Immejdiatelyjupon retiring to the jury room, you shall elect aforeperson. To reach averdict,

Similar documents
your members to serve as foreperson of the Jury. Your verdict will be determined by how you

NO. 07-CI JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION TEN (10) JUDGE IRV MAZE TONIA FREEMAN PLAINTIFF. BECKER LAW OFFICE, PLC, et al.

CO:MMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY 28th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT PULASKI CIRCUIT COURT DMSION.1 CML ACTION NO. 17-CI INSTRUCTIONS OF THE COURT

MODEL MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE CHARGE AND VERDICT SHEET. MOTOR VEHICLE VOLUME REPLACEMENT JUNE

Second, you must not be influenced by sympathy, passion or prejudice in favor of any party or against any of the parties.

Function of the Jury Burden of Proof and Greater Weight of the Evidence Credibility of Witness Weight of the Evidence

GENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to

Tara A. Newman v. Wonderful Miracle Hospital, Dr. Sharpest Blade, Ima Smartone, RN and Sharron D. Blame, RN EXHIBITS

CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. this case. As I mentioned at the beginning of the trial, you must keep an open

Preparing the Physician for Deposition and Trial

9 of their attorneys you have learned the conclusion which 10 each party believes should be drawn from the evidence

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA JUDGMENT ORDER

Case 5:17-cv CBM-RAO Document 446 Filed 11/16/18 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:17580

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND

CAUSE NUMBER 00 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE COUNTY CRIMINAL V. COURT AT LAW NUMBER 00 DEFENDANT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

MOCK TRIAL PROCEDURE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE March 23, 2004 Session

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH CQUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION C 0 M P L A I N T

eihj of, 9licIummd on g~day tjie 10tJi day of,.atlay" 2018.

CAUSE NO IN THE INTEREST OF IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHILDS NAME CHILDREN COUNTY, TEXAS A CHILD 15TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CHARGE OF THE COURT

PLAINTIFF'S SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS. Civil No Judge Barry Lawrence. Tier 3

No th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT'S CHARGE

JUDGE DENISE POSSE LINDBERG STOCK CIVIL JURY INSTRUCTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

TAKING A CIVIL VERDICT

7.32 COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE: INTERROGATORIES (Approved before 1985) NOTE TO JUDGE

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO

Also, please carefully follow the directions accompanying each question.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Civil Division Central District, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Department 36

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON March 4, 2002 Session

Neil B. KIRSCHEN, M.D., Winthrop University Hospital, Linda W. Roberts,

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

RULE 7: CALENDAR CALL AND PRETRIAL MEMORANDA

Scarpati v Kim 2013 NY Slip Op 30013(U) January 3, 2013 Sup Ct, Richmond County Docket Number: /2008 Judge: Philip G. Minardo Republished from

Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888)

E D AUG 1 G 2 0 « CLERK OF THE COURT CSeriT SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. Case No.

COME NOW the plaintiffs JO ANN and MICHAEL SMITH, a married couple, by and. through their attorneys of record, MARLER CLARK LLP and FRANK JENKINS LAW

Fr:8 I "TAFJ. Case 2:02-cr DT Document 1541 Filed 02/13/2007 Page 1 of Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

How the Law Works A guide to the Oregon court system and civil cases

Filing # E-Filed 06/09/ :22:25 PM

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

CAUSE NO CHARGE OF THE COURT

Lewis v New York City Tr. Auth NY Slip Op 33280(U) December 19, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /06 Judge: Paul Wooten

SCMF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

6.1 Jones Act - Unseaworthiness General Instruction (Comparative Negligence Defense) The Plaintiff seeks to recover under a federal statute known as

Case 5:06-cr TBR-JDM Document 202 Filed 03/23/2009 Page 1 of 29

Printable Lesson Materials

" Jurisdiction & Venue

* * * * * * * * Members of the Jury Panel [or Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury Panel]:

SS.7.C.3.3 and SS.7.C.3.8 Judicial Branch: Article III

EXPLAINING THE COURTS AN INFORMATION BOOKLET

PRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS. CACI No. 100

Case 1:17-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (NORTHERN DIVISION)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

3:05-cv MBS Date Filed 05/08/13 Entry Number 810 Page 1 of 16

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/12/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 21 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/12/2018

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 24, 2012 Session

Case 1:14-md JMF Document 4309 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 10

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/20/ :18 AM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 172 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/20/2014

Howard v. Univ. of Med. & Dentistry of N.J., 172 N.J. 537, 558 (2002). 463.

JUROR INSTRUCTIONS ALONG W/ QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR POTENTIAL JURORS

HIEU PHUONG HOANG NO CA-0749 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL THORTON SERVICES, INC., ET AL. FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

This memo was published originally as Appendix C to the 1996 Report of the Governor s Advisory Task Force on Civil Justice Reform.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT AT LAW

1. Duty, Breach, and the Meaning of Negligence

Court Reporter: Felicia Rene Zabin, RPR, CCR 478 Federal Certified Realtime Reporter (702)

Alpena County. Version 1.0 JURY DUTY HANDBOOK

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR

CHAPTER 4 JURY DELIBERATIONS; VERDICT FORMS

Filing # E-Filed 01/09/ :13:29 PM

10/18/ :38 AM 18CV47218 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : : VS. : NO. : :

William N. Lundy Justice of the Peace

" findings in regard to the following offenses against Tanji Jackson:

E-FILED 2017 MAY 11 3:00 PM DELAWARE - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT

Pursuant to Rule 50(b), Ala. R. Civ. Proc., Defendant, Mobile Infirmary Association,

8/4/ :46:38 AM 16CV25037 FOR THE COUNTY OF MUL TNOMAH. 12 Comes now plaintiff and for claims for relief against the above named defendant,

Pennsylvania Bar Association 100 South Street P.O. Box 186 Harrisburg, PA (800)

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND

Schoolcraft v. The City Of New York et al Doc. 553

Do Capital Jurors Understand Mitigation? Why mitigation? 4/13/2011. Aggravation vs. Mitigation

Victim / Witness Handbook. Table of Contents

The Problem of SpongeBob RoundPants

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH PLAINTIFF, JURY TRIAL TRIAL-DAY 27 VERDICT 5 vs. Case No.

C01:13-cv LEK-KSC Document 1 Filed 11/19/13 Page 1 of 12 PagelD 1

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 115,360 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. JESSECA PATTERSON, Appellant, KAYCE CLOUD, Appellee.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Commonwealth Of Kentucky. Court of Appeals

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO ORDER & REASONS

CASE NO. 1D Caryn L. Bellus and Bretton C. Albrecht of Kubicki Draper, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.

3/24/ :21:10 AM 17CV12356 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. ) ) Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

THE ANSWER BOOK FOR JURY SERVICE

Transcription:

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY MEADE CIRCUIT COURT DIV. II CASE NO. 15-CI-404 :assidydaugherty vs. JURY INSTRUCTIONS SCARED AND COimFUSED, INC., d/b/a leldof SCREAMS *** *** *** INSTRUCTION NO. 1; Immejdiatelyjupon retiring to the jury room, you shall elect aforeperson. To reach averdict, r^ine or morejjurors must agree on the answer to each of the questions herein. The nine or more jurors who agrs:e onithe answer to one question, however, need not be the same who agree on the answer to andlher. if all twelve agree on the answer to a question, the foreperson alone needs to ign the answpi If less than twelve, butnine or more agree, thendl of those who agree must sign le answer. 1 of 9

The tq] n these inkni engaged!tiith INSTRUCTION NO. 2: rhi "ominary care" when referring to Defendant, Scared and Comfiised, Inc., as used Ctionsj means that degree of care the jury would expect an ordinarily prudent person samejtype of business to exercise under similar circumstances presented in thiscase. Thfti^im "ordinary care" when referring to Plaintiff, Cassidy Daugherty, as used in these instructions njij^^ans that degree ofcare the jury would expect an ordinarily prudent person to exercise under similar ircun^stances presentedin this case. 2 of9

INSTRUCTION NO. 3: It iittraction in a reaso 10 inform wa; cor )lnab the duty of Defendant, Scared and Comfiised, Inc., in operating its haunted outdoor 1 ; - ' ponl^ known as Field ofscreams to exercise ordinary care to maintain its premises y safeicondition for the use of its patrons, includmg Plaintiff; Cassidy Daugherty and ins ofor elimate any unreasonable dangers that would otherwise be undetected. 3 of 9

INSTRUCTION NO. 4; The jjjjry shau answer the following question inaccordance with the direction herein: m ;^omfused. sei ubstanila E tlon NO. 1; Do you believe from the evidence that Defendant, Scared and k, violated its duty as set out in Instruction No. 3, and that such violation was a '1 ' ptpr in Causing thefall and iiyuries about which Plaintiffcomplains? ANSWER "YES" OR "N0"_m. otm POREPERSON, IF UNANIMOUS J^OTE: K tl le Courti^o ihstructioijino 5. 'out answer to Question No. 1 is "no", your verdict is completed and you shall return to om jivithout answering any further questions. If your answer is "yes", please proceedto 4 of 9 V

INSTRUCTION NO. 5: [t rdinar cafe aiownas V he duty of Plaintiff, Cassidy Daugherty, upon the occasion in question, to exercise Dr her own safety and protection while at the haunted outdoor attraction coimnonly 1 ofscreams. )UEStlQ aer dut> he fall and as li' Q. 2; Do you believe from the evidence that Plaintiff, Cassidy Daugherty, violated forth jin Instruction No. 5, and that such violation was a substantial factor in causing uies sibout which she complains? i ; ". 1 ANSWER "YES" OR "NO" I. FOREPERSON, IF UNANIMOUS NOTE: iplelase proceed to Instruction No. 6. 5 of 9

T] tt 16; JE INSTRUCTION NO. 6: ijry shall answer the following question in accordance with the direction herein: riqnno. 3: Ifyou answered Yes to both Question No. 1 and Question No. 2,thus inding Ifr le evidence that both Plaintiff arid Defendant failed to observe any one or more of Iheir duties he evidei )arties.; Ir ach partj that Such failure was a substantial factor in causing the fall, you will determine from and state below what percentage of the total fault was attributable to each of the ermining piercentages offault, you shall consider both the nature ofthe conduct of ault arid the extent of the causal connection between the conduct and the damages llaimedi. pe I PMk d^t, Scared and Comfused, Inc. %, Cassidy Daugherty % TOTAL 100 % FOREPERSON, IF UNANIMOUS lote: Pleis( aroceed to Instruction No. 7. 6 of 9 A

T1 )UESTI ^ou findfr lanns ajnc [f ;hall in6h f^andtb INSTRUCTION NO. 7: y shall answer the following question in accordance with the direction herein: ihfo. 4; Without considering any relative fault ofthe parties, what sum ofmoney do the evidence will fairly and reasonably compensate Plaintiff for suchof the following es she sustained, ifany, as a direct result ofthe fall referred to inthe testimony? ietermine that Plamtiff is entitled to recover damages for her injuries, your award bmpehsation for losses attributable or related to any pre-existing condition, but only xtent, that suchpre-existing condition was aroused or aggravated by the fall herein. I. ) For feastthable expenses incurred for hospital, doctor, medical services, medical supplies, and phanjnaqei :al expenses to date, not to exceed $103,022.10. _, FOREPERSON, IF UNANIMOUS 7 of 9

\>) For IT BU and physical pain and suffering which Cassidy Daugherty has endured to date, incl uc evidefi h ny loss of enjoyment of life, in an amount you believe fair and reasonable from the resented, not to exceed $650,000.00. $,, FOREPERSON, IF UNANIMOUS 8 of9

m lej ill of your answers are final, your verdict is completed. Please notify the bailiff. i(^ou will Jtulnh to the courtroom shortly, thank you for your service. HON. RQEERT JUDGE, MEADE CIRCUIT COUtlT 9 of9