Legal Aid in the EU: main features of Directive 2016/1919/EU

Similar documents
Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

Council of the European Union Brussels, 26 February 2015 (OR. en)

The following is an outline of the presentation but note that the speaker adlibbed. Outline - The EU Directive on Access to a Lawyer (Measure C1/D)

The presumption of innocence and procedural safeguards for children

The Commission s proposals on Legal Aid. ECBA Conference Warsaw, 26 April 2014

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

THE IMPACT OF THE NEW LEGAL AID REGIME ON CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN BULGARIA. SVETLA IVANOVA AND VLADIMIR NIKOLOV ERA, CRACOW, 2-3 March 2017

Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

The EU Green Paper on Detention

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 23 October /09 DROIPEN 131 COPEN 203. OUTCOME OF PROCEEDINGS General Secretariat Delegations

Equality of arms procedural safeguards for defendants: the way through and forward on the EU map

PRACTICAL ISSUES OF NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION IMPACT ON THE WORK OF THE POLICE

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

A world where every person s right to a fair trial is respected, whatever their nationality, wherever they are accused.

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 9 September /2/11 REV 2 COPEN 83 EJN 46 EUROJUST 58

Council of the European Union Brussels, 22 September 2014 (OR. en)

Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

The European Arrest Warrant: One step closer to reform?

Council of the European Union Brussels, 22 January 2016 (OR. en)

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 14 January /08 COPEN 4

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings

The Friends of the Presidency on 29/30 July 2009 examined 12141/09 DROIPEN 69 COPEN 142, containing a revised version of the above draft Resolution.

Delegations will find the text of this Resolution in annex II and are invited to present their comments at the COPEN meeting of 28 May 2014.

Delegations will find in the Annex a note by Belgium, France, Ireland, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom relating to the proposed Directive.

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Tables "State of play" and "Declarations" Accompanying the document

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

The Scope and the Challenges of the Access of Children to Justice in Macedonian Legislation and Practice

QUESTIONNAIRE RELATED TO

EU update (including the Green Paper on the Presumption of Innocence) ECBA Conference, Edinburgh April 2006

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

UK Central Authority International Criminality Unit Home Office 2nd Floor Peel Building 2 Marsham Street London SW1P 4DF

Submission Fair Trials International s submission to the European Commission

Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between the Member States (2001/C 332 E/18)

European Protection Order Briefing and suggested amendments February 2010

Solution approaches. Workshop ERA Helsinki Defence Counsel. A), I. Request for information issue

COUCIL OF THE EUROPEA UIO. Brussels, 28 ovember /13 Interinstitutional File: 2012/0036 (COD) DROIPE 151 COPE 217 CODEC 2716

INITIATIVE FOR A DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the European Protection Order

13515/16 SC/mvk 1 DG D 2B

Welcome and key note address

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 24 November /09 DROIPEN 149 COPEN 220

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 2 May /12 COPEN 97 EJN 32 EUROJUST 39

LIMITE EN. Brussels, 3 June 2008 COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION /08 Interinstitutional File: 2008/0803 (CNS) LIMITE COPEN 111

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 5 March 2014 (OR. en) 2012/0036 (COD) PE-CONS 121/13 DROIPEN 156 COPEN 229 CODEC 2833

Brussels, 13 December 2007 COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 16494/07. Interinstitutional File: 2006/0158 (CNS) COPEN 181 NOTE

european journal of crime, criminal law and criminal justice 25 (2017) 1-10 Editorial

1. The Council unanimously reached a general approach on the text set out in the Annex.

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 15 October 2015 *

5859/3/15 REV 3 SC/mvk 1 DG D 2B

11500/14 GS/mvk 1 DG D 2B

THE OFFICE OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Lawyer of the First Hour under the Swiss Criminal Procedure Code

Statewatch briefing on the European Evidence Warrant to the European Parliament

8414/1/14 REV 1 GS/mvk 1 DG D 2B

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 29 February /12 COPEN 45 EUROJUST 17 FIN 153

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels 2 September /11 CRIMORG 124 COPEN 200 EJN 100 EUROJUST 122

TRAINING LEGAL LANGUAGES FOR EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN EU EUROPEAN COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS

Part II Application of mutual recognition to the transfer of judgments of conviction in the context of EU law

Pre-trial detention, custodial sentences, supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions

A Guide to The European Arrest Warrant October 2012

LIMITE EN COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 7 December /09 LIMITE COPEN 242 EJN 38 EUROJUST 72 CRIMORG 179

COU CIL OF THE EUROPEA U IO. Brussels, 11 December /12 Interinstitutional File: 2012/0036 (COD) DROIPE 185 COPE 272 CODEC 2918

Lund University Faculty of Law. From the SelectedWorks of Christoffer Wong. Christoffer Wong. February 8, 2011

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 19 September 2018 *

Measures for pre-trial detention, custodial sentences, supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions

Some remarks regarding the Draft Council Framework Decision on the enforcement of decisions rendered in absentia 1

EXECUTION OF EAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 12 October 2017 *

Ed Cape Professor of Criminal Law and Practice

Brexit Paper 5: Criminal Justice

The European Arrest Warrant: Part of the Anti-terrorism Emergency Package?

2. The table in the Annex outlines the declarations received by the General Secretariat of the Council and their status to date.

III ACTS ADOPTED UNDER TITLE VI OF THE EU TREATY

The Implementation of the Right of Access to a Lawyer Directive in German law

Council of the European Union Brussels, 19 September 2016 (OR. en)

Prisoner Transfer, Material Detention Conditions & Sentence Execution In The European Union A Journey Bound For Choppy Waters?

III. (Preparatory acts) COUNCIL

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 16 July 2015 *

Joint position of Bundesrechtsanwaltskammer (The German Federal Bar) and Deutscher Anwaltverein (German Bar Association)

ALDE EAW Speech 17 th October 2013

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1 Adopted 16 December 1966 Entered into force 23 March 1976

Communication from Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Reference: G/SO 218/2

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Accompanying document to

Crime and Courts Bill Briefing for Public Bill Committee, House of Commons New Clauses: Extradition Reform

Dignity at Trial. Key Findings of the Czech National Report

GAS COORDINATION GROUP RULES OF PROCEDURE

The European Arrest Warrant: Latvian Experience of Application

A Guide to Applying to the European Court of Human Rights when fair trial rights have been violated October 2012

Official Gazette of the Kingdom of the Netherlands

International covenant on civil and political rights CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVENANT

Pre-trial detention, custodial sentences, supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions

Slide 2 We will discuss different areas where co operation with the judicial authorities may be important for prosecutors of environmental crime.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KOSOVA / No. 33 / 2 SEPTEMBER 2013, PRISTINA

ACCESS TO A LAWYER DIRECTIVE

Briefing. Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill. Second Reading, House of Lords

Developing best practice amongst defence lawyers and access to justice in European arrest warrant cases. Interim Report

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 12 November /07 COPEN 146 EJN 32 EUROJUST 60

Transcription:

Legal Aid in the EU: main features of Directive 2016/1919/EU Steven Cras Administrator, Council General Secretariat Co-funded by the Justice Programme of the European Union 2014-2020

Legal Aid Directive 2016/1919/EU Overview ECHR Roadmap Commission proposal Negotiations Subject matter and scope Legal aid: means and merits test Legal aid in EAW proceedings Competence to take decisions Quality of legal aid services and training Remedies and summary 2

ECHR Roadmap ECHR - Art. 6(3)(c): Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the right to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require. Roadmap Link with access to a lawyer 3

Commission proposal - Negotiations COM proposal: provisional legal aid in criminal proceedings for persons deprived of liberty + legal aid in EAW proceedings. European Parliament: enlarge scope. Council: reduce scope. Negotiations under LU and NL Presidencies. Agreement on 30 June 2016. Directive (EU) 2016/1919: OJ L 297, 4.11.2016, p.1. Deadline for implementation: 25 May 2019. 4

Subject matter and scope (Art. 1 + 2) Subject matter: legal aid (no provisional legal aid). Scope criminal proceedings: if right of access to a lawyer under Directive 2013/48, and 1) deprived of liberty; 2) required by law to be assisted by a lawyer; or 3) required or permitted to attend an investigative or evidence-gathering, as a minimum the following: i) identity parades; ii) confrontations; iii) experimental reconstructions of the scene of crime. Scope EAW proceedings: if right of access to a lawyer under Directive 2013/48, upon arrest in the executing Member State Exclusion minor offences, but Directive applies in any case when decision on detention is taken, and during detention 5

Legal Aid: means and merits test (Art. 4) Suspects or accused persons who lack sufficient resources to pay a lawyer have right to legal aid when the interests of justice so require (cf Art. 6 ECHR) Member States may apply means test and/or merits test. Merits text is deemed to be fulfilled when court or judge takes decision on detention, and during detention Legal aid should be granted without undue delay, and at the latest before questioning by police/other authority, or before carrying out an investigative or evidence gathering act 6

Legal aid in EAW proceedings (Art. 5) Executing State: legal aid from arrest until surrender (or when the decision on non-surrender becomes final). Issuing State: legal aid - when persons exercise their right to appoint a lawyer in the issuing State; - when EAW is for the purpose of conducting a criminal prosecution (not: for execution of a sentence); - if legal aid is necessary to ensure effective access to justice. Means test may apply. 7

Competence to take decisions (Art. 6) Decisions on legal aid should be taken by a competent authority. This can be independent authority (legal aid board) or court/judge; in urgent cases also police/prosecution (rec. 24) 8

Quality of legal aid services and training (Art. 7) Member States should take necessary measures including with regard to funding to ensure that: 1) there is an effective legal aid system of adequate quality; 2) legal aid services are of a quality adequate to safeguard the fairness of the proceedings. Training: 1) ensure adequate training for staff involved in legal aid decisions; 2) take appropriate measures to promote provision of adequate training for lawyers providing legal aid services. Suspects, accused persons and requested persons have the right to have the lawyer providing legal aid services replaced, where the specific circumstances so require. 9

Remedies (Art. 8) and summary Should be effective remedy in case of a breach. Summary: 10

Steven Cras Administrator, General Secretariat DG H Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters Council of the European Union December 2016 steven.cras@consilium.europa.eu