UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

COMPLAINT FOR DESIGN PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. C.A. NO. Defendant. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Courthouse News Service

Case 1:06-cv JJF Document 1 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 224 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/13/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT

case 3:14-cv TLS-CAN document 1 filed 03/21/14 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CIVIL CASE NO.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 3:16-cv MEJ Document 1 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 1:07-cv GEL Document 1 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 1 of 6

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/06/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 35 Filed: 09/13/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:130

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 3:12-cv-686

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION INTEX RECREATION CORP.,

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 8:17-cv EAK-JSS Document 114 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2433 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) Case No. PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/03/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:16-cv AKH Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 21. Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 6:08-cv Document 1 Filed 12/24/2008 Page 1 of 5 COMPLAINT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 07/09/13 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT. 1. This is an action for direct patent infringement of United States Letters Patent Nos.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:14-cv RS-EMT Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 01/30/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. Jonathan E. Singer (pro hac vice to be filed) 60 South 6 th Street, Suite 3200 Minneapolis, MN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Transcription:

Case :-cv-0 Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Rodger K. Carreyn (Bar No. 0) rcarreyn@perkinscoie.com One East Main Street, Suite Madison, WI Telephone: 0--0 Facsimile: 0-- Michael J. Song (Bar No. ) msong@perkinscoie.com Century Park East, Suite 00 Los Angeles, CA 00- Telephone: 0--00 Facsimile: 0-- Attorneys for Plaintiff, Easton Baseball/Softball Inc. Easton Baseball/Softball Inc., v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, Wilson Sporting Goods Co., Defendant. Case No. CV - COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case :-cv-0 Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Plaintiff Easton Baseball/Softball Inc. ( Easton ) alleges the following claims against Defendant Wilson Sporting Goods Co. ( Wilson ) for patent infringement under this Court s subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to U.S.C. and (a): THE PARTIES. Plaintiff Easton is a Delaware corporation, with its principal place of business located at Haskell Avenue, Suite 0, Van Nuys, California 0.. Easton is a leading supplier of sports equipment, including baseball bats.. Upon information and belief, Defendant Wilson is a Delaware corporation, with its principal place of business located at 0 W. Bryn Mawr Ave., Chicago, Illinois 0. Wilson is registered to do business in California and has a designated registered agent in California for purposes of service of process.. Upon information and belief, Wilson makes, sells, offers for sale in the United States, and/or imports into the United States, sports equipment, including baseball bats. JURISDICTION AND VENUE. This is a civil action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the United States, U.S.C. et seq. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under U.S.C. and (a).. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Wilson because Wilson engages in business within this district, and has placed infringing products into the stream of commerce by shipping products into this district (and/or knowing that the products would be shipped into this judicial district), and such infringing products have been sold and used in this district.. Venue is proper in this district under U.S.C. and 00(b), because, among other reasons, Wilson is subject to personal jurisdiction in this district and has committed acts of infringement in this district. --

Case :-cv-0 Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 COUNT I Patent Infringement of U.S. Patent No.,0,. Easton repeats and re-alleges each and every allegation of the foregoing paragraphs as though fully set forth herein.. Easton is the owner by assignment of U.S. Patent No.,0,, which was duly and lawfully issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office ( USPTO ) on July,, titled Ball Bat with Governed Performance ( the patent ). A true and correct copy of the patent is attached as Exhibit A and made a part hereof. 0. Wilson has had knowledge of the patent since at least as early as August,. For example, the patent was listed on Information Disclosure Statements submitted by Wilson to the USPTO on August, during the prosecution of U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. /, and Ser. No. /,0.. Wilson has at no time been licensed under the patent.. Wilson has infringed, and is currently infringing, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, one or more claims of the patent, in violation of U.S.C. et seq., by making, using, selling, offering to sell in the United States, and/or importing into the United States products that embody one or more claims of the patent, including without limitation Vexxum model baseball bats including stiffening elements, as well as any other substantially similar baseball bats.. Wilson s infringement of the patent has been and continues to be willful.. Easton has been injured and damaged by Wilson s infringement of the patent. Wilson s infringement has caused, and will continue to cause, irreparable harm to Easton, for which Easton has no adequate remedies at law, unless and until enjoined by this Court. --

Case :-cv-0 Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 COUNT II Patent Infringement of U.S. Patent No.,,0. Easton repeats and re-alleges each and every allegation of the foregoing paragraphs as though fully set forth herein.. Easton is the owner by assignment of U.S. Patent No.,,0, which was duly and lawfully issued by the USPTO on August,, titled Ball Bat with Governed Performance ( the 0 patent ). A true and correct copy of the 0 patent is attached as Exhibit B and made a part hereof.. Regarding the 0 patent, Easton has complied with the statutory notice provisions of U.S.C... Wilson has had knowledge of the 0 patent at least as early as the date of the service of this Complaint.. Wilson has at no time been licensed under the 0 patent.. Wilson has infringed, and is currently infringing, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, one or more claims of the 0 patent, in violation of U.S.C. et seq., by making, using, selling, offering to sell in the United States, and/or importing into the United States products that embody one or more claims of the 0 patent, including without limitation baseball bats in the CF, CF and CF BBCOR and Voodoo BBCOR model lines, as well as any other substantially similar baseball bats.. Wilson s infringement of the 0 patent is willful.. Wilson has been injured and damaged by Wilson s infringement of the 0 patent. Wilson s infringement has caused, and will continue to cause, irreparable harm to Easton, for which Easton has no adequate remedies at law, unless and until enjoined by this Court. --

Case :-cv-0 Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 0 patent; PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Easton prays for a judgment that: A. Wilson has infringed one or more claims of the patent and the B. Wilson s infringement of one of more claims of the patent and the 0 patent is willful; C. Wilson, its officers, directors, employees, agents, subsidiaries, licensees, servants, successors and assigns, and any and all persons acting in privity or in concert or participation with Wilson, be enjoined from infringement of the patent and the 0 patent under U.S.C. ; D. Easton be awarded all damages adequate to compensate Easton for Wilson s infringement of the patent and the 0 patent, and such damages be trebled under U.S.C. and awarded to Easton, with interest; E. This case be adjudged an exceptional case under U.S.C., and Easton be awarded attorneys fees, costs, and all expenses incurred in this action; F. Easton be awarded such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. DATED: November 0, By: /s/ Michael J. Song Michael J. Song (Bar No. ) msong@perkinscoie.com Attorneys for Plaintiff, Easton Baseball/Softball Inc. --

Case :-cv-0 Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 JURY DEMAND Pursuant to Rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Easton demands a trial by jury on all issues triable by jury. DATED: November 0, By: /s/ Michael J. Song Michael J. Song (Bar No. ) msong@perkinscoie.com Attorneys for Plaintiff, Easton Baseball/Softball Inc. --