STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel. THE STATE ENGINEER, AB-07-1 Claims of Navajo Nation

Similar documents
STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel. THE STATE ENGINEER, AB-07-1 Claims of Navajo Nation

DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY: The United States responses to interrogatories of the Cities of Aztec and Bloomfield

Vague and Ambiguous. The terms market and marketing are not defined.as such, the

Honorable James J. Wechler. Richard T. C. Tully, Esq., hereby certifies the original of this Certificate of Service TULLY LAW FIRM, P. A.

Honorable James J. Wechler v. San Juan River Adjudication. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., Claims of Navajo Nation CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

AMENDED NOTICE OF THE NAVAJO NATION OF RESPONSE TO NON-SETTLING PARTIES REQUESTS FOR DISCOVERY

SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN IN NEW MEXICO NAVAJO NATION WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN RIO GRANDE SILVERY MINNOW

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. Case No.

New Mexico Water Law Case Capsules 2-1

The Aamodt case is a complex, long-running adjudication of water

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

THE NAVAJO NATION S JOINDER IN THE UNITED STATES RESPONSE TO DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS OF NON-SETTLING PARTIES

UTE INDIAN WATER COMPACT. Purpose of Compact. Legal Basis for Compact. Water

NEW MEXICO S EXPERIENCE WITH INTERSTATE WATER AGREEMENTS

UTE MOUNTAIN UTE TRIBE S C.R.C.P. 26(a)(1) DISCLOSURES

NAVAJO NATION S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS CERTAIN NON-SETTLING PARTIES FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT S SCHEDULING ORDERS

Nambé, Pojoaque, San Ildefonso, and Tesuque Pueblos Settlement

Water and Growth Issues for Tribes and Pueblos in New Mexico Legal Considerations

Case 6:83-cv MV-JHR Document 4389 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

RECLAMATION PROJECTS AUTHORIZATION AND ADJUSTMENT ACT OF 1992 TITLE XVIII -- GRAND CANYON PROTECTION SECTION SHORT TITLE.

Pueblos and tribal reservations are located within most of the larger stream

Encyclopedia of Politics of the American West

Public Law th Congress An Act

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. NOS. A-1-CA and A-1-CA (Consolidated)

Case 6:15-cv JR Document 72 Filed 10/28/16 Page 1 of 16

No. 137, Original STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF WYOMING. and. STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA Defendants.

Supreme Court of the United States

COMES NOW San Juan County and moves the Court to defer consideration

Arkansas River Compact Kansas-Colorado 1949 ARKANSAS RIVER COMPACT

No. 137, Original STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF WYOMING. and. STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA Defendants.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. and No. 1:12-CV-00140

REPUBLICAN RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT S RULE 26(a)(1) DISCLOSURES

In The Supreme Court of the United States

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Summary of Washington, D. C. Briefing Meetings March 20 through 22, 2018

Pamela Williams, Director Secretary s Indian Water Rights Office. WSWC Spring Meeting March 21, 2019 Chandler, AZ

In the Supreme Court of the United States

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

The Rio Grande flows for approximately 1,900 miles from the

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

RIO GRANDE COMPACT VIOLATIONS. New Mexico s ever increasing water use and groundwater pumping below Elephant

III. SUMMARY OF TULE RIVER TRIBE'S HISTORIC AND FUTURE MONEY DAMAGES CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES

In The Supreme Court of the United States

Case 6:68-cv BB Document 2720 Filed 03/01/2010 Page 1 of 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

In The Supreme Court of the United States

2017 CO 43. This appeal from the water court in Water Division No. 1 concerns the nature and

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

End of a Long Dry Road: Federal Court Of Claims Rejects Klamath Farmers Takings Claims. Douglas MacDougal Marten Law PLLC

In the Supreme Court of the United States

Case 3:09-cv JAT Document 198 Filed 06/15/11 Page 1 of 9

COUNSEL JUDGES. MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Chief Judge, IRA ROBINSON, Judge. AUTHOR: MICHAEL E. VIGIL.

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF CLASS NOTICE AND SCHEDULING A FINAL FAIRNESS HEARING

In re Crow Water Compact

Moving Forward with Indian Water Rights Settlements

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant,

OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER DIVISION OF WATER RIGHTS STATE OF UTAH

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. Plaintiff, No. 17-cr JB MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS 1 AND 5 OF THE INDICTMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

CRS Report for Congress

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress of the United States of America

Examining the Rights-of-Way Process for Indian Allotment Lands Navajo-Gallup Water Supply Project

Case 1:90-cv LH-KBM Document 1159 Filed 08/27/2008 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. v. CV 10-CV PCT-JAT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 2:16-cv DB Document 13 Filed 10/06/16 Page 1 of 8

Case 6:83-cv MV-JHR Document 4390 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 2:18-cv KRS-GBW Document 3 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Senior College Session 2 Classic and Modern Water Law Cases

NAVAJO WATER RIGHTS: PULLING THE PLUG ON THE COLORADO RIVER?

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Native American Senate Documents 60th Congress (1908) 94th Congress (1975)

Idaho Water Law: Water Rights Primer & Definitions. A. What is a Water Right?

In This Issue: INDIAN WATER RIGHT NEGOTIATIONS INTERIOR S CONSIDERATIONS WHEN APPOINTING FEDERAL NEGOTIATION TEAMS.

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

When used in sections 371, 376, 377, 412, 417, 433, 462, 466, 478, 493, 494, 500, 501, and 526 of this title

Case 1:15-cv MV-KK Document 19 Filed 03/22/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. Vs. Case No: 1:15-cv MV-KK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. Plaintiffs, Defendants, Defendant-Intervenors

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

CHIPPEWA CREE TRIBE OF THE ROCKY BOY S RESERVATION INDIAN RESERVED WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT AND WATER SUPPLY ENHANCEMENT ACT OF 1999

Subject: Opinion on Whether Trinity River Record of Decision is a Rule

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS (BEAUMONT DIVISION) vs. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07CV0295

Law of the River Apportionment Scheme Short Summary of Laws. (January, 2012)

Case 1:15-cv SCY-KBM Document 2 Filed 01/21/15 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

State your full name, social security number, date of birth, residence address, and telephone number.

Congressional Record -- Senate. Saturday, October 27, 1990; (Legislative day of Tuesday, October 2, 1990) 101st Cong. 2nd Sess. 136 Cong Rec S 17473

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

(2) MAP. The term Map means the map entitled Proposed Pine Forest Wilderness Area and dated October 28, 2013.

Case 1:10-cv JDB Document 8-1 Filed 06/28/10 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 03/20/14 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Case No.

1. TRCP 194 created a new discovery tool entitled Requests for Disclosure.

Transcription:

STATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF SAN JUAN ELEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel. THE STATE ENGINEER, Plaintiff, AB-07-1 Claims of Navajo Nation vs. No. CV 75-184 Honorable James J. Wechsler THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Presiding Judge Defendants. DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY: Joint discovery about the other claims of the United States which might affect the water available in the San Juan basin, such as claims for endangered species, other Indian tribes, or federal lands. NUMBER OF PAGES: 5 DATE OF FILING: November 30, 2012 JOINT DISCOVERY ABOUT OTHER WATER CLAIMS BY THE UNITED STATES On behalf of various defendant non-settling parties, the following discovery is jointly propounded to the United States. INTERROGATORIES 1. In addition to the claims which the United States is asserting on behalf of the Navajo Nation in case number AB 07-1, does the United States claim any other water rights in the San Juan River basin, on behalf of itself or others?

2. Does the United States claim any water rights in the San Juan River basin for endangered species, including the razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus); Colorado pikeminnow, formerly known as Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus lucius); humpback chub (Gila cypha); bonytail chub or bonytail (Gila elegans); and southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax trailli extimus)? 3. What are the minimum flows which the United States currently requires (or intends to require) in the San Juan River below Shiprock for the protection of endangered species? Please include the cfs and acre-feet for the base flow and also for the additional spring releases from Navajo Dam. Please include the time periods when these flows apply, including the spring ramp up period, the peak period, and the ramp down period, and explain how the U.S. decides what quantities to require. 4. Does the United States claim any water rights in the San Juan River basin on behalf of any Native American tribe other than the Navajo Nation, for example the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe or the Southern Ute Indian Tribe? 2

5. Does the United States claim any water rights in the San Juan River basin for national forests, Bureau of Land Management lands, or other federal lands, or other federal purpose? 6. Does the United States have any other claims or rights or duties or obligations which might affect water flows in the San Juan River basin, or the amount of water which can be diverted or consumed in New Mexico? If so, please identify and describe each such right, duty or obligation, and explain how it might affect water flows or amounts, and under what conditions. 7. Does the United States claim any other water rights or obligations in the Upper Basin of the Colorado River which might directly or indirectly affect the amount of water available for diversion or use in New Mexico? 8. Does the United States claim any other water rights or obligations in the Lower Basin of the Colorado River which might directly or indirectly affect the amount of water available for diversion or use in New Mexico? 3

9. Does the United States claim any other water rights or obligations with regard to the Colorado River which might directly or indirectly affect the amount of water available for diversion or use in New Mexico, such as treaty obligations to Mexico, shortage sharing agreements, or agreements for operating the River? 10. If the answer to any of the foregoing interrogatories is yes, please identify and describe each water right claimed by the United States, including the nature, purpose, amount, and priority of each such right or obligation, and identify a person or persons to testify about the right or obligation pursuant to Rule 1-030(B)(6), NMRA. Notes: Including means including but not limited to. For purposes of this discovery, terms like claim and water rights and obligations are used broadly, to include any demands or claims which might affect the availability of water in the river system. The terms include claims which are not yet quantified; claims for reserved federal rights ; claims for priority federal rights; Winters claims; statutory claims; claims which the U.S. has asserted formally or informally in the past or might assert in the 4

future; and claims or obligations or responsibilities which are not necessarily property rights (such as shortage sharing agreements, compact obligations, agreements for operating the river, etc). For purposes of this discovery, San Juan River basin includes the basin within New Mexico and other states, e.g. Colorado. REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION 1. Please produce records relating to the answer to each of the above interrogatories. Respectfully submitted, VICTOR R. MARSHALL & ASSOCIATES, P.C. By /s/ Victor R. Marshall Victor R. Marshall Attorneys for San Juan Agricultural Water Users Association; Hammond Conservancy District; Bloomfield Irrigation District; various ditches; and various members thereof. 12509 Oakland NE Albuquerque, NM 87122 505-332-9400 / 505-332-3793 FAX CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 30th day of November, 2012, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on the parties and claimants by attaching a copy of said document to an email sent to the following list server: wrnavajointerse@nmcourts.gov and to the filing list referred to in paragraph 8 of the court s November 19, 2012 Corrected Order. /s/ Victor R. Marshall Victor R. Marshall, Esq. 5