What Merchants Need to Know About How the Key Players in the Mobile Payments Services Ecosystem Relate to Each Other. Patent Infringement Disputes

Similar documents
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Issues Proposed Rules for Post-Issuance Patent Review under the America Invents Act

T he landscape for patent disputes is changing rapidly.

Post-Grant Patent Proceedings

Post-Grant Proceedings in the USPTO

BCLT Back to School: The New Patent Law Explained (Post-Grant Procedures) Stuart P. Meyer

The New Post-AIA World

TECHNOLOGY & BUSINESS LAW ADVISORS, LLC

Intersection of Automotive, Aerospace, & Transportation: Practical Strategies for Resolving IP Conflicts in Multi-Supplier Sourcing

America Invents Act (AIA) Post-Grant Proceedings

America Invents Act Implementing Rules. September 2012

SPECIAL REPORT May 2018 SURPREME COURT FINDS USPTO S ADMINISTRATIVE PATENT TRIALS CONSTITUTIONAL AND SETS GROUND RULES FOR THEIR CONDUCT BY THE PTAB

IP Strategies for Software Tech Companies

IPRs and CBMs : The Good, the Bad, and the Unknown. Seattle Intellectual Property Inn of Court A Presentation by Group 6 April 17, 2014

Intellectual Property: Efficiencies in Patent Post-Grant Proceedings

AMERICA INVENTS ACT. Changes to Patent Law. Devan Padmanabhan Shareholder, Winthrop & Weinstine

America Invents Act: The Practical Effects of the New USPTO Post-Grant Proceedings

AIA Post-Grant Proceedings: Lessons Learned from PTAB and Federal Circuit Decisions

The America Invents Act : What You Need to Know. September 28, 2011

New Post Grant Proceedings: Basics by

Sughrue Mion, PLLC Washington, Tokyo, San Diego, Silicon Valley 7/2/2012

United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent Trial and Appeal Board

POST GRANT REVIEW PROCEEDINGS IN THE PTO STEPHEN G. KUNIN PARTNER

PROCEDURES FOR INVALIDATING, CLARIFYING OR NARROWING A PATENT IN THE PATENT OFFICE UNDER THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT (AIA)

Friend or Foe: the New Patent Challenge Procedures at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board

America Invents Act: Patent Reform

This Webcast Will Begin Shortly

PATENT TROLL LEGISLATION How it could affect your IP portfolio

Patent Reform State of Play

USPTO Post Grant Trial Practice

America Invents Act of 2011 Part 1: Impact on Litigation Strategy Part 2: Strategic Considerations of the FTF Transition

Post-grant opposition system in Japan.

July 12, NPE Patent Litigation. The AIA s Impact on. Chris Marchese. Mike Amon

Patent Prosecution in View of The America Invents Act. Overview

CBM Eligibility and Reviewability

2011 Foley & Lardner LLP Attorney Advertising Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome Models used are not clients but may be representative

Inter Partes and Covered Business Method Reviews A Reality Check

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013

America Invents Act: Patent Reform

The Scope and Ramifications of the New Post-Grant and Inter Partes Review Proceedings at the USPTO

NC General Statutes - Chapter 75 Article 8 1

POST-GRANT REVIEW UNDER THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT GERARD F. DIEBNER TANNENBAUM, HELPERN, SYRACUSE & HIRSCHTRITT LLP

2012 Winston & Strawn LLP

Presented to The Ohio State Bar Association. May 23, 2012

Policies of USPTO Director Kappos & U.S. Patent Law Reform

Newly Signed U.S. Patent Law Will Overhaul Patent Procurement, Enforcement and Defense

AIA Post-Grant Implementation Begins - Is Your Business Strategy Aligned? August 27, A Web conference hosted by Foley & Lardner LLP

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

IP LICENSING COMMITTEE MODEL LICENSING CLAUSES BULLETIN

SENATE PASSES PATENT REFORM BILL

POST GRANT PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. Oblon Spivak

Patent Resources Group Federal Circuit Law Course Syllabus

Can I Challenge My Competitor s Patent?

Robert D. Katz, Esq. Eaton & Van Winkle LLP 3 Park Avenue 16th Floor New York, N.Y Tel: (212)

Post-Grant Trends: The PTAB Strikes Back

A Rebalancing Act: Early Patent Litigation Strategies in Light of Recent Federal Circuit Cases ACC Litigation Committee Meeting

DACS DIGITAL PLATFORM LICENCE TERMS AND CONDITIONS 2016

Are the Board s Institution Decisions on 315 Eligibility for Inter Partes Review Appealable?

DAY ONE: Monday, February 26, 2018

LAWSON & PERSSON, P.C.

America Invents Act (AIA) Post-Grant Proceedings. Jeffrey S. Bergman Kevin Kuelbs Laura Witbeck

Venue Differences. Claim Amendments During AIA Proceedings 4/16/2015. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Impact of IPR in Hatch-Waxman and Biologics Strategies

Strategic Use of Post-Grant Proceedings In Light of Patent Reform

Patent Litigation With Non-Practicing Entities: Strategies, Trends and

September Media Law Update. Regulation On 1 October, Ofcom assumed a new role as the UK s postal services regulator from Postcomm.

Post-Grant Reviews Before The USPTO

QUICKPOLE.CA TERMS OF SERVICE. Last Modified On: July 12 th, 2018

AIA: How U.S. PTO Proceedings. are Changing Patent Litigation. Post-Grant Review Under the. Practice. David Hoffman. James Babineau.

February, 2010 Patent Reform Legislative Update 1

America Invents Act (AIA) The Patent Reform Law of 2011 Initial Summary

Inter Partes Review: At the Intersection of the USPTO and District Court

DACS Website Licence Terms and Conditions November 2014

Paper 14 Tel: Entered: July 25, 2016 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Leveraging the AIA s Joinder Provision, Recent Decisions, and New Court Procedures in Defending Infringement Disputes

America Invents Act H.R (Became Law: September 16, 2011) Michael K. Mutter Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch October 11-12, 2011

How To Fix The Amendment Fallacy

STATUS OF. bill in the. Given the is presented. language. ability to would be. completely. of 35 U.S.C found in 35. bills both.

Patent Pending: The Outlook for Patent Legislation in the 114th Congress

IDEAS ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW

The use of prosecution history in post-grant patent proceedings

The NYIPLA Report: Recent Developments in Patent Law at the U.S. Supreme Court: OIL STATES, SAS INSTITUTE, and WESTERNGECO

USPTO Implementation of the America Invents Act. Janet Gongola Patent Reform Coordinator Direct dial:

Expanding the Customer Suit Exception in Patent Law

Paper 24 Tel: Date: June 23, 2017 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

IP system and latest developments in China. Beijing Sanyou Intellectual Property Agency Ltd. June, 2015

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

PTAB Trial Proceedings and Parallel Litigation: Impact, Strategy & Consequences

High-Tech Patent Issues

Post-Grant Patent Practice: Review & Reexamination Course Syllabus

U.S. Patent Law Reform The America Invents Act

Discovery and Fact Investigation: New Patent Office Procedures under America Invents Act

TERMS OF SERVICE FOR SUPPORT NETWORK COMMUNITY HEART AND STROKE REGISTRY SITE Last Updated: December 2016

ZEN PROTOCOL SOFTWARE LICENSE

Managing Patent Infringement Risk in Product Development

Considerations for the United States

$2 to $8 million AMERICA INVENTS ACT MANAGING IP RISK IN THE NEW ERA OF POST GRANT PROCEEDINGS 7/30/2013 MANAGING RISK UNDER THE AIA

Terminating Inter Partes Review Proceedings Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Post Grant Review. Strategy. Nathan Frederick Director, IP Services

AON HEWITT DEFINED CONTRIBUTION NEXUS PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT

Technology Contracts and Agreements: A Practice Guide to Effective Negotiation, Drafting and Strategy

Transcription:

What Merchants Need to Know About How the Key Players in the Mobile Payments Services Ecosystem Relate to Each Other Patent Infringement Disputes Presented by Erica Wilson May 14, 2013 LSI Merchant Strategies for Mobile Payments

If you touch the internet... you likely will be sued for patent infringement 2

There are hundreds of thousands of software patents 3

NPEs are in the business of suing! A non-practicing entity (NPE) is broadly defined as: an entity that does not make a product but buys patents to make money through licensing or recovering money damages in a patent infringement suit 4

Direct Infringement 35 U.S.C. 271(a) -make -use - sell - offer to sell - import into the U.S. 5

How is it possible that a merchant is liable? Direct patent infringement is a strict liability offense Merchants can be liable even if they don t know of the patent s existence Merchants can be liable even if they didn t create the accused technology or can prove that the technology was independently developed 6

Active inducement under 35 U.S.C. 271(b) Merchant induces someone to act Induced act constitutes direct infringement Merchant knows that induced acts constitute patent infringement No liability if merchant did not know about patent 7

Contributory infringement under 35 U.S.C. 271 (c) Merchant sells a good that is a material component of a patented invention Component is used in direct infringement of a patent Merchant knows that component is especially made for use in infringement of a patented invention No liability for time period when merchant did not know of patent No liability if component is staple article of commerce that has substantial non-infringing uses 8

Patent infringement suits cover every aspect of a website and communications over the Internet Transmission of data between merchant and customers Compression/encryption Shopping cart technology Advertising Including a link in a text message Store locator Consumer rewards Portal features... and these are just a few examples 9

TQP Development Sued hundreds of merchants and others for using standard security protocol for Internet communications with customers Target Mattel Rite-Aid 1-800-Flowers.com Deere OTC Direct, Inc. Sierra Trading Post Net-a-Porter Gilt Groupe Green Dot Corp... and that s just a few 10

Infringement complaints are often incomprehensible Rite Aid generates, or directs the client computer to generate, a first sequence of pseudo-random key values, such as alpha and/or numerical values used to encrypt data, based on said seed value at the transmitter... 11

TQP is still suing even though the patent is expired No damages going forward Everyone is free to practice the patent But TQP wants to collect money for supposed past infringement Damages period starts 6 years prior to the time the patent infringement suit is filed and ends on the date the patent expired 12

Why sue merchants and not just technology vendors? NPEs hope to get more money by basing royalty on merchants sales 13

What to consider if you re served with... A demand letter or A complaint for patent infringement 14

Considerations Design-around Indemnification Patent exhaustion Limitations on damages Forum Transfer out of an undesirable forum America Invents Act ( AIA ) Inter partes review ( IPR ) Post-grant review ( PGR ) Covered business method ( CBM ) Band together Licensing 15

Do you need the accused feature? Can you remove it? Can you modify it? 16

Are you indemnified? 17

Indemnity Express Review all contracts and license agreements with technology vendors for indemnity provisions Promptly tender indemnity request to your technology vendor(s) Statutory/Treaty UCC CSIG Prompt notice required Negotiate indemnity after receipt of demand letter or patent infringement complaint 18

Patent Exhaustion Technology vendor s license may extend to customers (e.g., merchants) under the doctrine of patent exhaustion or first sale doctrine Vitality of patent exhaustion reaffirmed in Quanta Computer* Currently an issue for Helferich patents *Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc., 553 U.S. 617 (2008) 19

Where do you fight? 20

Popular NPE forums 21

Declaratory judgment action Available if merchant has received a demand letter but suit has not been filed Allows a merchant some choice of forum Must be a forum in which the patent holder is subject to personal jurisdiction 22

What if you find yourself in an unfavorable forum? Forum non conveniens motion under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) 23

Juries are uncomfortable invalidating patents because they don t feel qualified Consider challenging validity in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office 24

Challenging validity in the PTO Inter partes review ( IPR ) Invalidity and obviousness based on prior art patents and publications Applicable to any U.S. patent Can be filed 9 months after patent issued or after termination of postgrant review (whichever is later) Petition must be filed before civil action challenging invalidity Petition must be filed within one year of being sued for patent infringement Petitioner must propose claim construction Petition granted upon showing a reasonable likelihood that petitioner will succeed on invalidity challenge for at least one of the claims Some discovery Decided by 3-judge panel with oral argument before panel Fast Less expensive than district court litigation Estoppel 25

Challenging validity in the PTO Post-grant review ( PGR ) Covered business method review ( CBM ) Ex Parte Reexamination 26

Band together to share costs Joint defense group Joint representation 27

Soverain Software shopping cart 28

If you want to settle, negotiate! One million dollars! 29

Saving High-Tech Innovators From Egregious Legal Disputes (SHIELD) Bi-partisan bill Stated goal is chilling effect on NPE filings Loser pays defendants attorneys fees 30