Data Management Governance

Similar documents
NC WISE Configuration Control Board Charter

ASSOCIATION OF CORPORATE COUNSEL INFORMATION GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE CHARTER

Standards Committee Subcommittee Organization and Procedures March 10, 2008

Version 4 Type Charter. Printed copies are for reference only. Please refer to the electronic copy for the latest version.

NBIMS-US PROJECT COMMITTEE RULES OF GOVERNANCE

Project Committee Rules of Governance

AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP INC. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER

STL-DISC-CH-01 - SunTrust Banks, Inc. Disclosure Committee Charter

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURES DISCLOSURE CONTROLS

Standards Committee Charter

Chicago Board of Directors CAIC Meeting August 29, 2017 All Chicago, 651 W. Washington Chicago, IL :00 2:00 PM Agenda

Partnership for a Healthy Texas Organizational Structure

NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE CHARTER

Steering Committee meetings & Roles & Responsibilities

REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION REGIONS BANK NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE CHARTER

CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS FOLLOW-UP AUDIT

Stakeholder Governance Guide

MARYLAND STATE RETIREMENT AND PENSION SYSTEM GOVERNANCE CHARTERS. Adopted by the Board of Trustees

Accredited Standards Committee X12 Electronic Data Interchange Organization and Procedures

Board of Trustees Bylaws

SUNY ULSTER ACADEMIC SENATE CONSTITUTIONAL BYLAWS

UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED CHARTER OF THE NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE Adopted: October 17, 2018

X12 BYLAWS. CAP01v3. X12 Corporate Administrative Policy and Procedure. Bylaws (CAP01)

CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER

RUNNING EFFECTIVE MEETINGS GUIDEBOOK

DAVE & BUSTER S ENTERTAINMENT, INC. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER. (Adopted September 23, 2014)

Chicago Continuum of Care Governance Charter Ratified on June 25, 2014

EDISON INTERNATIONAL CHARTER FOR THE NOMINATING/CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. Adopted by the Board of Directors

Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers Standards Operations Manual v.3 Approved by Board of Governors Effective

Bylaws of Petroleum Industry Data Exchange, Inc.

BUILDINGSMART ALLIANCE COUNCIL CHARTER FOREWORD ARTICLE I. ESTABLISHMENT

Carequality Steering Committee Operating Policy and Procedure

Revision May 18, 2011 Publication Date. Copyright LXI Consortium, Inc. All rights reserved

Bylaws of the University of Alaska Fairbanks Staff Council Effective 9/12/2016 Revised 9/21/2016

CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC. CHARTER FOR COMPENSATION COMMITTEE. As of October 4, 2016

ASC X12N/ ACCREDITED STANDARDS COMMITTEE X12 INSURANCE SUBCOMMITTEE CONSTITUTION

Constitution of the Marist College Student Government Association

RULES OF PROCEDURE. NAESB Operating Practices as approved via Board Resolution September 11, 2015 Page 1

The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. Compensation Committee Charter

Policies and Procedures for Standards Development for the IEEE Cloud Computing Standards Committee. Date of Submittal: 08 July 2016

NEST Coordinating Center (NESTcc) Charter. Article I: Name, Preamble, Mission, and Vision

BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHARTER OF THE COMPENSATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE Revised May 21, 2014

MARATHON PETROLEUM CORPORATION. Compensation Committee Charter. (Amended and Restated Effective April 16, 2018) Statement of Purpose.

Proposed Amendments to Board Governance Committee Charter 1

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER

Operating Procedures. for. OpenSG Technical Committee

INDIANA PRESSLER MEMORIAL CHAPTER HFMA

Region 10 Operations Guidance REGION 10 RTOC/RTOC CONSORTIUM OPERATIONS GUIDANCE. Updated 9/5/2016

CLEARWATER PAPER CORPORATION COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER (As adopted by the Board of Directors effective as of September 21, 2018)

CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE THE SIAM CEMENT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

Technical Coordination Committee and Technical Committees Operating Manual

SFPE ANSI Accredited Standards Development Procedures Date: March 2, 2018

OpenID Process Document

FINANCE AND PERFORMANCE COMMITTEE. Final - Terms of Reference - Final

Parliamentary Procedure

Guidelines. Mission Statement. Purpose. Functions

PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY COMPENSATION AND LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHARTER

Standards Committee Charter

Executive Leadership Committee

IEEE Power and Energy Society (PES) Power System Relaying Committee. Policies and Procedures for: Working Groups. Date of Approval: 28 March 2014

ONEOK, INC. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHARTER

FSC PROCEDURE. THE DEVELOPMENT AND APPROVAL OF FSC SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS FSC-PRO (Version 2-0) EN

Interagency Committee of State Employed Women (ICSEW) Bylaws, Policies and Procedures. Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter

CONSULTATIVE COUNCIL CONSENSUS PROCEDURES. General. This consensus process shall be followed by the Consultative Council (Council) and its committees.

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES OF THE STATE RESIDENCE COMMITTEE

BEEHIVE AREA OF NARCOTICS ANONYMOUS SERVICE COMMITTEE POLICY MANUAL

Members of APAC shall be elected for staggered three (3) year terms.

Policies and Procedures for IEEE P1858 Camera Phone Image Quality Working Group

Environmental Council of the States

Decision-making Practices Document, Version 1.0

NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO, INC. ("Company") CHARTER OF THE NOMINATING/CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

BEEHIVE AREA OF NARCOTICS ANONYMOUS

AMENDED AND RESTATED NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE CHARTER

Interim By-laws. Midwest Big Data Hub I. MISSION

SEASPAN CORPORATION CHARTER OF THE COMPENSATION AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. (As amended and restated on June 25, 2013)

AOTA Representative Assembly Annual Meeting Report. April 25 th -26 th Indianapolis, IN

Policies and Procedures for Standards Development

Chapter Formation Guidance Package February 2014

NextDecade Corporation Nominating, Corporate Governance & Compensation Committee Charter

Chapter 801. LOCAL WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARDS. Section contains amendments regarding Requests for Formation of Boards.

New Jersey Marine Fisheries Council

Policies and Procedures for IEEE 3D Human Factors Working Groups Entity Method

CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER

X12 Corporate Administrative Policy and Procedure. X12 Membership (CAP04)

GOVERNANCE CHARTER OF THE GA-506 MARIETTA/COBB CONTINUUM OF CARE

COMPENSATION AND TALENT COMMITTEE CHARTER (Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2019) stock option or other equity participation plans;

THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA. BYLAWS of the PROFESSIONAL STAFF ASSEMBLY ARTICLE 1. CHARTER

Business Constituency Charter (v3.0)

BYLAWS. As amended by the 2018 Annual Convention

BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHARTER OF THE COMPENSATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE Revised October 24, 2017

NEW MEXICO CHARTER SCHOOL EDUCATIONAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION BYLAWS

University of Florida Clinical and Translational Science Institute Community Engagement Research Program Community Advisory Board

Guidelines for Standing Committee Tri-chairs

Minority Student Caucus Constitution

JOINT CHARTER OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE AND THE PERFORMANCE COMPENSATION SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS (As Amended through May 26, 2016)

Policies and Procedures for Standards Development for the IEEE Communication Society/Green ICT Standards Committee (COM/GreenICT-SC)

Transcription:

Data Management Governance Version 2.0 Update: 10.23.14

Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Governance 2.1 Data Management Structure for DPI 2.1.1 Data Managers 2.1.2 Data Management Group 2.1.2.1 Purpose 2.1.2.2 Authority 2.1.2.3 Membership 2.1.2.4 Meetings 2.1.3 DPI Senior Management

Section 1.0 Introduction Data that are collected, stored, processed, and/or disseminated by the NC Department of Public Instruction (DPI) are an agency-wide resource that must be managed from an enterprise perspective. Accordingly, this manual establishes the definitive data management policy for the agency. This policy applies to all data used by the agency in the performance of its mission. This data includes any that are collected, stored, processed, and/or disseminated using DPI information systems. No DPI employee or contractor may exchange data with a Local Education Agency (LEA), charter school, school, higher education institution or other constituent outside the guidelines set forth in this manual. DPI has an established data management governance structure. This structure consists of clearly articulated processes designed to ensure agency compliance with State statutes, NC State Board of Education (SBE) policy, and best practice standards for data management, data standardization, data certification, and data life cycle management. DPI Divisions and managers of agency data are responsible for the timeliness, accuracy, understandability, availability and security of data under their stewardship. Section 2.0 Governance 2.1 Data Management Structure for DPI 2.1.1 Data Managers Data Manager is not a job title; it is a responsibility within a position. The data manager should be a staff person who already has extensive knowledge of the data and uses the data on a regular basis. The role of a data user does not imply the role of a data manager. Everyone is a potential data user, but a data manager is responsible for the data within his or her program area. 2.1.2 Data Management Group The Data Management Group (DMG) is the official oversight body, comprised of program area representatives, that is accountable for department data. The DMG supports DPI s efforts to achieve the SBE s mission, by ensuring data quality, accountability, and timeliness, all of which are essential to enabling data-driven decisionmaking. 2.1.2.1 Purpose The purpose of the DMG is to enable DPI to meet the responsibility of providing accurate and timely data to key stakeholders. Data management operational policy will: emphasize data management as an essential agency function with data being a resource of the department establish comprehensive, enterprise data management guidelines including data standardization

establish standards and policies for data management to which each agency division and data manager must adhere 2.1.2.2 Authority The DMG is a decision making body charged with the responsibility for and empowered with the authority to set agency policy and resolve issues concerning DPI data collection, management, and use. The DMG is responsible to the DPI Senior Management per section 2.1.3. Collection The DMG has authority to set agency policy regarding the addition, deletion, and modification of agency data collections and the elements these collections contain. Management The DMG has the authority to set agency policy regarding data security. Use The DMG has authority to set agency policy regarding data availability, access, and use for analysis and reporting. 2.1.2.3 Membership Membership An individual who is a member of DMG is approved by the Steering Committee to represent a business area or a major data collection system. Each member has one equal vote. A member's attendance may not be substituted with a nonmember, but they may proxy their vote to another member of the DMG or a member of the Data, Research and Federal Policy (DRFP) staff. The DMG members will review membership, as needed, to identify potential new members. The need for new members will be based on the need to replace a member or add representation from a new business unit or new major data collection system. A three-fourths majority vote will be required to recommend a new member. All current members must vote directly for new members; no proxies will be allowed. The DMG will make the approved recommendation to the Chief Officer of the potential new member s area and the Chief Officer can then assign the person to the DMG (subject to approval by the Steering Committee). Contributor An individual who is a contributor to the DMG provides support and advice on specific topics. They may be regular attendees to a meeting or be invited based on their expert knowledge of a specific topic. A contributor does not have any voting rights.

Facilitator Staff from the DPI Data, Research and Federal Policy Division facilitate the DMG. DRFP staff do not have voting rights unless serving as a proxy, but are responsible for facilitating meetings and discussion, providing agendas prior to meetings, distributing minutes after meetings, collecting and compiling the work of the DMG, and providing other support and management as needed. Stakeholder The DMG may also be expanded to include representatives from stakeholders external to the agency. The DMG may invite other contributors to meetings as necessary, but only the official members approved by the Steering Committee have voting rights. 2.1.2.4 Meetings Cadence DMG meetings are held as needed, or at least once per month, to address agency issues related to data collection, management, and use. Materials Agendas, minutes from the previous meeting, and any information to be reviewed for the upcoming meeting are sent out to group members at least 48 hours in advance of each meeting. Agenda items and associated materials for a prospective meeting must be submitted to the DMG staff facilitator no later than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Attendance DMG members are expected to attend every DMG meeting. A dial-in number will be made available for each meeting to enable members to participate remotely, as needed. The minutes for each meeting will indicate those in attendance. Voting Voting is conducted during each meeting or via e-mail within 24 hours of the conclusion of the meeting at which the initial vote was held. To be eligible for a vote, an item must be on the meeting agenda and the DMG must have raised the item for discussion prior to the vote. For each item put to vote, all DMG members must vote either yes, no, or abstain, and the votes are entered into the official meetings minutes. Unless otherwise noted, voting outcome is determined by simple majority of voting membership present, including proxies (see Proxies below). In the event of a tie, the group may engage in further discussion and vote again, or may escalate the issue for decision by the Steering Committee. A vote to delete or modify any existing collection characteristics requires an agreement of 100% of the membership in order to set policy. Anything short of 100% is escalated to the Steering Committee.

All DMG decisions regarding data management policy and procedures are to be communicated to the Steering Committee at its next meeting and posted on the DMG website. Proxies In the event that a voting member is unable to attend a DMG meeting, the member may appoint a DRFP staff person or other voting member of the DMG to serve as proxy for the absent member for discussion and voting purposes. The member who grants proxy is responsible for having reviewed the agenda and provided to the proxy any information the member would like to the proxy to present at the meeting. If a DMG member is scheduled to be out for an extended amount of time (or is out because of an emergency for an extended amount of time) the member s organizational unit may name a representative to attend in the member s place, as necessary. Subcommittees The DMG may organize subcommittees to work on specific issues on a standing or ad hoc basis. 2.1.3 DPI Senior Management Per Section 2.1.2.1 (DMG Authority) the DMG has authority to set data management policy for DPI. This authority is granted by the DPI Senior Management, and assumes that only a select few issues that meet predetermined criteria are voted on by Senior Management rather than the DMG. If any one of the following criteria is met, the issue is escalated to Senior Management: 1. Budget or Resource Implications: Any issue that has a significant impact on the budget or requires allocation of resources must be approved by the Senior Management (this includes budget and resources at both DPI and within the LEAs). 2. New Collection: A decision to add a new or delete an existing data collection must be approved by Senior Management. 3. Lack of Consensus: For any decision requiring consensus on which the DMG cannot reach a consensus, the decision must be put to Senior Management.