ORDINANCE NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

Similar documents
County Of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

Item Number: Resolution Number: Date: May 17, /5 Vote Required

ORDINANCE NO The Board ofsupervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE

STAFF REPORT SAUSALITO CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION NO

COUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA (707) FAX (707)

PISMO BEACH COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

ORDINANCE NO

City of Carpinteria. COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT April 27, 2015

WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO. 169 BODEGA BAY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT

ORDINANCE NO The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

~RLY AGENDA REPORT. Meeting Date: April 11,2013 Item Number: F-5 To: Honorable Mayor & City Council

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING SECTION OF CHAPTER ( PARKING AND

ORDINANCE NO C.S.

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 18

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MISSION VIEJO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1279

VILLAGE OF NORTH RIVERSIDE ORDINANCE NO. 17-O-09

BODEGA BAY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT

CITY OF PALMDALE. REPORT to the Mayor and Members of the City Council from the City Manager

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCATA AMENDING THE ADMINISTRATION CITATION PROCEDURE OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE

SONOMA COUNTY WASTE MANAGEMENT AGENCY ORDINANCE NO

STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: April 18, City Council. FROM: Regan M. Candelario, City Manager. PRESENTER: Claudia Laughter, City Clerk

ORDINANCE NUMBER -2..Q.Q..3~) (City Council Series)

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CONCORD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 66, (OFFENSES AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS), ARTICLE III (CURFEW FOR MINORS)

COUNTY OF SONOMA AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY REPORT

City of Lafayette Staff Report

City of Calistoga Staff Report

STAFF REPORT SAUSALITO CITY COUNCIL

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE AMENDING SECTIONS 35-2 AND 35-5 TO CHAPTER 35 OF THE BUTTE COUNTY CODE ENTITLED THE RIGHT TO FARM ORDINANCE.

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. November 2, 2010

ORDINANCE NO. 725 (AS AMENDED THROUGH 725

* CITY CHICO City Council Agenda Report

Appendix A: Draft Billboard Ordinance

October 6, 2014 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council. THROUGH: Legislative Policy Committee (September 24, 2014)

RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 09/05/2017 AGENDA HEADING: Regular Business

SCC NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY CODE RELATING TO THE REGULATION OF SHOPPING CARTS

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA

24 in the manufacture of honey oil where such activity presents grave dangers and adverse health risks 25

NEW BUSINESS Agenda Item No. : 8b CC Mtg. : 7/12/2005

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Perris hereby ordains as follows:

BEVERLY HILLS AGENDA REPORT. Meeting Date: February 7, 2017 Item Number: D 8 To:

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ADDING CHAPTER 6

ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCE NO

The Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside, State of California, do ordain as follows:

V:'.1. ITo: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. ?.>cou, Y > r ".*-<?- " 1. uz'por"

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1312

ORDINANCE NO. C.S AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND ADOPTING CHAPTER 9.86 OF THE STANISLAUS COUNTY CODE PROHIBITING CANNABIS ACTIVITIES

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY. Jon Maginot, City Clerk/Assistant to the City Manager

ORDINANCE NO NS AN UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA REAUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC, EDUCATIONAL, AND GOVERNMENT

ORDINANCE NO The Board of Supervisors of the County of Napa, State of California, ordains as follows:

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3402

ORDINANCE NO. Recitals:

STAFF REPORT. MEETING October 24, City Council. Adam McGill, Chief of Police. PRESENTER: Michael Howard, Patrol Lieutenant

Chapter 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

CITY COUNCIL SUMMARY REPORT. Agenda No. Keywords: Sewer Connection Fee Ordinance Amendment October Meeting Date: PREPARED BY:

ORDINANCE NO The City Council of the City of Moreno Valley does hereby ordain as follows:

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3414

NOTICE OF INTENT TO BORROW MONEY AND RIGHT TO FILE PETITION. Notice is hereby given that pursuant to Ordinance Number 513, adopted April 28, 2009, the

amendments to the Anaheim City Charter to the qualified electors of said City at a general municipal

TO: BOARD OF EDUCATION ACTION/MAJOR 10/25/07 FROM: DIANNE TALARICO / UPDATE PARCEL TAX FEASIBILITY COMMITTEE

WHEREAS, the City and the Authority desire to provide for the negotiated sale of the Bonds; and

ORDINANCE NO.1376 C.S. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARTINEZ DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Resolution No

Public hearing to adopt Ordinance 1375 C.S. amending Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the Martinez Municipal Code

WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and

ORDINANCE NO. 15- RECITALS. WHEREAS, section (2), Florida Statutes, provides for the levy of a local

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE AMENDING PACIFIC GROVE MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 9.16 RELATING TO SOLID WASTE COLLECTION

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Yolo County, California

Agenda Item No. 6B August 9, Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Laura C. Kuhn, City Manager. Michelle A. Thornbrugh, City Clerk

ORDINANCE NO. 980 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANCASTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

TRINITY COUNTY. Board Item Request Form Phone

ORDINANCE NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Imperial, State of California, ordains as follows:

BOROUGH OF ELMER, COUNTY OF SALEM, NEW JERSEY ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF HEMET Hemet, California ORDINANCE NO. 1850

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

PAHRUMP TOWN ORDINANCE NO. 35

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of American Canyon unanimously recommended approval of the proposed ordinance; and

ORDINANCE NO RECORDS MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE

CITY OF DUNES CITY LANE COUNTY, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 206

Staff Report City of Manhattan Beach

Laguna Niguel Nuisance Animals

City of Signal Hill Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, CA

CITY OF ALAMEDA ORDINANCE NO. New Series

AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION TO THE EL DORADO COUNTY CODE PROHIBITING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES

TOWN OF JACKSON TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA DOCUMENTATION

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF HAPEVILLE, GEORGIA, CHAPTER 11, BUSINESS LICENSING AND

ORDINANCE NO. 553 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF

City of Los Alamitos

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY OF COCOA BEACH, FLORIDA, as follows:

ORDINANCE NO. 793 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHORELINE, WASHINGTON AMENDING CHAPTER 2.60 PURCHASING OF THE SHORELINE MUNICIPAL CODE

City of Westminster 2018Page

Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District (EMID)

Transcription:

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SONOMA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE SONOMA COUNTY CODE TO REVISE THE DELEGATED AUTHORITY OF THE PURCHASING AGENT TO ENTER INTO SERVICE CONTRACTS, AND TO ESTABLISH A COMPETIVE SOLICITATION PROCESS FOR SERVICE CONTRACTS EXCEEDING $50,000.00 The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows: SECTION I. Article V of Chapter 2 of the Sonoma County Code is hereby amended as follows: Article V, Division 1: Generally Section 2-54. Specific Duties. The purchasing agent shall administer the purchasing division, its stores, funds and accounts, and, except as otherwise provided herein, or by law, or by specific order of the board of supervisors, shall: (a) Purchase, lease or lease/purchase for the county and its departments all personal property; (b) Engage independent contractors to perform services for the county and its departments, with or without the furnishing of material, when the annual aggregate cost does not exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) subject to statutory procedures and to prior approval of the head of the department seeking approval of the contract; (c) Sell or exchange any item of personal property declared surplus to county needs; (d) Perform the above services for agencies and special districts organized under general law within the county and governed ex officio by, or under the control of, the board of supervisors; (e) Make purchases and dispositions of personal property for other public officers or agencies pursuant to authority of law; (f) Perform such other services as the board of supervisors requires. (Ord. No. 4654 1, 1993: Ord. No. 2490; Ord. No., I, 2016.) Section 2-58. Service Contracts (a) The department head is responsible for negotiating the terms of a contract appropriate for the purchase of any services. The department head shall comply with 1

all statutes, ordinances and regulations in the negotiation of such contracts. For service contracts not exceeding a total contract amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) per year for the life of the contract, the department head shall use such methods and informal procedures which, in the judgment of the department head, will secure the lowest competitive price consistent with operational needs. For service contracts exceeding a total contract amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) per year for the life of the contract, the department head shall use a formal competitive solicitation process. If a department head proposes a waiver of competitive solicitation for a particular agreement above this threshold, such waiver documenting a single or sole source justification must be submitted and approved by the Purchasing Agent prior to commencement of negotiation of the agreement. The purchasing agent and county auditor shall develop policies and procedures to assist department heads in complying with these requirements. (b) Contracts within the scope of authority granted in Section 2-54(b) and not within the exceptions listed in Section 2-55 shall be executed by the purchasing agent. Contracts for purchases described in Section 2-55 shall be executed by the department head or his or her designee. All other service contracts shall be submitted to the board for its approval. (Ord. No. 4654 1, 1993; Ord. No. 1, 2016.) SECTION II. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional and invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance. The Board of Supervisors hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and every section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or invalid. SECTION III. This Ordinance shall be and the same is hereby declared to be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days after the date of its passage and shall be published as follows: either (1) once in its entirety before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its passage, or (2) a summary shall be published once at least five (5) days before the proposed date of passage and a summary published once within fifteen (15) days after the date of passage. All publications shall include the names of the Supervisors voting for or against the same, in The Press Democrat, a newspaper of general circulation published in the County of Sonoma, State of California, and the Clerk of the Board shall post in the office of the Clerk, a certified copy of the full text of this ordinance along with the names of those Directors voting for or against the Ordinance. In regular session of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma introduced on the day of May, 2016, and finally passed and adopted this day of May, 2016 on regular roll call of the members of said Board by the following vote: SUPERVISORS: Rabbitt Gorin Zane Gore Carrillo 2

AYES NOES ABSTAIN ABSENT WHEREUPON, the Chair declared the above and foregoing ordinance duly adopted and SO ORDERED. 3

n;r: wn1m1 :1~:; muw:m 1;; i\ COFHECT COPY OF H1L OiHCiNAL ON F!l.E IN HllS OFFICE #11 Resolution No. 16-0102 County of Sonoma Santa Rosa, CA 95403 Date: March 15, 2016 Concurrent Resolution of the Iloard of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, the Board of Directors of the Sonoma County Water Agency, the Board of Directors of the Russian River County Sanitation District, the Board of the Directors of the South Park County Sanitation District, the Board of the Directors of the Occidental County Sanitation District, the Board of Directors of the Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District, and the Board of Directors of the Northern Sonoma County Air Pollution Control District Delegating Signature Authority To The Purchasing Agent, County Department Heads and Heads of the Sonoma County Water Agency, Community Development Commission, Agricultural Preservation nnd Open Space District, and Northern Sonoma County Air Pollution Control District for Service Agreements and Making Certain Other Legislative Policy Actions WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors, the Board of Directors of the Sonoma County Water Agency (hereinafter, "SCWA"), the Board of Directors of the Russian River County Sanitation District, the Board of the Directors ofthe South Park County Sanitation District, the Board of the Directors of the Occidental County Sanitation District (hereinafter Sanitation District Boards refe1ted to as "County Sanitation District Boards"), the Board of Directors of the Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District (hereinafter "SCOSD"), and the Board of Directors of the No1thern Sonoma County Air Pollution Control District (hereinafter "NSCAPCD") (collectively all hereinafter generally referred to as "Boards") to promote efficient and effective use ofresources with respect to preparation and review oflower dollar value Service Agreements; and WHEREAS, in furtherance of this objective, it is the desire of the Boards to authorize an increase in the delegated signature authority for service agreements for the County Purchasing Agent, the County Department Heads, as County officers, and the various heads of the above agencies and districts; and WHEREAS, another objective of the Boards is to improve procedures for competitive selection of service providers for higher value service agreements; and WHEREAS, in furtherance of this objective, it is the desire of the Boards to establish a tlu eshold for utilization of formal competitive solicitation processes and for County Purchasing Division staff to provide training on procurement procedures, processes, and competitive solicitation thresholds and best practices to County Department Heads, heads of the above entities and staff upon request; and WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 25502.S(a), in Counties having a population of 200,000 or more, the Board of Supervisors may

Page 2 authorize the Purchasing Agent to engage independent contractors to perform services for the County or County officers, with or without the furnishing of material, when the annual aggregate cost does not exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000); and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors in its resolution 95-0328 dated March 21, 1995, established exemptions from Purchasing procedmes and authorized certain County officers to execute agreements for indicated items or services within the limits otherwise established for the Purchasing Agent, which limit is currently up to $25,000; and WHEREAS, the SCWA Board and the Boards of the County Sanitation Districts operated by the SCW A (Sonoma Valley, Russian River, Occidental and South Park, hereinafter "County Sanitation Districts") adopted concunent resolution 02-0234 dated March 12, 2002, delegating to the General Manager/Chief Engineer (reference subsequently changed to "General Manager") of the SCWA authority to engage independent contractors to perfo1m services for the Agency and the County Sanitation Districts, including the furnishing of material, up to $25,000 subject to statutory procedures; and WHEREAS, the SCOSD Board in its Resolutions 92-1417 and 01-0087 dated September 22, 1992 and January 23, 2001 respectively and Resolution 02-0405 dated April 23, 2002, delegated certain purchasing authority to the General Manager of the SCOSD with a limit of $25,000 per transaction consistent with Public Resource Code Section 5549(b), as amended; and WHEREAS, the delegation from the SCOSD Board to the General Manager authorized by this Resolution will require and act by the Legislature before it is effective; and WHEREAS, the NSCAPCD cwtently has no formal delegated signature authority policy for service agreements and has informally followed County procurement procedures since 1993; and WHEREAS, there have been changes in the marketplace since the establishment of the signature authority of the County Purchasing Agent and the heads of the above agencies and districts, as well as inflation, and WHEREAS, it fuithers effective and efficient government operations and management to increase the amow1ts of delegated signature authority of the Purchasing Agent, other County officers, the SCW A General Manager, the CDC Executive Director, the SCOSD General Manager and the NSCAPCD Air Pollution Control Officer for services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Boards hereby find, declare, determine and order as follows: 1. All of the above recitals are true and conect; 2. Pursuant to Government Code section 25502.5, the Board of Supervisors authorizes the Purchasing Agent to engage independent contractors to perform services for the County or County officers, with or without the furnishing of material, when the annual aggregate cost does not exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000); the authorization shall be effective upon amendment of the current threshold of $25,000 in the Sonoma County

Page 3 Code; and 3. The Board of Supervisors authorizes all County Department heads to execute agreements for services in an amount not to exceed a total contract amount of $50,000 per year for the life of the contract, and hereby amends resolution 95-0328 dated March 21, 1995 to increase the delegated authority for County officers specified therein to this amount; and 4. The SCWA Board of Directors and the Sanitation District Boards hereby amend resolution 02-0234 dated March 12, 2002 to raise the delegated signature authority of the SCW A General Manager specified therein in an amount not to exceed a total contract amount of $50,000 per year for the life of the contract; and 5. The SCOSD Board hereby amends its resolutions 92-1417 and 01-0087 dated September 22, 1992 and January 23, 2001 respectively and resolution 02-0405 dated April 23, 2002, to authorize an increase in the delegated signature authority of the SCOSD General Manager in an amount not to exceed a total contract amount of $50,000 per year for the life of the contract as specified therein, or whatever amount is authorized by the Legislature in an amount no more than $49,999 per year, immediately upon the adoption by the Legislature of an amendment to Public Resource Code Section 5549(b) or other legislation increasing the delegated signature authority of the SCOSD General Manager as specified in the statutory delegation; and 6, The NSCAPCD Board hereby establishes the delegated signature authority of the NSCAPCD Air Pollution Control Officer in an amount not to exceed a total contract amount of $50,000 per year for the life of the contract; and 7. The Boards approve the above increases in delegated signature authority for service agreements effective upon amendment of the cunent threshold of $25,000 for the County Purchasing Agent in the Sonoma County Code; and 8. The Boards establish the requirement of a formal competitive solicitation process for service agreements in which payment is specified at greater than $50,000 per year. Ifa County Department or entity specified above proposes a waiver of competitive solicitation for a particular agreement above this threshold, such waiver documenting a single or sole source justification must be submitted and approved by the County Purchasing Agent prior to commencement of negotiation of the agreement. 9. The Board of Supervisors directs the Purchasing Agent to prepare amendments to the Sonoma County Code for consideration by the Board to change the cunent service contract delegated signature limit for the Purchasing Agent, and to establish a formal competitive solicitation process for the County. Sonoma County Board of Supervisors/Directors/Commissioners: Gorin: Aye Rabbitt: Aye Zane: Aye Gore: Aye Canillo: Aye Ayes: 5 Noes: 0 Absent: 0 Abstain: 0 So Ordered.

.

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SONOMA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE SONOMA COUNTY CODE TO REVISE THE DELEGATED AUTHORITY OF THE PURCHASING AGENT TO ENTER INTO SERVICE CONTRACTS, AND TO ESTABLISH A COMPETIVE SOLICITATION PROCESS FOR SERVICE CONTRACTS EXCEEDING $50,000.00 The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows: SECTION I. Article V of Chapter 2 of the Sonoma County Code is hereby amended as follows: Article V, Division 1: Generally Section 2-54. Specific Duties. The purchasing agent shall administer the purchasing division, its stores, funds and accounts, and, except as otherwise provided herein, or by law, or by specific order of the board of supervisors, shall: (a) Purchase, lease or lease/purchase for the county and its departments all personal property; (b) Engage independent contractors to perform services for the county and its departments, including with or without the furnishing of material, when the annual aggregate cost does not exceed up to one hundred twenty-five thousand dollars ($25100,000) subject to statutory procedures and to prior approval of the head of the department seeking approval of the contract; (c) Sell or exchange any item of personal property declared surplus to county needs; (d) Perform the above services for agencies and special districts organized under general law within the county and governed ex officio by, or under the control of, the board of supervisors; (e) Make purchases and dispositions of personal property for other public officers or agencies pursuant to authority of law; (f) Perform such other services as the board of supervisors requires. (Ord. No. 4654 1, 1993: Ord. No. 2490; Ord. No., I, 2016.) Section 2-58. Service Contracts (a) The department head is responsible for negotiating the terms of a contract appropriate for the purchase of any services. The department head shall comply with 1

all statutes, ordinances and regulations in the negotiation of such contracts, and. For service contracts not exceeding a total contract amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) per year for the life of the contract, the department head shall use such methods and informal procedures which, in the judgment of the department head, will secure the lowest competitive price consistent with operational needs. For service contracts exceeding a total contract amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) per year for the life of the contract, the department head shall use a formal competitive solicitation process. If a department head proposes a waiver of competitive solicitation for a particular agreement above this threshold, such waiver documenting a single or sole source justification must be submitted and approved by the Purchasing Agent prior to commencement of negotiation of the agreement. The purchasing agent and county auditor shall develop policies and procedures to assist department heads in complying with these requirements. (b) Contracts within the scope of authority granted in Section 2-54(b) and not within the exceptions listed in Section 2-55 shall be executed by the purchasing agent. Contracts for purchases described in Section 2-55 shall be executed by the department head or his or her designee. All other service contracts shall be submitted to the board for its approval. (Ord. No. 4654 1, 1993; Ord. No. 1, 2016.) SECTION II. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional and invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance. The Board of Supervisors hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and every section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or invalid. SECTION III. This Ordinance shall be and the same is hereby declared to be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days after the date of its passage and shall be published as follows: either (1) once in its entirety before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its passage, or (2) a summary shall be published once at least five (5) days before the proposed date of passage and a summary published once within fifteen (15) days after the date of passage. All publications shall include the names of the Supervisors voting for or against the same, in The Press Democrat, a newspaper of general circulation published in the County of Sonoma, State of California, and the Clerk of the Board shall post in the office of the Clerk, a certified copy of the full text of this ordinance along with the names of those Directors voting for or against the Ordinance. In regular session of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma introduced on the day of May, 2016, and finally passed and adopted this day of May, 2016 on regular roll call of the members of said Board by the following vote: SUPERVISORS: Rabbitt Gorin Zane Gore Carrillo 2

AYES NOES ABSTAIN ABSENT WHEREUPON, the Chair declared the above and foregoing ordinance duly adopted and SO ORDERED. 3