PSCI 6301: AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND THE SUPREME COURT Instructor: Dr. Banks Miller Office Hours: GR 3.230 (Monday 9-11; Wednesday 5-6) Contact Information: millerbp@utdallas.edu; 972-883-2930 This is a graduate level course; as such, be sure that you have met the perquisites for enrollment. Course Description: This is a class on the U.S. Constitution and the Supreme Court. The class is divided into two distinct sections. In the first seven weeks of the semester we will cover theories of constitutional interpretation and theories of judicial decision making. In the second half of the semester we will look at a number of key U.S. Supreme Court decisions interpreting the constitution. It is expected that you will use knowledge gained in the first half of the class to help you interpret the opinions that you read in the second half of the class. The class is taught as a seminar, meaning that your participation in class discussions of the assigned readings is crucial to a successful class. Course Goals: 1. Students should be able to identify and critically assess the various theories of constitutional interpretation and judicial decision making. 2. Students should be able to understand and explain the holdings of major Supreme Court cases. 3. Students should be able to apply the constitutional and judicial decision making theories to decision making in actual Supreme Court cases. Readings: The two books listed below are required. 1. Jeffrey Segal and Harold Spaeth. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited (SCAMR) (2 nd ed.). 2002. New York: Cambridge University Press. This book is dense, so give yourself at least two weeks to work through it. 2. Louis Fisher and Katy J. Harriger. American Constitutional Law (8 th ed.). Durham, N.C.: Carolina Academic Press. Make sure that you purchase the single edition, not one of the two volume editions. This book is referred to as ACL in the syllabus and all of the assigned cases come from ACL. Additionally, this course assumes some background knowledge of how courts operate and what the law, particularly in the U.S. Supreme Court, means. If you do not have this background knowledge, I recommend that you purchase Lawrence Baum s The Supreme Court (9 th ed.). This is an undergraduate text that will allow you to come quickly up to speed on the basics of the 1
Supreme Court. There is also a good deal of background information on the Court in the beginning chapters of the Segal and Spaeth text. The majority of readings in the first half of class come from journal articles, primarily in political science, that are either available online or that I will make available on the class website. The readings from the second half of the class come from the casebook. In general, in the second half of the class, you should read the material in the order in which it is listed (and be sure to read the headings for each of the cases which will help you to determine what is happening in the case). Grades: There are two components to your grade in this course. First, there are two examinations. The first examination will occur in the seventh week and will cover all of the material over constitutional theory and judicial decision making. The second exam will occur in the final week of class and will ask you to apply the theories we learn in the first half of the class to the cases that we will work through in the second half of the class. Together, the exams are worth 75% of your grade and will almost exclusively involve essays. The second component of your grade comes from your participation in class. Specifically, you will be responsible for leading the discussion once in the first half of class and once in the second half of class. You will probably share discussion responsibilities with another student in the class each of the two weeks that you are responsible for discussion. As the discussion leader, your job is to come to class with several questions that are likely to stimulate discussion in class and that engage the material on a sophisticated level. Your skill as a discussion leader, as well as your participation in discussion when you are not a discussion leader, will be worth 25% of your grade. We will assign discussion leaders during the first class period. The grading scale is as follows: A = 90-100% B = 89-80% C = 79-70% F = Below 70% Course Outline: 1. Legal Approaches a. Constitutional Theory b. Constitutional Interpretation c. Importance of Law in Decision Making 2. Attitudinal Approaches 3. Strategic Approaches a. Intra-Court b. Inter-Court 2
4. Constitutional Law a. Structure of Government I b. Structure of Government II c. Structure of Government III d. Structure of Government IV e. Civil Rights and Liberties I f. Civil Rights and Liberties II g. Civil Rights and Liberties III Class Schedule: Class 1: Introduction and Approaches to Judicial Decision Making Judicial Decision Making and the U.S. Constitution Class 2: Constitutional Theory 1. Herbert Wechsler. 1959. Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law, Harvard Law Review 73: 1-35. 2. Edward Corwin. 1925. The Constitution versus Constitutional Theory, American Political Science Review 19: 290-304. 3. James Bradley Thayer. 1893. Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. Class 3: Constitutional Interpretation 1. Keith Whittington. 2004. The New Originalism, Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy 2: 599-613. 2. Howard Gillman. 1997. The Collapse of Constitutional Originalism and the Rise of the Notion of the Living Constitution in the Course of American State-Building, Studies in American Political Development: 191-247. 3. Richard A. Posner. 2004. The Supreme Court 2004 Term: Foreword: A Political Court, Harvard Law Review 119: 31-102. Class 4: The Importance of Law in Decision Making 1. James F. Spriggs, II, and Thomas G. Hansford. 2001. Explaining the Overruling of U.S. Supreme Court Precedent. Journal of Politics 63 (November): 1091-1111. 2. Eileen Braman and Thomas Nelson. 2007. Mechanisms of Motivated Reasoning? Analogical Perception in Discrimination Disputes, American Journal of Political Science 51: 940-956. 3. Mark J. Richards and Herbert M. Kritzer. 2002. Judicial Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making, American Political Science Review 96: 305-320. 4. Robert Howard and Jeffrey Segal. 2002. An Original Look at Originalism, Law and Society Review 36: 113-134. 3
Class 5: The Attitudinal Model 1. Jeffrey Segal and Harold Spaeth. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press. Class 6: Strategy Intra-Court Strategy 1. Paul Wahlbeck, James Spriggs II, and Forrest Maltzman. 1998. Marshalling the Court: Bargaining and Accommodation on the U.S. Supreme Court, American Journal of Political Science 42: 294-315. 2. Chris Bonneau, Thomas Hammond, Forrest Maltzman, and Paul Wahlbeck. 2007. Agenda Control, the Median Justice, and the Majority Opinion on the U.S. Supreme Court, American Journal of Political Science 51: 890-905. Inter-Branch Strategy 1. Anna Harvey and Barry Friedman. 2009. Ducking Trouble: Congressionally Induced Selection Bias in the Supreme Court s Agenda, Journal of Politics 71: 574-592. 2. Brian Sala and James Spriggs II. 2004. Designing Tests of the Supreme Court and the Separation of Powers, Political Research Quarterly 57: 197-208. Class 7: Examination I (30%) Constitutional Law and the U.S. Supreme Court Class 8: Structure of Government I: Establishing the Power of Judicial Review 1. Article III (U.S. Constitution) 2. ACL: pp. 33-42. 3. Marbury v. Madison (1803) 4. Martin v. Hunter s Lessee (1816) 5. Eakin v. Raub: Gibson s dissent (1825) 6. Ashwander v. TVA: Brandeis concurrence (1936) Class 9: Structure of Government II: Legislative Power 1. Article I (U.S. Constitution); especially 8-10 2. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) 3. United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Cop. (1936) 4. Barenblatt v. United States (1959) 5. INS v. Chadha (1983) 6. ACL: pp. 219-221 4
Class 10: Structure of Government III: Executive Power and Separation of Powers 1. Article II (U.S. Constitution); especially 2-4 2. ACL: pp. 174-176 & 225-226 3. United State v. Nixon (1974) 4. Morrison v. Olson (1988) 5. ACL: pp. 247-249 & 256-258 6. Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952) 7. Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004) Class 11: Structure of Government IV: The Commerce Clause 1. ACL: pp. 314-318. 2. Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) 3. ACL: pp. 324-325 4. Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918) 5. ACL: pp. 332-335 6. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones and Laughlin Steel Corp. (1937) 7. Wickard v. Fillburn (1942) 8. ACL: pp. 347-352 9. United States v. Lopez (1995) Class 12: Civil Liberties I: Freedom of Speech/Expression 1. First Amendment 2. ACL: pp. 453-460 3. R.A.V. v. St. Paul (1992) 4. ACL: pp. 473-476. 5. Texas v. Johnson (1989) 6. ACL: pp. 496-501 7. New York Times v. United States (1971) 8. ACL: pp. 528-538 9. Miller v. California (1973) Class 13: Civil Liberties II: The Right to Privacy 1. Ninth Amendment 2. ACL: pp. 885-889 & 892-894 3. Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) 4. ACL: pp. 896-903 5. Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) 6. ACL: pp. 923-925 7. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health (1990) 8. ACL: pp. 929-934 5
9. Lawrence v. Texas (2003) Class 14: Civil Liberties III: Equality 1. Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments 2. ACL: pp. 760-764. 3. Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) 4. ACL: pp. 769-777 5. Brown v. Board of Education I (1954) 6. ACL: pp. 803-812 7. Regent of the Univ. of California v. Bakke (1978) 8. ACL: pp. 836-844 9. U.S. v. Virginia (1996) 10. ACL: pp. 950-964 11. Bush v. Gore (2000) Class 15: Examination II (45%) 6