NATIONAL BAR EXAMINATION. Criminal Procedure and the Law of Evidence Relating to Criminal Cases Curriculum

Similar documents
Together with Course A, this course should cover all the main aspects of criminal procedure encountered in practice.

LAW OF EVIDENCE B: 2017

Fair trial rights, freedom of the press, the principle of open justice and the power of the Supreme Court of Appeal to regulate its own process

LAW OF EVIDENCE B: 2016

S v LITAKO 2014 SACR 431 (SCA): A CLARIFICATION

JUDGMENT (For delivery)

IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, DURBAN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. DAVID MBALEKI First Appellant. AFRICA MGQAMBI Second Appellant. THE STATE Respondent

LAW OF EVIDENCE A: 2017

ARRESTS WITHOUT WARRANT: THE SCA BRINGS CLARITY

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, BISHO) CASE NO. 593/2014 In the matter between: UNATHI MYOLI SIYANDA NOBHATYI

IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, PIETERMARITZBURG REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. SOUTH AFRICAN INLAND LOGISTICS CC First Applicant

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ANNETTE VAN DER MERWE*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KWAZULU NATAL, PIETERMARITZBURG REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

A bi-annual update complementing the Commentary on the Criminal Procedure Act NO 2 OF 2017

VONNISSE. Electronic copy available at:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN

Case No.: CA&R 23/2011 Date heard: 23 May 2012 Date delivered: 25 May 2012

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT (JOHANNESBURG)

OVERVIEW OF THE JUDGMENTS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA SINCE 1994 TO 2005

first, for unlawful apprehension of a mentally ill person by the SAPS; and

NORTH WEST HIGH COURT, MAFIKENG SVETLOV IVANCMEC IVANOV

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

THE CHILD JUSTICE ACT: PROCEDURAL SENTENCING ISSUES

THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN

IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA PIETERMARITZBURG

PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF AN UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED. B. Iuris, LLB M.J MOTUBATSE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN)

JOHANNES WILLEM DU TOIT ACCUSED NO 1 GIDEON JOHANNES THIART ACCUSED NO 2 MERCIA VAN DEVENTER ACCUSED NO 3

IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, CAPE TOWN S NDUDULA & 17 OTHERS METRORAIL PRASA (WESTERN CAPE)

FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. THE STATE and [T.] [J ] [M..] Accused 1 [M.] [R.] [M.] Accused 2

THIRD RESPONDENT S HEADS OF ARGUMENT: INTERVENING APPLICATION

Index. All references are to page numbers. assault de minimis non curat lex defence, 32 police officer, on a, 7

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley) JUDGMENT: SPECIAL REVIEW

GELDENHUYS & JOUBERT v VAN WYK AND ANOTHER VAN WYK v GELDENHUYS & JOUBERT AND ANOTHER 2005 (2) SA 512 (SCA)

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

Electronic copy available at:

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

THE LAW AND PRACTICE OF CRIMINAL ASSET FORFEITURE IN SOUTH AFRICAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: A CONSTITUTIONAL DILEMMA

HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN

COURSE: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE A: 2016

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS, GAUTENG MOLEFE JOSEPH MPHAPHAMA

Strengthening the fight against crime: Is DNA- Database the answer?

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (Northern Cape Division) High Court Review Case No: 30/08 Magistrate Case No: 1149/2007 Date delivered:

THE INTERVENING PARTIES HEADS OF ARGUMENT

Section D: Post trial issues and remedies

IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA. Greater Louis Trichardt Transitional Local Council

THE REGIONAL MAGISTRATE, PRETORIA FIRST RESPONDENT (Mr. P JOHNSON) JUDGMENT

THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT) MARK JONATHAN GOLDBERG NATIONAL MINISTER OF ENVIRONMENTAL SECOND RESPONDENT FIFTH RESPONDENT

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, EASTERN CIRCUIT, MIDDELBURG)

Together with Course A, this course should cover all the main aspects of criminal procedure encountered in practice.

JUDGMENT DELIVERED 24 NOVEMBER 2017

REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF NAMIBIA. Case No: CA 68/2000. In the matter between: and ZACHARIA STEPHANUS FIRST RESPONDENT BERLINO MATROOS

THE MINISTER OF POLICE THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE THE STATION COMMISSIONER, SAPS, VIRGINIA COMBINED PRIVATE INVESTIGATIONS

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

MAHAMBO v ROAD ACCIDENT FUND 2005 (6) SA 475 (T) 2005 (6) SA 475 (T) Transvaal Provincial Division Patel J

Prof Wouter de Vos Faculty of Law University of Cape Town January 2011

IN THE GAUTENG DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, PRETORIA

Table of Contents. Dedication... iii Preface... v Table of Cases... xv. A. General Principles... 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE GRAHAMSTOWN) CASE NO. 06/10 DATES HEARD: 24 25/2/10 DATE DELIVERED: 3/3/10 NOT REPORTABLE

University of Cape Town

MINISTER OF SAFETY AND SECURITY JUDGMENT

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, JOHANNESBURG

SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, JOHANNESBURG

e-mantshi A KZNJETCOM Newsletter

IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, PIETERMARITZBURG J U D G M E N T

JUTA'S ADVANCE NOTIFICATION SERVICE

Introduction to the Legal Process

CRIMINAL LAW B. Specific Crimes. Course Outline & Reading List. Lecturer: Adv J C McConnachie

In the High Court of South Africa (Eastern Cape Division) Case No CA 344/2002

The admissibility in Namibia of evidence obtained through human rights violations

JUDGMENT. [1] The accused is guilty of one count of contravening section 15 of the Criminal

IN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) MOGALE, DAISY DIBUSENG PAULINAH...First Applicant

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH WEST DIVISION, MAHIKENG) ADRIAAN ALBERTUS STOLTZ

2016 SEPTEMBER 16 CASE No 802/2015

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

e-mantshi A KZNJETCOM Newsletter

FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. In the matter between:- FRANCIS RALENTSOE MOLOI

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA THE MINISTER OF SAFETY AND SECURITY

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISON)

FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTHERN CAPE DIVISION, KIMBERLEY

FORM A FILING SHEET FOR EASTERN CAPE JUDGMENT

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GORFIL BROTHERS INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD JUDGMENT

JUDGMENT IN BAIL APPLICATION

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISON, PRETORIA JUDGMENT

BUFFALO CITY METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY

JUDGMENT. The applicant is a medical doctor. First respondent is a magistrate. At this

IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG

ANTONELLA NATASCIA FLORIO-POONE Sixth Applicant/accused

THE MINISTER OF SAFETY & SECURITY THE NATIONAL DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS APPEAL JUDGMENT

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NATIONAL DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS. Kruger v National Director of Public Prosecutions [2018] ZACC 13

CHAPTER TWO THE SOUTH AFRICAN LEGAL SYSTEM

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA. Applicant

JUDGMENT DELIVERED 08 SEPTEMBER 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN R P JANSEN VAN VUUREN

Transcription:

NATIONAL BAR EXAMINATION UPDATED NOVEMBER 2015 Criminal Procedure and the Law of Evidence Relating to Criminal Cases Curriculum NOTE: Where sections, chapters or Acts are referred to, they are given merely as guidance for candidates. The curriculum is not limited to these sections of the Criminal Procedure Act, 51 of 1977 ( the CPA ) only. Candidates may be examined on the whole of the CPA. They must have due regard where applicable to the common law, the practice in the various courts and in the division where the candidate wishes to practice, and decided cases. It will assist to consider the commentary to the prescribed sections in the CPA in the following literature: Kriegler and Kruger, Hiemstra s Criminal Procedure, LexisNexis loose leaf latest service issue Etienne du Toit et al, Commentary on the Criminal Procedure Act, by Juta loose leaf latest service issue Zeffert & Paizes, The South African Law of Evidence, 2 nd Ed (2009) C R Snyman, Criminal Law, 5 th Edition LexisNexis 2008 Schmidt and Rademeyer, Law of Evidence, LexisNexis loose leaf latest service issue Schwikkard and Van der Merwe, Principles of Evidence, by Juta, 3 rd Edition 2008 A. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 1. Bail Chapters 9 and 10 of the CPA. Section 35(1)(f) of the Constitution, Act 108 of 1996. S v Dlamini; S v Dladla and others; S v Joubert; S v Schietekat 1999 (4) SA 623 (CC) passim S v Mabena and another 2007 (1) SACR 428 (SA) para 3 7 S v Viljoen 2002 (2) SACR 550 (SCA) para 10 15 S v Botha and another 2002 (1) SACR 222 (SCA) para 2 21 S v Bruintjies 2003 (2) SACR 575 (SCA) paras 4, 5 and 8 10

2 2. The charge Sections 80 104 of the CPA S v Wannenburg 2007 (1) SACR 27 (C) at 32J 34C S v Whitehead and others 2008 (1) SACR 431 (SCA) para 10 3. The plea Sections 105-122 of the CPA Inclusive of how pleas should be drafted (form and content) and plea and sentence agreements - section 105A S v Esterhuizen and others 2005 (1) SACR 490 (T) 4. Conduct of proceedings Sections 144 146 and Chapter 22 of the CPA 5. Discharge Section 174 of the CPA See: Commentary on the Criminal Procedure Act by Du Toit et al S v Lubaxa 2001 (2) SACR 703 (SCA) paras 8 23 6. Competent verdicts Chapter 26 of the CPA 7. Sentencing Chapter 28 and 29 of the CPA Sections 51-53 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 105 of 1997 S v Malgas 2001 (1) SAR 469 (SCA) S v Karolia 2006 (2) SACR 75 (SCA) S v Mthimkulu 2013 (2) SACR 89 (SCA) 8. Appeals and reviews Chapters 30 and 31 of the CPA (sections 302-324) (i) the difference between appeals and reviews (ii) powers of the court on appeal and review R v Dhlumayo 1948 (2) SA 677 (A) at 705-706 S v Rabie 1975 (4) SA 855 (A)

3 S v Van Aswegen 2001 (2) SACR 97 (SCA) S v S 1999 (1) SACR 608 (W) S v Bogaards 2013 (1) SACR 1 (CC) S v Ross 2013 (1) SACR 77 (WCC) B. EVIDENCE 1. Confirmation or cautionary rules in regard to: (i) Single witnesses: Section 208 of the CPA; (ii) Evidence of identification: S v Mthetwa 1972 (3) SA 766 (A) at 768A C (iii) Complaints in matters of a sexual nature: S v Jackson 1998 (1) SACR 470 (SCA); (iv) Children; (v) Confessions: Section 209 of the CPA; (vi) Accomplices; (vii) Traps See, generally, the commentary on the cautionary rule dealt with in Commentary on the Criminal Procedure Act by Du Toit et al under Section 208 of the CPA 2. Presumptions (i) Onus (on criminal cases in respect of defences pleaded); (ii) Particular presumptions (a) Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act, 140 of 1992; (b) The CPA; (c) Sections 65(3) and (4) of the National Road Traffic Act, 93 of 1996; (iii) The effect of Section 35 read with Section 36 of the Constitution, 108 of 1996, and statutory presumptions. S v Zuma 1995 (2) SA 642 (CC); S v Bhulwana; S v Gwadiso 1995 (2) SACR 748 (CC); 1996 (1) SA 388 (C);

4 S v Mbatha; S v Prinsloo 1996 (1) SACR 371 (CC); 1996 (2) SA 464 (CC); S v Coetzee and others1997 (3) SA 527 (CC). 3. Admissions and confessions (i) Sections 217 220 of the CPA; (ii) The effect of Section 35 read with Section 36 of the Constitution on admissions and confessions. S v Mekeba and another 2003 (2) SACR 128 (SCA); S v Ralukukwe 2006 (SACR) 394 (SCA); S v Yende 1987 (3) SA 367 (A); S v Litako 2014 (2) SACR 431 (SCA); S v Mhlongo; S v Nkosi 2015 (2) SACR 323 (CC). 4. Documentary evidence Section 212, particularly ss 212(1), (4), (8), (9), (11) and (12); and Sections 213, 221, 233, 234 and 236 of the CPA. 5. Mental capacity of accused persons Chapter 13 of the CPA; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1 of 1988. S v Eadie 2002 (1) SACR 663 (SCA) paras 2, 3 & 25 70 S v Cunningham 1996 (1) SACR 631 (A) at 635G 636C S v Scholtz 2006 (1) SACR 442 (E) De Vos NO & others v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development 2015 (2) SACR 217 (CC). 6. Search and seizures Sections 20-22 of the CPA Mandela and others v Minister of Safety and Security and another 1995 (2) SACR 397 (W) at 397C 399J; 404G 405C Minister of Safety and Security & others v Mohamed & another 2012 (1) SACR 321 (SCA) paras 20 24, 28, 29 Sello v Grobler and others 2011 (1) SACR 310 (SCA) Powell NO & others v Van der Merwe NO & others 2005 (1) SACR 317 (SCA) para 59;

5 NDPP v Zuma 2008 (1) SACR 258 (SCA) and, on further appeal, Thint (Pty) Ltd v NDPP; Zuma v NDPP 2008 (2) SACR 421 (CC). 7. Entrapment Section 252A of the CPA. Case law references in the commentary (Du Toit et al), including: S v Hammond 2008 (1) SACR 476 (SCA) paras 20 28 S v Kotzé 2010 (1) SACR 100 (SCA) paras 3, 16 36 8. The status of evidence illegally obtained (Having regard to Sections 35 and 36 of the Constitution and the commentary under Section 225 of the CPA in Du Toit et al) Khan v S 1997 (4) All SALR 435; 1997 (2) SACR 611 (SCA) at 615D F; 617H 621I S v Naidoo 1998 (1) BCLR 46 (D) S v Soci 1998 (3) BCLR 376 (E) S v Mphala and another 1998 (1) SACR 388 (W) Key v Attorney-General, Cape Provincial Division and another 1996 (4) SA 187 (CC) Director of Public Prosecutions, Western Cape v Killian 2008 (1) SACR 247 (SCA) S v Mthembu 2008 (2) SACR 407 (SCA) paras 21 37 S v Tandwa and Others 2008 (1) SACR 613 (SCA) paras 113 128 9. Unreasonable delay / Permanent stay Sections 168 and 342A of the CPA S v Pennington and another 1997 (4) SA 1076 (CC) S v Motsasi 1998 (2) SACR 35 (WLD) S v Motsasi en andere 2000 (1) SACR 574 (WLD) Broom v Director of Public Prosecutions, Western Cape and others 2008 (1) SACR 178 (C) paras 44 48 Sanderson v Attorney-General, Eastern Cape 1998 (1) SACR 227 (CC) Wild and another v Hoffert NO andothers 1998 (2) SACR 1 (CC) S v Sochop 2008 (1) SACR 552 (C) S v Jackson and others 2008 (2) SACR 274 (C) Bothma v Els and others 2010 (1) SACR 184 (CC)

6 C. LEGISLATION 1. Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act 108 of 1996 Sections 35 and 36 2. Regulation of Interception of Communications and Provision of Communication-Related Information Act, 70 of 2002 S v Naidoo and another 1998 (1) SACR 479 (N) S v Kidson 1999 (1) SACR 338 (W) S v Du Toit en andere 2005 (2) SACR 367 (T) S v Cwele and another 2011 (1) SACR 409 (KZP) paras 7 26 3. The Law of Evidence Amendment Act, 45 of 1988 (Hearsay) S v Ndhlovu and others 2002 (2) SACR 325 (SCA) S v Ralukukwe 2006 (2) SACR 394 (SCA) S v Shaik and others 2007 (1) SACR 247 (SCA) paras 168 179 S v Litako 2014 (2) SACR 431 (SCA) 4. Accused s right of access to information contained in the State brief / Police docket (Having regard to the provisions of Sections 35 and 36 of the Constitution.) Shabalala and others v Attorney General, Transvaal and another 1996 (1) SA 725 (CC) (1995 (2) SACR 761 (CC)) 5. Preservation, confiscation, restraint and forfeiture orders Sections 34 and 35 of the CPA Chapters 5 and 6 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 121 of 1998 Phillips and others v NDPP 2003 (6) SA 447 (SCA) NDPP v Rebuzzi 2002 (2) SA 1 (SCA) NDPP v Basson 2002 (1) SA 429 (SCA) NDPP v Parker 2006 (3) SA 198 (SCA) NDPP v Elran 2013 (1) SACR 429 (CC) NDPP v Van Staden and others 2013 (1) SACR 531 (SCA)

7 Falk & another v NDPP 2012 (1) SACR 265 (CC) NDPP v Van der Merwe and another 2011 (2) 188 (WCC) S v Shaik and others 2008 (2) SACR 165 (CC) NDPP v Van Staden and others 2007 (1) SACR 338 (SCA) 6. Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities, 12 of 2004 Section 34