Get Your Design Patent Fast!

Similar documents
AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce. SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has modified

Moving Patent Applications Through the USPTO: Options for Applicants

Chapter 1900 Protest Protest Under 37 CFR [R ] How Protest Is Submitted

United States Patent and Trademark Office and Japan Patent Office Collaborative Search. AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.

Accelerated Examination. Presented by Hans Troesch, Principal Fish & Richardson P.C. March 2, 2010

Delain Law Office, PLLC

Changes To Implement the First Inventor To File Provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act Final Rules

USPTO PATENT EXAMINATION ACCELERATION PROGRAMS AND PROPOSALS

Improving the Accuracy of the Trademark Register: Request for Comments on Possible

Introduction. 1 These materials are public information and have been prepared solely for educational and entertainment purposes to contribute

The petition to change patent term adjustment determination under 35 U.S.C. 154(b) from 153 days to a 318 days is DENIED.

United States Patent and Trademark Office. Substantive Submissions Made During Prosecution of the

Prioritized Examination and New Prior Art defined for First-Inventor-to-File

New Patent Application Rules Set to Take Effect November 1, 2007

Chapter 2500 Maintenance Fees

After Final Practice and Appeal

Fast Track. Strategies at the USPTO. Hillsborough County Bar Association. January 5, Anton Hopen. Smith & Hopen, PA

K&L Gates Webinar Current Developments in Patents. Peggy Focarino Commissioner for Patents September 13 th, 2012

Changes to Implement the First Inventor to File Provisions of the Leahy-Smith. AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.

John Doll Commissioner for Patents. February 1, 2006

Accelerating the Acquisition of an Enforceable Patent: Bypassing the USPTO s Backlog Lawrence A. Stahl and Seth E. Boeshore

Normal Examination Speed (2/2)

USPTO Programs for Expediting Patent Prosecution: Accelerated Exam, Patent Prosecution Highway, Green Technology. Susan Perng Pan November 2010

PATENT PROSECUTION STRATEGIES IN AN AIA WORLD: SUCCEEDING WITH THE CHANGES

Changes at the PTO. October 21, 2011 Claremont Hotel. Steven C. Carlson Fish & Richardson P.C. Bradley Baugh North Weber & Baugh LLP

HERBERT G. ZINSMEYER 5911 BULLARD DRIVE COpy MAILED AUSTIN TX OCT

PlainSite. Legal Document

PROCEDURES FOR INVALIDATING, CLARIFYING OR NARROWING A PATENT IN THE PATENT OFFICE UNDER THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT (AIA)

This is a decision on the petition under 37 CFR 1.378(b), filed July 8, 2008, to reinstate the above-identified patent.

Il ~ [E ~ OFFICE OF PETITtONS AUG BACKGROUND. Patricia Derrick DBA Brainpaths 4186 Melodia Songo CT Las Vegas NV

Understanding Patent Examiner Docketing & Workflow to Expedite Prosecution

Chapter 1400 Correction of Patents

1~~~rew OFFICE OF PETITIONS RELEVANT BACKGROUND OCT UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

FINAL RULES IMPLEMENTING EIGHTEEN MONTH PUBLICATION OF PATENT APPLICATIONS

Strategies for Expediting U.S. Patent Prosecution. Rachel K. Pilloff

Can I Challenge My Competitor s Patent?

Chapter 1800 Patent Cooperation Treaty

Priority Claims, Incorporation By Reference, and how to fix errors, big and small. March 9, Jack G. Abid. Orlando, Florida

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE TRADEMARK MANUAL OF EXAMINING PROCEDURE (TMEP) Chapter 600 Attorney, Representative, and Signature

~O~rE~ OFFICE OF PETITIONS JAN Haisam Yakoub 2700 Saratoga Place #815 Ottawa ON K1T 1W4 CA CANADA

After Final Consideration Pilot Program 2.0 Description and Memorandum of Understanding. September 23,2014

Practice Tips for Foreign Applicants

Chapter 1300 Allowance and Issue

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. LEGEND3D, INC., Petitioner,

Strategies... to Prepare for an Interference Washington, D.C. 17 October 2002

PlainSite. Legal Document

Patent Public Advisory Committee Public Hearing on the Proposed Patent Fee Schedule

Comments on Proposed Changes to Restriction Practice in Patent Applications

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE SEP OFFICE OF PETITIONS

PATENTS TRADEMARKS COPYRIGHTS TRADE SECRETS ZIOLKOWSKI PATENT SOLUTIONS GROUP, SC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ATTORNEYS. Patent Process FAQs

The Patent Bar's Role In Setting PTAB Precedence

August 31, I. Introduction

This is a decision on the renewed petition filed April 6, 20061, pursuant to 37 C.F.R (b)2, to reinstate the above- identified patent.

Policies of USPTO Director Kappos & U.S. Patent Law Reform

BACKGROUND. The above-identified application was filed as a Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) international application on October 14, 2011.

What is Post Grant Review?

1~0 ll,,[e~ Alexandria, VA

Proposed Computer-Implemented Invention Examination Guidelines

Patent Prosecution Under The AIA

AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce. SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO or Office)

Navigating the Patent Prosecution Highway and Other Accelerated Filing Options

Restriction. AIPLA Practical Patent Prosecution Alexandria, VA August Brian R. Stanton, Ph.D. US DOC/HHS (Ret.)

Fair Hearing Requests

PATENT DISCLOSURE: Meeting Expectations in the USPTO

Back2round. The contents of the prior decision on petition and the Request for Information are incorporated by reference into the present decision.

IPDAS Forms Library: A Complete List

3 Tex. Intell. Prop. L.J Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal Spring, 1995 METAMORPHOSIS IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

Restriction: Definition & Characteristics A tool used by the USPTO to limit the substantive examination of a patent application to a single invention

Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy

A Guide To Filing A Design Patent Application. Prepared by I.N. Tansel from pac/design/toc.

Chapter 2300 Interference Proceedings

Biological Deposits MPEP and 37 C.F.R Gary Benzion Supervisory Patent Examiner Technology Center 1600 Art Unit 1637

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD.

U.S. Patent Law Reform The America Invents Act

PATENT PROSECUTION HIGHWAY

The Limited Ability of a Patent Owner to Amend Claims and Present New Claims in Post-Grant and Inter Partes Reviews

Trademark/Service Mark Application, Principal Register TEAS Plus Application

Patent Term Adjustment: The New USPTO Rules

Re: JIPA Comments on the Proposed Enhanced Examination Timing Control Initiative in the United States

Patent Term Patent Term Extension Patent Term Adjustment

USPTO Implementation of the America Invents Act. Janet Gongola Patent Reform Coordinator Direct dial:

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

United States. Edwards Wildman. Author Daniel Fiorello

Venue Differences. Claim Amendments During AIA Proceedings 4/16/2015. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Considerations for the United States

APPENDIX B Attachment 1 SUBRECIPIENT / VENDOR AUDITS

Newly Signed U.S. Patent Law Will Overhaul Patent Procurement, Enforcement and Defense

2001 through 2017 IPLEGALED, Inc. All Rights Reserved

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. DR. MICHAEL FARM WALD and RPX CORPORATION Petitioner

What You Need to Know, But Do Not Know About USPTO Discipline. Cameron Weiffenbach AIPLA Spring Meeting May 3, 2013

By Howard L. Hoffenberg The IP and Business Law Offices of Howard L. Hoffenberg, Esq.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

MEMORANDUM. DATE: April 19, 2018 TO: FROM:

PRACTICE TIPS FOR PATENT PROSECUTION BEFORE THE USPTO

USPTO Final Rule Changes for Continuations and Claims. John B. Pegram Ronald C. Lundquist August 30, 2007

Prosecuting an Israel Patent Application and Beyond

Northern Ill.'s New Local Patent Rules

Rule 130 Declarations for First-Inventor-to-File Applications

Patent Prosecution Update

The United States Patent and Trademark Office

Transcription:

1

Get Your Design Patent Fast! Accelerated Examination And Expedited Examination Robert M. Spear Design Patent Specialist, TC2900 USPTO 2

Fast Patents! Accelerated examination applications are special cases under 37 CFR 1.102(d) Granted by petition Expedited examination applications are special cases under 37 CFR 1.155 Granted by request 3

Accelerated Examination Special examining procedure, see MPEP 708.02.VIII. and 708.02(a) Design applications must also comply with 37 CFR 1.151, 152, 153 & 154 Objective: to arrive at final disposition within 12 months of filing 4

Accelerated Examination MPEP 708.02(a)F.: The 12-month goal is achieved if Notice of Allowability Final Office action Abandonment Final disposition may occur after 12 months. 5

Accelerated Examination Petition Requirements 1. Petition to make special under accelerated examination program 2. Fee (37 CFR 1.17(h)) 3. Non-reissue utility or design case 4. Filed electronically 5. Complete application under 37 CFR 1.51 6. Willing to elect without traverse 7. Willing to conduct phone interview 8. State that pre-examination search was done 9. Include accelerated examination support document. 6

Accelerated Examination Pre-examination Search (MPEP 8.02(a)I.H.) US Patents & patent application publications Foreign publications Non-patent literature Directed to the claimed invention Encompass all features of the claims 7

Accelerated Examination Pre-examination Support Document 1. IDS citing references most closely related 2. Identify all limitations disclosed in references 3. Detailed explanation of how each claim is patentable over the reference 4. Concise statement of the utility of the invention (except in design cases) 5. Showing where each limitation finds support under 35 USC 112/1 st paragraph 6. ID references disqualified under 35 USC 103(c) 8

Accelerated Examination If the application is not complete, petition will be denied (MPEP 708.02(a)VIII.C.) If the application is deficient, petition will be dismissed; applicant has a single, 30-day opportunity to perfect petition 9

Accelerated Examination.All for the low price of $130.00 (4/14/08) 10

Expedited Examination Expedited Examination = Rocket Docket 11

Expedited Examination Intended to fulfill a particular need by affording rapid design patent protection that may be especially important where marketplace conditions are such that new designs on articles are typically in vogue for limited periods of time. 12

Expedited Examination 37 CFR 1.155 & MPEP 1504.30 $900.00 (37 CFR 1.17(k)) plus $210/$105 basic filing fee (37 CFR 1.16(b)) 13

Expedited Examination 1. Request for Expedited Examination under 37 CFR 1.155 (Form PTO/SB/27) 2. Application is complete (37 CFR 1.154) 3. Drawings comply with 37 CFR 1.84 4. Pre-examination search 14

Expedited Examination Pre-examination Search 1. List of the field of search (e.g., US class and subclasses) 2. US patent documents 3. Foreign documents 4. Non-patent literature 15

Expedited Examination Can be mailed, hand delivered or e-filed For initial filing of papers only: Mail Stop Expedited Design Commissioner for Patents P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 Thereafter fax to Special Procedures Submission 16

Expedited Examination All processing is expedited from the date the request is granted (including appeal) Streamlined filing-to-issuance, not just while on examiner s docket like accelerated examination 17

Comparison: AE & Rocket Docket Accelerated Examination Applications 30 Design applications filed since the beginning of the program in 2006. 7 Petitions have been granted. 2 Applications have been allowed 1 has issued: 6 months, 3 days. Source: AE Tracking March 30 2008 18

Pendency - Designs 2007 2008 Filing to First Action 11.7 mos. 10.4 mos. Filing to Allowance 12.6 mos. 11.6 mos. Filing to Issue 18.3 mos. 17.0 mos. Source: PALM2B41-PR3A Patent Business Area Statistics - Fiscal Year 2007-2008 19

Comparison: AE & Rocket Docket All applications in 2007: 26,626 were filed 25,819 were allowed in an average of 12.6 months 24,300 issued in an average of 18.3 months Rocket Docket applications: In 2007, 532 were allowed in an average of 4.1 months 478 issued in an average of 9.2 months 445 were allowed on 1st action Allowed in an average of Issued in an average of 3.1 months 8.0 months 308 were filed in 2007. Of those: 267 were allowed in an average of 2.5 months 231 issued in an average of 5.8 months Source: PALM2B41-PR3A Patent Business Area Statistics - Fiscal Year 2007-2008 and EXPO3109-PR2 Patent Business Area Statistics 20

Comparison: AE & Rocket Docket All applications Filed in 2007 12.6 18.3 Rocket Docket Allowed in 2007 4.1 9.2 Rocket Docket allowed on 1st Action in 2007 3.1 8 Rocket Docket Filed & Allowed in 2007 2.5 5.8 0 5 10 15 20 Months to Issue Months to Allowance Source: EXPO3109-PR2 Patent Business Area Statistics and PERFORMANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT: FISCAL YEAR 2007 21

Search Template Information Search Templates Home http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/searchtemplates/searchtemplates.htm Search Templates by Class http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/searchtemplates/class.htm 22

Contact Information for Rob Spear at USPTO: Telephone No.: (571) 272-2645 2645 e-mail address: robert.spear@uspto.gov 23