Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 9

Similar documents
Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 05/06/16 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/25/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 07/18/12 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:14-cv RLW Document 1 Filed 01/13/14 Page 1 of 6 COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION ) STUDIES, ) 1629 K Street, NW, Suite 600, ) Washington, DC 20

Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 07/06/12 Page 1of6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:16-cv-Of''l67-RDM Document 1 Filed 05/2?' 1 6 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/05/18 Page 1 of 5 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Case No.

Case 1:13-cv Document 1 Filed 06/21/13 Page 1 of 4. IN THE UNlTED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/23/18 Page 2 of Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(e) and 5 U.S.C.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/19/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/19/18 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/15/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/19/18 Page 2 of 10

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION,

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/24/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. v. Civil Action No.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/03/18 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants. INTRODUCTION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 9 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Case No.

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/02/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/06/16 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/17/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 06/25/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/03/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/08/17 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Introduction

Case 1:12-cv BAH Document 8-1 Filed 07/24/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/26/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/24/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/17 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/13/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/10/18 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:13-cv Document 1 Filed 11/22/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 07/03/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/31/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT THE PARTIES

Case 1:13-cv RC Document 1 Filed 06/06/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:16-cv JEB Document 1 Filed 01/01/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

~ 14 ~ 15 VOICE OF SAN DIEGO, Case No.

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv JKB Document 1 Filed 07/25/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION. No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT. Plaintiff, National Wildlife Federation ( NWF ), alleges as follows: INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMPLAINT

Case: 3:17-cv GFVT Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/14/17 Page: 1 of 15 - Page ID#: 1

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/11/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO CITIZENS FOR SAN LUIS VALLEY - WATER PROTECTION COALITION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/21/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FILED SEP NANCY MAYER WHITTINGTON, CLERK. Case 1:07-cv RBW Document 1 Filed 09/27/07 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendant.

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ATSEATTLE

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/16/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:15-cv ARR-RLM Document 1 Filed 12/11/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 7

Security ( DHS ) officials including ICE officers in field offices, detention facilities and

Case 1:17-cv RC Document 8 Filed 09/25/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 5:18-cv Document 85 Filed 03/21/18 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 7313

Case 2:08-cv CW-DBP Document 7 Filed 11/11/08 Page 1 of 14

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 8

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 4:18-cv KAW Document 1 Filed 01/03/18 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/14/17 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv APM Document 1 Filed 07/07/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/07/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Transcription:

Case 1:15-cv-01983 Document 1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., 425 Third Street SW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20024, v. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Office of the General Counsel 245 Murray Lane SW Mailstop 0485 Washington, DC 20528, Defendant. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT Plaintiff Judicial Watch, Inc. brings this action against Defendant U.S. Department of Homeland Security to compel compliance with the Freedom oflnformation Act, 5 U.S.C. 552 ("FOIA". As grounds therefor, Plaintiff alleges as follows: JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. The Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a( 4(B and 28 U.S.C. 1331. 2. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(e. PARTIES 3. Plaintiff Judicial Watch, Inc. is a not-for-profit, educational organization incorporated under the laws of the District of Columbia and headquartered at 425 Third Street SW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20024. Plaintiff seeks to promote transparency, integrity, and accountability in government and fidelity to the rule of law. As part of its mission, Plaintiff

Case 1:15-cv-01983 Document 1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 2 of 9 regularly requests records from federal agencies pursuant to FOIA. Plaintiff analyzes the agencies' responses and disseminates both its findings and the requested records to the American public to inform them about "what their government is up to." 4. Defendant United States Department of Homeland Security is an agency of the United States Government and is headquartered at 245 Murray Lane SW, Washington, DC 20528. Defendant has possession, custody, and control of records to which Plaintiff seeks access. STATEMENT OF FACTS 5. For years, Plaintiff has regularly monitored expenditures of U.S. Government funds on VIP travel. As part of this on-going monitoring, Plaintiff has served numerous FOIA requests on the U.S. Secret Service ("Secret Service", a component of Defendant, seeking access to records about U.S. Government funds expended on travel by the President, members of the First Family, and other VIPs receiving Secret Service protection. Secret Service records typically include records of expenses incurred for ground transportation, lodging, meals, and other related costs for the VIP and accompanying Secret Service detail. Plaintiff also regularly serves FOIA requests on the U.S. Air Force and other agencies for records about federallyfunded, VIP travel. U.S. Air Force records reflect the cost of air travel. 6. Plaintiff typically analyzes the records it receives in response to its requests and issues reports on its findings. See, e.g., Press Release, "Documents Show $200,383 in Taxpayer Expenses for Obama's Denver Fundraising Trip," (Dec. 30, 2014; Press Release, "Judicial Watch Obtains Records Revealing $937,487.94 in Security Expenses for Obamas' 2013 Vacations to Honolulu and Aspen," (Oct. 7, 2014; Press Release, "Judicial Watch Obtains Documents: Secret Service Tab for Obama Family 2013 Africa Trip Cost Taxpayers - 2 -

Case 1:15-cv-01983 Document 1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 3 of 9 $2,189,727.60 for Lodging, Entertainment, and Security," (May 29, 2014; Press Release, "Obama, Biden Presidents' Day Weekend Vacation Cost Taxpayers $295,437 According to Records Obtained by Judicial Watch," (Jan. 23, 2014; Press Release, "Malia Obama's Trip to Mexico: $115,500.87," (Dec. 6, 2012. Plaintiff also typically provides links to where the records may be reviewed on Plaintiffs website. 7. The Secret Service regularly fails to issue determinations in response to Plaintiffs VIP, travel-related FOIA requests within the time period required by FOIA, causing Plaintiff to bring suit in order to obtain the requested records. These lawsuits include the following: (1 Judicial Watch, Inc. v. US. Secret Service, Case No. 12-1562 (BAH (D. District of Columbia (filed Sept. 20, 2012; (2 Judicial Watch, Inc. v. US. Secret Service, Case No. 13-0647 (ESH (D. District of Columbia (filed May 6, 2013; (3 Judicial Watch, Inc. v. US. Secret Service, Case No. 13-0950 (KBJ (D. District of Columbia (filed June 21, 2013; (4 Judicial Watch, Inc. v. US. Secret Service, Case No. 14-0046 (RL W (D. District of Columbia (filed Jan. 13, 2014; and (5 Judicial Watch, Inc. v. US. Secret Service, Case No. 14-1732 (BAH (D. District of Columbia (filed Oct. 16, 2014. 8. Since July 21, 2014, Plaintiff has submitted 19 travel-related FOIA requests to the Secret Service as part of Plaintiffs on-going monitoring of federally-funded, VIP travel. All of the requests were identical or nearly identical but for the name of the VIP and the date and/or destination of the travel. Plaintiffs requests sought: "All records concerning use of U.S. Government funds to provide security and/or any other services to [name of VIP] and any other companions on their [date] trip to [location]." 9. The Secret Service has not made a determination on a single, travel-related FOIA request served by Plaintiff since July 21, 2014. - 3 -

Case 1:15-cv-01983 Document 1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 4 of 9 10. In all but two instances, the Secret Service acknowledged receipt of Plaintiffs request and assigned a tracking number to the request. 11. In three instances, the Secret Service provided a further communication about the status of the request, but otherwise failed to issue a determination on whether to comply with the request, produce responsive records, or demonstrate that responsive records were exempt from production under one or more of FOIA's exemptions. 12. The chart attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference sets forth, with respect to each request: ( 1 the date the request was sent; (2 the date of any acknowledgment letter; (3 the tracking number assigned to the request by the Secret Service; (4 the date of any further communication; and ( 5 the identity of the VIP, the date of travel, and the location of the travel. 13. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a(6(A(i, the Secret Service was required to determine whether to comply with each request within twenty (20 working days of receipt and to notify Plaintiff immediately of its determination, the reasons therefor, and the right to appeal any adverse determination. 14. As of the date of this Complaint, the Secret Service has failed to: (i determine whether to comply with each request; (ii notify Plaintiff of any such determination or the reasons therefor; (iii advise Plaintiff of the right to appeal any adverse determination; or (iv produce the requested records or otherwise demonstrate that the requested records are exempt from production. 15. Because the Secret Service has failed to comply with the time limit set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552(a(6(A, Plaintiff is deemed to have exhausted any and all administrative remedies with respect to its requests, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a(6(C. -4-

Case 1:15-cv-01983 Document 1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 5 of 9 16. As a result of the Secret Service's failure to make a determination on Plaintiffs travel-related FOIA requests, Plaintiff has been prevented from gathering complete records of federally-funded, VIP travel, and Plaintiffs reports about federally-funded, VIP travel have been incomplete. See, e.g., Press Release, "Judicial Watch Obtains Records Revealing Obama's February, March 2015 Golf Vacations and Fundraisers Cost Taxpayers $4,436,245.50 in Travel Expenses Alone," (Oct. 15, 2015 (noting Secret Service's failure to produce requested information regarding security costs; Press Release, "Records Reveal Michelle Obama's June Trip to UK, Italy Cost Taxpayers $240,495.67 in Flight Expenses Alone," (Aug. 20, 2015 (noting Secret Service's failure to respond to request for attendant costs for personnel, accommodations, meals, rental cars, and related expenses; Press Release, "Judicial Watch: Records Reveal Michelle Obama's 2014 Trip to China Cost Taxpayers More Than $360,000 in Air Transportation Expenses Alone," (same; Press Release, "Judicial Watch: Air Force Records Show Obama's Single-Day Earth Day Trip to Florida Everglades Cost Taxpayers $866,615.40 in Flight Expenses Alone," (noting Secret Service's failure to produce records regarding security costs; Press Release, "Records Obtained By Judicial Watch Reveal Michelle Obama's Weekend Ski Trip in February Cost More Than $57,000 in Transportation Expenses Alone," (May 5, 2015 (noting that costs for Secret Service personnel, accommodations, meals, rental cars, etc. are not included. 17. Plaintiff intends to continue submitting identical or nearly identical, travel-related FOIA requests to the Secret Service as part of its on-going efforts to educate and inform the public about "what their government is up to" and promote transparency, integrity, and accountability in government and fidelity to the rule of law. - 5 -

Case 1:15-cv-01983 Document 1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 6 of 9 COUNT I (Violation of FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 552 18. Plaintiff realleges paragraphs 1through17 as if fully stated herein. 19. Defendant is violating FOIA by failing to conduct a search reasonably calculated to uncover all records responsive to each of Plaintiffs requests and is unlawfully withholding records responsive to each request. 20. With respect to each individual request, Plaintiff is being irreparably harmed by reason of Defendant's violation offoia, and Plaintiff will continue to be irreparably harmed unless Defendant is compelled to comply fully with FOIA. COUNT II (Violation of FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 552 21. Plaintiff realleges paragraphs 1 through 20 as if fully stated herein. 22. On information and belief, Defendant has a policy and practice of violating FOIA's procedural requirements in connection with the processing of Plaintiffs FOIA requests and, in particular, ofregularly failing or refusing to produce requested records or otherwise demonstrate that requested records are exempt from production within the time period required by FOIA or at least within a reasonable period of time. 23. Plaintiff is being irreparably harmed by reason of Defendant's unlawful policy and practice and will continue to be irreparably harmed unless Defendant is compelled to comply fully with FOIA's procedural requirements. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court: (1 order Defendant to search for any and all records responsive to Plaintiffs FOIA requests and demonstrate that it employed search methods reasonably calculated to uncover all records responsive to each request; (2 order Defendant to produce, by a date certain, any and all non-exempt records - 6 -

Case 1:15-cv-01983 Document 1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 7 of 9 responsive to each request and a Vaughn index of any responsive records withheld under claim of exemption; (3 enjoin Defendant from continuing to withhold any and all non-exempt records responsive to each request; (4 enjoin Defendant from failing or refusing to produce all nonexempt records responsive to Plaintiffs FOIA requests or otherwise demonstrate that requested records are exempt from production within the time period required by FOIA or at least within a reasonable period of time; ( 5 grant Plaintiff an award of attorneys' fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred in this action pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a(4(E; and (6 grant Plaintiff such other relief as the Court deems just and proper. Dated: November 10, 2015 Respectfully submitted, isl Lauren M Burke Lauren M. Burke D.C. Bar No. 1028811 JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. 425 Third Street SW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20024 (202 646-5172 Counsel for Plaintiff - 7 -

EXHIBIT A 1 I July 21, 2014 I August 8, 2014 I 20140856 I No I Pres. Obama's July 17, 2014 Trip to New York, NY 2 I July 28, 2014 I August 8, 2014 I 20140853 I No I Pres. Obama's July 2014 Trip to Seattle, WA, San Francisco, CA, and Los Angeles, CA 3 I August 25, 2014 I October 20, 2014 I 20141036 I No I Pres. Obama's August 2014 Trip to Martha's Vineyard, MA 4 I September 2, 2014 I February 9, 2015 I 20150067 I No I Former Pres. Carter's August 2014 5 I September 2, 2014 I November 8, 2014 I 20150066 and Trip to Detroit, MI No I Pres. Obama's August 29, 2014 to 20150067 I September 1, 2014 Trips to Westchester, NY and Providence, RI 6 I September 19, 2014 I November 14, 2014 I 20150170 I February 9, 2015 I Vice Pres. Biden's September 17, 2014 Trip to Iowa 7 I September 19, 2014 I November 14, 2014 I 20150171 I February 9, 2015 I Vice Pres. Biden's May 9, 2014 Trip to South Carolina 8 I October 20, 2014 I November 6, 2014 I 20150107 and December 1, 2014 Pres. Obama's October 9-10, 2014 20150217 Tri to Los Angeles, CA 9 I January 5, 2015 I February 3, 2015 I 20150439 No Pres. Obama's December 2014 to January 2015 Trip to Honolulu, HI 10 I February 18, 2015 I March 16, 2015 I 20150560 I No I Pres. Obama's February 2015 Trip to Palm Springs, CA 11 I February 23, 2015 I March 16, 2015 I 20150564 I No I Pres. Obama's February 19, 2015 Trip to Chicago, IL 12 I March 13, 2015 I March 24, 2015 I 20150740 I No I Pres. Obama's March 12-13, 2015 Trip to Los Angeles, CA 13 I March 16, 2015 I April2,2015 I 20150759 I No I First Lady Michelle Obama's March 2015 Trip to Los Angeles, CA 14 I March 30, 2015 I April 29, 2015 I 20150815 I No I Pres. Obama's March 28-29, 2015 Trip to Palm City, FL Case 1:15-cv-01983 Document 1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 8 of 9-1 -

15 I April 23, 2015 I May 8, 2015 I 20150875 I No I Pres. Obama's April 23, 2015 Trip to Everglades Nat'l Park, FL 16 I June 22, 2015 I No I None I No I First Lady Michelle Obama's June 2015 Trip to the United Kingdom and Italy 17 I June 22, 2015 I No I None I No I Pres. Obama's June 18-21, 2015 Trip to California 18 I July 23, 2015 I August 31, 2015 I 20151283 I No I Pres. Obama's July 17-20, 2015 Trip to New York, NY 19 I August 24, 2015 I September 28, 2015 I 20151450 I No I Pres. Obama's August 2015 Trip to Martha's Vineyard, MA Case 1:15-cv-01983 Document 1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 9 of 9-2-