Patent Infringement Damages in France

Similar documents
The Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court EPLAW European Patent Lawyers Association Brussels 2 December 2011

Uniform protection and rights conferred: towards a limited unitary effect?

Substantive patent law harmonization: focus on grace period

SFIR / AIPPI 31 August Amendment of patent claims in France. Partial revocation of a claim by Court (only possibility until January 1, 2009)

French case law on the consequences of the revocation of a patent on the payment of royalties by the licensee and of damages by the infringer

Patent Infringement Damages awarded by the Tribunal de Grande Instance of Paris

The Current Status of the European Patent Package

20 YEARS OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION IN PATENT INFRINGEMENT LITIGATION

Plan. 1. Implementation of the Enforcement Directive (2004/48/EC) into Belgian law. C. Belgian Code of Economic Law

Patent litigation. Block 3; Module National approaches to damages. Essentials

European Patent Litigation: An overview

The Current Status of the Unitary Patent Package

IP ENFORCEMENT IN CHINA

Patent Litigation. Block 2; Module Plaintiff /Claimant. Essentials. The patent proprietor as plaintiff/claimant in infringement proceedings

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

Patent Misuse. William Fisher November 2017

The Unitary Patent & The Unified Patent Court IP Key & Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary University of London 8 November 2016

PE-CONS 80/14 DGG 3B EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 24 October 2014 (OR. en) 2013/0185 (COD) PE-CONS 80/14 RC 8 JUSTCIV 80 CODEC 961

ti Litigating Patents Overseas: Country Specific Considerations Germany There is no "European" litigation system.

Economic Damages in IP Litigation

Revision Draft of the Patent Law of the People s Republic of China (For Deliberation)

The German constitutional challenge

Protection of trade secrets through IPR and unfair competition law

Lessons learnt 6 February 2015

Patent litigation. Block 3. Module UPC Law Essentials

Remedies: Injunction and Damages. 1. General

IP ENFORCEMENT. IP Leaders in Spanish and Portuguese speaking countries. Igor Simões

Private Actions for Infringement of Competition Laws in the EU: An Ongoing Project

Lessons learnt 6 February 2015

Patent Resources Group Federal Circuit Law Course Syllabus

Date May 16, 2014 Court Intellectual Property High Court, Case number 2013 (Ne) 10043

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Law on Inventive Activity*

Proving Competition Law Private Claims An EU Perspective

Prathiba M. Singh President, APAA (Indian Group)

People s Republic of China State Intellectual Property Office of China

Belgium. Belgium. By Annick Mottet Haugaard and Christian Dekoninck, Lydian, Brussels

Notwithstanding Article 29, any invention that is liable to injure public order, morality or public health shall not be patented (Article 32).

[English translation by WIPO] Questionnaire on Exceptions and Limitations to Patent Rights

: Liability for contributory infringement of IPRs certain aspects of patent infringement

France Baker & McKenzie SCP

ETHIOPIA A PROCLAMATION CONCERNING INVENTIONS, MINOR INVENTIONS AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS PROCLAMATION NO. 123/1995 ENTRY INTO FORCE: May 10, 1995

a/ Disputes among individuals over copyright to literature, artistic or scientific works or derivative works;

Standing Committee on Patents. Questionnaire on the Publication of Patent Applications India Section

OUTLINE AND EVALUATION OF THE DOUBLE TRACK SYSTEM IN JAPAN--- INVALIDITY DEFENSE IN PATENT INFRINGEMENT LITIGATIONS AND INVALIDITY TRIALS AT JPO

Speaker and Panelists 7/17/2013. The Honorable James L. Robart. Featured Speaker: Panelists: Moderator:

Open Web Foundation. Final Specification Agreement (OWFa 1.0) (Patent and Copyright Grants)

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

The ECJ s Huawei v. ZTE Decision and its Implementation in Practice

From Law of Patents, Layout Designs of Integrated Circuits, Plant Varieties, and Industrial Designs, Chapter Two:

SUDAN Patents Act Act No. 58 of 1971 ENTRY INTO FORCE: October 15, 1971

Case 6:16-cv PGB-KRS Document 267 Filed 04/04/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID 4066

Survey on Trends for Commercializing IP. Australia

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Detailed Table of Contents

LEGAL INFORMATION NEWSLETTER. No. 5 September, 2011

LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR USE OF BRAND NAME

COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AGREEMENT AND ALLOCATION OF RIGHTS IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY UNDER AN STTR RESEARCH PROJECT between. and

Licensing Regulations in Japan in Accordance with Japanese Patent Law

Case 2:11-cv ECR -PAL Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 6

HUNGARY Patent Act Act XXXIII of 1995 as consolidated on March 01, 2015

The Foundation of the International Association of Defense Counsel INTERNATIONAL BEST PRACTICES SURVEY

The Rules of Procedure for the opt-out

Attachment: Opinions on the Draft Amendment of the Implementing Regulations of the Patent Law of the People s Republic of China

Patent Prosecution and Enforcement in Brazil

Case T-67/01. JCB Service v Commission of the European Communities

Norway. Norway. By Rune Nordengen, Bull & Co Advokatfirma AS

International Arbitration of Patent Disputes. M. Scott Donahey Arbitrator and Mediator Palo Alto

Damages United Kingdom perspective

Kazakhstan Patent Law Amended on July 10, 2012

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Patent Enforcement in India

35 U.S.C. 286 Time limitation on damages.

U.S. Patent Law Reform The America Invents Act

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Enforceability of IP Agreements and Enforcement Strategies

Patent Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Chapter 1. General provisions. Article 1. Basic notions and definitions used in the present Law

NIGERIA Patents and Designs Act Chapter 344, December 1, 1971 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 1990

GLOSSARY OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TERMS

Patent Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. C.A. NO. Defendant. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Actions for damages under national law: Achieving compensation through an appropriately balanced system

OLIVE & OLIVE, P.A. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW

Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber

Case 2:15-cv RSM Document 1 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1 of 8

Intellectual Property Enforcement Ali S. Razai. OCPA Annual Educational Conference September 15, 2018

9 The Enforcement of Patent Rights in Japan (*)

Patent Damages in China: Crossing the River by Feeling the Stones. Jill (Yijun) Ge April 20, 2017

Report. Reference. Study Question - Quantification of monetary relief - Switzerland. BENHAMOU, Yaniv, et al. & AIPPI

Choice of Forum: Considerations from a Practitioner s Perspective

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Securing evidence in patent cases by means of inspection

Understanding the Unified Patent Court: The Next Rocket-Docket for Patent Owners?

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 06/22/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

HUNGARY Utility Model Act Act XXXVIII OF 1991 on the protection of utility models as consolidated on April 1, 2013

THE JOINT EXAMINATION BOARD. PAPER P1 Basic United Kingdom Patent Law and Procedure a.m p.m.

Transcription:

Patent Infringement Damages in France Pierre VÉRON VÉRON & ASSOCIÉS 6, square de l'opéra Louis Jouvet F 75009 PARIS Tel. + 33.1.53.05.91.91 Fax + 33.1.53.05.91.98 53, avenue Maréchal Foch F 69006 LYON Tel. + 33.4.72.69.39.39 Fax + 33.4.72.69.39.49 www.veron.com pierre.veron@veron.com 4. FORUM Fachconferenz Cross-Border Litigation 1.-2. Juli 2004 Köln 1 Contents Substantive law issues Procedural law issues Damages calculation 2 Damages in France.ppt 1

Substantive Law Issues Who may sue? The patentee The exclusive licensee The licensee may join in Need to register the license agreement with the French Patent Office The distributor of the patented product has no legal standing to claim damages 3 Substantive Law Issues Who infringes? Anyone acting without the patentee s consent Possible to have a parent company held jointly liable if it takes part in the infringement Difficult to have the management held personally liable for infringement 4 Damages in France.ppt 2

Substantive Law Issues When did the infringement occur? Statute of limitation of three years: Article L. 615-8 8 IPC: Infringement claims ( ) have a statute of limitation of three years from the day the acts of infringement occurred. 5 Procedural Law Issues Jurisdiction of the courts Same civil court to decide validity and infringement Duration Average length of proceedings on the merits (before discussion on damages): 2 years Provisional payment on damages usually ordered by the Court ( 10 000 to 500 000; top 2 000 000) 6 Damages in France.ppt 3

Procedural Law Issues Court appoints an expert to gather relevant technical, financial and marketing information for the assessment of damages 7 Procedural Law Issues Court expert holds meetings and must listen to the parties the parties may provide the expert with relevant documents and send him written submissions ("dire ") which he must take in account in his report confidential information is protected 8 Damages in France.ppt 4

Damages Calculation Legal Grounds For Compensation Lost Profit Total Infringing Sales Lost Profit Lost Margin or Lost Royalty? Lost Profit Sales Actually Derived Lost Profit Lost Margin Lost Profit Lost Royalty Other Losses Suffered Ancillary Matters 9 Legal Grounds For Compensation Article L. 615-1 1 IPC: Patent infringement gives rise to the civil liability of the infringer 10 Damages in France.ppt 5

Legal Grounds For Compensation Compensation in the Civil Code: Article 1382 Any harmful wrongdoing must be compensated Article 1149 Compensation usually extends to the lost profit (gain manqué, lucrum cessans); and the loss suffered (perte subie, damnum emergens) 11 Legal Grounds For Compensation Impossible to claim for the infringer s s profit: the Fishing reel case (1963) The plaintiff cannot ask for the infringer s profit Only the actual loss of the plaintiff may give rise to compensatory damages (be it higher or lower than the infringer s s profit) 12 Damages in France.ppt 6

Lost Profit Total Infringing Sales The lost profit is based on total infringing sales ( masse masse contrefaisante ): The total infringing sales include any product or process held infringing 13 Lost Profit Total Infringing Sales First extension of the total infringing sales : the theory of the entire market value ( tout commercial ) when the infringing means constitute only a part of a more general product sold by the infringer, or when the sale of the infringing product will induce the sale of accessories (convoyed sales) 14 Damages in France.ppt 7

Lost Profit Total Infringing Sales Second extension of the total infringing sales : the springboard effect First Instance Court of Paris, May 7, 2001 the sale of the infringing product for 18 months gave to the defendants a competitive advantage acquired illegally for a part of its customers, an advantage which remains after the termination of the infringement acts 15 Lost Profit Lost Margin or Lost Royalty? Lost margin and reasonable royalty: does oes the plaintiff actually directly work out his invention? -If yes :: he is at least partially entitled to his lost margin -If no :: he is only entitled to a royalty based on the infringer s s turnover on the total infringing sales 16 Damages in France.ppt 8

Lost Profit Sales Actually Derived Would the plaintiff have made 100 % of the infringer s s sales? De facto presumption that yes 17 Lost Profit Sales Actually Derived Would the plaintiff have made 100 % of the infringer s s sales? Application of balancing factors - When the plaintiff was not in a position to make all the sales corresponding to the total infringing sales and/or - To reduce the part of the total infringing sales to be taken into account to apply the lost margin 18 Damages in France.ppt 9

Lost Profit Lost Margin Determination of the lost margin of the plaintiff: Based on the turnover the plaintiff would have made on the additional products Deduction of the proportional costs but not the fixed costs French approach is similar to the German approach in the case Gemeinkostanteil 19 Lost Profit From Theory To Practice Five highest awards of lost profit: - 8 400 000 Interphyto / Ciba Geigy - 2 888 000 Heriaut / Franquet - 2 378 000 Mécafrance - 2 245 000 Electrolux - 2 000 000 Technogenia 20 Damages in France.ppt 10

Lost Profit Lost Royalty Determination of the lost royalty of the plaintiff: Complement or replacement of the lost margin Basis to which the royalty rate will be applied: the infringer s s turnover 21 Lost Profit Lost Royalty Judicial increase of the reasonable contractual rate: An infringer must pay more than a licensee to reach an equivalent position because he is not in a position to refuse the conditions imposed on him 22 Damages in France.ppt 11

Lost Profit Lost Royalty Judicial increase of the reasonable contractual rate: Extent of the increase: average 50 % 23 Lost Royalty From Theory To Practice The highest reported royalty rate: 12.5% Court of Appeal Paris 24 April 1998 L Oréal v. Estée Lauder the court expert mentioned that the standard royalty rate in the industry of fine chemicals varies between 10% and 15%; the royalty rate should therefore be set in taking in account the fact that the infringer is not a licensee who was in a position to discuss arm s-length; the royalty rate of 12.5% suggested by the court expert is not excessive 24 Damages in France.ppt 12

Other Losses Suffered Distinct from the lost profit Compensate the loss of advantages inherent to the monopoly Price erosion Depreciation of the patent Lost licenses or assignments Any other distinct loss 25 Ancillary Matters Compensation assessed until the day the decision is rendered by the court (depreciation of money taken in account) Costs of the proceedings: No Court cost in France Article 700 of the French Code of Civil Procedure The losing party will be ordered to pay all or part of the attorneys fees and court appointed experts fees ( 10 000 to 200 000) 26 Damages in France.ppt 13

Thank you for your attention 27 Damages in France.ppt 14