Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Similar documents
Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION

Jennifer Araiza, v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Superior Court of the State California, County of Riverside Case No. RIC

If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

Case3:14-cv VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 43

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

A SUMMARY OF YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES. You May: Summary: Due Date:

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:

Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E

NOTICE OF CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. Berta Martin Del Campo v. Hometown Buffet, Inc., et al.

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

Case 3:15-cv JD Document 67-1 Filed 12/20/17 Page 1 of 29

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ANTONIA CANO V. ABLE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC639763

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS, COLLECTIVE AND REPRESENTATIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:

Case 8:15-cv JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EXHIBIT A

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT


NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

- 1 - Questions? Call:

CHANGE OF ADDRESS FORM. Pursuant to Section IV of the Notice, I hereby wish to change the mailing address on record for the remainder of this matter.

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THE SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

DYLAN HOFFMAN, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant.

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

Your legal rights are affected whether you act or don t act. Please read this Notice carefully.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING YOUR ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION

Notice of Pendency and Partial Settlement of Class Action to Investors of Thema International Fund plc

Case 1:13-cv GJQ Doc #12 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv MGC Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/28/2018 Page 1 of 21

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

RECEIVE YOUR SHARE EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT GO TO THE FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT.

OBJECT NO LATER THAN JULY 5, 2016 GO TO A HEARING DO NOTHING

ATTENTION: CURRENT AND FORMER EMPLOYEES OF LQ MANAGEMENT L.L.C. ("LA QUINTA") YOU MAY RECEIVE MONEY FROM THIS CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

FLSA NOTICE OF PENDING COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DOUGHERTY COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA ) ) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Attention California purchasers of Canada Dry Ginger Ale Between December 28, 2012 and June 26, 2018

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Your legal rights may be affected even if you do not act. Please read this Notice carefully. YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES

[EXHIBIT 1] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION OVERVIEW OF YOUR RIGHTS AND OPTIONS UNDER THE SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS. Case No.:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION. Consol. Case No

This is the only way to receive a payment from the Settlement Fund. DO NOTHING

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

Case 8:10-ml DOC-RNB Document 626 Filed 06/24/13 Page 1 of 13 Page ID #:29073

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 96-1 Filed: 09/20/17 Page 1 of 32 PageID #:637. Exhibit A

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

A Federal Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

As a current or former mortgage loan officer for PNC, you are eligible to get a payment from a class action settlement.

JOINT STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Attention purchasers of Bertolli Brand Olive Oil Between May 23, 2010 and April 16, 2018

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

Plaintiffs, Defendants. NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case3:10-cv JSW Document47-2 Filed07/06/12 Page2 of 58

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

EXHIBIT 1. Settlement Agreement. (to Declaration of Christina A. Humphrey)

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLASS ACTION

EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT QUESTIONS? VISIT

A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. You are not being sued.

Transcription:

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP Stanley D. Saltzman, Esq. (SBN 090058) 29229 Canwood Street, Suite 208 Agoura Hills, California 91301 Telephone: (818) 991-8080 Facsimile: (818) 991-8081 ssaltzman@marlinsaltzman.com DIVERSITY LAW GROUP, A Professional Corporation Larry W. Lee, Esq. (SBN 228175) 550 S. Hope St., Suite 2655 Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 488-6555 Facsimile: (213) 488-6554 lwlee@diversitylaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs WILLIAM WOODS (CA), DOMINIC SEALE (FL), WESLEY VARUGHESE (IL), ERIC ESSLER (MI), KRISTINA WILLS (MN), CASEY MCCALEB (MO), SAMUEL BARONE-CROWELL (NY), LOWELL HARVARD JR. (NY), ALTWELL WINFIELD (NY), TIFFANY REINHART (OH), individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiffs, VECTOR MARKETING CORPORATION and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. CASE NO. 14-CV-00264-EMC (Hon. Edward M. Chen) CLASS ACTION THIRD REVISED [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT DATE: June 2, 2016 TIME: 1:30 p.m. CTRM: 5 Complaint Filed: January 16, 2014 28-1 - THIRD Revised [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class And Collective Action Settlement Case No. 14-CV-00264-EMC Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 On June 2, 2016, the Court heard Plaintiffs unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class and Collective Action Settlement. The Court has considered the Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Preliminary Approval and the Notice of Settlement of Class and Collective Action and attached exhibits and hereby finds and orders as follows: The Court finds on a preliminary basis that the Settlement Agreement, filed with the Court as Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Christina A. Humphrey, falls within the range of reasonableness and, therefore, meets the requirements for preliminary approval. For ease of reference, the Settlement Agreement previously attached as Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Christina A. Humphrey is now attached hereto as Exhibit 1. On September 4, 2015, this Court granted the Plaintiffs motion for certification of the state law claims asserted in the action. (Doc No. 228). On September 24, 2015, this Court approved the class definitions (Doc No. 232) pursuant to Rule 23. On March 16, 2015, this Court conditionally certified the collective action. Doc. 145. Ultimately, 4,467 individuals submitted Consent to Join forms by the cutoff date of September 4, 2015. Those individuals constitute the FLSA Class. The Class and Collective Action Definitions, modified for settlement purposes are set forth below: 1. California (William Woods) All individuals, who, since January 16, 2010, through the Preliminary Approval Date, either (a) attended all three days of Vector s initial training program in California, or (b) attended some portion of Vector s training program in California and provided a list of individuals they thought might be interested in becoming sales representatives for Vector during training. Excluded from the California class are those individuals who either: (a) completed their initial training entirely online; or (b) who did not opt out of the case captioned: Harris v. Vector Marketing Corp., Civil Action Number 08-5198, before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; or (c) signed the Arbitration Agreement (as defined in Section 2.4 of the Settlement Agreement). / / / 28-2 - THIRD Revised [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class And Collective Action Settlement Case No. 14-CV-00264-EMC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2. Florida (Dominic Seale) All individuals, who, since January 16, 2012, through the Preliminary Approval Date, either (a) attended all three days of Vector s initial training program in Florida, or (b) attended some portion of Vector s training program in Florida and provided during training a list of individuals they thought might be interested in becoming sales representatives for Vector. Excluded from the Florida class are those individuals who completed their entire initial training online or who signed the Arbitration Agreement (as defined in Section 2.4 of the Settlement Agreement). 3. Illinois (Wesley Varughese) All individuals, who, since January 16, 2011, through the Preliminary Approval Date, either (a) attended all three days of Vector s initial training program in Illinois, or (b) attended some portion of Vector s training program in Illinois and provided during training a list of individuals they thought might be interested in becoming sales representatives for Vector. Excluded from the Illinois class are those individuals who completed their entire initial training online or who signed the Arbitration Agreement (as defined in Section 2.4 of the Settlement Agreement). 4. Michigan (Eric Essler) All individuals, who, since January 16, 2011, through the Preliminary Approval Date, either (a) attended all three days of Vector s initial training program in Michigan, or (b) attended some portion of Vector s training program in Michigan and provided during training a list of individuals they thought might be interested in becoming sales representatives for Vector. Excluded from the Michigan class are those individuals who completed their entire initial training online or who signed the Arbitration Agreement (as defined in Section 2.4 of the Settlement Agreement). 5. New York (Samuel Barone Crowell) All individuals, who, since January 16, 2008, through the Preliminary Approval Date, either (a) attended all three days of Vector s initial training program in New York, or (b) attended some 28-3 - THIRD Revised [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class And Collective Action Settlement Case No. 14-CV-00264-EMC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 portion of Vector s training program in New York and provided during training a list of individuals they thought might be interested in becoming sales representatives for Vector. Excluded from the New York class are those individuals who completed their entire initial training online or who signed the Arbitration Agreement (as defined in Section 2.4 of the Settlement Agreement). 6. FLSA Collective Class (William Woods, Dominic Seale, Wesley Varughese, Eric Essler) All individuals in the United States who, since September 22, 2011, through September 4, 2015, either (a) attended all three days of Vector s initial training program, or (b) attended some portion of Vector s initial training program and provided a list of personal recruits during training, and (c) timely submitted a consent to join form. Excluded are those individuals who completed their entire training online or who signed the Arbitration Agreement (as defined in Section 2.4 of the Settlement Agreement). The Court previously appointed Christina A. Humphrey and Stanley D. Saltzman of Marlin & Saltzman LLP and Larry W. Lee of Diversity Law Group, as Class and Collective Action Counsel for all purposes in the case. Simpluris, Inc. is appointed as Settlement Administrator. The Class Notice attached as Exhibit A to the Settlement Agreement (which is Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Christina A. Humphrey in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval), and as revised by the Parties consistent with the Court s instructions at the hearing on preliminary approval held on June 2, 2016, is approved as lodged on June 20, 2016. The Revised Notice lodged on June 20, 2016, is attached hereto as Exhibit 2. The Court also approves the documents additionally lodged on June 20, 2016, those being the endorsement language for the back of the check to be mailed to Settlement Class Members (attached hereto as Exhibit 3), and the language on the transmittal document for the settlement checks (attached hereto as Exhibit 4), also to be mailed to all Settlement Class Members. The Settlement Administrator is ordered to mail the Notice to the Class members as provided in the Settlement Agreement. The Court finds that this notice is the best notice practicable under the circumstances and is in compliance with the 28-4 - THIRD Revised [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class And Collective Action Settlement Case No. 14-CV-00264-EMC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 and applicable standards of due process. Each Class Member will have forty-five (45) days after the date on which the Settlement Administrator mails the Class Notice to object to the Settlement by filing with the Court, by the forty-five (45) day deadline, a written objection to the Settlement. Each Class Member who wishes to be excluded from the Settlement shall submit a timely Request for Exclusion to the Settlement Administrator, at the address set forth in the Notice of Settlement, postmarked no later than 45 days from the date the notice is first mailed. The Court hereby establishes the following briefing and hearing date schedule, following this Order granting Preliminary Approval of the Settlement: (a) July 14, 2016 Defendant will produce the class list and data to the TPA (10 business days after preliminary approval order); (b) July 28, 2016 The TPA will mail notice to class members (within 10 business days after receiving the list); (c) August 26, 2016 Plaintiffs will file their motion for approval of fees, costs and enhancements (seventeen days prior to the deadline for exclusions/objections, exceeding the Mercury Interactive requirement); (d) September 1, 2016 - Plaintiffs will file their motion for final approval (thirty five days prior to the final approval hearing); (e) September 12, 2016 Deadline to Request Exclusion from the Settlement or Object to Settlement; (f) September 22, 2016 - Last day for TPA to notify parties of the number of Requests for Exclusions; (g) September 22, 2016 Plaintiffs will file any supplemental papers/declarations as to any updated exclusion and objection submissions as of the close of the Notice period (fourteen days prior to the final approval hearing); (h) October 6, 2016 hearing date for Final Approval Hearing. / / / 28-5 - THIRD Revised [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class And Collective Action Settlement Case No. 14-CV-00264-EMC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 If the Settlement Agreement is not finally approved by the Court or for any reason is terminated or otherwise does not become effective, the following will occur: (1) this Preliminary Approval Order, and all of its provisions, will be automatically vacated; (2) the case will proceed as if no settlement has been attempted and notice will be provided to the putative class members that the settlement will not proceed and that, as a result, no payments will be made; (3) no party shall be deemed to have waived any claims, objections, rights, or defenses, or legal arguments or positions, including, but not limited to, objections to class certification and claims and defenses on the merits; (4) no term or draft of the Settlement Agreement, or any aspect of the Parties settlement discussions, including related documentation, will have any effect or be admissible into evidence for any purpose in the case or in any other proceeding; and (5) the Defendants shall have no obligation to pay all or any part of the settlement. During the Court s consideration of the settlement and pending further order of the Court, all proceedings in this case, other than proceedings necessary to carry out the terms and provisions of the Settlement Agreement, or as otherwise directed by the Court, are hereby stayed and suspended. October 30, 2016 DATED: Hon. Edward M. Chen United States District Judge IT IS SO ORDERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Judge Edward M. Chen 28-6 - THIRD Revised [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class And Collective Action Settlement Case No. 14-CV-00264-EMC

EXHIBIT 1 to Third Revised Proposed Order Granting Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement EXHIBIT 1 to Third Revised Proposed Order Granting Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement

EXHIBIT 1 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT - (Exhibit 1 to Humphrey Declaration) EXHIBIT 1 SIGNATURE PAGES TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT - (Exhibit 1 to Humphrey Declaration)

EXHIBIT 1 SIGNATURE PAGES TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT - (Exhibit 1 to Humphrey Declaration) EXHIBIT 1 SIGNATURE PAGES TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT - (Exhibit 1 to Humphrey Declaration)

EXHIBIT 1 SIGNATURE PAGES TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT - (Exhibit 1 to Humphrey Declaration) EXHIBIT 1 SIGNATURE PAGES TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT - (Exhibit 1 to Humphrey Declaration)

EXHIBIT A Class Notice (to Settlement Agreement) EXHIBIT A Class Notice (to Settlement Agreement)

EXHIBIT 2 to Third Revised Proposed Order Granting Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement EXHIBIT 2 to Third Revised Proposed Order Granting Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WILLIAM WOODS (CA), DOMINIC SEALE (FL), WESLEY VARUGHESE (IL), ERIC ESSLER (MI), KRISTINA WILLS (MN), CASEY MCCALEB (MO), SAMUEL BARONE-CROWELL (NY), LOWELL HARVARD JR. (NY), ALTWELL WINFIELD (NY), TIFFANY REINHART (OH), individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals, Case No. 14-CV-00264-EMC NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION ( CLASS NOTICE ) Plaintiffs, v. VECTOR MARKETING CORPORATION and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. ATTENTION: If you attended the initial training offered to persons interested in becoming sales representatives for Vector Marketing Corporation ( Initial Training Program ), you may be eligible to receive money from a proposed Settlement in the above-captioned collective and class action lawsuit ( Action ). The expected average recovery per class member before reduction of fees, costs and enhancements, is $73.00, the expected average recovery per class member after reduction for fees and costs, assuming that all requests for Court approval of such fees, costs and enhancements are granted, is $42.50. If some of the fees, costs and/or enhancements are not approved by the Court, your net share could increase. PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. This Notice relates to the proposed Settlement of this Action. If you are a Class Member (defined below), this Notice contains important information affecting your rights to participate in the Settlement as further described below. This Notice advises you of the terms of the Settlement and your rights and options under it. What is this Settlement about? Plaintiffs William Woods (CA), Dominic Seale (FL), Wesley Varughese (IL), Eric Essler (MI) and Samuel Barone-Crowell (NY) ( Named Plaintiffs ), together with plaintiffs Kristina Mills (MN), Casey McCaleb (MO), Lowell Harvard Jr. (NY), Winfield Atwell (NY) and Tiffany Reinhart (OH), filed the Action on January 16, 2014, alleging that Defendant Vector Marketing Corporation ( Defendant ) failed to pay them, and all others similarly situated nationwide, Page 1 If you have questions, contact the Settlement Administrator at [mailing address], [e-mail address], [phone number] or [fax number]. EXHIBIT A (Revised) pa-1733334

wages for the initial training Defendant offered them, in violation of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act ( FLSA ) and the laws of the states of California, Florida, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New York and Ohio. The Action was brought as a putative class and collective action and sought unpaid wages, penalties and restitution, as well as interest, attorneys fees and costs. The Court has certified a collective action under the FLSA comprised of the 4,467 individuals whose written consents to join the Action were in the possession of Plaintiffs Counsel as of September 4, 2015 ( FLSA Collective Action Class ). You are a member of the FLSA Collective Action Class if you are one of those individuals. The Court has also certified five state law classes under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ( FRCP 23 State Law Classes ), defined as follows: 1. California State Law Class: All individuals who, since January 16, 2010 through [Preliminary Approval Date], either (a) attended all three days of Defendant s Initial Training Program in California, or (b) attended some portion of Defendant s Initial Training Program in California and provided during training a list of individuals they thought might be interested in becoming sales representatives for Defendant, as determined from Defendant s records. Excluded from the California State Law Class are those individuals who either (a) completed their initial training entirely online; or (b) did not opt out of the case entitled Harris v. Vector Marketing Corp., Civil Action Number 08-5198, before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; or (c) signed Defendant s Sales Representative Agreement containing the arbitration and class action waiver which the Court in this case ruled was enforceable, in its Order filed in the Action on August 28, 2014 (the Arbitration Agreement ). 2. Florida State Law Class: All individuals who, since January 16, 2012 through [Preliminary Approval Date], either (a) attended all three days of Defendant s Initial Training Program in Florida, or (b) attended some portion of Defendant s Initial Training Program in Florida and provided during training a list of individuals they thought might be interested in becoming sales representatives for Defendant, as determined from Defendant s records. Excluded from the Florida State Law Class are those individuals who either completed their initial training entirely online or signed the Arbitration Agreement. 3. Illinois State Law Class: All individuals who, since January 16, 2011 through [Preliminary Approval Date], either (a) attended all three days of Defendant s Initial Training Program in Illinois, or (b) attended some portion of Defendant s Initial Training Program in Illinois and provided during training a list of individuals they thought might be interested in becoming sales representatives for Defendant, as determined from Defendant s records. Excluded from the Illinois State Law Class are those individuals who either completed their initial training entirely online or signed the Arbitration Agreement. Page 2 If you have questions, contact the Settlement Administrator at [mailing address], [e-mail address], [phone number] or [fax number]. EXHIBIT A (Revised) pa-1733334

4. Michigan State Law Class: All individuals who, since January 16, 2011 through [Preliminary Approval Date], either (a) attended all three days of Defendant s Initial Training Program in Michigan, or (b) attended some portion of Defendant s Initial Training Program in Michigan and provided during training a list of individuals they thought might be interested in becoming sales representatives for Defendant, as determined from Defendant s records. Excluded from the Michigan State Law Class are those individuals who either completed their initial training entirely online or signed the Arbitration Agreement. 5. New York State Law Class: All individuals who, since January 16, 2008 through [Preliminary Approval Date], either (a) attended all three days of Defendant s Initial Training Program in New York, or (b) attended some portion of Defendant s Initial Training Program in New York and provided during training a list of individuals they thought might be interested in becoming sales representatives for Defendant, as determined from Defendant s records. Excluded from the New York State Law Class are those individuals who completed their initial training entirely online or signed the Arbitration Agreement. If you come within the definition of one of the FRCP 23 State Law Classes described above in numbered paragraphs 1 5, you are a member of that class. Individuals within the FRCP 23 State Law Classes are referred to collectively with individuals within the FLSA Collective Action Class as Class Members. The Action has been heavily litigated over the past two years. Substantial discovery has been taken, and extensive court proceedings have occurred. Following that activity, the parties participated in a mediation conducted by a professional mediator. The Action did not settle during the mediation. In the course of post-mediation negotiations, the parties reached an agreement to settle the Action. The Settlement is not an admission of liability by Defendant. Throughout this case, Defendant has denied any liability or wrongdoing, or that any compensable injury arose out of the claims alleged in the Action. Defendant contends that it has complied with the FLSA and all relevant state laws regarding individuals participation in Defendant s Initial Training Program. Under the Settlement, Defendant agrees to make payments to all Class Members who do not timely submit a valid Request for Exclusion from the Settlement ( Settlement Class Members ). These payments will be based on the number of Training Days attended by each Settlement Class Member compared to the total number of Training Days attended by all Settlement Class Members, based on Defendant s records and as more fully described below. Defendant also agrees to pay Settlement Administration Costs, Service Awards to the Named Plaintiffs, and Plaintiffs Counsel s attorneys fees and costs/expenses up to the amounts set forth below, subject to court approval. Defendant s maximum total obligation to pay money under the Settlement is $6,750,000.00. Page 3 If you have questions, contact the Settlement Administrator at [mailing address], [e-mail address], [phone number] or [fax number]. EXHIBIT A (Revised) pa-1733334

Plaintiffs Counsel believes that the allegations made in the Action are valid and well-taken. However, recognizing the various defenses to the Action asserted by Defendant and the risk that one or more of those defenses might prevail, Plaintiffs Counsel also believes that the Settlement is in the best interests of the Class Members. Further proceedings would be very expensive and could take a long time, including the possibility of an appeal of any verdict. Moreover, no one can confidently predict the outcome of the legal issues in this case. At a preliminary approval hearing, the Court determined that there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the Settlement might be fair, reasonable and adequate. Any final determination of those issues will be made at the Final Approval Hearing. Summary of the Settlement Defendant has agreed to pay up to $6,750,000.00 ( Gross Settlement Fund ) to resolve all claims that were or could have been asserted in the Action, as more specifically described in the release of claims described below. If approved, the Settlement will distribute money as follows: Settlement Awards to Settlement Class Members: Settlement Class Members will be paid their pro rata share of the Net Settlement Fund, calculated as follows: The Settlement Administrator will calculate the total number of Training Days attended by all Settlement Class Members. The Settlement Administrator will then divide the Net Settlement Fund by the total number of Settlement Class Member Training Days, resulting in a per Training Day value. The Settlement Administrator will then take the Training Day value and multiply it by the number of Training Days attended by each Settlement Class Member. In the event a Settlement Class Member is a member of both the FLSA Collective Action Class and a FRCP 23 Class, the number of Training Days attended by the Settlement Class Member will only be counted once. The Settlement Administrator will mail checks to all the Settlement Class Members (those who do not elect to exclude themselves from the Settlement as permitted and described below), in payment of their Settlement Awards. You do not have to submit a claim of any kind if you wish to receive your Settlement Award. The Settlement Award checks will be mailed after the Effective Date of the Settlement, which is anticipated to occur in approximately October 2016. A Settlement Class Member s Settlement Award check will be valid and negotiable for 180 days from the date of its issuance, after which the check will be void and the Settlement Class Member will have no further rights to a Settlement Award although he or she will remain bound by the terms of the Settlement of the Action, including his or her release of all Released Claims and agreement not to sue any of the Released Parties on any of the Released Claims. Settlement Class Members will be responsible for the payment of all federal, state and local income taxes due on their Settlement Awards, if any taxes are due. Net Settlement Fund means the Gross Settlement Fund less the Fee and Expense Award, the Service Awards and the Settlement Administration Costs, all of which are described below. Training Days means the number of days, which will be one, two or three days (each assumed to be five hours), a Class Member attended Defendant s Initial Training Program. Page 4 If you have questions, contact the Settlement Administrator at [mailing address], [e-mail address], [phone number] or [fax number]. EXHIBIT A (Revised) pa-1733334

Fee and Expense Award for Plaintiffs Counsel: Upon approval by the Court, Defendant will pay attorneys fees and out-of-pocket costs/expenses to Plaintiffs Counsel (Marlin & Saltzman, LLP and Diversity Law Group, A Professional Corporation). The Settlement permits Plaintiffs Counsel to request up to $2,247,750.00 (1/3 of the Gross Settlement Fund) as their fees for prosecuting this case and up to $181,000.00 as reimbursement for their costs/expenses incurred in the Action. At the Final Approval Hearing, the Court will decide what amount of fees and costs/expenses will be approved. You are not personally responsible for any of Plaintiffs Counsel s attorneys fees or costs/expenses. Other Payments: The Settlement provides for the payment of Service Awards not to exceed $50,000.00 in the aggregate ($10,000.00 for each Named Plaintiff), subject to approval by the Court. At the Final Approval Hearing, the Court will decide what amount of Service Awards will be approved. The Settlement further provides for the payment of Settlement Administration Costs not to exceed $325,000.00 for the Settlement Administrator s services in administering the Settlement, subject to approval by the Court. What are my rights and options? 1. You can exclude yourself from the Settlement: If you do not want a Settlement Award and do not want to be bound by any of the Settlement s terms, you must make a timely written Request for Exclusion by completing and personally signing the enclosed Request for Exclusion form and mailing it to the Settlement Administrator at the following address:. Your Request for Exclusion must be postmarked by [Date 45 days after mailing of Class Notice]. You should not request to be excluded if you wish to receive money from the Settlement. 2. You can object to the Settlement: You can ask the Court to deny approval by filing a written objection. You cannot ask the Court to order a larger or different settlement; the Court can only approve or deny the settlement presented to it by the Parties. If the Court denies approval, no Settlement Payments will be sent out and the Action will continue. If that is what you want to happen, then you must object. You must object to the proposed Settlement in writing. You may also appear at the Final Approval Hearing, either in person or through your own attorney. If you appear through your own attorney, you are responsible for paying that attorney. All written objections and supporting papers must (a) clearly identify the case name and number (Woods et al. v. Vector Marketing Corporation, Case Number 14-CV-00264-EMC), (b) be submitted to the Court either by mailing them to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Courtroom 5, San Francisco, California 94102, or by filing them in person at any location of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and (c) be filed or postmarked on or before [Date 45 days after the mailing of the Class Notice]. You may object to the Settlement only if you do NOT submit a Request for Exclusion. Page 5 If you have questions, contact the Settlement Administrator at [mailing address], [e-mail address], [phone number] or [fax number]. EXHIBIT A (Revised) pa-1733334

3. You can do nothing: You can do nothing. If you do nothing, you will be bound by the terms of the Settlement and you will receive a Settlement Award as described above, subject to Court approval. What claims am I releasing by participating in the Settlement? In exchange for accepting the consideration given by Defendant in the Settlement, all Settlement Class Members, including those who did not previously opt-in to the FLSA claims, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment finally approving the Settlement, shall have expressly released, waived and discharged all Released Claims, as the term Released Claims is defined in the following paragraph. By participating in the Settlement, Settlement Class Members further agree not to sue or otherwise make a claim against any of the Released Parties with respect to any of the Released Claims and shall, as of the date of the Court s Final Approval Order approving the Settlement, be enjoined from filing any actions, claims, complaints or proceedings regarding the Released Claims with the United States Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division or any agency having jurisdiction over the wage and hour laws of the states of California, Florida, Illinois, Michigan and New York, or from initiating any other proceedings against the Released Parties arising out of or relating to the Released Claims. Released Claims means all claims and demands of every kind and nature, in law, equity or otherwise, known and unknown, suspected and unsuspected, disclosed and undisclosed, arising from or related to wages allegedly owed to a Class Member in connection with the Class Member s participation in Defendant s Initial Training Program, including (without limitation) all claims that were or could have been alleged in the Action, including (without limitation) all claims for unpaid minimum, regular or overtime wages, restitution, injunctive or other equitable relief, penalties, interest, costs and attorneys fees, based on any federal common or statutory law or the common or statutory law of the states of California, Florida, Illinois, Michigan or New York, including (without limitation) claims under the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq., Cal. Lab. Code 201, 202, 203, 1194, 1197, 2698 et seq., Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 17200 et seq., Fla. Stat. 48.110, Fla. Const. Art. X 24, 820 Ill. Comp. Stat. 105 et seq., Mich. Comp. Laws 408.382, 408.384, 408.393, 408.394, 12 N.Y. Comp. Code R. & Regs. Part 142-2 et seq., and 2 N.Y. Lab. Law 2, 191, 198, 650 et seq. Formatted: Font: Bold Released Parties means Defendant, all of Defendant s past and present parent corporations, subsidiaries and affiliates, and each of their respective past, present and future officers, directors, employees, partners, shareholders and agents. When is the next Court hearing? A Final Approval Hearing will be held before the Honorable Edward M. Chen in Courtroom 5 of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102, on, 2016 at :.m. to determine whether the Settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate and to approve the plan for Page 6 If you have questions, contact the Settlement Administrator at [mailing address], [e-mail address], [phone number] or [fax number]. EXHIBIT A (Revised) pa-1733334

payment of the Settlement Awards, Fee and Expense Award, Service Awards and Settlement Administration Costs. A motion for final approval of the Settlement should be on file with the Court no later than, 2016. A motion for approval of the requested Attorneys Fees, Costs/Expenses and Service Awards, should be on file with the Court no later than, 2016. Both of these motions will be available for review at the Settlement website, at www.xyz, after that date. The Final Approval Hearing may be continued without further notice to Class Members. It is not necessary for you to appear at this hearing but you may do so if you have timely filed an objection to the Settlement and wish to appear. What if I need more information? Capitalized terms in this Class Notice have the same meaning they are given in the Stipulation of Settlement and Release ( Agreement ) executed by the settling Parties to this Action. For the precise terms and conditions of the Settlement, you should consult the detailed Agreement and the Preliminary Approval Order, which is also on file with the Court, and available for viewing at the Settlement website, at www.xyz. If you have any questions, you can contact the Settlement Administrator at [mailing address], [e-mail address], phone number] or [fax number]. You can also contact Plaintiffs Counsel listed below: Stanley D. Saltzman (ssaltzman@marlinsaltzman.com) Christina A. Humphrey (chumphrey@marlinsaltzman.com) MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP 29229 Canwood Street, Suite 208 Agoura Hills, California 91301 Telephone: (818) 991-8080 Facsimile: (818) 991-8081 PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE DISTRICT COURT FOR INFORMATION ABOUT THIS SETTLEMENT BY ORDER OF THE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Page 7 If you have questions, contact the Settlement Administrator at [mailing address], [e-mail address], [phone number] or [fax number]. EXHIBIT A (Revised) pa-1733334

EXHIBIT 3 to Third Revised Proposed Order Granting Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement EXHIBIT 3 to Third Revised Proposed Order Granting Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement

(Printed on back of Class Member Check)

EXHIBIT 4 to Third Revised Proposed Order Granting Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement EXHIBIT 4 to Third Revised Proposed Order Granting Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement

(Inside Folded Postcard - Class Member Check) By endorsing the enclosed settlement check, you are indicating your intention to consent to join the action entitled William Woods et al. v. Vector Marketing Corporation, Case No. 14-CV-00264, such that your participation in the settlement includes a release of all the claims described on page 6 of the Notice of Settlement you received in this matter, including all FLSA claims.

Woods v. Vector c/o Simpluris, Inc. P. O. Box 26170 Santa Ana, CA 92799-9834 PRESORTED FIRST CLASS U.S. POSTAGE PAID SIMPLURIS INC Notice_Encoded «Notice» SIMID «SIMID» «FirstName» «LastName» «Address1» «Address2» «City» «State» «Zip» (Outside Back of Folded Postcard)