IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER ON PRELIMINARY APPROVAL

Similar documents
ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING NOTICE, AND SCHEDULING FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

\ 'C,_ \) ~THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 47 Filed: 10/11/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:299

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. TJ H Case No. 5:15-cv ~jc~-gjs

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

Case 2:15-cv MAK Document 78 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 130

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

2:14-cv CAS-JEM Document 38 Filed 04/27/15 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiff, j Judge: Hon. Joan M. Lewis ) ) )

mg Doc 4808 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 08:51:55 Main Document Pg 1 of 12

Case 2:17-cv GAM Document 56 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

Case 2:08-cv SHM-dkv Document 327 Filed 06/23/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 8969

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv JMA-SIL Document 5 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 6:05-cv ACC-DAB Document 56 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Case 7:16-cv KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 11

If Your Vehicle Was Repossessed and Sold by Regional Acceptance Corp. in the State of Ohio, You Could Get Benefits From a Class Action Settlement.

Case 3:17-cv JAG Document 41 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 258

Case 1:02-cv LJM-WTL Document 117 Filed 08/16/2005 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv NRB Document 243 Filed 09/26/17 Page 1 of 14. Case 1:15-cv NRB Document Filed 09/19/17 Page 1of14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:12-cv JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 13

1:1_ (I f 0 HiIiB} ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case 3:14-cv JAG Document 193 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 4730 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

CIV CIV DS MISC ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT filed

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 8:11-cv JST-JPR Document Filed 08/16/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:5240

Case 2:14-cv MCE-KJN Document 87 Filed 07/08/16 Page 1 of 14

Case: 4:16-cv JAR Doc. #: 97 Filed: 12/13/18 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 2279

Case 2:03-cv RCJ-PAL Document 2907 Filed 06/05/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:15-cv ELR Document 60 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 21

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. ORDER This matter came before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Modification of

Case 1:15-cv JFK Document 114 Filed 11/05/18 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:15-cv JFK Document Filed 10/30/18 Page 2 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H. D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

Case 1:15-cv YK Document 84 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:03-cv RCJ-PAL Document 2795 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 2:17-cv JS Document 59 Filed 05/10/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 02/22/ :16 AM INDEX NO /2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

nm OPOREPJYINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 4:02-cv SPF-FHM Document 1550 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 10/05/2006 Page 1 of 12

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 109 Filed: 10/26/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1837

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OFPENNSVLVAJ'ELA ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION AMENDED ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Case 1:17-cv WTL-MPB Document 72 Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 736

Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 214 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:09-cv JPG-PMF Document 47 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #466

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 117 Filed: 08/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:706

Case 1:13-cv WHP Document 571 Filed 06/02/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:09-cv RB-RHS Document 139 Filed 11/01/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHARON COBB, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,,

SUSAN DOHERTY and DWIGHT SIMONSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. l:10-cv nlh-kmw

FINALLY CERTIFYING A CLASS

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 0:13-cv JIC Document 318 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2016 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:04-cv DAB Document 569 Filed 12/02/10 Page 1 of 8 SOUTHERN DISTIUCT OF NEW YORK..

Case 2:11-cv CMR Document 30 Filed 05/07/12 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:16-cv SI Document 39 Filed 04/17/17 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:18-cv RJC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

BEFORE THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION

Case 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ Document 95 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:13-cv GJQ Doc #12 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Case 4:15-cv JSW Document 82 Filed 09/01/17 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:01-cv BLW Document 207 Filed 01/28/11 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 382 Filed: 03/08/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:7778

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Judge:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case: 4:14-cv ERW Doc. #: 74 Filed: 07/13/15 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 523. Case No.: 4:14-cv-00159

I ELECTRONICALLY FILED

[Proposedi Order Granting Motion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

Case 2:11-cv JLL-MAH Document 69 Filed 02/22/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 739

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 52 Filed: 12/23/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:463

Transcription:

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO MAIN STREET ACQUISITION CORP., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. SHERITA L. RAHMON, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff v. DRIVE FINANCIAL SERVICES, LP, and SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC. Third Party Defendants. CASE NO.: 13 CV 011846 JUDGE MARK A. SERROTT ORDER ON PRELIMINARY APPROVAL WHEREAS, the Court has been advised that parties to this action, Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff Sherita Rahmon ( Rahmon and Third Party Defendant Santander Consumer USA Inc., for itself and on behalf of and as successor by merger to Drive Financial Services, L.P. ( Santander, have agreed, subject to Court approval following notice to the Settlement Class and a hearing, to settle the claims asserted by Rahmon, individually and on behalf of a putative class, against Santander. The terms and conditions of the proposed settlement are set forth in the Settlement Agreement and Release ( Agreement 1, which has been filed with the Court as an attachment to Rahmon s Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement: and 1 For the purposes of this Order, capitalized terms defined by the Agreement will have the same meaning herein as in the Agreement. 808016.3

Based upon the Agreement and all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, it appearing to the Court that upon preliminary examination that the Agreement and settlement appear fair, reasonable and adequate, and that a hearing should and will be held after notice to the Settlement Class Members to confirm that the Agreement and settlement are fair, reasonable, and adequate, and to determine whether a Final Approval Order and Final Judgment should be entered in this Action based upon the Agreement; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Agreement and the settlement contained therein are preliminarily approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate. 2. The Court hereby conditionally certifies for settlement purposes only pursuant to Ohio Rule of Civil Procedure 23(B(2 and 23(B(3 a Settlement Class consisting of: All Persons: (1 who purchased a motor vehicle primarily for personal, family and/or household use by entering into a Retail Installment Contract, (2 whose Retail Installment Contract was assigned to Santander, (3 whose motor vehicle securing the Retail Installment Contract was repossessed by Santander in the state of Ohio, (4 who were sent one or more Post-Repossession Notices by Santander between April 18, 2007 and December 31, 2012 and (5 whose motor vehicle was disposed of by Santander resulting in a Deficiency Balance. The following are excluded as members of the Settlement Class: (a any Person who filed bankruptcy after execution of a Retail Installment Contract which was assigned to Santander; 808016.3 2

(b any Resolved Account Obligor 2 and (c any person who submits a valid and timely request for exclusion as provided under this Order and the Agreement. The Settlement Class consists of three subclasses. Each Settlement Class Member is a member of only one subclass. The subclasses are: (a The Deficiency Balance Subclass which is conditionally certified for settlement purposes only, pursuant to Ohio Rule of Civil Procedure 23(B(2 consisting of Settlement Class Members whose Settlement Class Account is owned by Santander as of the date of execution of this Agreement by the Parties and for which Santander s records relating to the Settlement Class Account reflect the absence of any payment by the Settlement Class Member on the Deficiency Balance or reflect payment on a Deficiency Balance of $25.00 or less; (b The Deficiency Payment Subclass which is conditionally certified for settlement purposes only, pursuant to Ohio Rule of Civil Procedure 23(B(3 consisting of Settlement Class Members whose Settlement Class Account is owned by Santander as of the date of execution of the Agreement by the Parties and for which Santander s records relating to the Settlement Class Member s Settlement Class Account reflect a payment by the Settlement Class Member on the Deficiency Balance of greater than $25.00; and (c The Sold Account Subclass which is conditionally certified for settlement purposes only pursuant to Ohio Rule of Civil Procedure 23(B(3, consisting of Settlement 2 Under the Agreement, Resolved Account Obligor is defined as a Person obligated under a Retail Installment Contract for which (1 an agreement was reached between the obligor(s under the Retail Installment Contract and Santander (or other assignee of the Retail Installment Contract after repossession and disposition of the subject motor vehicle regarding the resolution of the Deficiency Balance, or (2 Santander (or other assignee of the Retail Installment Contract has previously voluntarily waived the Deficiency Balance, or (3 Santander (or other assignee of the Retail Installment Contract has obtained a judgment relating to the Deficiency Balance. 808016.3 3

Class Members whose Settlement Class Account was assigned by Santander to a third party after repossession and disposition of the Settlement Class Member s vehicle and which Settlement Class Account had not been re-acquired by Santander as of the date of execution of the Agreement. 3. The Settlement Class consisting of over 12,000 Settlement Class Accounts is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable. There are questions of law or fact common to the Settlement Class. The claims of Rahmon are typical of the claims of the Settlement Class. Rahmon will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the Settlement Class. The questions of law or fact common to the members of the Settlement Class predominate over the questions affecting only individual members. Certification of the Settlement Class is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy. The Court finds that Rahmon is an adequate representative of Settlement Class. Rahmon is hereby approved as the representative of the Settlement Class for the purposes of implementing the settlement in accordance with the Settlement Agreement, and Dan Goetz and Greg Reichenbach are appointed as counsel for the Settlement Class ( Class Counsel. 4. The Class Notice and Cover Page are approved, in the forms attached hereto as Exhibit A. The Class Notice shall be considered to be an order of the Court, and the dates set forth therein shall govern this case and the Settlement Class, unless otherwise modified. 5. Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, Santander is hereby directed to prepare and provide to the Settlement Administrator and Class Counsel, a Class List in readable electronic form. The Class List shall include the names and account numbers of all Settlement Class Members. The Class List also shall set forth the outstanding Deficiency Balance for each Deficiency Balance and Deficiency Payment Subclass Member and shall identify the amount of 808016.3 4

monetary relief provided pursuant to the Agreement for each Deficiency Payment Subclass Settlement Class Account. The Class List shall also identify the Sold Account Subclass Settlement Class Accounts. The Class List provided to the Settlement Administrator shall state the last known addresses of the Settlement Class Members according to Santander s records. 6. As soon as practicable, but no later than February 26, 2018, the Settlement Administrator shall mail the Class Notice to each Settlement Class Member by first class mail, postage pre-paid, addressed to his or her last known address, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. Before mailing the Class Notices, the Settlement Administrator shall perform an address check of the entire Class List through the United States Postal Service s National Change of Address database to update the addresses of Settlement Class Members. For Class Notices returned by the postal service for lack of a correct address, the Settlement Administrator shall attempt a further address search using a recognized information broker such as Lexis/Nexis and re-mail the Class Notice by First Class Mail to any subsequently obtained addresses. Only one re-mailing will be required. Neither Santander nor the Settlement Administrator will be responsible for the failure of the postal service to timely deliver or return a Class Notice, and will have no obligation to re-send a Class Notice that is not returned by the postal service more than fourteen (14 days prior to the Final Approval Hearing. On or before seven (7 days prior to the Final Approval Hearing, the Settlement Administrator shall provide the Court and Class Counsel with a declaration confirming that the Class Notices were mailed to Settlement Class Members, and the steps taken during the Class Notice process. The costs and expenses of printing, preparing and mailing the Class Notice shall be paid by Santander as they are incurred. 7. The mailing of the Class Notice as directed in this Order constitutes the best notice practicable under the circumstances and sufficient notice to all members of the Settlement Class. 808016.3 5

8. Any member of the Settlement Class who is not excluded from the Settlement Class and who intends to object to the fairness of the settlement reached under the Agreement must, by March 30, 2018, file an objection with the Court and provide copies of the objection to the Settlement Administrator at the address specified in the Class Notice, to Santander s counsel, Jeffrey Seewald, MCGLINCHEY STAFFORD, PLLC, 1001 McKinney, Suite 1500, Houston, Texas 75202 and to Class Counsel, Daniel P. Goetz, Weisman Kennedy & Berris, LPA, 1600 Midland Building, 101 Prospect Avenue West, Cleveland, Ohio, 44115. (a To be valid, any objection to the settlement reached under the Agreement must include: (1 the name and case number of this action (2 the objector s full name, address, and telephone number; (3 a written and notarized statement of all grounds for the objection accompanied by any legal support for such objection; (4 copies of any papers, briefs, or other documents upon which the objection is based; (5 a statement whether the objector or his or her counsel intends to appear and argue at the Final Approval Hearing; and (6 a list of all cases in which the objector and/or his or her counsel has filed objections to a class action settlement in the preceding five (5 years. If the objecting Settlement Class Member intends to appear at the Final Approval Hearing through counsel, the objection must also state the identity of all attorneys representing the objector who will appear and argue at the Final Approval Hearing. An objection by any individual obligated on a Settlement Class Account will be deemed to be an objection on behalf of all obligors on the same 808016.3 6

Settlement Class Account. Any Settlement Class Member who does not file a timely written objection in compliance with this Order, or who fails to otherwise comply with the requirements of this Order relating to objections, (1 shall be deemed to have waived any such objection with the objection not being considered by the Court, (2 will not be heard during the Final Approval Hearing, and (3 the Settlement Class Member shall be foreclosed from seeking any adjudication or review of the settlement reached under the Agreement and preliminary approved herein by appeal or otherwise. 9. Any Settlement Class Member who wishes to be excluded from the Settlement Class must by March 30, 2018 file a request for exclusion (opt-out with the Court and provide copies to the Settlement Administrator at the address specified in the Class Notice, to Santander s counsel, Jeffrey Seewald, MCGLINCHEY STAFFORD, PLLC, 1001 McKinney, Suite 1500, Houston, Texas 75202 and to Class Counsel, Daniel P. Goetz, Weisman Kennedy & Berris, LPA, 1600 Midland Building, 101 Prospect Avenue West, Cleveland, Ohio, 44115. To be effective, the request for exclusion must be received by the Court and by the Settlement Administrator, counsel for Santander and Class Counsel no later than March 30, 2018 and: (a include the Settlement Class Member s full name, address, and telephone number; and (b specifically and unambiguously state his or her desire to be excluded from the Santander Settlement Class in Case No. 13 CV 011846; Main Street Acquisition Corp. v. Sherita Rahmon, et al. A request for exclusion filed by any individual obligated on a Settlement Class Account will be deemed to be a request for exclusion filed on behalf of all obligors on the Settlement Class Account. Any Settlement Class Member who fails to file a timely and complete request for 808016.3 7

exclusion with the Court and to send copies to the Settlement Administrator, counsel for Santander and Class Counsel in compliance with this Order shall be subject to and bound by settlement reached under the Agreement and every order or judgment entered by the Court relating to the settlement reached under the Agreement. Any purported request for exclusion that is ambiguous or internally inconsistent with respect to the Settlement Class Member s desire to be excluded from the Settlement Class will be deemed invalid unless determined otherwise by the Court. Any communications from Settlement Class Members (whether styled as an exclusion request, an objection, or a comment as to which it is not readily apparent whether the Settlement Class Member meant to exclude himself or herself from the Settlement Class will be evaluated by the Settlement Administrator and jointly by counsel for the Parties, who will make a good faith evaluation regarding the intent. Any uncertainties about whether a Settlement Class Member is requesting exclusion from the Settlement Class will be resolved by the Court. 10. The Settlement Administrator shall maintain a list of all requests for exclusion and shall report the names and addresses of all such persons requesting exclusion to the Court, counsel for Santander and Class Counsel seven (7 days prior to the Final Approval Hearing to assure consistency with the record of requests for exclusions filed with the Court. The list of persons deemed by the Court to have excluded themselves from the Settlement Class will be attached as an exhibit to the Final Approval Order. 11. All such persons for whom a proper request for exclusion has been filed with the Court and served upon the Settlement Administrator, counsel for Santander and Class Counsel shall not be Settlement Class Members and shall have no rights with respect to the settlement and no interest in the relief provided under the Agreement. 808016.3 8

12. All discovery and other pretrial proceedings in this action relating to the claims subject to the settlement reached under the Agreement are stayed and suspended until further order of this Court except such actions as may be necessary to implement the Agreement and this Order. 13. A hearing (the Final Approval Hearing shall be held on April 13, 2018, at 10:00 a.m., Courtroom 6E, 345 S. High Street, Columbus, Ohio to determine whether the proposed settlement reached under the Agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate and should be approved. The parties respective briefs and supporting papers in support of the proposed settlement shall be filed on or before March 23, 2018. 14. Only counsel for the Parties and objector or objector s counsel who have submitted an objection in compliance with the Agreement and this Order will be permitted to participate in the Final Approval Hearing. The Final Approval Hearing described in this paragraph may be postponed, adjourned, transferred or continued by order of the Court without further notice to the Settlement Class. After the Final Hearing, the Court may enter a Final Approval Order and Final Judgment in accordance with the Agreement that will adjudicate the rights of all Settlement Class Members. 15. Should the proposed settlement as provided in the Agreement not be finally approved by the Court, if for any reason the Parties fail to obtain a Final Approval Order and Final Judgment as contemplated in the Agreement, or the Agreement is otherwise terminated pursuant to its terms, then the Agreement and all orders entered in connection therewith shall become null and void and of no further force and effect, and shall not be used or referred to for any purposes whatsoever. In such event, the Agreement and all negotiations and proceedings relating thereto shall be withdrawn without prejudice as to the rights of any and all parties thereto, who shall be restored to their respective positions immediately prior to the execution of the Agreement. 808016.3 9

16. In sum, the dates for performance are as follows: Class Notice Mailed By: February 26, 2018 Requests for Exclusion Received by: March 30, 2018 Filing and Receipt of Objections March 30, 2018 Final Approval Submissions: March 23, 2018 Final Approval Hearing: April 23, 2018 at 10 a.m. DATED: February 7, 2018. Electronically Signed By: JUDGE MARK A. SERROTT 808016.3 10

Franklin County Court of Common Pleas Date: 02-07-2018 Case Title: Case Number: Type: MAIN STREET ACQUISITION CORP -VS- SHERITA L RAHMON 13CV011846 ORDER It Is So Ordered. /s/ Judge Mark Serrott Electronically signed on 2018-Feb-07 page 11 of 11

Court Disposition Case Number: 13CV011846 Case Style: MAIN STREET ACQUISITION CORP -VS- SHERITA L RAHMON Motion Tie Off Information: 1. Motion CMS Document Id: 13CV0118462018-02-0699980000 Document Title: 02-06-2018-MOTION - DEFENDANT: DRIVE FINANCIAL SERVICES LP - PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AGREE Disposition: MOTION GRANTED