UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/13/ :15 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/13/2015. Exhibit 1.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/03/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2015. ExhibitA

AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER IN INSURANCE CASE

Case Doc 89 Filed 07/26/17 Entered 07/26/17 16:29:16 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER ADOPTING PROTECTIVE ORDER. (Issued January 23, 2012)

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF A PROTECTIVE ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. versus Civil Action 4:17 cv 02946

Stipulated Protective Order and Order 09mc0110, 0111, 0112, 0113 and 0114

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1A Article 5 1

THE RETIREMENT BOARD OF THE FIREMEN S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF CHICAGO

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 H 1 HOUSE BILL 380. Short Title: Amend RCP/Electronically Stored Information.

Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure [ Proposed Amendment ]

RELIBIT LABS MUTUAL NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. DIVISION [Number]

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: Civ-Martinez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Judge:

PART III Discovery CHAPTER 8. Overview of the Discovery Process KEY POINTS THE NATURE OF DISCOVERY THE EXTENT OF ALLOWABLE DISCOVERY

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Inc. Patent and Copyright Agreement ( Agreement )

It is hereby STIPULATED by and between all parties to the within action that disclosure shall proceed and be completed as follows:

NON-DISCLOSURE AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN

INDEPENDENT SALES ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. Residential Customer List Agreement

Attorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters

Case 2:15-cv GHK-KS Document 37-2 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 22 Page ID #:262 EXHIBIT A JOINT STIPULATION OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,

Standing Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals

being preempted by the court's criminal calendar.

Michigan Medicaid False Claims Act

Section 1: Statement of Purpose Section 2: Voluntary Discovery Section 3: Discovery by Order of the Court... 2

SAMPLE FORMS - CONTRACTS DATA REQUEST AND RELEASE PROCESS NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT, Form (See Attached Form)

EXHIBIT J To THE DECLARATION OF HOLLY GAUDREAU IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR EXPEDITED

Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

MOTOROLA LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR MOTOROLA RADIO SERVICE SOFTWARE

Fulton Bonanza. Step #1

Framework Contract for the provision of Reference Mapping Products

MONTANA UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES

DISCOVERY & E-DISCOVERY

THE DAVID J. JOSEPH COMPANY USER ADMINISTRATOR AGREEMENT FOR SCRAPCONNECT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER

ARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 3 CIVIL RULES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

Case3:14-mc VC Document1 Filed11/04/14 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S.

LEWIS A. KAPLAN United States District Judge United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

Administrative Rules for the Office of Professional Regulation Effective date: February 1, Table of Contents

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT

Case 2:15-cv GMN-PAL Document 62 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6

RULES OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER MEDIATION AND HEARING PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS

Ch. 41 MEDICAL ASSISTANCE APPEAL PROCEDURES 55 CHAPTER 41. MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROVIDER APPEAL PROCEDURES GENERAL PROVISIONS

COMMERCIAL DIVISION PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE ORDER PURSUANT TO PART 202 OF THE UNIFORM CIVIL RULES FOR THE SUPREME COURT KINGS COUNTY

NON-TRANSFERABLE AND NON-EXCLUSIVE LICENSE AGREEMENT

IMPORTANT READ CAREFULLY BEFORE INSTALLING OR USING THIS PRODUCT

R U L E S. of the A R M E D S E R V I C E S B O A R D O F C O N T R A C T A P P E A L S

HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 12 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SUBTITLE 7 BOARDS CHAPTER 47

HDCP RESELLER ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT W I T N E S S E T H

RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE NOTICE

District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility. Board Rules

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant.

SUBPOENA IN AN ADVERSARY PROCEEDING

USTOCKTRAIN TRADING SIMULATOR TERMS AND CONDITIONS

BEFORE THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD. Finance Docket No

PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER SEAL

MOTION OF THE OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS FOR AN ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR COMPLIANCE WITH 11 U.S.C.

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW COURT

202.5-b. Electronic Filing in Supreme Court; Consensual Program.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SONOMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. : Plaintiff : vs. : FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER : Case No. Defendant :

Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Nassau IAS Trial Part 22 Part Rules Updated: January 25, 2018

PROMIS Rapid Electronic Filing System Submitter License Agreement

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/01/ :41 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 31 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/01/2016. Exhibit C

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULES 3:26 BAIL

IN THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO COURT REPORTING SERVICES PLAN

SAMPLE FORM F NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL

A Live 90-Minute Teleconference/Webinar with Interactive Q&A

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

ONTARIO GASOLINE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made on June 4, Between JAMES LORIMER. (the "Plaintiff. and

City State Country Zip. Contact Name Telephone Fax

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

Recommendations for Guidelines Production

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiff, j Judge: Hon. Joan M. Lewis ) ) )

Transcription:

Orlando Sanchez v. Experian Infomation Solutions Inc. Doc. 1 1 1 Douglas L. Clark (SBN 0) JONES DAY El Camino Real, Suite 0 San Diego, California 0 Telephone: +1... Facsimile: +1... Email: dlclark@jonesday.com Attorneys for Defendants EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. ORLANDO SANCHEZ, v. Plaintiff, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Defendants. Hon. Kenly K. Kato STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER [DISCOVERY MATTER] Dockets.Justia.com

1 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Orlando Sanchez ( Plaintiff ) and Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. ( Defendant ), through their respective attorneys of record, as follows: GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT WHEREAS, Fed. R. Civ. P. (c)(1) requires a showing of good cause for the entry of a protective order by the Court to prevent public disclosure of material such as trade secrets or other confidential research, development, or commercial information; WHEREAS, documents and information have been and may be sought, produced or exhibited by and among the parties to this action relating to trade secrets, confidential research, development, technology or other proprietary information belonging to Defendant (including, but not limited to, its computer systems, software and processes used for credit reporting, and information derived therefrom); WHEREAS, an order of this Court is necessary to protect Defendant from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense related to the disclosure of confidential, proprietary or private information of Defendant for purposes other than prosecuting and defending this litigation; and WHEREAS, this Order does not confer blanket protection on all disclosures or responses to discovery, and the protection it gives from public disclosure and use extends only to the specific documents and material entitled to confidential treatment under applicable legal principles. THEREFORE, an Order of this Court protecting such confidential information shall be and hereby is made by this Court on the following terms: 1. This Order shall govern the use, handling and disclosure of all documents, testimony or information produced or given in this action which are designated to be subject to this Order in accordance with the terms hereof. - -

1 1. Any party or non-party producing or filing documents or other materials in this action (a Producing Party or Designating Party ) may designate such materials and the information contained therein subject to this Order by typing or stamping on the front of the document, or on the portion(s) of the document for which confidential treatment is designated, Confidential. No party shall be obliged to challenge the propriety of a CONFIDENTIAL designation, and a failure to do so shall not preclude a subsequent attack on the propriety of such designation at any time that is consistent with the Court s Scheduling Order.. To the extent any motions, briefs, pleadings, deposition transcripts, or other papers to be filed with the Court incorporate documents or information subject to this Order, including materials labeled as Confidential, or known to be Confidential pursuant to this order, the party filing such papers shall file them with the clerk under seal pursuant to the procedures set out in Civil Local Rule -..; provided, however, that a copy of such filing without the confidential information may be made part of the public record. Any party filing any document under seal must comply with all of the requirements of Civil Local Rule -. Confidential materials may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the specific Confidential material at issue. If a party s request pursuant to Civil Local Rule - to file Confidential material under seal is denied by the Court, then the party that received information or materials designated as Confidential ( Receiving Party ) may file the information in the public record unless otherwise instructed by the Court.. All documents, transcripts, or other materials subject to this Order, and all information derived therefrom (including, but not limited to, all testimony given in a deposition, declaration or otherwise, that refers, reflects or otherwise discusses any information designated Confidential hereunder), unless challenged successfully under paragraph, shall not be used, directly or indirectly, by any person, for any business, commercial or competitive purposes or for any purpose - -

1 1 whatsoever other than solely for the preparation and trial of this action in accordance with the provisions of this Order; provided however, nothing in this protective order shall be construed as authorizing a party to disobey a lawful subpoena or court order issued in another action.. Except with the prior written consent of the individual or entity designating a document or portions of a document as Confidential, or pursuant to prior Order after notice, any document, transcript or pleading given Confidential treatment under this Order, and any information contained in, or derived from any such materials (including but not limited to, all deposition testimony that refers to, reflects or otherwise discusses any information designated Confidential hereunder) may not be disclosed other than in accordance with this Order and may not be disclosed to any person other than: (a) the Court and its officers; (b) parties to this litigation; (c) counsel for the parties, whether retained outside counsel or inhouse counsel and employees of counsel assigned to assist such counsel in the preparation of this litigation; (d) fact witnesses subject to a proffer to the Court or a stipulation of the parties that such witnesses need to know such information; (e) present or former employees of the Producing Party in connection with their depositions in this action (provided that no former employees shall be shown documents prepared after the date of his or her departure); and (f) experts specifically retained as consultants or expert witnesses in connection with this litigation. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this protective order shall apply to the Court or the court personnel, who are subject only to the Court s internal procedures regarding the handling of material filed or lodged, including material filed or lodged under seal.. Documents produced pursuant to this Order shall not be made available to any person designated in Subparagraph (f) unless he or she shall have first read this Order, agreed to be bound by its terms, and signed the attached Declaration of Compliance. - -

1 1. All persons receiving any or all documents produced pursuant to this Order shall be advised of their confidential nature. All persons to whom confidential information and/or documents are disclosed are hereby enjoined from disclosing same to any person except as provided herein, and are further enjoined from using same except in the preparation for and trial of the above-captioned action between the named parties thereto. No person receiving or reviewing such confidential documents, information or transcript shall disseminate or disclose them to any person other than those described above in Paragraph and for the purposes specified, and in no event shall such person make any other use of such document or transcript.. Nothing in this Order shall prevent a party from using at trial any information or materials designated Confidential. Any use of Confidential material at trial or other court hearings or proceedings shall be governed by the orders of the trial judge.. This Order has been agreed to by the parties to facilitate discovery and the production of relevant evidence in this action. Neither the entry of this Order, nor the designation of any information, document, or the like as Confidential, nor the failure to make such designation, shall constitute evidence with respect to any issue in this action.. Within sixty (0) days after the final termination of this litigation, all documents, transcripts, or other materials afforded confidential treatment pursuant to this Order, including any extracts, summaries or compilations taken therefrom, but excluding any materials which in the good faith judgment of counsel are work product materials, shall be destroyed upon request of the Producing Party. Furthermore, the Receiving Party shall provide a written certification to the Producing Party that (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and () affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies. - -

1 1. In the event that any party to this litigation disagrees at any point in these proceedings with any designation made under this Protective Order ( Challenging Party ), the parties shall first try to resolve such dispute in good faith on an informal basis in accordance with Local Rule -1. If the dispute cannot be resolved, the parties shall seek appropriate relief from this Court in accordance with Local Rule -. The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Challenging Party to sanctions. Unless the Designating Party has waived or withdrawn the confidentiality designation, all parties shall continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party s designation until the Court rules on the challenge. 1. Nothing herein shall affect or restrict the rights of any party with respect to its own documents or to the information obtained or developed independently of documents, transcripts and materials afforded confidential treatment pursuant to this Order. 1. The Court retains the right to allow disclosure of any subject covered by this stipulation or to modify this stipulation at any time in the interest of justice. SO STIPULATED. Dated: May 1, SEMNAR & HARTMAN, LLP By: /s/ Babak Semnar Babak Semnar Attorneys for Plaintiff ORLANDO SANCHEZ - -

1 1 Dated: May 1, - - JONES DAY By: /s/ Douglas L. Clark Douglas L. Clark Attorneys for Defendant EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. Signature Certification Pursuant to Local Rule -..(a)(), I hereby certify that all other signatories listed, on whose behalf this filing is submitted, concur with the contents of this filing and have authorized the filing. /s/ Douglas L. Clark Douglas L. Clark FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May, Magistrate Judge Kenly K. Kato

1 1 EXHIBIT A DECLARATION OF COMPLIANCE Orlando Sanchez v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. United States District Court, Central District of California I,, declare as follows: 1. My address is.. My present employer is.. My present occupation or job description is. I have received a copy of the Stipulated Protective Order entered in this action on,.. I have carefully read and understand the provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order.. I will comply with all provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order.. I will hold in confidence, and will not disclose to anyone not qualified under the Stipulated Protective Order, any information, documents or other materials produced subject to this Stipulated Protective Order.. I will use such information, documents or other materials produced subject to this Stipulated Protective Order only for purposes of this present action.. Upon termination of this action, or upon request, I will return and deliver all information, documents or other materials produced subject to this Stipulated Protective Order, and all documents or things which I have prepared relating to the information, documents or other materials that are subject to the Stipulated Protective Order, to my counsel in this action, or to counsel for the party by whom I am employed or retained or from whom I received the documents.. I hereby submit to the jurisdiction of this Court for the purposes of enforcing the Stipulated Protective Order in this action. - 1 -

1 1 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the following is true and correct. Executed this day of, at. QUALIFIED PERSON - -