UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Similar documents
COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND

Case 4:18-cv RGE-SBJ Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA

Case 1:18-cv ECF No. 1 filed 06/20/18 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:18-cv PLM-PJG ECF No. 1 filed 09/20/18 PageID.1 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION

EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ROBERT S AMERICAN GOURMET FOOD, INC., a domestic corporation; & JURY DEMAND

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. The plaintiff, David Lutz, by and through his counsel of record, Brett Dressler, Esq.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN JOSE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION CASE NO.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Pacer Service Center

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

COME NOW the plaintiffs JO ANN and MICHAEL SMITH, a married couple, by and. through their attorneys of record, MARLER CLARK LLP and FRANK JENKINS LAW

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY. COMES NOW the plaintiff, Heather Tuttle, for a cause of action against defendant

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CASE NO.

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF CALHOUN. Plaintiff, Case No

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF CALHOUN

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT DODGE COUNTY BRANCH

Case 3:10-cv B Document 1 Filed 09/10/10 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 2:12-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 08/02/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON CASE NO. COMPLAINT. Plaintiffs, (Personal Injury) Defendants.

Case 2:16-cv BCW Document 2 Filed 12/02/16 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Filing # E-Filed 12/22/ :53:20 PM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

CASE 0:17-cv JNE-FLN Document 1 Filed 06/20/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Sheffield Edwards, III

Case 3:15-cv JAH-NLS Document 1 Filed 09/14/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. v. Case No.:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

C01:13-cv LEK-KSC Document 1 Filed 11/19/13 Page 1 of 12 PagelD 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

CASE 0:17-cv JNE-FLN Document 1 Filed 05/25/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Joseph Owings

Case 2:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/08/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/09/2018 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA NO. COMPLAINT

Case3:09-cv WHA Document48 Filed04/05/12 Page1 of 21

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION. ClassAction.

CASE 0:17-cv JNE-FLN Document 1 Filed 08/24/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Everett Banks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH JURY DEMAND

Case No. Division COMPLAINT GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Case 0:17-cv WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2017 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

CASE 0:17-cv JNE-FLN Document 1 Filed 07/18/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

vs Case 3:16-cv JPG-PMF Document 1 Filed 04/01/16 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #1 TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Case 3:12-cv Document 1 Filed 08/02/12 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/14/17 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA COMPLAINT

Case 3:13-cv JE Document 1 Filed 12/20/13 Page 1 of 13 Page ID#: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, for his causes of action against Defendant, allege that: PARTIES

STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

CAUSE NO. V. JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANTS. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION NOW COMES SHERRY REYNOLDS, BRANDON REYNOLDS, KATY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

Case 5:14-cv JLV Document 138 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 1868

Plaintiff, for his cause of action against Defendants, alleges that: PARTIES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR AUTAUGA COUNTY, ALABAMA

CASE NO. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. The Plaintiff, CHARLESETTA WALKER, as CONSERVATOR FOR THE PERSON,

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/23/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiffs, COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT v. (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)

CASE 0:17-cv JNE-FLN Document 1 Filed 03/13/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Donna Dobeck

2:14-cv RMG Date Filed 02/25/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 7:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION. CASE NO: 1:15-cv RNS

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/30/15 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION

1:15-cv JMC Date Filed 04/06/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11

Case 3:10-cv HEH Document 1 Filed 08/19/10 Page 1 of 7

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

Strict Liability and Product Liability PRODUCT LIABILITY WARRANTY LAW

Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 40 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 4:12-cv Y Document 28 Filed 08/29/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID 179

Case 3:17-cv SRU Document 1 Filed 08/21/17 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. ADRIAN LOVELL, Civil Action No.

Case 8:13-cv JSM-AEP Document 17 Filed 01/14/14 Page 1 of 12 PageID 64 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

CAUSE NO CV ANNA DRAKER IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF VS. MEDINA COUNTY, TEXAS

COMPLAINT. COMES NOW the Plaintiffs, Christopher Cooper and Shelley Smith, by and through

P H I L L I P S DAYES

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/03/17 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT

CASE 0:12-cv PJS-TNL Document 15 Filed 08/14/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1. Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION. Defendants. )

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 8:17-cv VMC-MAP Document 1 Filed 03/15/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID 1 MUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 02/22/16 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Transcription:

CASE 0:18-cv-01636 Document 1 Filed 06/12/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ROBIN MILLER KROENING vs. Plaintiff, DEL MONTE FRESH PRODUCE N.A., INC. a foreign corporation, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Defendant. COME NOW the Plaintiff Robin Miller Kroening, files suit against the Defendant and states and alleges as follows: PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Robin Miller Kroening is a resident of the City of St. Charles, Winona County, Minnesota. 2. Defendant Del Monte Fresh Produce N.A., Inc. (hereinafter Del Monte ) is a corporation organized under the laws of Florida, with a principal place of business and corporate headquarters located at 241 Sevilla Avenue. Coral Gables, Florida 33134. 3. Del Monte s Minnesota registered agent for service is 1010 Dale Street North, St. Paul, Minnesota 55117. 4. At all relevant times, Defendant Del Monte sold prepackaged ready-to-eat vegetable trays across America including at Kwik Trip stores in Minnesota and Wisconsin.

CASE 0:18-cv-01636 Document 1 Filed 06/12/18 Page 2 of 9 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 5. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332(c) because the amount in controversy exceeds Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000.00), exclusive of interest and costs, and because there is complete diversity of citizenship between the Plaintiff and Defendant. 6. Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391 because a substantial part of the acts and omissions giving rise to the claims asserted occurred in this district. FACTS Cyclospora 7. Cyclospora is a protozoan that causes severe gastroenteritis in humans called cyclosporiasis. 8. Symptoms of cyclosporiasis include watery diarrhea, loss of appetite, cramping, nausea, fatigue, fever, dehydration and weight loss. 9. Untreated, these symptoms can last several months or longer. Cyclospora infections in the United States are difficult to diagnose unless a specific test for the parasite is ordered. 10. Humans contract Cyclospora infections from eating food or drinking water contaminated with Cyclospora. Contamination of food often occurs when produce is irrigated or washed in water contaminated with feces. 11. Numerous previous outbreaks of Cyclospora in the United States have been associated with consumption of fecally-contaminated fruits and vegetables. 2

CASE 0:18-cv-01636 Document 1 Filed 06/12/18 Page 3 of 9 The Outbreak and Plaintiff s Illness 12. In early June of 2018, health officials in Minnesota and Wisconsin began investigating a cluster of gastrointestinal illnesses among individuals who tested positive for the rare protozoan Cyclospora. 13. On June 8, 2018, the Minnesota and Wisconsin Departments of health informed the public that a cluster of at least 13 Cyclospora cases were linked to consumption of Del Monte Vegetable Tray (containing broccoli, cauliflower, carrots, and dill dip) 6 and 12 ounce varieties. The number of confirmed Cyclospora cases is expected to rise significantly. 14. Fresh produce producers, including Defendant, have a duty to produce food free of dangerous organisms. This duty includes a duty to develop a food safety program; follow good agricultural practices; monitor and test its products and processing environments; and otherwise ensure that its ready-to-eat products are not exposed to fecal matter. 15. Fresh produce producers, including Defendant, also have a duty to comply with all applicable state and federal regulations intended to ensure the purity and safety of food products, including the requirements of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.) and Minnesota Food Code. These acts are designed to protect consumers such as the Plaintiff. 16. The Defendant failed to comply with the provisions of the health and safety acts identified above, and, as a result, was negligent in its manufacture, distribution, and sale of food adulterated with Cyclospora, a deadly pathogen. 3

CASE 0:18-cv-01636 Document 1 Filed 06/12/18 Page 4 of 9 17. Plaintiff purchased a Del Monte vegetable tray at Kwik Trip in St. Charles, Minnesota on May 26, 2018. Plaintiff consumed the vegetable tray for lunch that day. 18. The produce in the tray consumed by Plaintiff was contaminated with Cyclospora. 19. On or about June 1, 2018, Plaintiff began suffering severe diarrhea, fatigue and cramping. 20. Plaintiff remained deathly ill for the next several days. On or about June 5, 2018, Plaintiff sought medical treatment at Olmsted Medical Group. 21. Plaintiff remained ill for the next week, and again sought medical treatment due to her worsening condition. 22. On or about June 7, 2018, Plaintiff was diagnosed with a Cyclospora infection. 23. Plaintiff was prescribed Bactrim to treat her infection. 24. Plaintiff continues to suffer symptoms from the Cyclospora infection and cannot yet return to work. 25. As a direct and proximate result of consuming contaminated produce produced by Defendant Del Monte, Plaintiff suffered a debilitating and painful gastrointestinal illness; incurred medical expenses; lost wages; and suffered other losses and damages as proved at trial. 4

CASE 0:18-cv-01636 Document 1 Filed 06/12/18 Page 5 of 9 CAUSES OF ACTION COUNT I STRICT PRODUCT LIABILITY MANUFACTURING DEFECT 26. Plaintiff incorporates the preceding paragraphs by reference as if each paragraph was set forth here. 27. Defendant processed, manufactured, marketed, and sold the contaminated vegetable tray that caused Plaintiff s illness. 28. The vegetable tray produced by Defendant Del Monte and consumed by Plaintiff was contaminated with Cyclospora when it left the control of Defendant Del Monte. 29. Plaintiff s consumption of the contaminated food caused her to become infected with Cyclospora and become deathly ill. 30. Food contaminated with Cyclospora is dangerous if eaten and is particularly dangerous to children, the elderly, and anyone with a compromised immune system. 31. Because Cyclospora is colorless and odorless, consumers like Plaintiff have no way of detecting the contamination. 32. The vegetable tray produced by Defendant and subsequently consumed by Plaintiff was contaminated with Cyclospora and therefore defective and unreasonably dangerous to ordinary consumers. 33. The vegetable tray produced by Defendant lacked any warning whatsoever to consumers. 5

CASE 0:18-cv-01636 Document 1 Filed 06/12/18 Page 6 of 9 34. Defendant is therefore strictly liable to the Plaintiff for the harm proximately caused by the production and sale of its dangerous and defective product and for its failure to warn of foreseeable risks to ordinary consumers. 35. As a direct and proximate result of Del Monte s production and sale of a defectively manufactured product and failure to warn, Plaintiff sustained injuries and damages set forth in the preceding paragraphs. COUNT II NEGLIGENCE 36. Plaintiff incorporates the preceding paragraphs by reference as if each paragraph was set forth here. 37. Defendant Del Monte grew, processed, manufactured, marketed, and sold vegetable trays that were contaminated with Cyclospora, a deadly pathogen. 38. Defendant Del Monte owed a duty to all its customers who consume its products, including Plaintiff, to manufacture and sell food that is safe to eat, that is not adulterated with deadly pathogens like Cyclospora, and that was not produced in violation of applicable food safety regulations and industry standards. 39. Defendant Del Monte breached the duties owed to its customers by committing the following negligent acts and omissions: a. Failing to adequately maintain and monitor the safety of its products, premises, equipment and employees; b. Using fresh produce that was exposed to fecal matter; c. Failing to properly operate its manufacturing facilities in a safe, clean, and sanitary manner; 6

CASE 0:18-cv-01636 Document 1 Filed 06/12/18 Page 7 of 9 d. Failing to adopt, implement, and follow adequate food safety policies and procedures; e. Failing to apply its food safety policies and procedures to ensure the safety and sanitary conditions of its food products, premises, and employees; f. Failing to adopt, implement, and validate food safety policies and procedures that met industry standards for the safe and sanitary production of ready-to-eat foods; g. Failing to adequately test its products and processing environment; h. Failing to properly train its employees and agents how to prevent the transmission of Cyclospora; i. Failing to properly supervise its employees and agents to prevent the transmission of Cyclospora; and j. Other acts and omissions as revealed through investigation and discovery. 40. Plaintiff s injuries are a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Defendant Del Monte. 41. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant Del Monte s negligence, Plaintiff sustained the injuries and damages set forth in the preceding paragraphs. COUNT III NEGLIGENCE PER SE (MINN. STAT. 31.02) 42. Plaintiff incorporates the preceding paragraphs by reference as if each paragraph was set forth here. 43. Defendant Del Monte, its employees, agents, or those working on its behalf, as providers of food products within the State of Minnesota, owe a duty to comply with Minn. Stat. Chapter 31. 7

CASE 0:18-cv-01636 Document 1 Filed 06/12/18 Page 8 of 9 44. Minnesota Food Law, Minn. Stat. 31.02 et seq., prohibits: a. The manufacture, sale, or delivery, holding or offering for sale of any food that is adulterated or misbranded; b. The adulteration or misbranding of any food; c. The receipt in commerce of any food that is adulterated or misbranded, and the delivery or proffered delivery thereof for pay or otherwise. 45. Defendant Del Monte, its employees, agents, or those working on its behalf, failed to comply with Minn. Stat. Chapter 31. Such conduct constitutes negligence per se. 46. As a result of the failure of Defendant Del Monte, its employees, agents, or those working on its behalf to comply with Minn. Stat. Chapter 31, Plaintiff sustained damages as set forth in the preceding paragraphs. COUNT IV NEGLIGENCE PER SE (21 U.S.C. 331) 47. Plaintiff incorporates the preceding paragraphs by reference as if each paragraph was set forth here. 48. Defendant Del Monte, its employees, agents, or those working on its behalf, as providers of food products in the United States of America, owe a duty to comply with 21 U.S.C. 331, which states: The following acts and the causing thereof are prohibited: a. The introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of any food that is adulterated; b. The receipt in interstate commerce of any food that is adulterated, and the delivery or proffered delivery thereof for pay or otherwise. 8

CASE 0:18-cv-01636 Document 1 Filed 06/12/18 Page 9 of 9 49. Defendant Del Monte, its employees, agents, or those working on its behalf, failed to comply with U.S.C. 331. Such conduct constitutes negligence per se. 50. As a result of the failure of Defendant Del Monte, its employees, agents, or those working on its behalf, to comply with 21 U.S.C. 331, Plaintiff sustained damages as set forth in the preceding paragraphs. RELIEF REQUESTED WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays judgment against the Defendant in an amount greater than Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000.00) together with pre- and postjudgement interest, costs, and disbursements incurred herein and such other relief as the court may find just and equitable. JURY DEMAND Plaintiff hereby demands a jury trial. Respectfully Submitted, Dated: June 11, 2018 PRITZKER HAGEMAN, P.A. By: Ryan Osterholm (#039015) Brendan Flaherty (#0327657) 45 South Seventh Street Suite 2950 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1652 Telephone: (612) 338-0202 Email: ryan@pritzkerlaw.com Brendan@pritzkerlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 9