attract promising foreign enterprises with reference to the management strategies of individual companies, adopting a mindset similar to that of execu

Similar documents
[Points-Based System for Highly-Skilled Professionals] Question 1: What is the Points-Based System for Highly-Skilled Professionals?

Strengthening Regional Cooperation in East Asia

Push and Pull Factors for Japanese Manufacturing Companies Moving Production Overseas

SECTION THREE BENEFITS OF THE JSEPA

Highly-Skilled Migration and Competitiveness: The Science and Engineering Industries in Japan

Preamble. The Government of Japan and the Government of the Republic of the Philippines (hereinafter referred to in this Agreement as the Parties ),

Basic Plan for Immigration Control (5th Edition)

Issues Over Accepting More Foreign Workers

The East Asian Community Initiative

Session 1: Gender Mainstreaming--Achievements and Challenges

Part I. Immigration Control in Recent Years

Determining factors of inbound travel to Japan A stronger yen matters more for the NIEs than China

Data Section 1. Major Developments since April 1, 2013

Basic Plan for Immigration Control

Fundamental Approach to Japan-Russia Economic Relations

JETRO Bangkok Newsletter October/November/December 2013 HIGHLIGHTS OF THIS ISSUE

EU-Japan FTA/EPA JETRO s perspective. Jan 2015 Jun ARIMA Director General, JETRO London

White Paper on Gender Equality Outline

Part II. Major Policies Related to Immigration Control Administration

Information for the UPR

Economic Relations between Mexico and Japan in the Asia-Pacific Era. June 11, 2015 Hiroyuki Ishige Chairman and CEO

Cambodia Industrial Development Policy

Part II. Immigration Control in Recent Years

The Various Dimensions of Thailand-Japan Economic Partnership. His Excellency Virasakdi Futrakul the Ambassador of Thailand to Japan

Overview of the Act on the Protection of Specially Designated Secrets (SDS)

Outline. Why is international mobility an important policy issue? The International Mobility of Researchers. IMHE Conference

Survey on International Operations of Japanese Firms (FY2007)

TRADE POLICY REVIEW OF JAPAN DAY 1 STATEMENT BY AMBASSADOR IHARA. Madam Chair, Fellow Ambassadors, and distinguished representatives,

August 2011 Japan Federation of Bar Associations

10% of Companies Recruited Foreign Students in the Past Three Years: JILPT Survey on Recruiting of Foreign Students

(1) Overview of Japan 1-1) Land and Society

Preamble. The Government of Japan and the Government of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam,

Attracting skilled international migrants to China A review and comparison of policies and practices

Japan s Policy to Strengthen Economic Partnership. November 2003

INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, FINANCE AND TRADE Vol. II - Globalization and the Evolution of Trade - Pasquale M. Sgro

Building an ASEAN Economic Community in the heart of East Asia By Dr Surin Pitsuwan, Secretary-General of ASEAN,

Recent trends in the internationalisation of R&D in the enterprise sector. Thomas Hatzichronoglou

MOVEMENT OF NATURAL PERSONS

Overview of the Results of the. Seventh National Survey on Migration

3 1-1 GDP GDP growth rate Population size Labor force Percentage distribution of labor force by ethnic group

One Belt and One Road and Free Trade Zones China s New Opening-up Initiatives 1

Ⅰ Strategic Partnership for Shared Principles and Goals

JAPAN-CANADA ECONOMIC FRAMEWORK. The Government of Japan and the Government of Canada, hereinafter referred to as Japan and Canada respectively,

HIGHLIGHTS. There is a clear trend in the OECD area towards. which is reflected in the economic and innovative performance of certain OECD countries.

IMMIGRATION CONTROL. Immigration Bureau,Ministry of Justice,JAPAN

ASEAN 2015: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES

The Quest for Prosperity

Disaster Prevention and Reconstruction from a Gender Equal Society Perspective

2. Economy (Business, Trade and Investment) 3. Cultural Cooperation, Expo and Olympics

Country Assistance Evaluation of China

Social Economy of Republic of Korea: Conditions of Success and Policy Direction

As Prepared for Delivery. Partners in Progress: Expanding Economic Opportunity Across the Americas. AmCham Panama

State and Prospects of the FTAs of Japan and the Asia-Pacific Region. February 2013 Kazumasa KUSAKA

3. Spouse or Child of above 1and 2. General Remarks. January 2018

Working in Japan - Open for Professionals - March 2018 METI Technical Cooperation Division, Trade and Economic Cooperation Bureau

Can Japan Take Standpoint Promoting Establishment of Common Currency in East Asia?

Guidelines for the Creation of a Multicultural Society in Hyogo

Trade Negotiation. Course Code: IE409 Evening Class

3 Trends in Regional Employment

Sixth Periodic Report on the Implementation of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women Japan

Miracle of Estonia Entrepreneurship and Competitiveness Policy in Estonia

Article 10 Treatment of Detainees Legal Framework The Right to Consultations with Defense Counsel in Criminal Custodial Facilities Treatment in

A Japanese Culture of Privacy

Japan s Role in Managing the Global Economy

Science and Technology Diplomacy in Asia

PRESS KIT FRANCE ATTRACTIVENESS SCOREBOARD & SURVEY ON FRANCE S BUSINESS IMAGE NOVEMBER 2016

Global Natives. How online businesses are leading a new wave of globalization despite growing challenges to international trade JANUARY 2019

2017 Update to Leaders on Progress Towards the G20 Remittance Target

Japan-Thailand Joint Press Statement on the Occasion of the Visit by Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha

Spain Your base for European expansion.

Japan s participation in the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB)

Lecture on Bilateral Relations between Japan and Pakistan At Karachi University on August 26, 2015

5 Multiple Protection of Inventions

Findings and Implications from Empirical Research in Economics

Impact of Japan s ODA Loan on Asian Economic Developments

Outline of Application Procedures for Japanese Multiple Entry Visas for Russian Nationals

Executive Summary of the Report of the Track Two Study Group on Comprehensive Economic Partnership in East Asia (CEPEA)

Act on Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation, etc.

Application Procedures for Multiple Entry Visas (Nationals of Belarus, Moldova and Ukraine)

Implementing the Global Jobs Pact in Africa

General Directorate for Economic and Cultural Promotion and Innovation. General Director, Mr. Vincenzo de Luca

The Government of Japan

GUIDELINES CONCERNING ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDANCE UNDER THE ANTIMONOPOLY ACT. June 30, Fair Trade Commission

Seventh and Eighth Periodic Reports on the Implementation of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women

The Mystery of Economic Growth by Elhanan Helpman. Chiara Criscuolo Centre for Economic Performance London School of Economics

Japanese External Policies and the Asian Economic Developments

Foreign Exchange Order Cabinet Order No. 260 of October 11, 1980

IIPS International Conference

Set appropriate tariff rates and improve the customs system, taking into account domestic and international economic conditions.

MOVEMENT OF NATURAL PERSONS

WHY INVEST IN FRANCE?

Chapter 5: Internationalization & Industrialization

UK Productivity Gap: Skills, management and innovation

Introduction: Summary of the Survey Results

Article (Threshold Amount of Total Assets Requiring Notification of Special Financial Instruments Business Operator)

Briefing Memo. Yusuke Ishihara, Fellow, 3rd Research Office, Research Department. Introduction

FY 2010 Institute of Developing Economies Research Principles

POS 335 Andreas Syz February 17, 2004

Economic and Social Research Institute, Cabinet Office, Government of Japan

Mizuho Economic Outlook & Analysis

Transcription:

Chapter 3 Promoting inward direct investment The expansion of inward direct investment will assist in improving productivity and creating employment in Japan, through inflows of management resources such as management know-how and techniques, as well as personnel. In particular, given the high level of technical skills in Japan, including among its SMEs, attracting foreign enterprises is extremely important from the perspective of promoting open innovation and revitalizing local economies. However, our nation s inward direct investment balance has experienced sluggish growth since peaking in 2008 and Japan s inward direct investment as a proportion of GDP compares very unfavorably with the figures achieved by major developed countries and emerging economies in Asia (Figures III-3-1-1 and III-3-1-2). Internationally, the competition to attract foreign enterprises has intensified further in recent years, so to attract global enterprises, it is necessary for all parts of the government to work together to develop a business environment comparable with that of other countries, by endeavoring to enhance the investment environment for global enterprises, as well as improving the living environment for foreign nationals. To this end, the government has put together the new growth strategy, entitled Japan Revitalization Strategy JAPAN is BACK (approved by the Cabinet on June 14, 2013), which contains three action plans. One of these, the Strategy of Global Outreach, which aims to ensure that Japan can tap into expanding international markets, stipulates that the government will activate inward direct investment. This strategy states that the government will promote thorough globalization throughout Japan and will aim to double the inward direct investment balance to 35 trillion (from 17.8 trillion at the end of 2012) by 2020, in order to create employment and innovation by attracting outstanding overseas personnel and technologies to Japan. Accordingly, to draw more foreign money and technologies into Japan, the government will make effective use of the National Strategic Special Zones in developing the world s most user-friendly business environment for companies. Such environmental improvements will also help to bring back Japanese-affiliated companies that have relocated overseas. On May 1 this year, the government designated six National Strategic Special Zones and has just approved the policy for each zone. In the Tokyo and Kansai zones, which are extensive metropolitan zones, the government intends to implement comprehensive regulatory reform, turning them into centers for international business and innovation that will become hubs for attracting talent, capital, and technology from around the world. Moreover, the Niigata City, Yabu City (Hyogo Prefecture), and Fukuoka City zones will become centers for the reform of the bedrock of Japan s regulatory regime, in such fields as agriculture and employment, with the aim of turning them into gateways for promoting the liquidation of farmland and offering powerful support for startups and entrepreneurship. Furthermore, in these six National Strategic Special Zones, including Okinawa Prefecture, which has immense tourism resources, the national government, local governments, and the private sector will work in partnership to put together specific business plans. To fundamentally strengthen government systems for attracting and supporting foreign enterprises, the government will bolster the industry specialist functions of the Japan External Trade Organization (hereinafter JETRO ) and develop support measures for global enterprises, aiming to identify and 556

attract promising foreign enterprises with reference to the management strategies of individual companies, adopting a mindset similar to that of executives from global enterprises (Figure III-3-1-4). In addition, the government will strengthen the comprehensive support system for foreign enterprises by having JETRO handle all queries regarding such matters as the systems and administrative procedures required when preparing plans for investing in Japan, as well as dealing with requests for regulatory reform. Under this system, JETRO will respond to queries and requests individually, working in collaboration with relevant ministries and agencies (Figure III-3-1-5). Offering direct incentives to global enterprises is an effective means of improving Japan s appeal as a destination for investment. Accordingly, in FY2014, the government will implement the Subsidy Program for Projects Promoting Foreign Direct Investment, Site Location and Regional Development in Japan, which supports the development of bases by companies that are operating an actual business in multiple countries, including Japan, or which are based in Japan and are targeting overseas markets. In addition, under the Act on Special Measures to Promote Research and Development Business, etc. by Specified Multinational Enterprises (Act for Promotion of Japan as an Asian Business Center; entered into force in November 2012), the government will continue to take such measures as alleviating the corporation tax burden and reducing patent fees for global enterprises engaging in research and development business or supervisory business (Figure III-3-1-6). Furthermore, the government has gathered information about cases of Japanese SMEs that are successfully undertaking investment alliance with foreign companies, and has used this to compile a publication entitled Case Studies of Investment Alliances (Japanese companies point of view), which describes advantages gained from investment alliance, such as expanding marketing channels both within Japan and overseas, as well as the risks that can arise from such alliance, including the loss of employees. It also details the key points and areas of caution to be borne in mind when engaging in investment alliance. The government is promoting the widespread use of this anthology of cases, in the hope that it will be of assistance to the proprietors of Japanese companies when they are formulating a new management strategy. In addition to these measures, the Agenda for the Evolution of the Growth Strategy (approved by the Industrial Competitiveness Council on January 20 this year) states that, to assist in the realization of further specific measures aimed at improving the business environment, requests, etc. received from senior managers at foreign enterprises concerning institutional reforms for improving the investment/living environment in Japan will be addressed at the highest levels of government and a system for promoting efforts to manage progress in dealing with these issues will be established, to facilitate the implementation of concrete measures through government-wide initiatives. At the first meeting of the Council on Economic and Fiscal Policy (held on January 20 this year), the Prime Minister instructed the members of the Council to listen to the opinions of the managers of foreign enterprises and to summarize the challenges that must be overcome in order to encourage foreign direct investment in Japan. At the Expert Group Meeting on Foreign Direct Investment in Japan (hereinafter the Expert Group Meeting ) (five meetings held, starting on February 27 this year), which was organized in response, interviews with foreign enterprises took place and the issues they 557

faced were summarized. Amid this situation, in response to an instruction from the Prime Minister at a joint meeting of the Council on Economic and Fiscal Policy and the Industrial Competitiveness Council (April 4 this year), approaches to foreign enterprises by the government as a whole including JETRO, diplomatic missions overseas, and Cabinet ministers were fundamentally strengthened. In addition, the Cabinet-level meeting Council for Promotion of Foreign Direct Invest to Japan was established to deal with institutional reforms that will help to expand investment in Japan, taking into account the needs of foreign enterprises. As well as serving as a control tower for efforts by JETRO and diplomatic missions overseas to identify prospects and attract them to Japan. Invest Japan will listen directly to the opinions of senior managers from foreign enterprises and encourage initiatives by relevant ministers and consultative bodies aimed at bringing the necessary institutional reforms to fruition. Thus, aiming to create innovation through new stimuli, and to improve productivity and achieve regional economic revitalization, the government will undertake cross-cutting institutional reforms and conduct even more proactive efforts to identify prospects and attract them to Japan, working in partnership with JETRO, diplomatic missions overseas, and forward-thinking local governments. In addition, it will promote top-level sales pitches by the Prime Minister and Cabinet ministers to encourage foreign direct investment in Japan. Figure III-3-1-1 Japan s inward direct investment position and GDP ratio (Trillion yen) 30 (%) 10 Inward direct investment position (trillion yen) GDP ratio (%) 8 20 15.1 18.5 18.4 17.5 17.5 17.8 18.0 6 10 6.6 1.3 9.4 9.6 10.1 1.9 1.9 2.0 11.9 2.4 12.8 2.5 3.0 3.7 3.9 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.8 4 2 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Notes: The figures in 2013 are estimates. Source: International Investment Position of Japan (Ministry of Finance), National Accounts of Japan (Cabinet Office) 0 558

Figure III-3-1-2 International comparison of inward direct investment position as a percentage of GDP for major countries (year-end 2012) 100 (%) 80 Inward direct investment position / GDP Inward direct investment position from outside the EU / GDP 262.3 60 54.3 40 37.4 26.4 24.8 20 0 16.9 12.4 3.8 6.0 7.4 Japan the U.S. UK France Germany ROK Singapore Notes: All figures for "Inward direct investment position / GDP" from outside the EU regions are actual results at the end of 2011. Source: The following data <FDI (book values)> Japan: International Investment Position (Ministry of Finance) UK, Germany, ROK, Singapore: International Financial Statistics Yearbook 2013 (IMF) US: Survey of Current Business (Bureau of Economic Analysis) France: The French Balance of Payments and International Investment Position (Banque de France) <GDP, rate> Japan: Cabinet Office, (National Account of Japan) The U.S., UK, France, Germany, ROK and Singapore : International Financial Statistics Yearbook 2013 (IMF) 559

Figure III-3-1-3 Promotion of inward foreign direct investment Figure III-3-1-4 Strengthen JETRO's industry specialist function Develop the system to make aggressive approaches to discover prospective foreign companies and attract them to Japan (strengthen JETRO's industry specialist function) Appoint industry specialists utilizing external consultants at JETRO to improve the system to develop active discovering and attracting activities centered on major companies Target company (key person) Approach Local strategic consultant Discovering Target company (key person) Industry specialist (overseas) Overseas office Approach Individual with extensive experience in the industry Overseas office Attracting Negotiation Individual who has thorough knowledge of the domestic industry and locational conditions Target company (key person) Cooperation Decision Negotiation Setting up a base Local government Industry specialist (Japan) Image of industry specialist (overseas) (example) - A consultant who has thorough knowledge in the specific industrial field - Conduct consultations with top management of global companies on such matters as management, financial accounting, and global business strategies Source: Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry Domestic and overseas industry specialists make specific proposals including incentives. * In addition, to collect and provide information that contributes to activities of industry specialists, best practices regarding cooperation between small and medium-sized enterprises and foreign companies were analyzed, and were published in April 2014. 560

Figure III-3-1-5 Comprehensive support by JETRO JETRO, as a pilot, conducts comprehensive support for foreign companies, supporting the business development of foreign companies in Japan. Started comprehensive support for clarifying matters required for investing in Japan by foreign companies, solving problems, etc. in September 2013 Questions Requests Foreign company - Consultation regarding investing in Japan (administrative procedures and information on regulations and systems) - Request for regulatory reforms * Service available in languages other than Japanese Response to consultation (1) Arrange a date and time for consultation (JETRO Division or office in charge) (2) Conduct a consultation with the division of the office in charge (a JETRO staff will escort the foreign company representative and provide language support) Question Answer Official in charge Response to a consultation with a meeting Arrange meetings with the relevant authorities Invest Japan Hotline JETRO person in charge of attracting companies One stop service provided by JETRO Accepting inquiries Collating content of inquiries (translating into Japanese when necessary) If able to answer the matter, JETRO will answer questions directly. Support applications for subsidies, etc. Translation of application forms Translate application forms for various subsidies upon a request from a foreign company Application JETRO will arrange meetings with the relevant authorities and provide comprehensive support including language support. Translation Application form in Japanese Submit requests to the Office for Promotion of Regulatory Reform Response to requests for regulatory reform (1) After examining the request, the Office for Promotion of Regulatory Reform will ask the relevant authorities to consider the possibilities of reform (2) Report to the Regulatory Reform Council (3) The results of the deliberation will be reported JETRO will follow up on each case from the time the request is received to the time the result is reported. Source: Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry 561

Figure III-3-1-6 Overview of Act for Promotion of Japan as an Asian Business Center <Came into effect in November 2012> Source: Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry 562

Column 14 Initiatives to promote the acceptance of foreign human resources with advanced expertise Foreign enterprises with bases in Japan face various issues, such as the status of residence of their foreign staff in Japan and the ability of the spouses of those employees to work here. Japan has a stock of around 200,000 foreign workers capable of working in specialist/technical fields, and the Japanese government has stipulated a policy of proactively accepting such personnel. Due in part to the impact of the Lehman Shock and the Great East Japan Earthquake, the number of new entrants had been declining in recent years, but began to increase once more in 2012. Accordingly, in May 2012, Japan introduced a points-based system of the kind used in the UK, Canada, and Australia, as a means of promoting the acceptance of highly skilled foreign professionals, in order to encourage the acceptance and retention of foreign nationals who can bring innovation to Japan. Unlike the entry-type points-based systems used in the UK and Canada, which specify entry requirements, Japan s points-based system grants preferential treatment in terms of immigration control to those foreign workers who already have a status of residence in a specialist/technical field that allows them to work and who score at least 70 points under a scoring system that assigns points for such factors as their academic background, work history, annual income. This preferential treatment includes reducing the number of years that they must have spent in the country before being eligible to apply for permanent residence, and permitting their spouses to work. In that sense, it is similar to ROK s points-based system. By May 2012, 11 months after the points-based system had been introduced, only around 430 foreign nationals had been recognized as highly skilled professionals, so the Ministry of Justice and other related ministries began working on revising the system as soon as possible. In addition, the targets in the Japan Revitalization Strategy published in June 2013 included reconsider the income standards...and start the new system within the year. Based on these outcomes of the government s deliberations, the revised points-based system began operating at the end of 2013 and the number of those recognized as highly skilled professionals is now much higher than it was when the system was first introduced, thanks to such changes as the relaxation of the income standards. In addition, the Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act reform bill was submitted during the 186th session of the Diet, to implement the measures required to shorten the period for which highly skilled foreign professionals must stay before they can be granted permanent residence (a status of residence with an unlimited period of stay). 563