D-1-GN PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE

Similar documents
Case 4:14-cv RAS Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

2016CI21911 CAUSE NO. v. JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION. COMES NOW GRUPO INTEGRADORA SOLAR, SAPI DE CV (hereinafter, GIS ),

PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION & REQUESTS FOR DISCLOSURE

/ Court: 055

CAUSE NUMBER PLAINTIFF S FIRST AMENDED ORIGNAL PETITION AND REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY AND REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

CAUSE NO. JANE DOE IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, JUDICIAL DISTRICT v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

DENISE CANTU, IN THE DISTRICT COURT. VS. JUDICIAL DISTRICT JP MORGAN CHASE & CO., LIONOR DE LA FUENTE and CARLOS I. URESTI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

DC PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION COME NOW, PLAINTIFFS DEE VOIGT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS

I. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN

CAUSE NO. D-1-GN THE STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff,

Case 5:17-cv Document 2 Filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

CAUSE NO PC IN PROBATE COURT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, Plaintiff,

CAUSE NO. C E RICARDO DIAZ MIRANDA IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF. vs. HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS SECOND AMENDED ORIGINAL ANSWER OF PLAINSCAPITAL BANK

CAUSE NO. SUSAN DAVIS and IN THE DISTRICT COURT PRASHANTH MAGADI

No SHERBERT & CAMPBELL, P.C. IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff PLAINTIFF S FIRST AMENDED ORIGINAL PETITION AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE

CAUSE NO. v. FALLS COUNTY, TEXAS I. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN LEVEL

CAUSE NO. JANE DOE, Individually and as IN THE DISTRICT COURT Next Friend of JOHN DOE, a Minor Child, Plaintiffs,

NO. D-1-GN-19- SALLY HERNANDEZ, 201ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT TRAVIS COUNTY SHERIFF PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION

CAUSE NO. Mark S. Wolfe, in his Official Capacity as Texas State Historic Preservation

Case 4:08-cv Document 1 Filed 01/04/2008 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

D-1-GN Cause No. v. JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Status Conference - 05/04/2017

Case 2:06-cv JLL-CCC Document 55 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 1 of 27

Courthouse News Service

UnofficialCopyOfficeofChrisDanielDistrictClerk

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/12/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1

CAUSE NO. MELANIE MENDOZA, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, VS. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

Case 4:17-cv Document 1-2 Filed in TXSD on 11/15/17 Page 2 of NO.

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

NO. V. JUDICIAL DISTRICT. CORRIE LONG, DAVID TANG AND MICHAEL P. FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Defendants. OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

UnofficialCopyOfficeofChrisDanielDistrictClerk

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION, RULE 194 REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURES AND RULE NOTICE

Case 0:17-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2017 Page 1 of 12

e; SktS5 OFFiec 2011MAY 10 FILED CiffiliAL 4DIVISVt CLEgit-StiPERICR SAW DIEGO COUNTY. CA

DC CAUSE NO. CDK REALTY ADVISORS, LP IN THE DISTRICT COURT. v. DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS. Defendant. JUDICIAL DISTRICT

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016

CAUSE NO CV ANNA DRAKER IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF VS. MEDINA COUNTY, TEXAS

CAUSE NO. PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE. PLAINTIFF, TIMOTHY PETERS, complains of RICHARD TAMARO, CASEY

Courthouse News Service

DC NO. PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION AND REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CAUSE NO. PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE. NOW COMES Plaintiff, Stephen Torres, and files this, his Original Petition

THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 1:19-cv LY Document 1 Filed 04/12/19 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 3:10-cv P-BN Document 76 Filed 07/27/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID 995

Case 2:12-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 08/02/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION

Courthouse News Service

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI

State Consumer and Protection Laws Enforcement and Litigation Trends in Texas. September 20, 2011

3:17-cv MGL Date Filed 08/29/18 Entry Number 88 Page 1 of 10

NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION

Unofficial Copy Office of Loren Jackson District Clerk

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO. Case No.

DEFENDANT S 1st AMENDED MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE files this his Defendant s

No. PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION, REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS. Plaintiff, MIKE complains of defendants STEPHEN and

19-CV-0222 CAUSE NO. Plaintiff, v. GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS

DEPOSITORY AND BANKING SERVICES CONTRACT. This Depository and Banking Services Contract, hereinafter

Case 8:18-cv JVS-DFM Document 1-5 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 29 Page ID #:41

Filing # E-Filed 01/31/ :35:29 PM

Case 5:15-cv BLF Document 1 Filed 11/05/15 Page 1 of 18

The Law Offices. John S. Morgan, Esq.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/21/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/21/2017 EXHIBIT E

COMES NOW the State of Texas, by and through the Texas General Land Office, by and

Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/04/16 Page 1 of 23

3:17-cv MGL Date Filed 06/29/18 Entry Number 55 Page 1 of 8

Case: 4:15-cv BYP Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/11/15 1 of 18. PageID #: 1

Cause No CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS. MARTIN GREENSTEIN, Appellant

CC A CAUSE NO. STEVEN AKIN, IN COUNTY COURT

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER. EDGARDO RODRIGUEZ, an individual,

CAUSE NO. COMES NOW, Plaintiff, Colin Shillinglaw, and files this Original Petition, complaining

CAUSE NO. DEFENDANTS. JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION I. SUMMARY AND KEY FACTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT YAKIMA

Case 3:16-cv SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/16 Page 1 of 23

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU. LegalFormsForTexas.Com

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Case No. Division COMPLAINT GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Defendant.

NO. NO. PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION. NOW COME Valeria Barrera, Denise Del Angel, Erica Cruz, Flor Elizondo, Christine

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION. STATE OF ARKANSAS ex rel. DUSTIN McDANIEL, ATTORNEY GENERAL. v. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

DALLAS BAR ASSOCIATION TRIAL SKILLS SECTION March 8, By: Robert L. Tobey Johnston Tobey, P.C.

CAUSE NO. COME NOW, Raymond Gilbert (REDACTED) and Daniela (REDACTED), Individually, and

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Attorney for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL CENTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION. CASE NO: 1:15-cv RNS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No:

Case 1:18-cv MSK-KMT Document 1 Filed 09/18/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 4:18-cv O Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1

Transcription:

CAUSE NO. D-1-GN-17-003705 8/1/2017 12:19 PM Velva L. Price District Clerk Travis County D-1-GN-17-003705 victoria benavides KENNETH WESLEY FLIPPIN AND CANDACE ELAINE DUVAL Plaintiffs v. IN THE DISTRICT COURT TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS AIRBNB, INC., AIRBNB, CRAWFORD & COMPANY RYAN PAYNE Defendants 345th JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: COME NOW, Kenneth Flippin and Candace Duval ( Plaintiffs ), Plaintiffs herein, and file this Plaintiffs Original. Petition against Defendants Airbnb, Inc. and Airbnb ( Airbnb ), Crawford & Company ( Crawford ), and Ryan Payne ( Payne ), and in support thereof, would show this Honorable Court as follows: I. PARTIES 1. Plaintiffs Kenneth Flippin and Candace Duval are individuals and residents of Williamson County, Texas. Their current address is 305 Washburn, Taylor, Texas 76574. 2. Defendant, Airbnb Inc., is a Delaware corporation doing business in the state of Texas. This defendant may be served with citation and petition, pursuant to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, via the Texas Secretary of State, or upon its president, chief operating officer or registered agent as follows: Corporation Service Company, 251 Little Fails Drive, Wilimington, Delaware, 19808, or wherever it may be found. PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION & REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE Page 1

3. Defendant, Airbnb is an unidentified corporation operating in the stale of Texas under the assumed name Airbnb responsible for the breaches of its contractual and other obligations to Plaintiffs alleged herein. Plaintiffs request that once Airbnb is identified, and its registered agent and address is determined, it be served with citation and petition, pursuant to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, at the address of its registered agent and/or wherever it may be found. Plaintiffs specifically invoke the right to institute this suit against Airbnb in any other name which has been used to designate it, or which it has used. Plaintiffs expressly invoke their right under Rule 28 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure to have the true name of this party substituted at a later time upon the motion of any party or of the Court. 4. Defendant, RYAN PAYNE, Defendant (hereinafter PAYNE ) is upon information and belief a natural person and a resident of Travis County, Texas. This Defendant may be served with citation and petition, pursuant to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, at his residence as follows; 4209 Lakeway Blvd., Austin, Texas 78734, or wherever he may be found. 5. Defendant, Crawford & Company, is a Georgia corporation licensed to do business in the state of Texas. This defendant may be served with citation and petition, pursuant to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, via the Texas Secretary of State, or upon its president, chief operating officer or registered agent as follows: Corporation Service Company d/b/a CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Service Company, 211 E. 7,h Street, Ste. 620, Austin, Texas 78701, or wherever it may be found. II. DISCOVERY 6. This case should be governed by Tex. R. Civ. P. 190.3, a Level Three case. PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION & REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE Page 2

III. VENUE AND JURISDICTION 7. This Court has jurisdiction of this matter as the damages suffered by Plaintiffs as a result of the conduct and actions of Defendants exceed the minimum jurisdictional limitations of this Honorable Court. As required by Rule 47(c) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs' counsel states that Plaintiffs seek monetary relief between $200,000 and $1,000,000. The amount of monetary relief awarded will ultimately be determined by the trier of fact. 8. Venue is proper as all or a substantial pari of the events giving rise to this lawsuit occurred in Travis County, Texas. At the time of the accrual of Plaintiffs causes of action. Plaintiffs resided in Travis County, Texas. The properly made the basis of this lawsuit is in Travis County, Texas. IV. BACKGROUND 9. Plaintiffs contracted with Airbnb to sublet their property located at 3806 Holt Drive. Austin, TX 78749 for short term rentals. Pursuant to this agreement, Airbnb contracted with Plaintiffs under a contract or contracts, including a Host Guarantee, to reimburse them for losses to their personal property,1 and other attendant damages, in the event of damage by a short-term renter to the home s structure or contents. At all times material, the contracts in question were in full force and effect. 10. Airbnb is a hosting company that facilitates short term rentals through their website and puts prospective customers in touch with prospective lessors. In conjunction with this business exchange, Airbnb provides its participating property lessors with a Host Guarantee and other assurances providing them certain remedies in the event of loss as a result of actions by renters. 1 This agreement also provided coverage for structural loss, but that coverage is not at issue here, as Plaintiffs did not own the property in question, although they were greatly affected by the severe damage to this home. PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION & REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE Page 3

11. On or about July 27, 2015, Plaintiffs engaged in a short-term rental with Defendant Ryan Payne pursuant to their contracts with Airbnb, and upon information and belief pursuant to Payne s mother Grace s contract with Airbnb on his behalf. Ryan Payne was staying at the property the night of August 1, 2015 when this incident occurred. On this night, Ryan negligently discarded a lit cigarette in a trash can causing a devastating fire and tremendous damage to the home where Plaintiffs resided. When Plaintiffs learned of this terrible incident they were extremely concerned for the welfare of fellow renters at the home, and their valuable contents of the home, which included the following: a. Thousands of items of personal property destroyed including: valuable and original artwork created by Plaintiff, Candace Duval; family heirlooms; items with immense personal value; loss of a lifetime of artwork collections; electronics; clothing; home decor; toiletries; linens; dishes, and appliances. Plaintiffs lost the majority of all their personal belongings as a result of this incident. 12. Plaintiffs were away on vacation in Colorado when this incident occurred, and were notified about the fire by their friend, also a renter at their home, after the fire department had subdued the flames. Plaintiffs immediately returned to Austin, Texas as soon as they were informed of the fire. An important concern for Plaintiffs, in addition to their valuable property destroyed, was ensuring the safety of their two cats. One cat, Polypaw, had been found while they were in route to the home, and the other was still missing. 13. On August 3, 2017, Plaintiffs were finally able to gain access to their personal belongings from their property manager. Only then did Plaintiffs find their other missing cat, Meja, who was still hiding in a clothes drawer. PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION & REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE Page 4

14. On or about August 3, 2015, Plaintiffs also immediately contacted Airbnb to make a claim for their loss, for approximately three weeks, Airbnb provided them with a place to stay while Plaintiffs attempted to get back on their feet, although Plaintiffs were faced with the added burden of moving at least seven times to different properties in this short span. When Plaintiffs voiced their preferences for a long-term place to say, Airbnb responded by no longer assisting them with any accommodations, and saying they should just stay where they pleased and submit a reimbursement request later. 15. Following their stay with Airbnb, Plaintiffs did not find permanent housing for over a year. Over the next year, Plaintiffs worked hundreds of hours transporting items out of their home, moving items to storage, cleaning items, and documenting and photographing the loss of their personal items. Throughout this entire time. Plaintiffs stayed in constant contact with Airbnb to ensure that their claim would be processed, and complied with all conditions to claim for loss of all property, and other attendant losses claimed in this action under the Host Guarantee, or otherwise. Airbnb directed them to submit claims documentation to Defendant Crawford and Company, whom they identified as their independent adjuster responsible for the claim. 16. However, Plaintiffs struggle to claim for property loss and Defendant s Airbnb and Crawford s unreasonable documentation of loss demanded countless hours of Plaintiffs time. and proved to be excessively burdensome for Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs were constantly told by Airbnb and Crawford & Company to complete a damages form to be submitted to these Defendants for consideration, containing an itemization of each and every personal item of loss claimed, no matter the value. These Defendants further refused to allow Plaintiffs to submit partial itemization as they worked, or receive partial compensation until they had completely itemized PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION & REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE PageS

every single item, in detail, for which they claimed. Plaintiffs did not finish this form until a year later due to the excessively burdensome nature of Defendants documentation requirements and demands. 17. Plaintiffs have further experienced significant mental anguish and lost wages as a result of this incident and these Defendants wrongful and unreasonable conduct. Prior to this incident. Plaintiffs had expressed interest in purchasing this home because it was essentially their dream home. Plaintiffs had to work long hours in severe heat to attempt to recover items from the home, and had to subject themselves to a toxic environment in order to do so. Until recently Plaintiffs still had not been able to secure a permanent residence, and are just now beginning to rebuild their lives after this traumatic incident. 18. Plaintiffs have complied with all conditions precedent and proper notice has been given to Defendants Crawford and Airbnb, and/or waived by these Defendants. V. BREACH OF CONTRACT (AIRBNB) 19. The conduct of Airbnb constitutes a breach of contract in that it has failed to pay the full amount of Plaintiffs covered loss and claims in accordance with the Host Agreement, or other contracts with Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs have complied with all Conditions Precedent under the Hosting Agreement, or any other applicable contracts. VI. NEGLIGENCE (PAYNE) 20. By negligently and improperly disposing of smoking materials, or otherwise, Payne caused the massive fire that caused tremendous property damage to the Plaintiffs home and PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION &. REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE Page 6

personal property, Payne is further responsible for all other reasonably foreseeable damages caused by his negligence. VII. VIOLATIONS OF THE TEXAS DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT (AIRBNB AND CRAWFORD & COMPANY) 21. Plaintiffs would further show that Defendants Airbnb and Crawford engaged in certain false, misleading and deceptive acts, practices and/or omissions actionable under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices - Consumer Protection Act (Texas Business and Commerce Code, Chapter 17.41, et seep), as alleged herein below. In order to recover under the- DTPA, the Plaintiff must be a consumer.2 As previously discussed, the Plaintiffs in this case are individuals who acquired services (rental assistance from Airbnb and claims assistance from Crawford) by purchase (fees paid to Airbnb), thus making them consumers. TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE 17.45(4). 22. Defendants Crawford and Airbnb can be sued under the DTPA, which allows a Plaintiff to bring an action against any person who uses or employs false, misleading, or deceptive acts or practices. TEX BUS. & COM. CODE 17.50(a)(1). 23. These Defendants actions constitute violations of Tex. Bus. & Comm. CODE Ann. 17.46(b), including, but not limited to the following: a. The Defendants violated several provisions of Section 17.46(b) of the TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE (the so-called "laundry list"): 1. The Defendants represented that the protection provided by the Hosting Agreement was of a standard, quality, or grade that it was not. TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE 17.46(b)(7). 2 See TEX BUS. & COM. CODE 17.45(4); Eckman v. Centennial Sav. Bank, 784 S.W.2d 672, 674 (Tex. 1990). 5 PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION & REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE Page 7

2. The Defendants represented that the Hosting Agreement and/or other applicable agreements or guarantees conferred rights, remedies, or obligations that those agreements did not confer. 3. Defendant Airbnb failed to disclose information concerning its services which was known at the time of the short-term rental transaction with the intention to induce the consumer into a transaction which the consumer would not have entered had the information been disclosed. b. Both Defendants further engaged in an unconscionable course of action. which is defined in the Act as an act or practice that takes advantage of a consumer's lack of knowledge, ability, experience, or capacity to a grossly unfair degree and to the detriment of the consumer. TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE 17.45(5). 24. The false, misleading, and/or deceptive acts or practices committed by these Defendants were relied upon by Plaintiffs to their detriment, and were the producing cause of their damages. including actual damages, expenses, and attorney s lees. TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE 175.0(a). To be a producing cause, an act must be both a causc-in-fact and a substantial factor in causing the Plaintiffs damages. Union Pump Co. v. Allbritton, 898 S.W.2d 773, 775 (Tex. 1995). In this case. the Defendants' misrepresentations and deceptive actions were both the proximate and producing cause of the Plaintiffs' damages as set forth herein 25. In addition, these Defendants knowingly and/or intentionally violated the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, within the meaning of those terms therein, in their conduct with Plaintiffs, and as a result Plaintiffs are entitled to additional statutory damages for Airbnb\s conduct, and recovery of damages for their Mental Anguish. PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION & REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE Pages

Written Notice Impracticable: 26. Plaintiffs would show that provision of sixty (60) days formal statutory notice of their DTPA ciaims was rendered impractical by the need to file this claim in advance of any possible limitations period for their two-year causes of action. However, Defendants Airbnb and Crawford have been aware of the misconduct and damages alleged for over sixty days. VIII. DAMAGES 27. In addition to actual damages, Plaintiffs rightfully seek recovery of any and all additional, double, treble and/or extra damages, mental anguish damages, consequential damages, and any and all other damages as allowed and defined by statute or common law for the conduct of Defendants as alleged above. Plaintiffs also make demand of Defendants to pay all costs of court related to the prosecution of this matter. 29 As a result of the conduct of Defendants, Plaintiffs have incurred damages and have been damaged in a sum in excess of the minimum jurisdictional limits of this Court. IX. ATTORNEY S FEES 28. As a result of the foregoing. Plaintiffs employed the services of Kitchens Law Firm, P.C. to protect and prosecute their interests and claims in this matter. Plaintiffs seeks recovery of thenreasonable attorney s fees for the prosecution of this case, all original proceedings, and all appellate proceedings including any appeals due to the Breaches of Contract, and violations of the Deceptive Trade Practices Act by the respective Defendants identified above. X. JURY DEMAND AND PRAYER 31. Plaintiffs respectfully request a trial by jury. PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION & REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE Page 9

XI. REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE 32. Pursuant to Rule 194, the Defendants are requested to disclose, separately and within fifty (50) days of service of this request, the information and material described in Rule 194.2. XII. DOCUMENTS TO BE USED 33. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 193,7, Plaintiffs provide notice to Defendants that any and all documents and things exchanged and produced by Plaintiffs or any other party including, but not limited to, correspondence and discovery responses, may be used during any pre-trial proceeding and/or the trial of this case without the necessity of authenticating said documents and things. XIII. ELECTRONIC SERVICE 34. Plaintiffs request that service of pleadings, orders, and notices in this cause be made electronically upon their counsel of record at; ikitchciis@ioiinkitchenslavv.com. Plaintiffs reserve the right to amend the service address by providing written notice to all parties of record. XIV. ELECTRONIC PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE 35. Plaintiffs give notice of intent to use, in whole or in part, electronic presentation of evidence, including but not limited to, electronic courtroom technology during the trial of the above-referenced case. XV. PRAYER 36. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiffs pray that upon final trial of this matter, Plaintiffs have: PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION & REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE Page 10

a. Judgment against Defendants, jointly and severally, as appropriate, for a just and reasonable sum; b. Judgment for all extra, treble, mental anguish, and/or additional damages under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act; c. Judgment for all reasonable attorney s fees as prayed for herein; d. Judgment for all prejudgment and post-judgment interest for which Plaintiffs may show themselves justly entitled and at the maximum legal rate allowable by law; e. Judgment for all costs of court; and f. Such other and further relief to which Plaintiffs may be entitled. KITCHENS LAW FIRM, PC By: f. -? <-./} & John C. Kitchens Texas Bar No. 00796893 2901 Bee Cave Rd., Box E Austin, Texas 78746 Tel. (512) 476-1176 Fax. (512) 476-1910 jkitchens@johnkitchenslaw.com ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS ----- PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION & REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE Page 21