions not testified to in deposition, or exclude expert opinion testimony by percipient witnesses will not be granted. If there is a particular witness or piece of testimony that is the obje of the motion, it must be identified with specificity. 6

EXHIBIT B Format for Witness Lists Plaintiffs List Witness Part y (P or D Dire Cro ss Redire Total Subje Smith, John P 20 5 250 Formation of contra Brown, Nancy P 15 5 20 Breach of contra White, Ron P 70 15 85 Damages Black, Peter P 60 15 75 Formation of contra Garcia, Dr. Ruth P 120 30 150 Damages Rogers, Officer Ted P 60 10 70 Arrest of Susan Petersen Defendant s List Witness Part y (P or D Dire Cro ss Redire Total Doe, Edward D 20 5 25 Subje Formation of contra Chang, Dr. Sam D 75 15 90 Damages Martin, Eric D 120 30 150 Damages 7