AS MODIFIED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, STERLING SAVINGS BANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

1 The parties to this action, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to. 2 the following:

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:14-cv WBS-EFB Document 14 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 5

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

copy 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VTJLCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FAX. IN TUE SUPERIOR COURT OF TUE STATE OF caiafornia INANDFORTHLCQLNTYOELOSANELES. EAST l)i$trict

DEC 1 i1z ) FOR DEFENDANTS DEMURRER TO ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ) ) Time: 439-pm.3) C.D. Michel -

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff{s),

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)

Case 2:09-cv DOC-RZ Document 72 Filed 08/31/10 Page 1 of 37 Page ID #:992

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT GRANTING PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE

CON. KEhrlichjmbm.com. ECulleyjmbm.com. 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7

Case 3:13-cv EMC Document 736 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:18-cv R-AGR Document 7 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:26

Case 2:14-cv GW-AS Document 6 Filed 07/07/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:389

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL D.

Gk) AUo Superior Court of California CountY of Los Angeles. Sherri R. Carter, xecutive ofricer/clerk Deputv

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiffs and Appellants, Defendants and Res ondents.

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5

LODGED. MHY p CLERK, QS DISTRICT COL VIRAL DISTRICT OF CA i, F,, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI A

This matter came on regularly before this Court for hearings on October 7,2004 and on April

October 4, 2005 RE: APPLICATION /INVESTIGATION

in furtherance of and in response to its Tentative Decision dated 1/4/2010 addressing various matters

HAROLD P. STURGEON, Plaintiff and Petitioner, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants and Respondents, and

TO THE HONORABLE TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, CHIEF JUSTICE, AND TO THE HONORABLE ASSOCIATE JUSTICES OF THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT:

Case 5:12-cv EJD Document 1134 Filed 01/27/16 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendant.

REQUEST FOR PUBLICATION OF OPINION. Andre Torigian v. WT Capital Lender Services Case No. F (Fresno County Superior Court No.

Part Description 1 5 pages 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Motion for Summary Judgment

Fresno County Superior Court, Case No. 1OCECGO2 116 The Honorable Jeffrey Y. Hamilton, Judge

In the Supreme Court of the State of California

Case 2:07-cv TJH-CT Document 56 Filed 11/29/2007 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:08-cv BEN-BLM Document 3 Filed 06/17/2008 Page 1 of 2

Case 4:04-cv RAS Document 41 Filed 12/09/2004 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:08-cv VRW Document 9 Filed 07/23/2008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

)

the unverified First Amended Complaint (the Complaint ) of plaintiffs MIKE SPITZER and

Jonathan Arvizu v. City of Pasadena Request for Publication Second District Case No.: B Superior Court Case No.: BC550929

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF KERN, NORTH KERN DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case3:11-cv WHA Document33 Filed01/06/12 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Plaintiffs,

TAKE ACTION NOW TO PROTECT YOUR INTERESTS!

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Benjamin v. Google Inc. Doc. 45

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER ANSWERING A BREACH OF CONTRACT COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv RS Document 380 Filed 04/19/18 Page 1 of 5

MOTION TO STRIKE OPENING BRIEF; PROPOSED ORDER

1 Justice, on January 9, A copy of the Proof of Service of Summons is attached hereto. 4 Dated: January 27, 2015 MICHEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendant and Respondent CITY OF ANAHEIM SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

IIAR CONN )14)R1) toliv

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/28/17 Page 1 of 7 SAN FRANCISCO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

December 10, Cohen v. DIRECTV, No. S177734

2:11-cv R -JCG Document 58 Filed 01/06/12 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:699

vs. ) NOTICE OF RULING 14 )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OMARI BOBO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO

SAMPLE FORM F NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY ROCKARD J. DELGADILLO CITY ATTORNEY REPORT RE: COURT RULING

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2011 Page 1 of 8

PARKER, et al., THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF PURSUANT TO RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

TO BE FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

Request for Publication

Case 2:15-cv MMD-GWF Document 50 Filed 09/19/16 Page 1 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION } } } } } } } } } } } } } } /

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case dml11 Doc 6977 Filed 03/13/12 Entered 03/13/12 15:13:05 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES NORTH CENTRAL DISTRICT (GLENDALE) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:04-cv ABC-Mc Document 171 Filed 05/01/06 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:126. UNITED STATES DISTRICT ( ClJIr1o;.~"';rj[~J!"";m1. Defendants.

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 212 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:00-cv GAF-RC Document 435 Filed 05/14/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:1893

Case 2:17-ap BB Doc 24 Filed 03/21/17 Entered 03/21/17 10:59:09 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6

Case 3:16-cv CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

DISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

By S. Lee, Deputy Clerk

Transcription:

Sterling Savings Bank v. Poulsen Doc. 1 1 BETTY M. SHUMENER (Bar No. ) HENRY H. OH (Bar No. ) JOHN D. SPURLING (Bar No. ) 0 South Hope Street, Suite 0 Los Angeles, CA 001- Tel:..0 Fax:..1 Attorneys for Plaintiff, STERLING SAVINGS BANK STERLING SAVINGS BANK, a Washington corporation, Successor In Interest by Merger to SONOMA NATIONAL BANK, v. Plaintiff, NORMAN POULSEN, aka LISA POULSEN, an individual; and DOES 1 through, inclusive, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Case No. :-cv-0-edl STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES AS MODIFIED CASE NO. CV --EDL Dockets.Justia.com

1 STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Sterling Savings Bank ("Plaintiff') and defendant Lisa Poulsen, aka Norman Poulsen ("Defendant"), through their respective counsel of record, as follows: WHEREAS, this Court entered a Case Management and Pretrial Order for Jury Trial for this action on October,, which set forth the following dates and deadlines: 1. Jury trial to begin on June, ;. All non-expert discovery to be completed no later than February 1, ;. Initial expert disclosures to be made no later than March, ;. Rebuttal expert disclosures to be made no later than March, ;. All expert discovery to be completed no later than April, ;. The last day to file a motion, or stipulation and proposed order, to join other parties or to amend the pleadings was January, ;. The last day for hearing dispositive motions is March, ;. Mediation proceedings are to be completed by December, (within 0 days of the order), or as soon thereafter as possible; and. A pretrial conference is to be held on May, ; WHEREAS, both Plaintiff and Defendant have been diligent in conducting discovery, and agree that additional time is needed to complete written discovery and depositions necessary for the adjudication of this case; WHEREAS, the parties commenced mediation on December,, and are currently engaged in ongoing mediation and settlement discussions, and agree that it is in the best interest of both Plaintiff and Defendant to undergo further settlement negotiations with the mediator; WHEREAS, the parties agree that extending the deadlines for discovery, dispositive motions and trial by approximately sixty (0) days would benefit the parties' settlement discussions; -- CASE NO. CV --EDL

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree and stipulate: 1. Plaintiff and Defendant agree and stipulate that the current schedule for this case, as set forth in this Court's Case Management and Pretrial Order for Jury Trial filed October,, be modified as follows: a. Jury trial is to begin on October, ; b. All non-expert discovery must be completed no later than April 1, ; c. Initial expert disclosures must be made no later than May, ; d. Rebuttal expert disclosures must be made no later than May 1, ; e. All expert discovery must be completed no later than June 0, ; f. The last day to file a motion, or stipulation and proposed order, to join other parties or to amend the pleadings is March 1, ; g. The last day for hearing dispositive motions is July, ; h. Mediation proceedings are to be completed by March 1,, or as soon thereafter as possible; and i. A pretrial conference is to be held on September, ;. The parties respectfully request that the Court modify the time frames set forth in the aforementioned Case Management and Pretrial Order to reflect the dates and deadlines provided in the preceding paragraph;. Plaintiff and Defendant have reviewed, agree and consent to the entry of the Proposed Order to Extend Deadlines. IT IS SO STIPULATED: DATED: January, ODSO OH LLP By: SAVINGS BANK CASE NO, CV I--EDL --

1 DATED: January, DOHERTY GEORGESON LLP By: Adamont N. Geo. Attorneys for Defe ant LISA POULSEN SIIUMENER, CASE NO. CV --EDL --

1 ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 1. The current schedule for this case, as set forth in the Case Management and Pretrial Order for Jury Trial entered October,, shall be modified as follows: a. Jury trial is to begin on October, ; b. All non-expert discovery must be completed no later than April 1, ; c. Initial expert disclosures must be made no later than May, ; d. Rebuttal expert disclosures must be made no later than May 1, ; e. All expert discovery must be completed no later than June 0, ; f. The last day to file a motion, or stipulation and proposed order, to join other parties or to amend the pleadings is March 1, ; g. The last day for hearing dispositive motions is July, ; h. Mediation proceedings are to be completed by March 1,, or as soon thereafter as possible; and i. A pretrial conference is to be held on September, ; IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January, Elizabeth D. Laporte Magistrate Judge of the United States District Court, Northern District of California ODSON & OH LLI' CASE NO. CV --EDL -- [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES

1 PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I am employed in the City of Los Angeles, in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of and not a party to the within action. My business address is 0 South Hope Street, Suite 0, Los Angeles, CA 001. On, January, I served the foregoing document(s) described as follows: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES on the interested parties in this action by delivering a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed as follows: Adamont N. Georgeson Doherty Georgeson LLP Fifth Avenue, Suite San Rafael, CA 01 monty@baylaw.us (BY MAIL) I deposited such envelope in the mail at Los Angeles California. The envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid. I am readily familiar with the firm's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, this document will be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on this date with postage thereon fully prepaid at Los Angeles, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. (BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY/COURIER) I delivered an envelope or package to a courier or driver authorized by the express service carrier; or deposited such envelope or package to a regularly maintained drop box or facility to receive documents by the express service carrier with delivery fees provided for. [ ] (BY MESSENGER) I served the document(s) to the person(s) at the address(es) listed by providing the document(s) to a messenger for personal service. (A proof of service executed by the messenger will be filed in compliance with the Code of Civil Procedure). [X] (BY ELECTRONIC MAIL) As follows: I caused the above-referenced documents(s) to be transmitted by electronic mail to its intended recipient(s) through ECF at the e-mail addresses indicated above. [ (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) I delivered the foregoing document(s) by hand to the office(s) of the addressee(s). [X] (FEDERAL) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction service was made. Executed on January,, at Los Angeles, CA. Donna Holland PROOF OF SERVICE