Alternative Dispute Resolution. Association of Corporate Counsel October 27, 2016

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION

Arbitration Agreements v. Wage and Hour Class Actions

DRAFTING ENFORCEABLE CONSUMER AND EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS IN January 17, 2017

United States Supreme Court Considering A California Appellate Court Opinion Invalidating A Class Action Arbitration Waiver

Let's Make A Deal: What You Need to Know About Drafting and Enforcing Arbitration Agreements. April 15, 2015

Drafting the Perfect ADR Provision and Litigating All of the Rest

This Webcast Will Begin Shortly

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: 4:15-cv JAR Doc. #: 21 Filed: 08/05/16 Page: 1 of 13 PageID #: 302

The Alternatives After Grafton Partners For Drafting and Enforcing Alternative Dispute Resolution Clauses

waiver, which waived employees right[s] to participate in... any

User Name: Thomas Horan Date and Time: Sep 05, :50 EST Job Number: Document(1)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

Case 1:13-cv AWI-JLT Document 10 Filed 03/10/14 Page 1 of 12

POLICY STATEMENT REVISED UNIFORM ARBITRATION ACT (RUAA)

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Doing it Right in an Uncertain Legal Climate: Arbitration Agreements. Sponsored by Sidley Austin LLP

MILES E. LOCKER LOCKER FOLBERG LLP 71 Stevenson Street, Suite 422 San Francisco, California (415)

CHERYL OLDHAM, Plaintiff and Respondent, vs. LARRY FLYNT et al., Defendants and Appellants. APPELLANTS OPENING BRIEF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. San Francisco Division INTRODUCTION

Case5:11-cv EJD Document43 Filed02/01/12 Page1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Class Action Exposure Post-Concepcion

702 FITZ v. NCR CORP. 118 Cal.App.4th 702; 13 Cal.Rptr.3d 88 [Apr. 2004] [No. D Fourth Dist., Div. One. Apr. 27, 2004.]

The Supreme Court will shortly be considering

Consumer Class Action Waivers Post-Concepcion

CHARTING THE FUTURE OF CLASS ACTION WAIVERS IN ARBITRATION CLAUSES

COMPELLING ARBITRATION: WHO KNOWS THE RULES TO APPLY? By Judge William F. Highberger. Superior Court Judge, Los Angeles (CA) Superior Court

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Page 1 of 6. Page 1. (Cite as: 287 F.Supp.2d 1229)

Arbitration Provisions in Employment Contract May Be Under Fire

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

The Ninth Circuit Grapples with the Arbitrability and Unconscionability of MMWA Claims

BRAGG v. LINDEN RESEARCH, INC. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania 487 F. Supp. 2d 593 (E.D. Pa.

The Future of Class Actions: Fallout from Concepcion and American Express January 28, 2014 Association of Corporate Counsel James M.

Arbitration Agreements and Class Action Waivers After AT&T. Mobility v. Concepcion

In the Supreme Court of the United States

Jack S. Sholkoff Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart PC 400 S. Hope St. Suite 1200 Los Angeles, CA 90071

Case 3:11-cv JAP-TJB Document 24 Filed 06/11/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID: 300 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE

Bell Prods. v. Hosp. Bldg. & Equip. Co.

A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Arbitral Forum: The Latest On The Use of Class Action Waivers In Arbitration Agreements In the United States

BENJAMIN D. WINIG, Plaintiff, v. CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC, Defendant. No. C MMC

Insight. NLRB Continues Attack on Class and Collective Action Waivers FEBRUARY 22, 2016 IN-DEPTH DISCUSSION. NLRB Decisions

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

Petitioner, Respondents. No IN THE DIRECTV, INC., AMY IMBURGIA ET AL.,

AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION CLASS ACTION AND EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION TRIBUNAL

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE

Mayers v. Volt Management (Cal. Ct. App.): FEHA/Arbitration.

Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Table of Contents

336 S.W.3d 83 (Ky. 2011), 2010-SC MR, Hathaway v. Eckerle Page S.W.3d 83 (Ky. 2011) Velessa HATHAWAY, Appellant, v. Audra J.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

I Won t See You in Court: Arbitration Options for Hospitals

which shall govern any matters not specifically addressed in these rules.

Arbitrating Managed Care Disputes

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO A145553

CLASS ACTION WAIVERS AND ENFORCEABLE ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS AFTER THE SUPREME COURT'S 2011 DECISION IN AT&T

Chicken or Egg: Applying the Age- Old Question to Class Waivers in Employee Arbitration Agreements

The year 2006 was an eventful one in the development of arbitration

Case 1:14-cv CMA-KMT Document 705 Filed 09/21/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 20

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE B222689

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STEVEN MCARDLE, vs. AT&T MOBILITY LLC, et al.,

Case: , 09/19/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 40-1, Page 1 of 6 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Contractual Clauses That Impact Disputes. By David F. Johnson

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE B232583

x

This Webcast Will Begin Shortly

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

In the Supreme Court of the United States

Petitioner, Respondents.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT. (Sacramento) ----

Case 1:16-cv NRB Document 46 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 10

Case 3:17-cv EDL Document 53 Filed 11/17/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Supreme Court of the United States

AB 465 (HERNANDEZ) CONTRACTS AGAINST PUBLIC POLICY OPPOSE JOB KILLER

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

STATE BAR OF TEXAS LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW SECTION STATE OF ADR

Qui Tam Claims - A Way to Pierce the Federal Policy on Arbitration?: A Comment on Sakkab v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

EMPLOYMENT. Real estate agent must arbitrate wage claims, California appeals court says

By: Professor Jean R. Sternlight University of Nevada Las Vegas Boyd School of Law

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

No. S IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No.

I. Alternative Dispute Resolution

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

Arbitration-Related Litigation in Texas

The Great Arbitration Debate April 30, 2014

Arbitration Post-AT&T Mobiloty v. Concepcion at the American Arbitration Association - A Service Provider's Perspective

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO MONSTER ENERGY COMPANY SECTION R (2) ORDER AND REASONS

Recent Developments in Federal and State Arbitration Law

Iskanian v. CLS Transportation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,

The U.S. Supreme Court Issues Important Decision Finding Class Action Waivers in Employment Arbitration Agreements Enforceable

AGCC/LAC NEW CASES OF INTEREST. (January 12 through February 6, 2004)

VIII. Cumulative Error Defendants both argue that there is cumulative error requiring dismissal. Whatever

SHARON McGILL, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CITIBANK, N.A., Defendant and Appellant. G049838

Mortgage Banking & Consumer Financial Products Alert

Transcription:

Alternative Dispute Resolution Association of Corporate Counsel October 27, 2016

Heather Anderson Sr. Corporate Counsel, Best Buy Joshua Heinlein Partner, Dinsmore & Shohl Commercial Litigation Adriana Cara Partner, Dinsmore & Shohl Labor & Employment 2

Overview What is Alternative Dispute Resolution? Mediation Arbitration Judicial Reference Recent Case Law 3

Alternative Dispute Resolution Less expensive, less formal, less time-consuming means to resolve dispute Types Mediation Arbitration Judicial Reference Others Neutral Evaluation Settlement Conference Dispute Resolution Board 4

Presentation Title MEDIATION 5

Mediation Pros Negotiation with aid of third party mediator Confidential Cal. Evid. Code 1119 FRE 408 Preview of other side s case You are in charge of outcome Creative solutions Can have multiple sessions 6

Mediation Cons Costs: $2,000 - $5,000 per side for good mediator Other side gets preview of your case Can take time to get good mediator May not settle 7

Presentation Title ARBITRATION 8

Arbitration Pros Private, third party neutral decides case Quicker timeline Private arbitrators have few cases No formal motions Smaller damages awards and settlements 2011 Cornell study: An Empirical Study of Employment Arbitration: Case Outcomes and Processes Discovery may be less broad Not public Prevent class actions 9

Arbitration Cons Expensive (arbitrator s fees and filing fees) No rules of evidence Arbitrator need not follow law Limited or no appellate rights Possibly encourages more individual claims 10

Presentation Title JUDICIAL REFERENCE 11

Judicial Reference Pros Private, third party neutral decides case/issue typically retired judge Scope may be limited (e.g., discovery referee) May be by agreement or motion (CCP 639) Quicker timeline Discovery rights same as in typical litigation unless contract says otherwise Required to follow rules of evidence Required to follow law 12

Judicial Reference Cons Expensive (referee s fees) Open to public (CRC 3.931) Full appellate rights (CCP 645) 13

Judicial Reference Clauses Cite CCP 638 and state scope of issues to be decided by referee Specify how referee is to be chosen and qualifications Consider limiting discovery rights Right to seek provisional remedies in court Specify how fees to be paid Make conspicuous (bold, separately initialed/signed) 14

Presentation Title ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS 15

Arbitration Agreements California Arbitration Act (C.C.P. 1280, et seq.) Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. 1, et seq.) Both have strong public policy in favor of enforcing arbitration agreements Defenses to enforcement are same as those applicable to contracts in general (fraud, unconscionability, etc.) Class Action Waivers Benefits of Arbitration Program 16

Unconscionability Procedural Unconscionability Concerned with oppression and surprise Adhesion contracts Employment Agreements Consumer Contracts Substantive Unconscionability Concerned with fairness and mutuality Carve-outs for injunctive relief in certain circumstances Discovery limits Damages limits Shortened SOL s 17

Unconscionability Cont d Employment & Consumer Agreements Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83: 5 Requirements Neutral arbitrator More than minimal discovery Need not be full discovery, but must provide access to documents and witnesses Written award Provides for all types of relief that would be available in court Company cover costs in employment arbitrations In consumer arbitrations, indigent consumers eligible for fee waiver (CCP 1284.3) 18

Unconscionability Cont d Employment Agreements Baltazar v. Forever 21 (2016) 62 Cal.4th 1237 Arbitration agreement at end of employment application Failure to attach arbitration rules does not add to procedural unconscionability Injunctions to preserve effectiveness of arbitration not substantively unconscionable (CCP 1281.8) Armendariz requirements must be met 19

Unconscionability Cont d Consumer Agreements Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co., LLC (2015) 61 Cal.4th 899 Arbitration agreement in contract to purchase used Mercedes Allow party to appeal awards of $0 or over $100k or when injunctive relief awarded; party appealing had to front appeal costs Preserved right to go to small claims court and/or self-help remedies (repossession) Class action waiver Arbitration agreement not substantively unconscionable 20

Fraud Distinguish between entire contract or arbitration provision itself Courts deem arbitration provisions separate from rest of contract If claim is entire contract void for fraud arbitrable (Ericksen, Arbuthnot, McCarthy, Kearney & Walsh, Inc. v. 100 Oak Street (1983) 35 Cal.3d 312, 319) If claim is arbitration provision void for fraud court (Engalla v. Permanente Med. Group, Inc. (1997) 15 Cal.4th 951, 973) 21

Class Action Waivers FAA CAA Class action waivers valid in agreements governed by FAA; state rules to contrary are preempted AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion (2011) 563 U.S. 333 DirecTV v. Imburgia (2015) 136 S.Ct. 463 Open question Discover Bank v. Superior Court (2005) 36 Cal.4th 148 Gentry v. Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal.4th 443 Caveat: Morris v. Ernst & Young, LLP, F.3d (9th Cir. Aug. 22, 2016) 22

Recommendations Specify that arbitration agreement is governed by FAA Be as explicit as possible when specifying rules Make arbitration agreement separate from other agreements/handbook Include class action waiver Satisfy Armendariz requirements 23

Presentation Title Josh Heinlein Joshua.Heinlein@dinsmore.com (619) 356-3518 Adriana Cara Adriana.Cara@dinsmore.com (619) 356-3518 Heather Anderson Heather.Anderson@bestbuy.com (858) 775-8458 24