Report of the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee

Similar documents
No Multilateral. Multilat6ral

International treaty examination of the New Zealand People's Republic of China Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters

AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE SOUTH PACIFIC REGIONAL ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME (SPREP) (AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING SPREP) (Apia, 16 June 1993)

Agreement On The Network Of Aquaculture Centers In Asia And the Pacific

Police Service Act 2009

COUNTRY OPERATIONS PLAN. Countries: Australia, New Zealand, and the South Pacific

Revised rules and by-laws for the Australian region

ATTACKS ON JUSTICE PAPUA NEW GUINEA

No. 17 of Bougainville (International Assistance Groups) (Privileges and Immunities) Act Certified on: / /20.

THE PACIFIC ISLANDS CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AND SECURITY TREATY

Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Act 1981

General Assembly Security Council

Protection of the Sea (Powers of Intervention) Act 1981

BILATERAL AGREEMENT ON THE LEGAL PROFESSION UNIFORM FRAMEWORK

Agreement. Between the Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty Regarding the Status of Their Forces

New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants RULES OF THE NEW ZEALAND INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS EFFECTIVE 26 JUNE 2017 CONTENTS

Bangkok, Thailand, 5-8 January, The Conference of Plenipotentiaries was held in Bangkok, Thailand, from 5th to 8th January 1988.

AFP s ROLE IN CAPACITY BUILDING AND PEACE OPERATIONS

DEFENCE ACT, 2002 (ACT 1 of 2002) ACT

Rail Safety (Adoption of National Law) Act 2012 No 82

International police missions as reverse capacity building: experiences of Australian police personnel

the general policy intent of the Privacy Bill and other background policy material;

Access Agreement. Queensland Rail Limited. [Insert name of Operator] [Insert name of Access Holder]

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.

4 New Zealand s statement in Geneva to the Indonesian government specific to Papua was as follows:

Brokering (Weapons and Related Items) Controls Bill

Coastal Trading (Revitalising Australian Shipping) Act 2012

Annex III: Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone

TREATY SERIES 1999 Nº 1. International Convention on Salvage

This explanatory note sits above all paragraphs in this Model Arrangement.

General Assembly. United Nations A/61/494

Work Health and Safety Act 2011 No 10

REGULATION (EU) No 439/2010 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 19 May 2010 establishing a European Asylum Support Office

Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations (PACER)

Work Health and Safety Act 2011 No 10

Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011

Whistleblower Protection Act 10 of 2017 (GG 6450) ACT

Official Journal of the European Union L 10/29

Inquiry into Work Health and Safety (Industrial Manslaughter) Amendment Bill 2015

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION *

Legal Profession Uniform General Rules 2015

Immigration (Visa, Entry Permission, and Related Matters) Regulations 2010

Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992

RFMOs and the Development of High Seas Fisheries Regulations

GOVERNMENT GAZETTE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA

Protocol on Liability and Compensation for Damage Resulting from Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal

Provider Contract for the Provision of Legal Aid Services and Specified Legal Services

Age Discrimination Act 2004

Further recalling the general principle of the protection of the civilian population against the effects of hostilities,

MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS REGISTRATION ACT 1996

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES ACADEMY NAME: ONE

OFFENCE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT ACT

Outer Space and High-altitude Activities Act 2017

[Assented to 23rd March, 2007]

CHAPTER DISASTER PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE ACT

POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY ACT 1998 BERMUDA 1998 : 29 POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY ACT 1998

EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON EXTRADITION. Paris, 13.XII.1957

BERMUDA POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY ACT : 29

TREATY SERIES 2001 Nº 23. International Convention on Oil Pollution Preparedness, Response and Co-Operation

Outer Space and High-altitude Activities Bill

SOUTH PACIFIC FORUM FISHERIES AGENCY CONVENTION

Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006

COMMONWEALTH WOMEN PARLIAMENTARIANS New Zealand Group. A perspective from women parliamentarians

PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE CONTENTS: 1. Agreement p Additional Protocol (USA not a party) p. 8

PRIVACY BILL 2018 APPROVAL FOR INTRODUCTION AND ADDITIONAL POLICY DECISIONS

ARMED FORCES (OFFENCES AND JURISDICTION) (JERSEY) LAW 2017

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ROME STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT ACT 27 OF ] (English text signed by the President)

INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON SALVAGE, 1989

Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill [HL]

(1 March 2015 to date) LABOUR RELATIONS ACT 66 OF (Gazette No , Notice No. 1877, dated 13 December 1995) Commencement:

KEY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE UNIFORM LAW AND THE NEW SOUTH WALES AND VICTORIAN LEGAL PROFESSION ACTS

Mutual Indemnity and Hold Harmless Deed

Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (full text)

Trade Disputes Act Ch. 48:02

It is hereby notified that the President has assented to the following Act which is hereby published for general information:-

Bowie State University Police Department General Order

International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombing

SENATOR THE HON. CHRISTOPHER ELLISON Minister for Justice and Customs Senator for Western Australia Manager of Government Business in the Senate

The Legal Framework for Extradition, MLA and Recovery of Proceeds of Corruption

Decree umber 9. umber 14 for the year 2008 Internal Security Forces Penal Code. Chapter One Application of the Law

Official Journal of the European Union COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION OF TERRORISM

Carriage of Goods Act 1979

Visiting Forces Act SHORT TITLE INTERPRETATION

Engineers Registration Bill 2018

Whale Protection Act 1980

Western Australia. Weapons Act Extract from see that website for further information

Supplement No. 18 published with Extraordinary Gazette No. 71 dated 9 th September, 2016.

Scheme and Model Bill for the Protection of Cultural Heritage Within the Commonwealth

SAINT CHRISTOPHER AND NEVIS No. 19 of 2011

SOUTH PACIFIC NUCLEAR-FREE ZONE (TREATY OF RAROTONGA)

Antarctica (Environmental Protection: Liability Annex) Amendment Act 2012

Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism *

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 10 November 2009 (OR. en) 15053/09 COSDP 991 PESC 1409 BIH 32 COWEB 236

International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombing

Regional employment and labour mobility

The Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

An Act to provide for the creation and management of State forests and other related matters.

NATIONAL HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE ORGANIZATION, INCORPORATED AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS*

DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION

Transcription:

International Treaty Examination of the Agreement between Solomon Islands, Australia, New Zealand, Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Samoa and Tonga Concerning the Operations and Status of the Police and Armed Forces and Other Personnel Deployed to Solomon Islands to Assist in the Restoration of Law and Order and Security Report of the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee The Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee has conducted an international treaty examination of the Agreement between Solomon Islands, Australia, New Zealand, Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, and Tonga Concerning the Operations and Status of the Police and Armed Forces and Other Personnel Deployed to Solomon Islands to Assist in the Restoration of Law and Order and Security, and has no matters to bring to the attention of the House. The National Interest Analysis for the treaty is appended to this report. Hon Peter Dunne Chairperson

Agreement between Solomon Islands, Australia, New Zealand, Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, and Tonga concerning the operations and status of the police and armed forces and other personnel deployed to Solomon Islands to assist in the restoration of law and order National Interest Analysis Date of Proposed Binding Treaty Action New Zealand signed the Agreement between Solomon Islands, Australia, New Zealand, Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, and Tonga concerning the operations and status of the police and armed forces and other personnel deployed to Solomon Islands to assist in the restoration of law and order and security on 24 July 2003. The Agreement entered into force between the Government of the Solomon Islands and the Government of New Zealand by way of an exchange of notes completed on 24 July 2003. The Agreement will enter into force between New Zealand and the remaining parties upon the conclusion of an exchange of notes between each party notifying the other of the completion of its constitutional requirements. The Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade considers that the subject-matter of this agreement is likely to be of interest to members of the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee, such as to warrant referral under the international treaty examination process. However binding treaty action has been taken prior to the completion of the parliamentary examination process, under the international treaties examination process urgency mechanism (Cab Manual 5.90), in order to ensure that New Zealand personnel in the Solomon Islands would enjoy the jurisdictional protections provided by the Agreement from the outset of their deployment. The urgency mechanism has not been used previously. Under this mechanism, formal treaty action exceptionally can precede referral to the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee as long as the treaty is tabled as soon as possible after the binding action has been taken, together with a National Interest Analysis and an explanation from the government as to why it was considered necessary to take urgent action. The Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade wrote to the Chair of the Foreign Affairs, Trade and Defence Committee advising of the Government s decision to rely on the urgency mechanism in this particular case and the reasons for its doing so. Reasons for New Zealand to become party to the treaty Whenever New Zealand is contemplating deploying its police and/or its armed forces overseas, it is preferable to have a status of forces agreement (SOFA) with the host country setting out the legal responsibilities of the parties. A SOFA of this kind provides a legal framework for resolving issues that may arise from the deployment. This can be especially important with respect to issues such as legal jurisdiction and compensation for claims, where in the absence of such an agreement we would need to rely on customary international law. 1

Under this SOFA agreement New Zealand personnel have legal immunity (for acts carried out in the course of official duties that is only New Zealand, not the Solomon Islands, has jurisdiction over New Zealand personnel. With respect to compensation for claims, it has been agreed that claims between the Solomon Islands and assisting countries be waived. The SOFA, also clarifies issues of command and control. Advantages and Disadvantages to New Zealand of the Treaty entering into force Advantages to New Zealand of the Treaty entering into force The Agreement provides New Zealand with a legal framework governing key issues related to the deployment in the Solomon Islands. In the absence of the Agreement, New Zealand would have to rely on customary international law. Such protection as exists under customary international law for the armed forces of another country may not be regarded as extending to police personnel. New Zealand personnel enjoy the legal protections guaranteed under the Agreement from the outset of their deployment in the Solomon Islands. In terms of legal jurisdiction, New Zealand personnel will enjoy immunity from legal proceedings (which includes criminal, civil and disciplinary proceedings) in the Solomon Islands for all acts or omissions carried out in the course of official duties. This is an important measure to safeguard New Zealand personnel who may be involved in an incident where, if it were not for the provision in the Agreement, they would be subject to legal proceedings in the Solomon Islands. Compensation claims generally between the parties and the Solomon Islands will be waived. Any claims not covered under the Agreement (i.e. third party claims) will be subject to consultation between the parties. This will enable any well-founded claims to be considered on a one-off basis, without creating an expectation that there may be a source of funds easily accessible for possibly ill-founded claims. The Agreement clarifies the role and relationship of police and armed forces participating in the visiting contingent and provides for our police and armed Forces to retain national command for its personnel. Thus, under the Agreement police will have recourse to a red-card facility that effectively allows police members of the visiting contingent if necessary to refuse to carry out tasks or orders that are inconsistent with their national laws and procedures. Under the Agreement while both the police members and armed forces would be subject to the control of the Australian head of the relevant forces (as defined in the Agreement), New Zealand would retain national command. Disadvantages to New Zealand of the Treaty Entering into Force A possible disadvantage of this Agreement is that, while members of the visiting contingent will have legal immunity for acts carried out in the course of official duties, for acts that fall outside of official duties, the Solomon Islands will cede jurisdiction only if the sending country can under its domestic law exercise jurisdiction over its personnel overseas. In some SOFAs, receiving countries have been willing to cede jurisdiction to the sending state for offences committed outside official duties without conditioning it on the sending state s ability to prosecute. However, the inclusion of such a qualifier at the request of the 2

Solomon Islands Government was considered reasonable, so as to ensure that members of the visiting contingent cannot escape prosecution where prosecution seems appropriate. The inclusion of this qualifier has drawn attention to a gap under New Zealand law in such a situation. Currently New Zealand can exercise jurisdiction over its personnel for offences committed overseas as part of deployments only where these offences are committed by members of the New Zealand Armed Forces (Armed Forces Discipline Act 1971) or by police serving in a United Nations force (United Nations (Police Act) 1964). New Zealand cannot currently exercise jurisdiction over police serving in non-un operations or over civilians serving in overseas operations. The inability to do so under New Zealand law may mean that, if these personnel were involved in offences falling outside of official duties, they may be prosecuted and imprisoned in the Solomon Islands. Legislation has been introduced in the House (the Crimes and Misconduct (Overseas Operations) Bill) to fill this gap in order to allow New Zealand to exercise its jurisdiction over police and civilians serving in overseas operations such as that underway in the Solomon Islands in the same way that we can for armed forces personnel and police serving in UN operations. This ought to minimise any potential exposure of New Zealand police and civilian members to prosecution and imprisonment in the Solomon Islands, or in other third countries where we might similarly want to provide help of a similar kind in the future. It also ensures that such personnel would not have impunity from prosecution for offences for which in the host country they are granted full immunity. They would be subject to prosecution in New Zealand, subject to the same protections as would be available to them had the acts or omissions been committed in New Zealand in similar circumstances. On balance, it is in New Zealand s interest to be party to this Agreement because it provides increased protection to personnel deployed in the Solomon Islands to assist in the restoration of law and order. Obligations (i) Under the Agreement New Zealand would be obliged to: consult with the Solomon Islands Government if a significant withdrawal of members of the Visiting Contingent, other than for the purpose of rotation, is to take place (Article 3); withdraw 3 months after receipt of a written request from the Government of Solomon Islands for the visiting contingent to withdraw (Article 3); record, where possible, particulars of weapons and ammunition seized or destroyed (Article 9); deal with claims arising in the Area of operations (i.e. the territory of Solomon Islands, all areas where it exercises maritime jurisdiction, and the superjacent airspace) (Article 13); 3

waive claims against any other party in respect of loss of, or damage (including loss of use) to, property owned, hired or chartered by a Party and used by the Visiting Contingent; of maritime salvage of any vessel or cargo owned by a Party and used by the Visiting Contingent; and of personal injury or death suffered by any member of the Visiting Contingent (Article 13); consult on claims not otherwise covered under the Agreement (Article 13); take all appropriate measures to ensure that the laws and regulations of Solomon Islands are observed and respected (Article 10(1)); ensure that appropriate action (consistent with its laws and practices) is taken where an assisting Country asserts the jurisdiction over a member of the Visiting Contingent (Article 10(5)); provide assistance in carrying out necessary investigations into any offences alleged to have been committed by a member from an Assisting Country where criminal or civil immunity has been waived (Article 10(7)); take all appropriate measures to ensure the maintenance of discipline and good order among its members of the Visiting Contingent (Article 11) act in a manner consistent with their obligations under international law (Article 12); be responsible for the salary, allowances, removal expenses, costs of transport to Solomon Islands, and medical and dental expenses of its members of the Visiting Contingent (Article 16(4)); establish headquarters, camps, training areas, or other premises as may be necessary and cover the personal accommodation and transport costs of its members of the Visiting Contingent unless otherwise negotiated (Article 17); settle by consultation or negotiation between the Parties, and not to refer to any third party or tribunal for resolution, any matter arising with respect to its interpretation, application or implementation of the agreement (Article 22); and notify the other signatories in writing of the completion of the constitutional formalities by its laws for the entry into force of this Agreement (Article 24). (ii) Under the Agreement New Zealand police would be obliged to: work co-operatively with the Government of Solomon Islands and its authorities, and to consult with the Commissioner of the Solomon Islands Police Force (Article 5(5)). carry out tasks or orders consistent with the laws, procedures and standards of conduct applicable to them in New Zealand Article 5(6)) (this is the basis for the red-card enabling New Zealand police members to refuse to carry out an order if it is considered inconsistent with our laws or practice). arrange consultations between Police Commissioners if a request is made by a Police Commissioner of a country contributing personnel to the Participating Police Force, with respect to the application or implementation of Article 5 (status of participating police force) (Article 5(10)) 4

(iii) Under the Agreement New Zealand Armed Forces will be obliged to: work co-operatively with the Government of Solomon Islands and its authorities (Article 6(3)); exercise the powers, authorities and privileges exercised by members of the Solomon Islands Police Force. Article (Article 6(4)); arrange consultations with other national commanders if a national military commander of a country contributing personnel to the Participating Armed Forces makes such a request (Article 6(6)). (iv) Under the Agreement New Zealand Personnel in general will have: Immunity from legal proceedings in the Solomon Islands for all acts or omissions carried out in the course of official duties. Criminal jurisdiction will not be exercised over visiting contingent members for actions taking place in the Solomon Islands (e.g. Outside the course of official duties) if such jurisdiction is asserted by the assisting country. Reservations are not specifically provided for in the text although article 23 provides for the variation or suspension of this agreement subject to the parties agreeing. Economic, Social, Cultural and Environmental Effects There are no immediate economic, social, cultural or environment effects on New Zealand per se, but the Agreement is likely to contribute and benefit the regional security in the Pacific by allowing countries to help restore peace and security and civil order, to facilitate the more effective functioning of Governmental institutions, and to help revive the Solomon Islands economy. This is reflected in the Agreement itself whereby the signatories have noted that deteriorating law and order and security in the Solomon Islands poses a threat to the good governance and economic prosperity of the Solomon Islands. They also acknowledged the need to assist the effective functioning of government, the restoration of confidence in law and order, and the economic recovery of Solomon Islands. Costs While there are costs associated with the deployment of police, armed forces and other civilian personnel, there are none consequential on the terms of the Agreement itself. Future Protocols None are likely or anticipated. Implementation Currently under New Zealand law we do not have any basis for exercising jurisdiction over police personnel serving in non-un operations or for civilians involved in such operations. The absence of a mechanism under New Zealand law to assume jurisdiction over New Zealand police and civilians may mean under the Agreement that, if these personnel were 5

involved in offences falling outside of official duties, then they might be prosecuted and imprisoned in the Solomon Islands for them. The Crimes and Misconduct (Overseas Operations) Bill has thus been prepared and introduced into the House to allow New Zealand to exercise its jurisdiction over police and civilians serving in overseas operations such as that underway in the Solomon Islands. Its introduction would thus minimise possible exposure of New Zealand police and civilian members to such prosecution and imprisonment in the Solomon Islands, or other countries where similar operations might be undertaken in the future. It would also prevent such personnel having impunity from prosecution in situations where they enjoy immunity, subject to the usual protections available to them e.g. for acts undertaken in the course of official duties. Consultation The views of the New Zealand Police and the New Zealand Defence Force have been considered. Withdrawal or Denunciation The Agreement will expire on the complete withdrawal of the Visiting Contingent from the Area of Operations unless otherwise agreed by the Parties The Assisting Countries may at any time withdraw any or all of their members of the Visiting Contingent from the Area of Operations after consultation with the Government of the Solomon Islands. The Government of the Solomon Islands may at any time in writing request withdrawal of the Visiting Contingent from the Area of Operations. On receipt of such written notice, the Visiting Contingent must withdraw prior to the expiration of 3 months from the date of receipt of that notice. 6