EEOC & Suzanne Whitty v. Mount Carmel, LLC, and Benedictine Health System, et al.

Similar documents
EEOC and Quianna M. Knowles v. Remedy Intelligent Staffing, Inc.

EEOC and Maria Torres v. The Restaurant Company dba Perkins

EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bob Watson Chevrolet

EEOC v. Ealge Wings Industries, Inc.

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

EEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rochdale Village, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Studley Products, Inc. and Wildwood Industries, Inc., Defendants.

EEOC & Wolansky v. United Healthcare of Florida, Inc.

EEOC & Aimee Boss and Morgan Hagedon v. Bodega Bars USA, LLC d/b/a Mosaic Restaurant

EEOC v. CMC Service of Chicago, LLC d/b/a Great Clips for Hair

U.S. EEOC v Promens USA, Inc. and Bonar Plastics, Inc.

EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.

EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Airlines, Inc., and Transport Workers Union Local 501

EEOC v. Northwest Savings Bank

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels

EEOC and David Marcotte and Robert Kerouac v. Federal Express Corp.

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Majesty Maintenance, Inc.

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

Cornell University ILR School. Judge Karen E. Schreier

EEOC v. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. and Mike Patel

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Japanese Food Solutions Inc., d/b/a Minado Restaurant

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al., v. White House Home for Adults

EEOC v. JEC Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a McDonalds

EEOC v. Fleming, Inc., d/b/a J. Edward's

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Associated Home Health Care of Palm Beach.

EEOC v. Mcdonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Defendant.

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Jetson Midwest Mailers, Inc., Defendant.

EEOC v. Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center

EEOC v. Bice of Chicago, et al.

EEOC, et al v Lafayette College, et al.,

EEOC v. Consolidated Stores, Inc. d/b/a Big Lots

EEOC v. Dillard's, Inc

EEOC, Christopher, Bhend, and Chamara v. National Education Association, National Education Association - Alaska

EEOC v. Tropiano Transportation Services, Inc.

EEOC & Rodriguez, et al. v. Dynamic Medical Services, Inc.

EEOC v. Lawry's Retaurants, Inc,, d/b/a Lawry's The Prime Rib, Five Crowns, and Tam O'Shanter Inn

EEOC v. Oglethorpe University

EEOC v. John Wieland Homes and Neighborhoods, Inc.

EEOC v. Parker Palm Springs Hotel

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dutch Farms, Inc.

EEOC v. Moka Shoe Corporation

EEOC v. Altec Industries

United States of America v. City of Alma, Georgia and Bacon County, Georgia

EEOC v. Family Dollar Stores of Arkansas

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Convergys Corporation

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Sherree Salter, et al., v. The Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc., Andre Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. CONSENT DECREE INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLIll~ STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

EEOC v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.

United States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico

EEOC & Mitchel, et al., v. Allied Aviation Services, Inc., Allied Aviation Fueling of Dallas, LP, Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Texas, Inc.

EEOC v. Baldwin Supply Co.

EEOC v. Grimmway Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Grimmway Farms; Esparza Enterprises, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Lutheran Social Services of Southern California, Defendant.

EEOC and Darmo et al. v. Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. et al.

EEOC v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Tri-Spur Investment Company, Inc., dba Sbarro's Italian Eatery

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc., Defendant.

EEOC v. Supervalu Holdings, Inc.

EEOC v. Hannon's Food Services of Jackson Inc (d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken)

EEOC v. River View Coal, LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc., d/b/a Harbor Freight Tools

EEOC. v. Fox News. Cornell University ILR School. Judge William H. Pauly

Case 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 11 Filed 06/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Revolution Studios and Smile Productions, LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Foodscience Corporation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, CV-W-2-ECF

EEOC v. Supreme Corporation and Supreme Northwest LLC

EEOC v. Brink's Incorporated

EEOC v. KCD Construction, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Gehl Corporation d/b/a The Gehl Group

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. d/b/a Betsy Ross Flag Girl and Barjac Company

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc.

EEOC v. Stephens Institute d/b/a The Academy of Art College

EEOC v. Eastern Engineered Wood Products, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Peter Servidio, Plaintiffs, v. Labranche & Co., Inc., Defendant.

Case 1:11-cv NLH -AMD Document 61 Filed 01/24/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 211 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

EEOC v. Original Hot Dog Shops, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop, Food Gallery Original, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff and Jane Doe, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Brookshire Grocery Company, Defendant.

EEOC v. Pass and Seymour, Inc. and Kennmark Group, Ltd. (Consent Decree as to Pass and Seymour)

EEOC v. Scrub Inc. Cornell University ILR School. Judge Susan Cox

EEOC v. Cleveland Construction, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Seafoods Company

IN TIlE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, FOR TIlE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Judge Gettleman CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

EEOC and Thornton, et al, v. University of Phoenix, Inc. and Apollo Group, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. United Airlines, Inc., Defendant.

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores d/b/a Sam s Club

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Plaintiff, Defendant. CONSENT DECREE

United States of America v. City of Lubbock, Texas

)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:01-cv MLM Document 59 Filed 11/20/2002 Page 1 of 16

Transcription:

Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 10-7-2004 EEOC & Suzanne Whitty v. Mount Carmel, LLC, and Benedictine Health System, et al. Judge Aaron E. Goodstein Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec Thank you for downloading this resource, provided by the ILR School's Labor and Employment Law Program. Please help support our student research fellowship program with a gift to the Legal Repositories! This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Labor and Employment Law Program at DigitalCommons@ILR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Consent Decrees by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@ILR. For more information, please contact hlmdigital@cornell.edu.

EEOC & Suzanne Whitty v. Mount Carmel, LLC, and Benedictine Health System, et al. Keywords Suzanne Whitty, Mount Carmel, LLC, and Benedictine Health System, et al., 03-C-0898, Consent Decree, Retaliation, Sexual Harassment, Termination, Sex, Female, Healthcare, Employment Law, Title VII This article is available at DigitalCommons@ILR: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec/326

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN U S. DIST. COURT EAST DIST. WSC. TILED. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, SUZANNE WHITTY, v. Plaintiff-Intervenor, Civil Action No. 03-C-0898 MOUNT CARMEL, LLC, and BENEDICTINE HEALTH SYSTEM, et al., Defendants. CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER This suit was filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("Commission") on September 15, 2003, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seg. ("Title VII"), Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, and 42 U.S.C. 1981a. The Commission alleged that Mount Carmel, LLC, discriminated against Suzanne Whitty when it terminated her employment as an Assistant Administrator, in retaliation for her opposition to an unlawful employment practice, specifically sexual harassment. The Commission, Plaintiff-Intervenor, and all defendants, (the "parties") have agreed to resolve this matter pursuant to this Consent Decree, without continuing to trial on the merits of the Commission's and Plaintiff-Intervenor's claims. NOW, THEREFORE, the Court having carefully examined the terms and provisions of this Consent Decree, and based on the pleadings, record and stipulations of the parties, it is Case 2:03-cv-00898-AEG Filed 10/07/04 Page 1 of 8 Document 40

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT: 1. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and over the parties for purposes of entering and enforcing this Decree. 2. The terms of this Decree are adequate, fair, reasonable, equitable and just. 3. This Decree conforms with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and is not in derogation of the rights or privileges of any person. The entry of this Decree will further the objectives of Title VII, Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, and 42 U.S.C. 1981a and will be in the best interests of the parties, those for whom EEOC seeks relief, and the public. 4. This case was resolved by a mutually-agreeable settlement, to avoid the time, cost, and uncertainty associated with further contesting this matter. Defendants and their agents and employees do not admit to any wrongdoing. 5. This Decree resolves all claims against all defendants arising out of the Charge of Discrimination filed by Suzanne Whitty, EEOC Charge No. 260-A2-00820, the Commission's amended complaint, and Ms. Whitty's amended complaint. INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 1. Injunction. Mount Carmel, LLC, its officers, agents, employees, successors, and all persons in active concert or participation with it shall be and are hereby enjoined from engaging in any employment practice that violates Title VII, Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, or 42 U.S.C. 1981a, for two years. Case 2:03-cv-00898-AEG Filed 10/07/04 Page 2 of 8 Document 40

2. Training. Mount Carmel, LLC, shall provide training in regard to Title VII, Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, and 42 U.S.C. 1981a to all of its management and supervisory employees once per year for the next two years from the date of entry of this Consent Decree and Order, and shall annually provide the EEOC's Milwaukee District Office with a list of those trained and the date and description of the training provided, and shall include training on sexual harassment and retaliation. 3. Posting. Mount Carmel, LLC, shall place a public notice, in a conspicuous place, at its offices, for a period of two years from the date of entry of this Consent Decree and Order. The notice shall be in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A and captioned "Notice To All Employees." Mount Carmel, LLC, shall annually provide the Commission's Milwaukee District Office with proof of compliance with this provision. 4. Dissemination of Policy Statement Mount Carmel, LLC, agrees to issue and disseminate a statement to all its employees, in the form attached as Exhibit B (or in such other form as it may choose, with the consent of the Commission), affirming its obligation to comply with Title VII, Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, and 42 U.S.C. 1981a, and affirming that it is the responsibility of all of Mount Carmel, LLC's employees to comply with Title VII, Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, and 42 U.S.C. 1981a within 30 days of execution of this Consent Decree. Once each year for the next two years, Mount Carmel, LLC, shall re-issue the policy statement, to all of its human resources staff, recruiting department personnel, and all others with day-to-day EEO responsibility. 3 Case 2:03-cv-00898-AEG Filed 10/07/04 Page 3 of 8 Document 40

5. Certification to Commission. Upon each annual compliance with the foregoing provision of this Consent Decree, Mount Carmel, LLC, shall promptly certify to the undersigned counsel for the Commission that Mount Carmel, LLC, has complied with it. 6. References to Ms. Whitty by Defendant Mount Carmel, LLC, further agrees to prohibit any dissemination, directly or indirectly, to any other employer or potential employer of any facts or circumstances surrounding Ms. Whitty's charge of discrimination or the events relating to the charge or this lawsuit. 7. Reporting For two years from the entry of this Consent Decree and Order, Mount Carmel, LLC, shall report in writing, to the undersigned counsel for the Commission (on a semiannual basis every June 30 and December 31 starting with December 31, 2004), the name, address, phone number, job title, of each employee or applicant for employment, and for all individuals who are terminated, disciplined, or promoted. Mount Carmel, LLC, shall also maintain such documents for the two-year term of this Decree, and shall make such documents available for inspection by the Commission pursuant to Paragraph 8 herein. Upon the termination of this Decree, Mount Carmel, LLC, shall retain documents pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1602.14. 8. Right of Entry for Inspection For two years from entry of this Consent Decree and Order, the Commission shall have the right, on 10 days written notice to Mount Carmel, LLC, to enter upon Mount Carmel, LLC's offices and inspect any relevant documents or records for the purpose of determining Mount Carmel, LLC's compliance with this Consent Decree and Order. 4 Case 2:03-cv-00898-AEG Filed 10/07/04 Page 4 of 8 Document 40

MONETARY RELIEF Mount Carmel, LLC, agrees, within 15 days of signature of this Consent Decree and Order by the Court, to pay Ms. Whitty $27,500.00 for alleged past and future lost payroll income, less appropriate deductions, and Mount Carmel, LLC, shall pay its own share of all applicable withholdings, which shall not reduce the award. Mount Carmel, LLC, further agrees to pay Ms. Whitty $150,000.00 for all other forms of alleged damages, including emotional distress and reputation damages, and to pay her attorney, Walter F. Kelly, $80,000.00 for plaintiffintervenor's reasonable attorney's fees, costs, and other litigation expenses. Mount Carmel, LLC, shall mail the payments to Ms. Whitty and Mr. Kelly's firm c/o Attorney Walter F. Kelly, Walter F. Kelly, S.C., Broadway Theatre Center, 158 North Broadway, Suite 600, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202, and shall simultaneously provide a copy of the payment check(s) to the undersigned counsel for the Commission. SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED this 7^day offfifefl, 2004. XT 15 &/vfw\ &c^f*4 tkd ait $*nji^ ftvtmi fr& dpwtdqs irwfft United States DistricTCourt DistricfCourt Magistrate Judge Date Robert F. Tomlinson Senior Trial Attorney Date Case 2:03-cv-00898-AEG Filed 10/07/04 Page 5 of 8 Document 40

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 310 West Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 800 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202 Walter F. Kelly (j Attorney for Suzanne Whitty PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR Rob; Attorney for all De fd'i - w Date A-1-</ Date ' Case 2:03-cv-00898-AEG Filed 10/07/04 Page 6 of 8 Document 40

Exhibit A NOTICE TO ALL EMPLOYEES This notice is being posted by order of the Court in a lawsuit brought against Mount Carmel, LLC by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC"). The EEOC alleged that the Mount Carmel, LLC, violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et sea. ("Title VII"), Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, and 42 U.S.C. 1981a, by terminating Suzanne Whitty in retaliation for opposing an unlawful employment practice, and for participating in an investigation of an unlawful employment practice. This case was resolved by a mutually-agreeable settlement, to avoid the time, cost, and uncertainty associated with further contesting this matter. Mount Carmel, LLC, its agents and employees do not admit to any wrongdoing. Mount Carmel, LLC, has further agreed not to discriminate against any employee for opposing an unlawful employment practice or for participating in an investigation of an unlawful employment practice. Should you have any complaints of discrimination for opposing an unlawful employment practice or for participating in an investigation of an unlawful employment practice, contact [Human Resources], or the local EEOC office in Milwaukee. EEOC charges no fee for its services, and has employees who speak languages other than English. EEOC's offices are accessible to individuals with disabilities. THIS IS AN OFFICIAL NOTICE AND MUST NOT BE DEFACED BY ANYONE Case 2:03-cv-00898-AEG Filed 10/07/04 Page 7 of 8 Document 40

Exhibit B [Mount Carmel, LLC Letterhead] Mount Carmel, LLC, believes in hiring, placing, and promoting individuals on the basis of qualifications and merit. It is Mount Carmel, LLC's policy that all employment practices, including recruiting, hiring, promotion, layoff, recall from layoff, training, compensation, benefits, and other terms, privileges and conditions of employment, be free from discrimination of any kind, including discrimination for opposing an unlawful employment practice or for participating in an investigation of an unlawful employment practice. Mount Carmel, LLC, believes in full compliance with fair employment laws. It is the responsibility of all Mount Carmel, LLC's, employees to comply with this policy in fact and in spirit. Dated: Executive Administrator Case 2:03-cv-00898-AEG Filed 10/07/04 Page 8 of 8 Document 40